pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11029 · v1 · pith:VOZHBYVXnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · physics.class-ph

Fe3O4 Nano-octahedra/Vulcan XC72: Optimization and Combination with Solar-Based Electro-Fenton for Progestins Degradation

Juliana M. S. de Jesus , Caroline de O. Carrilho , Jo\~ao P. C. Moura , Aline B. Trench , Caroline C. Augusto , Bruno L. Batista , Mauro C. dos Santos This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 11:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph physics.class-ph
keywords Fe3O4 nano-octahedraVulcan XC72gas diffusion electrodehydrogen peroxide electrogenerationelectro-Fentonprogestins removalsolar-assisted oxidationcurrent efficiency
0
0 comments X

The pith

Incorporating 3% nano-octahedral magnetite into Vulcan XC72 doubles hydrogen peroxide selectivity in gas diffusion electrodes and enables over 70% removal of two progestins via solar-assisted electro-Fenton.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper synthesizes Fe3O4 nano-octahedra hydrothermally and blends them at 3% loading with Vulcan XC72 to form cathodes that produce H2O2 more selectively than plain carbon. A 2^3 factorial design optimizes current density, pH, and Na2SO4 concentration to reach 0.44 g/L H2O2 at 43% current efficiency. The same electrode then drives solar and anodic electro-Fenton processes that remove more than 70% of levonorgestrel and gestodene while retaining performance over three cycles. A sympathetic reader cares because the work shows a concrete route to improve in-situ peroxide generation for electrochemical oxidation of endocrine disruptors without external chemical addition.

Core claim

The 3% Fe3O4-NO/C gas diffusion electrode doubles H2O2 selectivity relative to Vulcan XC72 alone, reaches a maximum production of 0.44 g L^{-1} with 43.1% current efficiency under optimized conditions, and delivers over 70% removal of levonorgestrel and gestodene in solar-assisted electro-Fenton treatment with stable reuse across three cycles.

What carries the argument

The 3% Fe3O4-NO/C gas diffusion electrode, which raises H2O2 electrogeneration selectivity for use in electro-Fenton oxidation.

If this is right

  • The electrode maintains stable performance for at least three reuse cycles in progestin degradation.
  • Solar-assisted electro-Fenton with this cathode achieves over 70% removal of both levonorgestrel and gestodene under the identified conditions.
  • The factorial optimization shows that current density, pH, and Na2SO4 concentration control the maximum H2O2 output and current efficiency.
  • The same cathode can be applied directly to combined solar and anodic electro-Fenton without additional reagents.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The selectivity gain may allow lower applied currents in scaled systems, lowering energy use per gram of pollutant removed.
  • The hydrothermal synthesis route for the nano-octahedra could be adapted to produce larger electrode areas if the 3% loading ratio remains effective.
  • Matrix effects from real wastewater could reduce the observed removal percentages if competing species consume the generated peroxide.
  • Extending the process to other micropollutants would test whether the H2O2 selectivity improvement is general or specific to these progestins.

Load-bearing premise

The three variables tested in the 2^3 factorial design are enough to locate the true optimum for H2O2 production and pollutant removal.

