Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 86 references

Sequential binding-unbinding based specific interactions influence exchange dynamics and size distribution of protein condensates

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the shape of an interaction's lifetime distribution, not just its mean, controls how protein condensates exchange molecules, age, and distribute sizes.

desk verdict Good idea, but the N=1 exponential baseline is actually a peaked first-passage distribution; the paper's central contrast needs re-doing. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02516 v2 pith:VOK5GRU4 submitted 2025-06-03 cond-mat.soft physics.bio-ph

classification cond-mat.softphysics.bio-ph
keywords biomolecularcondensatesinteractionlifetimedistributionsequentialbinding-unbindingtruncatedpowerlawcondensateagingBrowniandynamicssimulationneighborexchangeclustersize
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how biomolecular condensates can be at once compositionally specific and dynamically fluid, and proposes that the answer lies in the distribution of interaction lifetimes, not just their average. It models two binding mechanisms: single-step binding-unbinding, which gives exponentially distributed interaction lifetimes, and sequential multi-step binding-unbinding through conformational changes, which gives truncated power-law lifetimes. Holding the mean lifetime equal, the two mechanisms produce different condensate behavior in Brownian-dynamics simulations: the multi-step mechanism exchanges neighbors faster at first but then ages, with cumulative exchanges growing as $t^{1/2}$, whereas the single-step mechanism exchanges steadily and linearly in time. The final cluster size distributions also differ. The paper concludes that the shape of the lifetime distribution may by itself control condensate dynamics.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a one-dimensional diffusion model of binding and unbinding on a conformational coordinate. The probability $P(n,t)$ of being in conformational bound state $n$ evolves by $\partial P/\partial t = C\,\partial^2 P/\partial n^2$ on $0\le n\le N$, with an absorbing boundary at the unbound state $n=0$ and a reflecting boundary at $n=N$, starting from $n=1$. The survival probability $S(t)=\int_0^N P(n,t)\,dn$ has the closed form $S(t)=\frac{4}{\pi}\sum_{\ell=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2\ell-1}\sin\!\big(\frac{(2\ell-1)\pi}{2N}\big)\exp\!\big[-C\big(\frac{(2\ell-1)\pi}{2N}\big)^2 t\big]$, whose derivative gives the lifetime distribution: exponential for $N=1$ and truncated-power-law-like for $N>1$. These lifetime distributions feed a Brownian-dynamics simulation in which discs bind with a sticking probability and stay bound for durations drawn from the distribution; the cumulative number of neighbor exchanges and the cluster size distribution are the outputs that carry the argument.

What would settle it

Measure, for one condensate-forming protein at fixed mean interaction lifetime, both the single-molecule unbinding time distribution and the cumulative neighbor-exchange curve $F_{\mathrm{ex}}(t)$; observing an exponential unbinding distribution together with $F_{\mathrm{ex}}\propto t^{1/2}$, or a truncated power-law unbinding distribution together with $F_{\mathrm{ex}}\propto t$, would show that lifetime distribution shape is not the controlling variable the paper claims.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the lifetime distribution of individual protein interactions, not the mean lifetime alone, may singularly control condensate dynamics. With the same mean lifetime $\tau_m$, a single-step interaction ($N=1$) yields an exponential lifetime distribution, while a sequential multi-step interaction ($N>1$) yields a truncated power-law distribution. In simulations, these distributions translate into distinct observable behavior: cumulative neighbor-exchange events grow as $F_{\mathrm{ex}}\propto t$ for $N=1$ but as $F_{\mathrm{ex}}\propto t^{1/2}$ for $N>1$, so the multi-step system exchanges molecules faster initially yet ages, slowing its exchange rate over time. The two mechanisms also produce different complementary cumulative distributions of cluster sizes at the same mean lifetime. The authors interpret this as evidence that condensate aging and size selection can emerge from static binding-unbinding kinetics, without requiring interactions to strengthen over time.

