REVIEW 8 cited by
AgentSafe: Safeguarding Large Language Model-based Multi-agent Systems via Hierarchical Data Management
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
AgentSafe: Safeguarding Large Language Model-based Multi-agent Systems via Hierarchical Data Management
read the original abstract
Large Language Model based multi-agent systems are revolutionizing autonomous communication and collaboration, yet they remain vulnerable to security threats like unauthorized access and data breaches. To address this, we introduce AgentSafe, a novel framework that enhances MAS security through hierarchical information management and memory protection. AgentSafe classifies information by security levels, restricting sensitive data access to authorized agents. AgentSafe incorporates two components: ThreatSieve, which secures communication by verifying information authority and preventing impersonation, and HierarCache, an adaptive memory management system that defends against unauthorized access and malicious poisoning, representing the first systematic defense for agent memory. Experiments across various LLMs show that AgentSafe significantly boosts system resilience, achieving defense success rates above 80% under adversarial conditions. Additionally, AgentSafe demonstrates scalability, maintaining robust performance as agent numbers and information complexity grow. Results underscore effectiveness of AgentSafe in securing MAS and its potential for real-world application.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
PropGuard: Safeguarding LLM-MAS via Propagation-Aware Exploration and Remediation
PropGuard is a propagation-aware framework for LLM-MAS that constructs dual-view spatio-temporal graphs, employs a GE-GRPO inspector to recover suspicious subgraphs, and applies source-guided remediation to lower atta...
-
Breaking the Secret: Economic Interventions for Combating Collusion in Embodied Multi-Agent Systems
A mutagenic incentive mechanism reshapes payoffs in embodied MAS to induce strategic defection from collusion, achieving performance comparable to non-collusion baselines in simulations and real-world tests.
-
When Agents Go Rogue: Activation-Based Detection of Malicious Behaviors in Multi-Agent Systems
Activation-space divergence detects and corrects compromised LLM agents in multi-agent systems without interaction graphs or synchronized rounds, outperforming graph baselines especially under async stealthy attacks.
-
The Capability Paradox: How Smarter Auditors Make Multi-Agent Systems Less Secure
Higher worker capability in multi-agent LLM systems increases semantic hijacking attack success rates via linguistic certainty in reports, with heterogeneous ensembles reducing ASR from 52.8% to 2.0%.
-
Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses
A multi-level taxonomy of risks, attacks, and defenses across the full embodied AI pipeline, synthesizing 500+ papers and flagging overlooked failure modes.
-
Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses
The survey organizes over 400 papers on embodied AI safety into a multi-level taxonomy and flags overlooked issues such as fragile multimodal fusion and unstable planning under jailbreaks.
-
Don't Trust Your Upstream: Exploiting LLM Multi-Agent System via Topology-Guided Adversarial Propagation
A topology-aware attack propagates adversarial contamination across LLM multi-agent systems to achieve 40-85% success rates on frameworks and real applications, revealing overlooked vulnerabilities.
-
Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluation
A synthesis of 247 papers on LLM agent security identifies prompt injection and tool hijacking as dominant threats, notes weakly compositional defenses, and argues for trust boundaries and realistic evaluations.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.