What would settle it

Repeat the H2O2 production and progestin removal experiments while varying one untested factor such as temperature or a different supporting electrolyte and check whether the reported 0.44 g/L yield and 70% removal are maintained.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11029 by Aline B. Trench, Bruno L. Batista, Caroline C. Augusto, Caroline de O. Carrilho, Jo\~ao P. C. Moura, Juliana M. S. de Jesus, Mauro C. dos Santos.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Representation of the experimental setup used for electrochemical experiments: (I) Solar simulator; (II) Anode (Pt, BDD, or DSA); (III) GDE; (IV) mechanical stirring; (V) Power supply, and (VI) oxygen supply. GES and LNG concentrations were analyzed using ultra-fast liquid chromatography (UFLC) with Shimadzu equipment (LC-20AD), which included a UV– Visible detector (SPD-20A) and a C18 column (ACE, 250 mm … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The widespread presence of synthetic progestins, such as levonorgestrel (LNG) and gestodene (GES), in aquatic environments poses significant ecotoxicological risks due to their endocrine-disrupting properties. In this study, nano-octahedral magnetite (Fe3O4-NO) was synthesized via a hydrothermal route and incorporated into gas diffusion electrodes (GDEs) supported on Vulcan XC72 to enhance the in-situ electrogeneration of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). High-resolution transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, SEM, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and contact angle measurements thoroughly characterized the physicochemical and morphological properties of the materials. The 3% Fe3O4-NO/C catalyst provided a two-fold increase in H2O2 selectivity compared with Vulcan XC72. Electrochemical performance was optimized using a 2^3 factorial design and principal component analysis (PCA), with current density, pH, and Na2SO4 concentration as variables. The optimized GDE (3% Fe3O4-NO/C) achieved a maximum H2O2 production of 0.44 +/- 0.02 g L-1 with a current efficiency of 43.1 +/- 0.23% and a specific energy consumption of 0.012 +/- 0.009 kWh g-1. The electrode was further applied to the degradation of LNG and GES using solar and anodic-assisted electro-Fenton processes. Under optimal conditions, over 70% removal of both progestins was achieved, with stable performance across three operational cycles. These findings demonstrate the potential of 3% Fe3O4-NO/C-GDEs as efficient, reusable cathodes for sustainable electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs) in water treatment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports synthesis of nano-octahedral Fe3O4 incorporated into Vulcan XC72 carbon for gas diffusion electrodes, claiming a two-fold H2O2 selectivity increase at 3% loading. Electrochemical performance is optimized via 2^3 factorial design and PCA on current density, pH, and Na2SO4 concentration to yield 0.44 +/- 0.02 g L-1 H2O2 at 43.1 +/- 0.23% efficiency; the optimized GDE is then applied in solar/anodic-assisted electro-Fenton to achieve >70% removal of levonorgestrel and gestodene with stability over three cycles.

Significance. If the reported H2O2 metrics and degradation performance are robust, the work provides a practical, reusable cathode material for in-situ H2O2 generation in EAOPs targeting micropollutants. The multi-technique characterization (HRTEM, XRD, SEM, XPS, contact angle) strengthens the link between material properties and performance; however, the limited scope of the optimization reduces the strength of claims that the conditions represent a true maximum.

major comments (2)
  1. [Optimization section (factorial design and PCA)] The 2^3 factorial design (with PCA) is restricted to current density, pH, and Na2SO4 concentration while fixing Fe3O4-NO loading at 3% post-selection; this design space does not test interactions with unvaried parameters such as O2 flow rate, temperature, or electrode hydrophobicity, which is load-bearing for the headline claim of maximum H2O2 production (0.44 g L-1) and two-fold selectivity gain.
  2. [Results (electrochemical performance and degradation)] The reported optimum (0.44 +/- 0.02 g L-1 H2O2, 43.1 +/- 0.23% efficiency) and downstream >70% progestin removal rest on the factorial results without provision of raw replicate data, full PCA loadings/scores, or ANOVA tables; this limits independent verification that the selected conditions are superior to alternatives within the tested space.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and Results] The abstract states error bars but the main text should explicitly state the number of replicates and how they were used to compute the reported uncertainties.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Optimization section (factorial design and PCA)] The 2^3 factorial design (with PCA) is restricted to current density, pH, and Na2SO4 concentration while fixing Fe3O4-NO loading at 3% post-selection; this design space does not test interactions with unvaried parameters such as O2 flow rate, temperature, or electrode hydrophobicity, which is load-bearing for the headline claim of maximum H2O2 production (0.44 g L-1) and two-fold selectivity gain.