Load-bearing premise

The predictions rest on modeling sequential binding and unbinding as a drift-free, constant-rate random walk up and down a uniform one-dimensional ladder of conformational states with only one exit; if real interactions have uneven energy barriers, drift, or parallel unbinding routes, the truncated power-law distributions and the downstream condensate scalings may not survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Condensate aging can be driven by the shape of the interaction lifetime distribution alone: a static, sequential multi-step binding mechanism produces a gradual slowdown in molecular exchange without any change in interaction strength over time.
  • Identical mean interaction lifetimes do not imply identical condensate behavior, so measurements that report only average binding times miss a controlling variable.
  • The exchange curve provides a fingerprint of the binding mechanism: cumulative exchanges growing as $t^{1/2}$ versus $t$ distinguish multi-step from single-step interactions.
  • Observed curvature changes in condensate cluster size distributions can be traced to the protein interaction pathway, giving a way to connect structural interaction changes to condensate-level outcome.
  • Truncated power-law interaction lifetime distributions observed in experiments do not require a mixture of exponentially decaying populations; a single population following sequential multi-step binding can produce them.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism generalizes, measuring the scaling exponent of $F_{\mathrm{ex}}(t)$ in live condensates could serve as a label-free probe of whether the underlying interactions are single-step or multi-step; the paper itself does not propose this diagnostic.
  • The same lifetime-distribution logic should apply to other protein-driven processes whose output depends on dwell times, such as enzyme cascades or molecular communication, but the paper only gestures at these settings and does not test them.
  • The uniform, drift-free energy landscape is the simplest possible case; introducing rugged barriers or parallel unbinding routes would likely modify the truncated power-law tail, so single-molecule measurements on engineered proteins with tunable numbers of conformational steps would be a direct test of whether the predicted $N$-dependent scalings survive in real systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a heuristic model in which protein binding-unbinding proceeds via sequential conformational states, described as diffusion on a one-dimensional coordinate with absorbing and reflecting boundaries (Eq. 1 and Eq. S6). The authors derive lifetime distributions from this model and combine them with Brownian dynamics simulations of condensing proteins. They report that single-step (N=1) and multi-step (N>1) interactions can share the same mean lifetime yet produce different exchange dynamics: N>1 yields faster early exchange but aging with F_ex ~ t^{1/2}, while N=1 shows F_ex ~ t and no aging. They also report different cluster size distributions. The central claim is that the shape of the interaction lifetime distribution, not just the mean, controls condensate behavior.

Significance. If the central claim were established, it would offer a mechanistic route to condensate aging and size polydispersity that does not require time-dependent strengthening of interactions, a topic of active current interest. Strengths of the manuscript include an analytic solution for the survival probability, a clearly described hybrid Brownian-dynamics framework, and careful accounting of several simulation parameters (sticking probability, binding regions, area fraction). The paper explicitly acknowledges the absence of condensate-level experimental validation and the need to calibrate N and C for specific proteins. However, the current implementation of the N=1 baseline is mathematically incorrect: Eq. (S6) with N=1 is not an exponential distribution. This error directly affects the abstract's claim of 'exponential vs. truncated power-law' lifetime distributions and the interpretation of all N=1 simulation results. The qualitative finding that distribution shape matters may still survive after correction, but the manuscript as written does not support its headline claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [SI, Eq. (S6) and main text, Fig. 1c] For N=1, Eq. (S6) gives S(t) = (4/π) Σ_{l=1}^∞ (-1)^{l-1}/(2l-1) exp[-C ((2l-1)π/2)^2 t], which is the survival probability of a diffusing particle on [0,1] with absorbing and reflecting boundaries, not the exponential distribution of a first-order single-step process. For C=0.034 (τm=15 s), S(1.2 s) ≈ 0.999 whereas exp(-t/τm) ≈ 0.92; the corresponding PDF is zero at t=0 and peaks at a finite time. Therefore the SI's assertion that 'the form S(t) in Eq. S6 predicts an exponential trend for N=1' is incorrect, and the subsequent claim that using Eq. S6 or an exponential distribution gives the same outcome is unverified. Since all N=1 simulation results in Figs. 3 and 4 use lifetimes drawn from this peaked distribution, the single-step baseline is mis-specified. The authors should re-run the N=1 simulations using a true exponential lifetime distribution (or a discrete one-state Markov model) and revise the abstract and discussion accordingly.
  2. [Model and Results, Figs. 3 and 4] The simulation framework feeds the model's lifetime PDFs directly into the Brownian dynamics, so the observed differences in F_ex, aging, and size distributions are consequences of the assumed lifetime distributions rather than independent tests of the model. This is a legitimate heuristic approach, but the phrase 'the lifetime distributions of individual interactions may singularly control condensate dynamics' overstates the evidence. Only three values of N (1, 5, 25) are compared, and parameters p_s, R_b, and a_f are also varied. Please temper the claim and state explicitly that the simulations illustrate possible consequences of the assumed distributions, not validation of the mechanism.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (2) and SI] The symbol 'Ã' appears in place of π in Eq. (2) and throughout the SI; this encoding issue should be corrected.
  2. [Main text] The notation 'Äm' is used for the mean lifetime in several places; it should be typeset as 'τm' consistently.
  3. [SI1] The SI contains a direct contradiction: it states that using Eq. (S6) for N=1 'may be inappropriate' yet then asserts that it nevertheless yields an exponential trend. Given the major comment above, this section needs to be rewritten to provide the correct exponential baseline or to justify a different baseline.
  4. [Fig. S1] The axes of Fig. S1 are not fully described; please define the x- and y-axes and the physical units for lifetime and probability density.
  5. [SI3] The counting of neighbor exchanges is described verbally; adding a pseudocode or a flowchart would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the lifetime distributions are derived from an explicit first-passage model, and the condensate simulations are transparently driven by those derived inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. The survival probability S(t) is obtained as an exact solution (Eq. 2; SI Eq. S6) of the stated diffusion equation (Eq. 1; SI Eq. S1) with absorbing/reflecting boundaries and a delta initial condition; no condensate observable is used to construct these distributions. The Brownian dynamics simulations draw binding lifetimes directly from these PDFs (SI section SI2), so the reported Fex scalings and cluster-size CCDFs are consequences of the model inputs rather than independent empirical predictions. This is a transparent modeling choice—the paper calls it a 'hybrid framework'—and not a hidden reduction: the paper does not fit the condensate results to experimental condensate data. The calibration of C to the experimental survival curves in Fig. 1b is a fit, but the subsequent same-mean-lifetime comparison is constructed by choosing C to equalize the mean lifetime, which is the intended control, not a circular prediction. Two minor caveats are noted. First, the Discussion cites the authors' prior work [37] as having 'shown by us and others' that such distributions arise from multistep sequential binding; because the present paper re-derives the result from its own SI, this self-citation is not load-bearing. Second, SI1 contains an unverified equivalence claim: 'Using the form S(t) in Eq. S6 for N = 1 may be inappropriate... Therefore, whether we use Eq. S6 for N = 1 or an exponential distribution function, the outcome remains the same.' This assertion (and the claim that Eq. S6 for N=1 is exponential) is a correctness or baseline concern rather than circularity—it does not make the derivation rely on its own target conclusion. Overall, the derivation chain is not circular. Score 1 reflects only the minor non-load-bearing self-citation and the flagged SI caveat, not any reduction of the central claim to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the number of conformational states N and on the fitted values of ~C used to equalize mean lifetimes. Other listed parameters affect quantitative simulation outcomes but are varied systematically. No new physical entities are introduced; the conformational coordinate and sequential pathway are modeling constructs.

