Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 46 references

Heat flow through moiré Chern bands is quantized by the Chern number alone.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 13:07 UTC pith:VO6SL24R

load-bearing objection First clean intrinsic quantized heat flow in moiré Chern bands, but the universality claim runs ahead of the high-Chern data. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.19205 v1 pith:VO6SL24R submitted 2026-07-21 cond-mat.mes-hall

Quantized heat flow in moir\'e chern bands of bilayer graphene

classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords thermal conductance quantizationmoiré Chern bandsHofstadter butterflyheat Coulomb blockadeJohnson-noise thermometrybilayer grapheneChern insulatorbulk-edge correspondence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports measurements of heat transport in the fractal topological bands of a bilayer graphene–hexagonal boron nitride moiré superlattice. Using Johnson-noise thermometry, the authors find that the thermal conductance of quantum Hall, Chern insulator, and symmetry-broken Chern insulator states is quantized in units of the thermal conductance quantum, with the integer coefficient equal to twice the Chern number for their device geometry. The result holds across states whose topological character arises from very different microscopic mechanisms, suggesting that heat flow in these systems is a universal probe of band topology. If correct, it extends the bulk–edge correspondence for heat beyond conventional quantum Hall systems and opens a route to testing fractional and other exotic topological phases through their thermal response.

Core claim

The paper claims that the thermal conductance of chiral edge modes in moiré Chern bands is quantized as G_Q = t κ₀ T, where t is the Chern number and κ₀ = π² k_B² / 3h is the thermal conductance quantum. In the specific device geometry, the floating metallic reservoir emits 2|t| outgoing edge modes, so the observed value is 2t κ₀ T. The authors verified this for conventional quantum Hall states, for single-particle Chern insulators, and for interaction-driven symmetry-broken Chern insulators, all within experimental error. They further report that the quantized value is not reduced by heat Coulomb blockade for |t| ≤ 4, and that deviations for higher Chern numbers are consistent with the onse

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the heat balance relation J_Q = t κ₀ (T_M² − T_0²), which connects the power dissipated in a floating metallic reservoir to the number of chiral edge modes carrying heat away. The temperature of the reservoir is measured via Johnson-noise thermometry, and the slope of J_Q versus (T_M² − T_0²) yields the thermal conductance. Equipartition of the edge modes among the contacts is verified electrically, ensuring that the heat carried by the modes is faithfully detected.

Load-bearing premise

The extraction of the thermal conductance assumes that the floating reservoir loses heat exclusively through the 2|t| chiral edge modes, with no appreciable phonon or radiation leakage, and that the capacitive charging energy of the reservoir does not suppress a heat channel at the measured temperatures.

What would settle it

A measurement of the thermal conductance for a state with |t| = 4 at a lower electron temperature (e.g., 15 mK) that shows a reduction below 8 κ₀ T, or a clear deviation from linearity in the J_Q versus T_M² − T_0² plot at higher heating powers, would contradict the claim that HCB is absent for this state and call the universality statement into question.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • If the result holds, thermal conductance becomes a direct experimental probe of the Chern number in moiré materials, independent of the physical origin of the topological state.
  • The absence of heat Coulomb blockade in the low-Chern-number states of this device geometry allows intrinsic quantization to be observed, resolving a discrepancy with a prior monolayer experiment.
  • The technique can be extended to fractional Chern insulators, where the thermal conductance is predicted to carry information about the fractional edge structure.
  • The measurement provides evidence for the bulk–edge correspondence for heat in a system where the edge structure is not simply described by free fermion Landau levels.
  • The observed HCB onset at |t| ≥ 5, despite the estimated onset at |t| > 3, indicates a need to refine the capacitance model for floating reservoirs in such devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's reliance on a floating reservoir to simultaneously dissipate power and launch edge modes means that the universality claim is tested only for integer Chern numbers up to 4; extending the claim to every possible topological state would require validating the heat balance at higher channel counts.
  • If the heat Coulomb blockade onset is indeed set by the effective capacitance of the reservoir, then a systematic measurement of G_Q as a function of reservoir size or gate separation could directly test that interpretation, rather than adjusting the capacitance post hoc.
  • The success of the measurement in a bilayer graphene–hBN superlattice suggests that the same thermometry could probe thermal signatures of correlated states and fractional phases in other moiré systems, where electrical transport alone cannot distinguish certain edge structures.
  • A natural follow-up is to compare the thermal conductance of states with the same Chern number but different Diophantine labels (s), which would further test whether only the topological invariant matters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports thermal conductance measurements, via Johnson-noise thermometry, of quantum Hall, Chern insulator, and symmetry-broken Chern insulator states in a bilayer graphene/hBN moiré superlattice. The central claim is that the thermal conductance G_Q is quantized as G_Q = t κ0 T (measured as 2t κ0 T in the floating-reservoir geometry) and is determined solely by the Chern number t, independent of the microscopic origin of the topological state. Data from two devices show agreement with this quantization for |t| ≤ 4 across QH, CI, and SBCI states, while deviations for |t| ≥ 5 are attributed to heat Coulomb blockade (HCB). The paper concludes that thermal conductance is a universal probe of topology in Hofstadter bands.