    Authors: The 3% Fe3O4-NO loading was selected following preliminary screening experiments (detailed in the manuscript) that identified it as providing the highest H2O2 selectivity among 1%, 3%, and 5% loadings. The subsequent 2^3 factorial design was intentionally focused on the three operational variables most relevant to the electro-Fenton application, with other parameters (O2 flow, temperature, and base electrode hydrophobicity) held constant based on established protocols for Vulcan XC72 GDEs in our prior studies and the literature. We agree that this limits claims of a global maximum. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly qualify the optimization as applying within the tested design space, remove any implication of an absolute maximum, and add a short justification for the fixed parameters. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results (electrochemical performance and degradation)] The reported optimum (0.44 +/- 0.02 g L-1 H2O2, 43.1 +/- 0.23% efficiency) and downstream >70% progestin removal rest on the factorial results without provision of raw replicate data, full PCA loadings/scores, or ANOVA tables; this limits independent verification that the selected conditions are superior to alternatives within the tested space.

    Authors: We appreciate this point on transparency. The reported values derive from triplicate experiments, and the PCA/ANOVA were performed on the full dataset. To enable independent verification we will add the raw replicate data, complete PCA loadings/scores, and full ANOVA tables (including F-values and p-values) to the supplementary information in the revised version. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental optimization and application testing

full rationale

The work reports material synthesis, physicochemical characterization (HRTEM, XRD, SEM, XPS, contact angle), a standard 2^3 factorial design plus PCA on three process variables, measured H2O2 production/selectivity, and progestin removal percentages. No equations, fitted models, or derivations are presented that reduce reported performance metrics to prior fitted constants or self-citations. The factorial design is an experimental tool, not a predictive model whose outputs are forced by its inputs. Central claims rest on direct measurements and are falsifiable by additional experiments outside the tested space.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the factorial optimization and the assumption that the listed characterization methods confirm the material properties responsible for the observed performance gains. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • Fe3O4-NO loading = 3%
    The 3% value was selected after 2^3 factorial optimization as the level giving maximum H2O2 production.
  • Current density, pH, Na2SO4 concentration
    Three variables varied in the factorial design to locate the reported optimum conditions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5910 in / 1414 out tokens · 21510 ms · 2026-06-27T11:29:54.520016+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gogoi, P

    A. Gogoi, P. Mazumder, V.K. Tyagi, G.G. Tushara Chaminda, A.K. An, M. Kumar, Occurrence and fate of emerging contaminants in water environment: A review, Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 6 (2018) 169 –180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2017.12.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gsd.2017.12.009 2018

  2. [2]

    hua Liu, J.A

    Z. hua Liu, J.A. Ogejo, A. Pruden, K.F. Knowlton, Occurrence, fate and removal of synthetic oral contraceptives (SOCs) in the natural environment: A review, Science of the Total Environment 409 (2011) 5149 –5161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.08.047

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.08.047 2011

  3. [3]

    Oropesa, L

    A.L. Oropesa, L. Guimarães, Occurrence of Levonorgestrel in Water Systems and Its Effects on Aquatic Organisms: A Review, in: Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., Springer, 2021: pp. 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2020_44

    work page doi:10.1007/398_2020_44 2021

  4. [4]

    Q. Yu, J. Geng, X. Zong, Y. Zhang, K. Xu, H. Hu, Y. Deng, F. Zhao, H. Ren, Occurrence and removal of progestagens in municipal wastewater treatment plants from different regions in China, Science of the Total Environment 668 (2019) 1191–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.327

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.327 2019

  5. [5]

    Goeury, G

    K. Goeury, G. Munoz, S. Vo Duy, M. Prévost, S. Sauvé, Occurrence and seasonal distribution of steroid hormones and bisphenol A in surface waters and suspended sediments of Quebec, Canada, Environmental Advances 8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100199

    work page doi:10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100199 2022

  6. [6]

    de Jesus, F.K

    J.M.S. de Jesus, F.K. Tominaga, A. dos Santos Argolo, A.C.G. Nascimento, S.I. Borrely, D.P. Vieira, D.M. Bila, A.C.S.C. Teixeira, Radiolytic degradation of levonorgestrel and gestodene: Performance and bioassays, Process Safety and Environmental Protectio n 162 (2022) 520 –530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.04.021

    work page doi:10.1016/j.psep.2022.04.021 2022

  7. [7]