free parameters (6)
  • Scaled conformational diffusivity ~C = C/alpha = ~C = 0.0038 to 1 (Table S1)
    Fitted to the experimental survival data in Fig. 1b and tuned to set the mean lifetime to 15 s or 130 s for each N. It is the main fitted parameter in the paper.
  • Number of conformational states N = N = 1, 5, 25
    Chosen to represent single-step versus multi-step binding pathways; not fitted to data but directly controls the shape of the lifetime distribution.
  • Sticking probability ps = 0.1
    Estimated from a van der Waals and Eyring-rate approximation in SI2, not measured for the simulated system.
  • Binding regions per molecule Rb = 3 or 4
    Chosen to vary molecular valence; affects cluster connectivity and exchange dynamics.
  • Area fraction af = 0.05 and 0.1
    Chosen arbitrarily as two concentrations to test the model; the authors state they are not aiming for a phase diagram.
  • Protein diffusivity Dp = 0.1 micrometer^2/s
    Taken from literature values for RNA/protein mobility in crowded cellular environments.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Binding and unbinding proceed as diffusion on a one-dimensional conformational coordinate n, with no drift and constant diffusivity C (uniform energy landscape).
    Invoked in Eq. (1) and SI Eq. S1; the authors call this a heuristic simplification and state that realistic energy landscapes require future work.
  • domain assumption The future conformational bound state depends only on the current state (Markov property).
    Assumed explicitly in the paragraph preceding Eq. (1).
  • ad hoc to paper The unbound state n=0 is an absorbing boundary and n=N is a reflective boundary.
    SI Eqs. S2-S3; the reflective boundary creates the trap that generates long lifetimes, which is central to the power-law tails.
  • domain assumption Binding begins at the first bound conformational state, n=1, represented by a delta-function initial condition.
    SI Eq. S4.
  • ad hoc to paper The discrete conformational states are treated as a continuum, including the N=1 case.
    SI text states that the continuum limit is 'inappropriate' for N=1 but still yields the correct exponential trend; the single-step case is first-order kinetics.
  • domain assumption In the Brownian dynamics simulations, molecules bind on contact with probability ps and remain bound for a lifetime drawn from the model's PDFs.
    SI2; this is the mechanism by which the lifetime distribution shapes affect condensate dynamics in the simulations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sequential binding-unbinding based specific interactions influence exchange dynamics and size distribution of protein condensates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VOK5GRU4

@misc{pith2026250602516,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sequential binding-unbinding based specific interactions influence exchange dynamics and size distribution of protein condensates},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VOK5GRU4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02516}
}
read the original abstract