Significance. If the claim holds, this is a notable experimental advance: it would be the first observation of intrinsic quantized heat flow in moiré Chern bands, extending the bulk-edge correspondence for thermal transport beyond conventional quantum Hall systems and providing a new probe for future fractional Chern insulator studies. The work has clear strengths: two-device reproducibility, careful electrical characterization of edge-mode equipartition and bulk conduction, and a detailed calibration of the Johnson-noise gain chain anchored to the Johnson–Nyquist law. The extracted slopes are not forced to equal 2t by construction, since a non-universal per-channel heat conductance would shift them. However, the universality claim is broader than the data support because the boundary of the 'universal' regime (|t| ≤ 4) is set using an ad hoc, unverified adjustment of the floating-reservoir capacitance, and the deviations for |t| ≥ 5 are excluded from the summary.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplementary Note 3 / Supplementary Table 2 / Main Fig. 2(e)] The estimated HCB crossover temperature T_CB = N×7 mK (with N = 2|t|) gives T_CB ≈ 42 mK for t = 3 and T_CB ≈ 56 mK for t = 4, both comparable to or above the operating electron temperature T0 ≈ 37 mK. This predicts HCB suppression should already be visible for t ≥ 3, yet full quantization is observed for t = 4 and deviations appear only for t ≥ 5. The explanation that the effective capacitance is larger than the ~40 fF geometric estimate is not supported by an independent capacitance measurement. Because the boundary between the trusted universal regime and the HCB-dominated regime is set by this unverified adjustment, the claim that G_Q = t κ0 T holds 'across all the investigated topological states' (Abstract, Conclusion) is not established for |t| ≥ 5.
  2. [Discussion / Supplementary Fig. 13] For (−5,−3), (−6,−2), and (−8,0), the measured values are 9.79, 11.42, and 14.83 κ0 T, which are 2.1%, 4.8%, and 7.3% below 2|t|κ0 T. These states are excluded from Figure 4 and attributed to HCB, but for (−8,0) the measured value is even below the HCB-suppressed prediction (2t−1)κ0 T = 15 κ0 T. The statement that this may be due to 'uncertainty in measuring G_Q for states with a large number of edge modes (N > 10)' is not quantified. If these deviations reflect calibration errors at low R_xy or an additional heat-loss channel rather than HCB, the universality claim for all studied states is overstated. The paper should either provide a quantitative uncertainty analysis for high-N states or explicitly restrict the claim to |t| ≤ 4.
  3. [Heat-balance model / Methods] The extraction of G_Q relies on the heat-balance equation J_Q = t κ0 (T_M² − T_0²), which assumes the floating reservoir loses heat only through the 2|t| chiral edge modes, with no phonon or radiation leakage. No estimate or control for such leakage is provided. A phonon heat-loss term would also produce a sub-quantum slope in the J_Q versus T_M² − T_0² plot, which could mimic the deviations attributed to HCB at |t| ≥ 5. The authors should estimate the reservoir's thermal coupling to the lattice or provide a measurement that rules out this channel, since it is load-bearing for the universality claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Main text vs Supp. Fig. 12] The SBCI state in Device 2 is labelled (t,s) = (−5,5/6) in the main text but (−5,−5/6) in Supplementary Fig. 12. Please correct the sign discrepancy.
  2. [Discussion paragraph] The sentence 'thermal conductance measurements were limited to (t,s) states with a maximum |t| ≃ 5' is contradicted by Supplementary Fig. 13, which presents data for |t| = 6 and 8. Clarify that the summary figure excludes these states or revise the wording.
  3. [Fig. 1(a) caption] The caption says the schematic is for a single chiral edge mode (t = 1), but the measured geometry uses 2t outgoing modes. A brief note explaining the factor of 2 in the device-specific relation G_Q = 2t κ0 T would improve clarity.
  4. [References and supplementary formatting] Reference formatting is inconsistent (e.g., some entries use full journal names and others abbreviated). A final copy editing pass would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No construction-forced circularity; only minor self-citation for the measurement technique and a post-hoc HCB onset adjustment in the auxiliary interpretation.