    Baena-Nogueras, E

    R.M. Baena-Nogueras, E. González-Mazo, P.A. Lara-Martín, Degradation kinetics of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in surface waters: photolysis vs biodegradation, Science of the Total Environment 590 –591 (2017) 643 –654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.015 2017

  8. [8]

    Dewil, D

    R. Dewil, D. Mantzavinos, I. Poulios, M.A. Rodrigo, New perspectives for Advanced Oxidation Processes, J. Environ. Manage. 195 (2017) 93 –99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.010 2017

  9. [9]

    Saharan, D

    V.K. Saharan, D. V. Pinjari, P.R. Gogate, A.B. Pandit, Advanced Oxidation Technologies for Wastewater Treatment: An Overview, in: Industrial Wastewater Treatment, Recycling and Reuse, Elsevier Inc., 2014: pp. 141 –191. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-099968-5.00003-9

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-099968-5.00003-9 2014

  10. [10]

    Oxygen Reduction on Platinum Single Crystal Electrodes, 2018

    2018

  11. [11]

    Oliveira, M.C

    J.T. Oliveira, M.C. de Sousa, I.A. Martins, L.M.G. de Sena, T.R. Nogueira, C.B. Vidal, E.F.A. Neto, F.B. Romero, O.S. Campos, R.F. do Nascimento, Electrocoagulation/oxidation/flotation by direct pulsed current applied to the removal of antibiotics from Br azilian WWTP effluents, Electrochim. Acta 388 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138499. 45

    work page doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138499 2021

  12. [13]

    Machado Fernandes, A.O

    C. Machado Fernandes, A.O. Santos, V.S. Antonin, J.P.C. Moura, A.B. Trench, O.C. Alves, Y. Xing, J.C.M. Silva, M.C. Santos, Magnetic field-enhanced oxygen reduction reaction for electrochemical hydrogen peroxide production with different cerium oxide nanostructures, Chemical Engineering Journal 488 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.150947

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.150947 2024

  13. [14]

    W. Liu, R. Chen, Z. Sang, M. Zheng, Z. Li, J. Nie, Q. Jiang, L. Yin, F. Hou, J. Liang, Efficient and economic H2O2 electrosynthesis via two -electron oxygen reduction reaction enabled by dynamically reconstructed Mn(*OH)-N3O-C motif and coupled alcohol oxidation, Journal of Energy Chemistry 108 (2025) 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2025.04.058

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2025.04.058 2025

  14. [15]

    Cordeiro-Junior, J

    P.J.M. Cordeiro-Junior, J. Lobato Bajo, M.R.D.V. Lanza, M.A. Rodrigo Rodrigo, Highly Efficient Electrochemical Production of Hydrogen Peroxide Using the GDE Technology, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 61 (2022) 10660 –10669. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c01669

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.2c01669 2022

  15. [16]

    Assumpção, R.F.B

    M.H.M.T. Assumpção, R.F.B. De Souza, D.C. Rascio, J.C.M. Silva, M.L. Calegaro, I. Gaubeur, T.R.L.C. Paixão, P. Hammer, M.R.V. Lanza, M.C. Santos, A comparative study of the electrogeneration of hydrogen peroxide using Vulcan and Printex carbon supports, Ca rbon N. Y. 49 (2011) 2842 –2851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.014 2011

  16. [17]

    Trench, C.M

    A.B. Trench, C.M. Fernandes, J.P.C. Moura, L.E.B. Lucchetti, T.S. Lima, V.S. Antonin, J.M. de Almeida, P. Autreto, I. Robles, A.J. Motheo, M.R.V. Lanza, M.C. Santos, Hydrogen peroxide electrogeneration from O2 electroreduction: A review focusing on carbon electrocatalysts and environmental applications, Chemosphere 352 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ch...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141456 2024

  17. [19]

    Perry, D

    S.C. Perry, D. Pangotra, L. Vieira, L.I. Csepei, V. Sieber, L. Wang, C. Ponce de León, F.C. Walsh, Electrochemical synthesis of hydrogen peroxide from water and oxygen, Nat. Rev. Chem. 3 (2019) 442 –458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-019- 0110-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41570-019- 2019