The interaction lifetimes between condensate-forming biomolecules can dictate both the specificity of the condensate-forming species as well as the fluidity and exchange dynamics of these condensates. Using a heuristic modeling approach, we show that single-step vs. sequential, multistep binding-unbinding interactions between proteins can lead to similar average interaction lifetimes, but with either exponential or truncated power-law-like lifetime distributions, respectively. Combining this model with Brownian dynamics simulations, we find that the differences in these lifetime distributions influence the features of condensates, such as their fluidic nature, aging, and size distribution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02516 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of sequential binding-unbinding in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Variation of the average size of clusters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Schematic of different types of neighbor ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. After [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hyman , author C

    author author A. Hyman , author C. Weber ,\ and\ author F. J \"u licher ,\ title title Liquid-liquid phase separation in biology ,\ @noop journal journal Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. \ volume 30 ,\ pages 39 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  2. [2]

    Shin \ and\ author C

    author author Y. Shin \ and\ author C. Brangwynne ,\ title title Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease ,\ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 357 ,\ pages eaaf4382 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  3. [3]

    Banani , author H

    author author S. Banani , author H. Lee , author A. Hyman ,\ and\ author M. Rosen ,\ title title Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. \ volume 18 ,\ pages 285 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  4. [4]

    Brangwynne , author C

    author author C. Brangwynne , author C. Eckmann , author D. Courson , author A. Rybarska , author C. Hoege , author J. Gharakhani , author F. J \"u licher ,\ and\ author A. Hyman ,\ title title Germline p granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation ,\ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 324 ,\ pages 1729 ( year 200...

  5. [5]

    Patel , author H

    author author A. Patel , author H. Lee , author L. Jawerth , author S. Maharana , et al. ,\ title title A liquid-to-solid phase transition of the als protein fus accelerated by disease mutation ,\ @noop journal journal Cell \ volume 162 ,\ pages 1066 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  6. [6]

    Banani , author A

    author author S. Banani , author A. Rice , author W. Peeples , author Y. Lin , author S. Jain , author R. Parker ,\ and\ author M. Rosen ,\ title title Compositional control of phase-separated cellular bodies ,\ @noop journal journal Cell \ volume 166 ,\ pages 651 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  7. [7]

    Caragine , author S

    author author C. Caragine , author S. Haley ,\ and\ author A. Zidovska ,\ title title Nucleolar dynamics and interactions with nucleoplasm in living cells ,\ @noop journal journal Elife \ volume 8 ,\ pages e47533 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  8. [8]

    Lee , author C

    author author D. Lee , author C. Choi , author D. Sanders , author L. Beckers , author J. Riback , author C. Brangwynne ,\ and\ author N. Wingreen ,\ title title Size distributions of intracellular condensates reflect competition between coalescence and nucleation ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 19 ,\ pages 586 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    author author E. D. \ Siggia ,\ title title Late stages of spinodal decomposition in binary mixtures ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 20 ,\ pages 595 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

  2. [10]

    Tanaka ,\ title title A new coarsening mechanism of droplet spinodal decomposition ,\ @noop journal journal J

    author author H. Tanaka ,\ title title A new coarsening mechanism of droplet spinodal decomposition ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 103 ,\ pages 2361 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

  3. [11]

    Tanaka ,\ title title Viscoelastic phase separation ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 12 ,\ pages R207 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    author author H. Tanaka ,\ title title Viscoelastic phase separation ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 12 ,\ pages R207 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

  4. [12]

    Shimizu \ and\ author H

    author author R. Shimizu \ and\ author H. Tanaka ,\ title title A novel coarsening mechanism of droplets in immiscible fluid mixtures ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 7407 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  5. [13]

    Jawerth , author E

    author author L. Jawerth , author E. Fischer-Friedrich , author S. Saha , et al. ,\ title title Protein condensates as aging maxwell fluids ,\ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 370 ,\ pages 1317 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  6. [14]

    Vidal Ceballos , author J

    author author A. Vidal Ceballos , author J. D \' az A , author J. Preston , author C. Vairamon , author C. Shen , author R. Koder ,\ and\ author S. Elbaum-Garfinkle ,\ title title Liquid to solid transition of elastin condensates ,\ @noop journal journal Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. ...

  7. [15]

    Poudyal , author K

    author author M. Poudyal , author K. Patel , author L. Gadhe , author A. Sawner , author S. Maiti , et al. ,\ title title Intermolecular interactions underlie protein/peptide phase separation irrespective of sequence and structure at crowded milieu ,\ @noop journal journal Nat...

  8. [16]

    Emmanouilidis , author E

    author author L. Emmanouilidis , author E. Bartalucci , author Y. Kan , author M. Ijavi , author M. P \'e rez , author P. Afanasyev , author D. Boehringer , author J. Zehnder , author S. Parekh , author M. Bonn , et al. ,\ title title A solid beta-sheet structure is formed at ...

