Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.14471 v1 pith:VQTPFXHY submitted 2023-05-23 cs.CL

CGCE: A Chinese Generative Chat Evaluation Benchmark for General and Financial Domains

classification cs.CL
keywords chatbenchmarkcgcechinesegenerativemodelsevaluationfinancial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative chat models, such as ChatGPT and GPT-4, have revolutionized natural language generation (NLG) by incorporating instructions and human feedback to achieve significant performance improvements. However, the lack of standardized evaluation benchmarks for chat models, particularly for Chinese and domain-specific models, hinders their assessment and progress. To address this gap, we introduce the Chinese Generative Chat Evaluation (CGCE) benchmark, focusing on general and financial domains. The CGCE benchmark encompasses diverse tasks, including 200 questions in the general domain and 150 specific professional questions in the financial domain. Manual scoring evaluates factors such as accuracy, coherence, expression clarity, and completeness. The CGCE benchmark provides researchers with a standardized framework to assess and compare Chinese generative chat models, fostering advancements in NLG research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fin-Bias: Comprehensive Evaluation for LLM Decision-Making under human bias in Finance Domain

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LLMs copy biased analyst ratings in investment decisions but a new detection method encourages independent reasoning and can improve stock return predictions beyond human levels.

  2. TaxPraBen: A Scalable Benchmark for Structured Evaluation of LLMs in Chinese Real-World Tax Practice

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TaxPraBen is a new benchmark with 14 datasets and a structured evaluation method for measuring LLM performance on Chinese real-world tax tasks and scenarios.