  18. [20]

    Niculescu, C

    A.G. Niculescu, C. Chircov, A.M. Grumezescu, Magnetite nanoparticles: Synthesis methods – A comparative review, Methods 199 (2022) 16 –27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.04.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.04.018 2022

  19. [21]

    Muzenda, O

    C. Muzenda, O. V. Nkwachukwu, K.D. Jayeola, O. Zinyemba, M. Zhou, O.A. Arotiba, Heterogenous electro -Fenton degradation of sulfamethoxazole on a polyethylene glycol -coated magnetite nanoparticles catalyst, Chemosphere 339 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139698. 46

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139698 2023

  20. [22]

    Barros, Q

    W.R.P. Barros, Q. Wei, G. Zhang, S. Sun, M.R.V. Lanza, A.C. Tavares, Oxygen reduction to hydrogen peroxide on Fe3O4 nanoparticles supported on Printex carbon and Graphene, Electrochim. Acta 162 (2015) 263 –270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.175

    work page doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.175 2015

  21. [23]

    Gentil, L.E.B

    T.C. Gentil, L.E.B. Lucchetti, J.P.C. Moura, J.C.M. Silva, M. Minichova, V. Briega-Martos, A.B. Trench, B.L. Batista, S. Cherevko, M.C. Santos, Fe3O4 nano- octahedra and SnO2 nanorods modifying low -Pd amount electrocatalysts for alkaline direct ethanol fue l cells, Electrochim. Acta 535 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2025.146576

    work page doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2025.146576 2025

  22. [24]

    Zhang, J

    W. Zhang, J. Li, Z. Wei, Carbon-based catalysts of the oxygen reduction reaction: Mechanistic understanding and porous structures, Chinese Journal of Catalysis 48 (2023) 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(23)64427-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s1872-2067(23)64427-4 2023

  23. [25]

    Moura, V.S

    J.P.C. Moura, V.S. Antonin, A.B. Trench, M.C. Santos, Hydrogen peroxide electrosynthesis: A comparative study employing Vulcan carbon modification by different MnO2 nanostructures, Electrochim. Acta 463 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142852

    work page doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142852 2023

  24. [26]

    Borenstein, O

    A. Borenstein, O. Hanna, R. Attias, S. Luski, T. Brousse, D. Aurbach, Carbon - based composite materials for supercapacitor electrodes: A review, J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 5 (2017) 12653–12672. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta00863e

    work page doi:10.1039/c7ta00863e 2017

  25. [27]

    R. Ma, G. Lin, Y. Zhou, Q. Liu, T. Zhang, G. Shan, M. Yang, J. Wang, A review of oxygen reduction mechanisms for metal-free carbon-based electrocatalysts, NPJ Comput. Mater. 5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-019-0210-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-019-0210-3 2019

  26. [28]

    Salmerón, I

    I. Salmerón, I. Oller, K. V. Plakas, S. Malato, Carbon-based cathodes degradation during electro-Fenton treatment at pilot scale: Changes in H2O2 electrogeneration, Chemosphere 275 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129962

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129962 2021

  27. [29]

    Prato, V

    R.A. Prato, V. Van Vught, S. Eggermont, G. Pozo, P. Marin, J. Fransaer, X. Dominguez-Benetton, Gas Diffusion Electrodes on the Electrosynthesis of Controllable Iron Oxide Nanoparticles, Sci. Rep. 9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51185-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-019-51185-x 2019

  28. [30]

    Geraldino, T.K.F.S

    H.C.L. Geraldino, T.K.F.S. Freitas, D.D. Manholer, F. França, J.H. Oliveira, E.A. Volnistem, A.R.F. Lima, M. Bertotti, E.M. Girotto, J.C. Garcia, Electrochemical generation of H2O2 using gas diffusion electrode improved with rGO intensified with the Fe3O4/GO catalyst for degradation of textile wastewater, Journal of Water Process Engineering 36 (2020). ht...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101377 2020

  29. [31]