  9. [17]

    Benedek ,\ title title Cataract as a protein condensation disease: the proctor lecture

    author author G. Benedek ,\ title title Cataract as a protein condensation disease: the proctor lecture. ,\ @noop journal journal Investigative ophthalmology & visual science \ volume 38 ,\ pages 1911 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

  10. [18]

    Mehra , author S

    author author S. Mehra , author S. Sahay ,\ and\ author S. Maji ,\ title title -synuclein misfolding and aggregation: Implications in parkinson’s disease pathogenesis ,\ @noop journal journal Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Proteins and Proteomics \ volume 1867 ,\ pages 89...

  11. [19]

    Ray , author N

    author author S. Ray , author N. Singh , author R. Kumar , author K. Patel , author S. Pandey , author D. Datta , et al. ,\ title title -synuclein aggregation nucleates through liquid--liquid phase separation ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Chemistry \ volume 12 ,\ pages 705 ( y...

  12. [20]

    Brangwynne , author P

    author author C. Brangwynne , author P. Tompa ,\ and\ author R. Pappu ,\ title title Polymer physics of intracellular phase transitions ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 11 ,\ pages 899 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  13. [21]

    Choi , author A

    author author J. Choi , author A. Holehouse ,\ and\ author R. Pappu ,\ title title Physical principles underlying the complex biology of intracellular phase transitions ,\ @noop journal journal Ann. Rev. Biophys. \ volume 49 ,\ pages 107 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  14. [22]

    Zhang , author B

    author author Y. Zhang , author B. Xu , author B. Weiner , author Y. Meir ,\ and\ author N. Wingreen ,\ title title Decoding the physical principles of two-component biomolecular phase separation ,\ @noop journal journal Elife \ volume 10 ,\ pages e62403 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

  15. [23]

    Hess \ and\ author J

    author author N. Hess \ and\ author J. Joseph ,\ title title Structured protein domains enter the spotlight: modulators of biomolecular condensate form and function ,\ @noop journal journal Trends in Biochemical Sciences \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

  16. [24]

    Lin ,\ title title Modeling the aging of protein condensates ,\ @noop journal journal Phys

    author author J. Lin ,\ title title Modeling the aging of protein condensates ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 4 ,\ pages L022012 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

  17. [25]

    Garaizar , author J

    author author A. Garaizar , author J. Espinosa , author J. Joseph , author G. Krainer , author Y. Shen , author T. Knowles ,\ and\ author R. Collepardo-Guevara ,\ title title Aging can transform single-component protein condensates into multiphase architectures ,\ @noop journa...

  18. [26]

    Takaki , author L

    author author R. Takaki , author L. Jawerth , author M. Popovi \'c ,\ and\ author F. J \"u licher ,\ title title Theory of rheology and aging of protein condensates ,\ @noop journal journal PRX Life \ volume 1 ,\ pages 013006 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

  19. [27]

    Zhang , author A

    author author Y. Zhang , author A. Pyo , author R. Kliegman , author Y. Jiang , author C. Brangwynne , author H. Stone ,\ and\ author N. Wingreen ,\ title title The exchange dynamics of biomolecular condensates ,\ @noop journal journal Elife \ volume 12 ,\ pages RP91680 ( year...

  20. [28]

    Biswas \ and\ author D

    author author S. Biswas \ and\ author D. Potoyan ,\ title title Molecular drivers of aging in biomolecular condensates: Desolvation, rigidification, and sticker lifetimes ,\ @noop journal journal PRX life \ volume 2 ,\ pages 023011 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  21. [29]

    Sundaravadivelu Devarajan , author J

    author author D. Sundaravadivelu Devarajan , author J. Wang , author B. Sza a-Mendyk , author S. Rekhi , author A. Nikoubashman , author Y. Kim ,\ and\ author J. Mittal ,\ title title Sequence-dependent material properties of biomolecular condensates and their relation to dilu...

  22. [30]

    Katira , author A

    author author P. Katira , author A. Agarwal ,\ and\ author H. Hess ,\ title title A random sequential adsorption model for protein adsorption to surfaces functionalized with poly (ethylene oxide) ,\ @noop journal journal Adv. Mater. \ volume 21 ,\ pages 1599 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

  23. [31]

    Changeux \ and\ author S

    author author J. Changeux \ and\ author S. Edelstein ,\ title title Conformational selection or induced fit? 50 years of debate resolved ,\ @noop journal journal F1000 Biology Rep. \ volume 3 ,\ pages 19 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

  24. [32]

    Seo , author J

    author author M. Seo , author J. Park , author E. Kim , author S. Hohng ,\ and\ author H. Kim ,\ title title Protein conformational dynamics dictate the binding affinity for a ligand ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 3724 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  25. [33]

    Stank , author D

    author author A. Stank , author D. Kokh , author J. Fuller ,\ and\ author R. Wade ,\ title title Protein binding pocket dynamics ,\ @noop journal journal Acc. Chem. Res. \ volume 49 ,\ pages 809 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  26. [34]