full rationale

The central thermal-conductance claim is not forced by construction. The measurement chain is calibrated with the equilibrium Johnson–Nyquist law (Supplementary Note 2, Eqs. 1–4), which is independent of the quantized heat-flow result. The excess-noise signal is converted to an electron temperature using the electrical conductance quantum, and G_Q is then the empirical slope of J_Q versus T_M^2 − T_0^2 (Figs. 2d, 3e, and 4). This slope is not preset to 2tκ0: the same procedure yields 9.79, 11.42, and 14.83 κ0T for |t| = 5, 6, and 8 against the expected 10, 12, and 16 κ0T (Supplementary Fig. 13), demonstrating that non-universal values would be detected. The paper does rely on the group's earlier works for the noise-thermometry scheme (refs 31–33, 35, 37), but the calibration is anchored to an external standard and standard QH states, so this self-citation is not load-bearing. The main caveat is in Supplementary Note 3: the estimated HCB onset T_CB ≈ N × 7 mK for a ~40 fF capacitance predicts HCB should begin at t > 3 at T0 = 37 mK, whereas deviations appear only for t ≥ 5. The paper attributes this to an unmeasured larger floating-reservoir capacitance (fringing/separation uncertainty). This is a robustness/interpretation concern about the high-|t| boundary, not a circular reduction of the central claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The experiment depends on the standard Landauer–Büttiker formalism for chiral edge transport, the Johnson–Nyquist calibration, the Diophantine assignment of (t,s) from magnetotransport, and the HCB theory used to rationalize high-t deviations. The only adjustable free parameter is the effective FR capacitance, adjusted to move the HCB onset from the estimated t>3 to the observed t≥5.

free parameters (2)
  • Effective floating-reservoir capacitance (C) = ~40 fF geometric estimate; effectively higher (unspecified)
    Supplementary Note 3: T_CB ~ N×7 mK with C=40 fF predicts HCB should affect t=4 (T_CB=56 mK > T0=37 mK), but data show full quantization at t=4 and reduction only for t≥5; the paper hypothesizes a larger capacitance from fringing/uncertain separation to move the HCB onset. This is an ad hoc adjustment used to preserve the central claim.
  • HCB onset threshold = t≥5 (observed) vs t>3 (estimated)
    Post-hoc selection: states with |t|≥5 deviate from 2t κ0 T (Supp Fig 13) and are excluded from the summary; the boundary is rationalized via the capacitance adjustment.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Heat balance relation J_Q = t κ0 (T_M^2 − T_0^2) for chiral edge modes from a floating reservoir
    Used to extract G_Q (main text, 'Heat balance relation'). Based on Landauer–Büttiker theory and prior experiments (refs 28–33, 37).
  • standard math Johnson–Nyquist noise formula S_V = g^2 (4 k_B T R + V_n^2 + I_n^2 R^2)/BW
    Supplementary Note 2, Eq. (1); used for gain calibration and electron-temperature determination.
  • domain assumption Diophantine equation n/n0 = t φ/φ0 + s identifies Chern number t of each gap
    Standard Hofstadter band theory; used to label QH, CI, SBCI states from electrical transport (main text, Fig 1b).
  • domain assumption Heat Coulomb blockade theory from Sivre et al. (ref 40)
    Supplementary Note 3; used to explain deviations of |t|≥5 states from quantization.
  • domain assumption No phonon or radiation heat leakage from the floating reservoir; all heat carried by 2|t| chiral edge modes
    Pervasive in the extraction; checked only indirectly via vanishing R_xx and equipartition, but not via a direct heat-loss measurement.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13542 in / 17502 out tokens · 180028 ms · 2026-08-01T13:07:32.884752+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantized heat flow in moir\'e chern bands of bilayer graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VO6SL24R