    L. Wang, G. Chen, H. Shu, X. Cui, Z. Luo, C. Chang, A. Zeng, J. Zhang, Q. Fu, Facile covalent preparation of carbon nanotubes / amine -functionalized Fe3O4 nanocomposites for selective extraction of estradiol in pharmaceutical industry wastewater, J. Chrom atogr. A 1638 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2021.461889

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2021.461889 2021

  30. [33]

    Larrea, V

    A. Larrea, V. Sebastian, A. Ibarra, M. Arruebo, J. Santamaria, Gas Slug Microfluidics: A Unique Tool for Ultrafast, Highly Controlled Growth of Iron Oxide Nanostructures, Chemistry of Materials 27 (2015) 4254 –4260. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00284

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00284 2015

  31. [34]

    Souza, P

    F.M. Souza, P. Böhnstedt, V.S. Pinheiro, L.A. Oliveira, B.L. Batista, L.S. Parreira, R.A. Antunes, M.C. Santos, Niobium increasing the electrocatalytic activity of palladium for alkaline direct ethanol fuel cell, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 858 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.113824

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.113824 2020

  32. [35]

    Trench, J.P.C

    A.B. Trench, J.P.C. Moura, C.M. Fernandes, M.C. Santos, Effect of fluorine doping on the electrocatalytic properties of Nb2O5 for H2O2 electrogeneration, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 992 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2025.119231

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2025.119231 2025

  33. [36]

    T. O. Silva, J. Fernandez-Cascán, J. Isidro, C. Saez, M.R. Marcos, M.A. Rodrigo, Degradation of real lindane wastes using advanced oxidation technologies based on electrogenerated hydrogen peroxide, Process Safety and Environmental Protection 180 (2023) 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.10.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.psep.2023.10.031 2023

  34. [37]

    Sánchez-Montes, G

    I. Sánchez-Montes, G. O. S. Santos, T. O. Silva, R. Colombo, M. R. V. Lanza, An innovative approach to the application of electrochemical processes based on the in-situ generation of H2O2 for water treatment, J. Clean. Prod. 392 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136242

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136242 2023

  35. [38]

    Kronka, G

    M.S. Kronka, G. V. Fortunato, L. Mira, A.J. dos Santos, M.R.V. Lanza, Using Au NPs anchored on ZrO2/carbon black toward more efficient H2O2 electrogeneration in flow -by reactor for carbaryl removal in real wastewater, Chemical Engineering Journal 452 (202 3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.139598

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cej.2022.139598 2022

  36. [39]

    Nogueira, M.C

    R.F.P. Nogueira, M.C. Oliveira, W.C. Paterlini, Simple and fast spectrophotometric determination of H2O 2 in photo -Fenton reactions using metavanadate, Talanta 66 (2005) 86 –91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2004.10.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2004.10.001 2005

  37. [40]

    Hübner, S

    U. Hübner, S. Spahr, H. Lutze, A. Wieland, S. Rüting, W. Gernjak, J. Wenk, Advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment – Guidance for systematic future research, Heliyon 10 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30402

    work page doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30402 2024

  38. [41]

    B., Ünal, S

    P. Geladi, J. Linderholm, 2.03 - Principal Component Analysis, in: Comprehensive Chemometrics: Chemical and Biochemical Data Analysis, Second Edition: Four Volume Set, Elsevier, 2020: pp. 17 –37. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978 -0-12- 409547-2.14892-9

    work page doi:10.1016/b978 2020

  39. [42]

    Moura, L.E.B

    J.P.C. Moura, L.E.B. Lucchetti, C.M. Fernandes, A.B. Trench, C.N. Lange, B.L. Batista, J.M. Almeida, M.C. Santos, Experimental and theoretical studies of WO3/Vulcan XC-72 electrocatalyst enhanced H2O2 yield ORR performed in acid and alkaline medium, J. En viron. Chem. Eng. 12 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.113182. 48

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jece.2024.113182 2024

  40. [43]