    Biancaniello , author A

    author author P. Biancaniello , author A. Kim ,\ and\ author J. Crocker ,\ title title Colloidal interactions and self-assembly using dna hybridization ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 94 ,\ pages 058302 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

  27. [35]

    Rogers , author T

    author author W. Rogers , author T. Sinno ,\ and\ author J. Crocker ,\ title title Kinetics and non-exponential binding of dna-coated colloids ,\ @noop journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 9 ,\ pages 6412 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

  28. [36]

    Penna , author M

    author author M. Penna , author M. Mijajlovic ,\ and\ author M. Biggs ,\ title title Molecular-level understanding of protein adsorption at the interface between water and a strongly interacting uncharged solid surface ,\ @noop journal journal J. Am. Chem. Soc. \ volume 136 ,\...

  29. [37]

    Armstrong , author J

    author author M. Armstrong , author J. Rodriguez III , author P. Dahl , author P. Salamon , author H. Hess ,\ and\ author P. Katira ,\ title title Power law behavior in protein desorption kinetics originating from sequential binding and unbinding ,\ @noop journal journal Langm...

  30. [38]

    Garcia , author G

    author author D. Garcia , author G. Fettweis , author D. Presman , author V. Paakinaho , author C. Jarzynski , author A. Upadhyaya ,\ and\ author G. Hager ,\ title title Power-law behavior of transcription factor dynamics at the single-molecule level implies a continuum affini...

  31. [39]

    Chen , author S

    author author Z. Chen , author S. Boyken , author M. Jia , author F. Busch , author D. Flores-Solis , author M. Bick , author P. Lu , et al. ,\ title title Programmable design of orthogonal protein heterodimers ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 565 ,\ pages 106 ( year 2...

  32. [40]

    Garcia , author T

    author author D. Garcia , author T. Johnson , author D. Presman , author G. Fettweis , author K. Wagh , et al. ,\ title title An intrinsically disordered region-mediated confinement state contributes to the dynamics and function of transcription factors ,\ @noop journal journa...

  33. [41]

    author author D. Baker ,\ title title What has de novo protein design taught us about protein folding and biophysics? ,\ @noop journal journal Protein Science \ volume 28 ,\ pages 678 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  34. [42]

    Lu ,\ title title Probing single-molecule protein conformational dynamics ,\ @noop journal journal Acc

    author author H. Lu ,\ title title Probing single-molecule protein conformational dynamics ,\ @noop journal journal Acc. Chem. Res. \ volume 38 ,\ pages 557 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

  35. [43]

    Guo \ and\ author H

    author author J. Guo \ and\ author H. Zhou ,\ title title Protein allostery and conformational dynamics ,\ @noop journal journal Chem. Rev. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 6503 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  36. [44]

    Brooks III , author J

    author author C. Brooks III , author J. Onuchic ,\ and\ author D. Wales ,\ title title Taking a walk on a landscape ,\ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 293 ,\ pages 612 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

  37. [45]

    Wales \ and\ author T

    author author D. Wales \ and\ author T. Bogdan ,\ title title Potential energy and free energy landscapes ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. Chem. B \ volume 110 ,\ pages 20765 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

  38. [46]

    Joseph , author K

    author author J. Joseph , author K. R \"o der , author D. Chakraborty , author R. Mantell ,\ and\ author D. Wales ,\ title title Exploring biomolecular energy landscapes ,\ @noop journal journal Chem. Commun. \ volume 53 ,\ pages 6974 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  39. [47]

    Mazzocca , author E

    author author M. Mazzocca , author E. Colombo , author A. Callegari ,\ and\ author D. Mazza ,\ title title Transcription factor binding kinetics and transcriptional bursting: What do we really know? ,\ @noop journal journal Current Opinion in Structural Biology \ volume 71 ,\ ...

  40. [48]

    Elkins , author A

    author author M. Elkins , author A. Bandara , author G. Pantelopulos , author J. Straub ,\ and\ author M. Hong ,\ title title Direct observation of cholesterol dimers and tetramers in lipid bilayers ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. Chem. B \ volume 125 ,\ pages 1825 ( year 20...

  41. [49]

    Lyu , author H

    author author K. Lyu , author H. Chen , author J. Gao , author J. Jin , author H. Shi , author D. Schwartz ,\ and\ author D. Wang ,\ title title Protein desorption kinetics depends on the timescale of observation ,\ @noop journal journal Biomacromolecules \ volume 23 ,\ pages ...

  42. [50]

    Kulin , author R

    author author S. Kulin , author R. Kishore , author J. Hubbard ,\ and\ author K. Helmerson ,\ title title Real-time measurement of spontaneous antigen-antibody dissociation ,\ @noop journal journal Biophys. J. \ volume 83 ,\ pages 1965 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

  43. [51]

    Gebhardt , author D

    author author J. Gebhardt , author D. Suter , author R. Roy , author Z. Zhao , author A. Chapman , author S. Basu , author T. Maniatis ,\ and\ author X. Xie ,\ title title Single-molecule imaging of transcription factor binding to dna in live mammalian cells ,\ @noop journal j...