@misc{pith2026260719205,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantized heat flow in moir\'e chern bands of bilayer graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VO6SL24R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19205}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

When electrons are subjected simultaneously to a magnetic field and a periodic potential, they form the fractal Hofstadter spectrum, whose topological gaps host quantum Hall and Chern insulating states with distinct Chern numbers. While electrical transport has established the topology of these states, whether their heat transport is likewise universal has remained unexplored. Here, we measure the thermal conductance of quantum Hall, Chern insulator, and interaction-driven symmetry-broken Chern insulator states in a bilayer graphene-hexagonal boron nitride moir\'e superlattice with a moir\`e wavelength of $\sim$14 nm using Johnson-noise thermometry. We find that the thermal conductance ($G_Q$) is quantized in units of the thermal conductance quantum ($G_Q = t\kappa_0T$) and is determined solely by the Chern number ($t$), independent of the microscopic origin of the topological state. By directly revealing universal topological heat transport in Hofstadter bands, our work establishes thermal conductance as a stringent probe of moir\'e topological matter and provides a route to investigating more exotic phases, including fractional Chern insulators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19205 by Abhijit Halder, Anindya Das, Debangan Sarkar, K. Watanabe, Santanu Samai, Saurabh Kumar Srivastav, Subroto Mukerjee, T. Taniguchi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Device schematic, measurement scheme, and QH to CI response of a hBN-BLG moiré su￾perlattice. (a) Schematic of measurement setup used for electrical transport and thermal conductance mea￾surement. (b) Rxx = dV34/dISD as a function of the carrier numbers per moiré unit cell, n/n0, and perpendicular magnetic field, B⊥ for Device 1. The right axis shows the magnetic flux per moiré unit cell, ϕ/ϕ0. White dashe… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Thermal conductance of conventional QH states in Device 1. (a,b) Excess thermal noise SI as a function of source current ISD for (t, s) = (−2, 0) (blue) (a), (t, s) = (−4, 0) (black) (b). (c) The temperature, TM, of the floating-reservoir as a function of dissipated power, JQ for (−2, 0) (N = 4) (blue), (−4, 0) (N = 8) (black), where N = 2|t| denotes the total number of outgoing edge modes from the floatin… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Thermal conductance of Chern Insulator (CI) states in Device 1. (a,b,c) Excess thermal noise SI as a function of source current ISD for (t, s) = (−2, 2) (blue) (a),(t, s) = (−3, −2) (red) (b), (t, s) = (−4, −2) (black) (c). (d) TM as a function of JQ for (−2, 2) (N = 4) (blue), (−3, −2) (N = 6) (red), (−4, −2) (N = 8) (black), where N = 2|t| denotes the total number of outgoing edge modes from the floating… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Summary of the results measured in two devices. (a) Measured GQ of several conventional QH states at different B⊥. Black and blue solid circles represent data from Device 1 and Device 2, respectively, with error bars indicating the uncertainty in the extracted GQ values from fitting. (b) Measured GQ, of CI states as a function of B⊥. Black diamonds and blue solid circles correspond to Device 1 and Device 2… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Supplementary Note 2. Detailed gain calibration of the measurement chain and electron temperature determination To calibrate the gain of the measurement chain, we performed temperature-dependent Johnson noise mea￾surements in the absence of any injected current. Under these equilibrium conditions, the measured voltage noise spectral density is given by4–6 SV = g 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Song, Z.et al.All magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene are topological.Physical review letters 123, 036401 (2019)

  2. [2]

    R., Efetov, D

    Balents, L., Dean, C. R., Efetov, D. K. & Young, A. F. Superconductivity and strong correlations in moiré flat bands.Nature Physics16, 725–733 (2020)

  3. [3]