    Bimbi Júnior, O.C

    F.E. Bimbi Júnior, O.C. Junior, R.S. Souto, J.P.P. Encide, M.M. Baruch, M.C.V. Felipe, L. Fernandes, I.F. Araujo, C.H.M. Fernandes, I.G.S. Oliveira, K.M. Honorio, R. Colombo, V.R. Mastelaro, W.R.P. Barros, M.R.V. Lanza, In -situ electrogeneration of H2O2 a nd hydroxyl radical applied for venlafaxine degradation: A novel strategy using FeSe2 -modified carb...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cej.2025.164432 2025

  41. [44]

    Hassanzadeh-Tabrizi, Precise calculation of crystallite size of nanomaterials: A review, J

    S.A. Hassanzadeh-Tabrizi, Precise calculation of crystallite size of nanomaterials: A review, J. Alloys Compd. 968 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171914

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171914 2023

  42. [45]

    W. Lei, Y. Liu, X. Si, J. Xu, W. Du, J. Yang, T. Zhou, J. Lin, Synthesis and magnetic properties of octahedral Fe3O4 via a one-pot hydrothermal route, Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics 381 (2017) 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2016.09.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2016.09.018 2017

  43. [46]

    T. Han, X. Jin, C. Li, L. Zhang, Y. Lei, One -pot hydrothermal synthesis and magnetic properties of octahedral and clover -structured Fe3O4 by a Ce cation - assisted route, Mater. Lett. 92 (2013) 184 –187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2012.10.095

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2012.10.095 2013

  44. [47]

    Liang, Y

    Y. Liang, Y. Han, J. sha Li, J. Wang, D. Liu, Q. Fan, Wettability control in electrocatalyst: A mini review, Journal of Energy Chemistry 70 (2022) 643 –655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2021.09.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2021.09.005 2022

  45. [48]

    Z. Hou, P. Yan, B. Sun, H. Elshekh, B. Yan, An excellent soft magnetic Fe/Fe3O4- FeSiAl composite with high permeability and low core loss, Results Phys. 14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102498

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102498 2019

  46. [49]

    Zhang, C

    W. Zhang, C. Jiang, H. Guan, Y. Wang, Y. Hu, W. Wang, W. Tian, L. Hao, Unlocking OER catalytic potential and chiral Fe3O4 film as a game -changer for electrochemical water oxidation pathway and by -product control, Mater. Adv. 5 (2024) 1340–1347. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ma00854a

    work page doi:10.1039/d3ma00854a 2024

  47. [50]

    Estrade-Szwarckopf, XPS photoemission in carbonaceous materials: A “defect” peak beside the graphitic asymmetric peak, Carbon N

    H. Estrade-Szwarckopf, XPS photoemission in carbonaceous materials: A “defect” peak beside the graphitic asymmetric peak, Carbon N. Y. 42 (2004) 1713 –1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2004.03.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2004.03.005 2004

  48. [51]

    Morgan, Comments on the XPS Analysis of Carbon Materials, C (Basel)

    D.J. Morgan, Comments on the XPS Analysis of Carbon Materials, C (Basel). 7 (2021) 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/c7030051

    work page doi:10.3390/c7030051 2021

  49. [52]

    Alves Felisardo, C.H

    R.J. Alves Felisardo, C.H. Magalhães Fernandes, G. de Oliveira Santiago Santos, M.R. de Vasconcelos Lanza, Unlocking the potential of in situ H2O2 generation in urine as a decentralized electro -sanitation strategy, Chemical Engineering Journal 507 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.160391

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cej.2025.160391 2025

  50. [53]

    Y. Qiao, N. Ren, X. Li, J. An, X. Wang, N. Li, Electrochemical production of H2O2 with 100% current efficiency and strong stability by adjusting the interfacial side reactions of air-breathing cathodes, Chemical Engineering Journal 463 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.142417. 49

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.142417 2023

  51. [54]

    Zhang, M

    Y. Zhang, M. Gao, S.G. Wang, W. Zhou, Y. Sang, X.H. Wang, Integrated electro- Fenton process enabled by a rotating Fe3O4/gas diffusion cathode for simultaneous generation and activation of H2O2, Electrochim. Acta 231 (2017) 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.091

    work page doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.091 2017

  52. [55]