  44. [52]

    Banerjee , author S

    author author S. Banerjee , author S. Maurya ,\ and\ author R. Roy ,\ title title Single-molecule fluorescence imaging: Generating insights into molecular interactions in virology ,\ @noop journal journal J. Biosciences \ volume 43 ,\ pages 519 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  45. [53]

    Bespalova , author S

    author author M. Bespalova , author S. Mahanta ,\ and\ author M. Krishnan ,\ title title Single-molecule trapping and measurement in solution ,\ @noop journal journal Curr. Opinion Chem. Biol. \ volume 51 ,\ pages 113 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  46. [54]

    Bespalova , author R

    author author M. Bespalova , author R. Oz , author F. Westerlund ,\ and\ author M. Krishnan ,\ title title Single-molecule trapping and measurement in a nanostructured lipid bilayer system ,\ @noop journal journal Langmuir \ volume 38 ,\ pages 13923 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

  47. [55]

    Walker-Gibbons , author X

    author author R. Walker-Gibbons , author X. Zhu , author A. Behjatian , author T. Bennett ,\ and\ author M. Krishnan ,\ title title Sensing the structural and conformational properties of single-stranded nucleic acids using electrometry and molecular simulations ,\ @noop journ...

  48. [56]

    Henry , author R

    author author E. Henry , author R. Best ,\ and\ author W. Eaton ,\ title title Comparing a simple theoretical model for protein folding with all-atom molecular dynamics simulations ,\ @noop journal journal Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. \ volume 110 ,\ pages 17880 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

  49. [57]

    Dommer , author N

    author author A. Dommer , author N. Wauer , author S. Marrink ,\ and\ author R. Amaro ,\ title title All-atom virus simulations to tackle airborne disease ,\ @noop journal journal Curr. Op. Struct. Biol. \ volume 92 ,\ pages 103048 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

  50. [58]

    Vicsek \ and\ author F

    author author T. Vicsek \ and\ author F. Family ,\ title title Dynamic scaling for aggregation of clusters ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 52 ,\ pages 1669 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

  51. [59]

    Family , author P

    author author F. Family , author P. Meakin ,\ and\ author T. Vicsek ,\ title title Cluster size distribution in chemically controlled cluster--cluster aggregation ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 83 ,\ pages 4144 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

  52. [60]

    Lin , author H

    author author M. Lin , author H. Lindsay , author D. Weitz , author R. Ball , author R. Klein ,\ and\ author P. Meakin ,\ title title Universal reaction-limited colloid aggregation ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 41 ,\ pages 2005 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

  53. [61]

    Chandrasekhar ,\ title title Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy ,\ @noop journal journal Rev

    author author S. Chandrasekhar ,\ title title Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy ,\ @noop journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1943 ) NoStop

  54. [62]

    Kumaran ,\ title title Droplet interaction in the spinodal decomposition of a fluid ,\ @noop journal journal J

    author author V. Kumaran ,\ title title Droplet interaction in the spinodal decomposition of a fluid ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 109 ,\ pages 7644 ( year 1998 a ) NoStop

  55. [63]

    Kumaran ,\ title title Effect of convective transport on droplet spinodal decomposition in fluids ,\ @noop journal journal J

    author author V. Kumaran ,\ title title Effect of convective transport on droplet spinodal decomposition in fluids ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 109 ,\ pages 2437 ( year 1998 b ) NoStop

  56. [64]

    Chen , author W

    author author F. Chen , author W. Guo ,\ and\ author H. Shum ,\ title title Fractal-dependent growth of solidlike condensates ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 133 ,\ pages 118401 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  57. [65]

    Brilliantov , author W

    author author N. Brilliantov , author W. Otieno , author S. Matveev , author A. Smirnov , author E. Tyrtyshnikov ,\ and\ author P. Krapivsky ,\ title title Steady oscillations in aggregation-fragmentation processes ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 98 ,\ pages 012...

  58. [66]

    Bouchaud ,\ title title Weak ergodicity breaking and aging in disordered systems ,\ @noop journal journal Journal de Physique I \ volume 2 ,\ pages 1705 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    author author J. Bouchaud ,\ title title Weak ergodicity breaking and aging in disordered systems ,\ @noop journal journal Journal de Physique I \ volume 2 ,\ pages 1705 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

  59. [67]

    Monthus \ and\ author J

    author author C. Monthus \ and\ author J. Bouchaud ,\ title title Models of traps and glass phenomenology ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General \ volume 29 ,\ pages 3847 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

  60. [68]

    Linsenmeier , author M

    author author M. Linsenmeier , author M. Hondele , author F. Grigolato , author E. Secchi , author K. Weis ,\ and\ author P. Arosio ,\ title title Dynamic arrest and aging of biomolecular condensates are modulated by low-complexity domains, rna and biochemical activity ,\ @noo...