    & MacDonald, A

    Wu, F., Lovorn, T. & MacDonald, A. H. Topological exciton bands in moiré heterojunctions.Physical review letters118, 147401 (2017)

  4. [4]

    Andrei, E. Y . & MacDonald, A. H. Graphene bilayers with a twist.Nature materials19, 1265–1275 (2020)

  5. [5]

    Cao, Y .et al.Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices.Nature 556, 80–84 (2018)

  6. [6]

    & MacDonald, A

    Wu, F., Lovorn, T., Tutuc, E. & MacDonald, A. H. Hubbard model physics in transition metal dichalco- genide moiré bands.Physical review letters121, 026402 (2018)

  7. [7]

    Li, T.et al.Continuous mott transition in semiconductor moiré superlattices.Nature597, 350–354 (2021)

  8. [8]

    Cao, Y .et al.Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices.Nature556, 43–50 (2018)

  9. [9]

    Nature574, 653–657 (2019)

    Lu, X.et al.Superconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene. Nature574, 653–657 (2019)

  10. [10]

    Polshyn, H.et al.Electrical switching of magnetic order in an orbital chern insulator.Nature588, 66–70 (2020)

  11. [11]

    Sun, X.et al.Correlated states in doubly-aligned hbn/graphene/hbn heterostructures.Nature Commu- nications12, 7196 (2021)

  12. [12]

    Xia, Y .et al.Superconductivity in twisted bilayer wse2.Nature637, 833–838 (2025)

  13. [13]

    Guo, Y .et al.Superconductivity in 5.0 twisted bilayer wse2.Nature637, 839–845 (2025)

  14. [14]

    Ponomarenko, L.et al.Cloning of dirac fermions in graphene superlattices.Nature497, 594–597 (2013)

  15. [15]

    Wang, L.et al.Evidence for a fractional fractal quantum hall effect in graphene superlattices.Science 350, 1231–1234 (2015). 10

  16. [16]

    Science340, 1427–1430 (2013)

    Hunt, B.et al.Massive dirac fermions and hofstadter butterfly in a van der waals heterostructure. Science340, 1427–1430 (2013)

  17. [17]

    M.et al.Observation of fractional chern insulators in a van der waals heterostructure

    Spanton, E. M.et al.Observation of fractional chern insulators in a van der waals heterostructure. Science360, 62–66 (2018)

  18. [18]

    Kuiri, M.et al.Enhanced electron-phonon coupling in doubly aligned hexagonal boron nitride bilayer graphene heterostructure.Physical Review B103, 115419 (2021)

  19. [19]

    Hofstadter, D. R. Energy levels and wave functions of bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields.Physical review B14, 2239 (1976)

  20. [21]

    Das, I.et al.Symmetry-broken chern insulators and rashba-like landau-level crossings in magic-angle bilayer graphene.Nature Physics17, 710–714 (2021)

  21. [22]

    Saito, Y .et al.Hofstadter subband ferromagnetism and symmetry-broken chern insulators in twisted bilayer graphene.Nature Physics17, 478–481 (2021)

  22. [23]

    Theory of the edge states in fractional quantum Hall effects.International Journal of Modern Physics B6, 1711–1762 (1992)

    Wen, X.-G. Theory of the edge states in fractional quantum Hall effects.International Journal of Modern Physics B6, 1711–1762 (1992)

  23. [24]

    Chiral luttinger liquid and the edge excitations in the fractional quantum Hall states.Phys- ical Review B41, 12838 (1990)

    Wen, X.-G. Chiral luttinger liquid and the edge excitations in the fractional quantum Hall states.Phys- ical Review B41, 12838 (1990)

  24. [25]

    L., Fisher, M

    Kane, C. L., Fisher, M. P. A. & Polchinski, J. Randomness at the edge: Theory of quantum Hall transport at fillingν=2/3.Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 4129–4132 (1994)

  25. [26]

    & Fisher, M

    Kane, C. & Fisher, M. P. Impurity scattering and transport of fractional quantum Hall edge states. Physical Review B51, 13449 (1995)

  26. [27]

    & Fisher, M

    Kane, C. & Fisher, M. P. Thermal transport in a Luttinger liquid.Physical review letters76, 3192 (1996)