    P. V. Nidheesh, G. Divyapriya, N. Oturan, C. Trellu, M.A. Oturan, Environmental Applications of Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes: 1. Applications in Water and Wastewater Treatment, ChemElectroChem 6 (2019) 2124 –2142. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.201801876

    work page doi:10.1002/celc.201801876 2019

  53. [56]

    Comninellis, ELECTROCATALYSIS IN THE ELECTROCHEMICAL CONVERSION/COMBUSTION OF ORGANIC POLLUTANTS FOR WASTE WATER TREATMENT, 1994

    C. Comninellis, ELECTROCATALYSIS IN THE ELECTROCHEMICAL CONVERSION/COMBUSTION OF ORGANIC POLLUTANTS FOR WASTE WATER TREATMENT, 1994

    1994

  54. [57]

    Martínez-Huitle, S

    C.A. Martínez-Huitle, S. Ferro, Electrochemical oxidation of organic pollutants for the wastewater treatment: Direct and indirect processes, Chem. Soc. Rev. 35 (2006) 1324–1340. https://doi.org/10.1039/b517632h

    work page doi:10.1039/b517632h 2006

  55. [58]

    García Morales, I

    B.D. García Morales, I. F․ Mena, O.A. Jaramillo -Quintero, C. Sáez Jiménez, H. Olvera-Vargas, M.A. Rodrigo Rodrigo, Intensifying paired hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) electrosynthesis: Influence of electrolyte composition and light irradiation, Electrochim. Acta 533 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2025.146551

    work page doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2025.146551 2025

  56. [59]

    Oturan, M.A

    N. Oturan, M.A. Oturan, Electro-fenton process: Background, new developments, and applications, in: Electrochemical Water and Wastewater Treatment, Elsevier, 2018: pp. 193–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813160-2.00008-0

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813160-2.00008-0 2018

  57. [60]

    Santana -Martínez, G

    G. Santana -Martínez, G. Roa -Morales, E.M. Del Campo, R. Romero, B.A. Frontana-Uribe, R. Natividad, Electro-Fenton and Electro-Fenton-like with in situ electrogeneration of H2O2 and catalyst applied to 4 -chlorophenol mineralization, Electrochim. Acta 195 ( 2016) 246 –256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.093

    work page doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.093 2016

  58. [61]

    Brillas, I

    E. Brillas, I. Sirés, M.A. Oturan, Electro -fenton process and related electrochemical technologies based on fenton’s reaction chemistry, Chem. Rev. 109 (2009) 6570–6631. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900136g

    work page doi:10.1021/cr900136g 2009

  59. [62]

    Brillas, I

    E. Brillas, I. Sirés, Hybrid and sequential chemical and electrochemical processes for water decontamination, in: Electrochemical Water and Wastewater Treatment, Elsevier, 2018: pp. 267–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813160-2.00011- 0

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813160-2.00011- 2018

  60. [63]

    Martínez-Huitle, M.A

    C.A. Martínez-Huitle, M.A. Rodrigo, I. Sirés, O. Scialdone, A critical review on latest innovations and future challenges of electrochemical technology for the abatement of organics in water, Appl. Catal. B 328 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122430

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122430 2023

  61. [64]

    Ridruejo, C

    C. Ridruejo, C. Salazar, P.L. Cabot, F. Centellas, E. Brillas, I. Sirés, Electrochemical oxidation of anesthetic tetracaine in aqueous medium. Influence of the anode and matrix composition, Chemical Engineering Journal 326 (2017) 811–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.139. 50

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.139 2017

  62. [65]

    Fernandes, E

    C.M. Fernandes, E. Brillas, M.C. Santos, S. Garcia -Segura, Electro -Fenton treatment of benzophenone -4 solutions: A sustainable approach for its removal using an air-diffusion cathode, Process Safety and Environmental Protection 199 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2025.107342

    work page doi:10.1016/j.psep.2025.107342 2025