  61. [69]

    Molliex , author J

    author author A. Molliex , author J. Temirov , author J. Lee , author M. Coughlin , author A. Kanagaraj , author H. Kim , author T. Mittag ,\ and\ author J. Taylor ,\ title title Phase separation by low complexity domains promotes stress granule assembly and drives pathologica...

  62. [70]

    Buchwalter \ and\ author M

    author author A. Buchwalter \ and\ author M. Hetzer ,\ title title Nucleolar expansion and elevated protein translation in premature aging ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  63. [71]

    Zhang \ and\ author H

    author author Y. Zhang \ and\ author H. Hess ,\ title title Toward rational design of high-efficiency enzyme cascades ,\ @noop journal journal ACS Catalysis \ volume 7 ,\ pages 6018 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  64. [72]

    Zhao , author H

    author author X. Zhao , author H. Palacci , author V. Yadav , author M. Spiering , author M. Gilson , author P. Butler , author H. Hess , author S. Benkovic ,\ and\ author A. Sen ,\ title title Substrate-driven chemotactic assembly in an enzyme cascade ,\ @noop journal journal...

  65. [73]

    Nakano , author M

    author author T. Nakano , author M. Moore , author F. Wei , author A. Vasilakos ,\ and\ author J. Shuai ,\ title title Molecular communication and networking: Opportunities and challenges ,\ @noop journal journal IEEE transactions on nanobioscience \ volume 11 ,\ pages 135 ( y...

  66. [74]

    Handbook of linear partial differential equations for engineers and scientists; 2001

    Polyanin A. Handbook of linear partial differential equations for engineers and scientists; 2001

  67. [75]

    Handbook of exact solutions for ordinary differential equations; 2002

    Zaitsev V, Polyanin A. Handbook of exact solutions for ordinary differential equations; 2002

  68. [76]

    Dynamic computer simulation of concentrated hard sphere suspensions: I

    Cichocki B, Hinsen K. Dynamic computer simulation of concentrated hard sphere suspensions: I. Simulation technique and mean square displacement data. Physica A: Stat Mech Appl. 1990;166:473-91

  69. [77]

    Macromolecular crowding directs the motion of small molecules inside cells

    Smith S, Cianci C, Grima R. Macromolecular crowding directs the motion of small molecules inside cells. J Roy Soc Interface. 2017;14:20170047

  70. [78]

    Detection of miRNAs with a nanopore single-molecule counter

    Gu L, Wanunu M, Wang M, McReynolds L, Wang Y. Detection of miRNAs with a nanopore single-molecule counter. Expert Rev Mol Diagnos. 2012;12:573-84

  71. [79]

    Imaging of single mRNA molecules moving within a living cell nucleus

    Tadakuma H, Ishihama Y, Shibuya T, Tani T, Funatsu T. Imaging of single mRNA molecules moving within a living cell nucleus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;344:772-9

  72. [80]

    A reaction-diffusion model to study RNA motion by quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching

    Braga J, McNally J, Carmo-Fonseca M. A reaction-diffusion model to study RNA motion by quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Biophys J. 2007;92:2694-703

  73. [81]

    Cytoplasmic HIV-1 RNA is mainly transported by diffusion in the presence or absence of Gag protein

    Chen J, Grunwald D, Sardo L, Galli A, et al. Cytoplasmic HIV-1 RNA is mainly transported by diffusion in the presence or absence of Gag protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111:E5205-13

  74. [82]

    The activated complex and the absolute rate of chemical reactions

    Eyring H. The activated complex and the absolute rate of chemical reactions. Chem Rev. 1935;17:65-77

  75. [83]

    The theory of rate processes: the kinetics of chemical reactions, viscosity, diffusion and electrochemical phenomena

    Glasstone S, Laidler K, Eyring H. The theory of rate processes: the kinetics of chemical reactions, viscosity, diffusion and electrochemical phenomena. McGrawHill Book, New York. 1941

  76. [84]

    Universal kinetics in reaction-limited aggregation

    Ball R, Weitz D, Witten T, Leyvraz F. Universal kinetics in reaction-limited aggregation. Phys Rev Lett. 1987;58:274

  77. [85]

    Available from:

    ENTRY address assignee author booktitle chapter cartographer day edition editor howpublished institution inventor journal key month note number organization pages part publisher school series title type volume word year eprint doi url lastchecked updated label INTEGERS output....

  78. [86]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION hyphenate 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #2 global.max substring 't := while t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize ":...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.