  27. [28]

    Jezouin, S.et al.Quantum limit of heat flow across a single electronic channel.Science342, 601–604 (2013)

  28. [29]

    Banerjee, M.et al.Observed quantization of anyonic heat flow.Nature545, 75 (2017)

  29. [30]

    Banerjee, M.et al.Observation of half-integer thermal Hall conductance.Nature559, 205–210 (2018)

  30. [31]

    K.et al.Universal quantized thermal conductance in graphene.Science Advances5(2019)

    Srivastav, S. K.et al.Universal quantized thermal conductance in graphene.Science Advances5(2019). 11

  31. [32]

    K.et al.Vanishing thermal equilibration for hole-conjugate fractional quantum Hall states in graphene.Phys

    Srivastav, S. K.et al.Vanishing thermal equilibration for hole-conjugate fractional quantum Hall states in graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 216803 (2021)

  32. [33]

    K.et al.Determination of topological edge quantum numbers of fractional quantum hall phases by thermal conductance measurements.Nature Communications13, 5185 (2022)

    Srivastav, S. K.et al.Determination of topological edge quantum numbers of fractional quantum hall phases by thermal conductance measurements.Nature Communications13, 5185 (2022)

  33. [34]

    Physical Review Letters129, 116803 (2022)

    Le Breton, G.et al.Heat equilibration of integer and fractional quantum hall edge modes in graphene. Physical Review Letters129, 116803 (2022)

  34. [35]

    Roy, U.et al.Half-integer thermal conductance in integer quantum hall states.Nature Communications 17, 2853 (2026)

  35. [36]

    Nature Communications13, 1–7 (2022)

    Kumar, R.et al.Observation of ballistic upstream modes at fractional quantum Hall edges of graphene. Nature Communications13, 1–7 (2022)

  36. [37]

    Kumar, R.et al.Absence of heat flow inν= 0 quantum hall ferromagnet in bilayer graphene.Nature Physics20, 1941–1947 (2024)

  37. [38]

    Kumar, R.et al.Electrical noise spectroscopy of magnons in a quantum hall ferromagnet.Nature Communications15, 4998 (2024)

  38. [39]

    Zhang, A.et al.Quantized heat flow in the hofstadter butterfly.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.05694 (2026)

  39. [40]

    Quantized heat flow in moiré chern bands of bilayer graphene

    Sivre, E.et al.Heat Coulomb blockade of one ballistic channel.Nature Physics14, 145 (2018). 12 Materials and Methods Device fabrication and measurement scheme:Device fabrication began with the assembly of bottom- graphite-gated bilayer graphene (BLG) heterostructures encapsulated in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN), using conventional dry-transfer methods. T...

  40. [41]

    & Van Wees, B

    Zomer, P., Guimarães, M., Brant, J., Tombros, N. & Van Wees, B. Fast pick up technique for high quality heterostructures of bilayer graphene and hexagonal boron nitride.Applied Physics Letters105(2014)

  41. [42]

    Hunt, B.et al.Massive dirac fermions and hofstadter butterfly in a van der waals heterostructure.Science 340, 1427–1430 (2013)

  42. [43]

    R.et al.Hofstadter’s butterfly and the fractal quantum hall effect in moiré superlattices.Nature 497, 598–602 (2013)

    Dean, C. R.et al.Hofstadter’s butterfly and the fractal quantum hall effect in moiré superlattices.Nature 497, 598–602 (2013)

  43. [44]

    B.et al.Thermal agitation of electricity in conductors.Physical review32, 97–109 (1928)

    Johnson, J. B.et al.Thermal agitation of electricity in conductors.Physical review32, 97–109 (1928)

  44. [45]

    Thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors.Physical review32, 110 (1928)

    Nyquist, H. Thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors.Physical review32, 110 (1928)

  45. [46]

    K.et al.Universal quantized thermal conductance in graphene.Science advances5, eaaw5798 (2019)

    Srivastav, S. K.et al.Universal quantized thermal conductance in graphene.Science advances5, eaaw5798 (2019)

  46. [47]

    Sivre, E.et al.Heat coulomb blockade of one ballistic channel.Nature Physics14, 145–148 (2018). 16