pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.02111 · v2 · pith:VSTUG4KZnew · submitted 2026-02-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.other

Intersubband electric dipole spin resonance in transition metal dichalcogenide heterobilayers

K.K. Grigoryan , M.M. Glazov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 13:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.other
keywords electric dipole spin resonancetransition metal dichalcogenidesheterobilayersspin-orbit couplingRashba effectintersubband transitionsoptical selection rulesconduction band spin splitting
0
0 comments X

The pith

Reduced symmetry in transition metal dichalcogenide heterobilayers lets an electric field couple and flip spins between conduction subbands.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a theory showing that heterobilayers of transition metal dichalcogenides allow electric fields to drive spin-flip transitions between split conduction bands. Symmetry analysis reveals that the lower symmetry of the bilayer, unlike a monolayer, mixes states so that an electric field produces a nonzero transition matrix element. The underlying process is spin-orbit coupling that mixes Bloch waves from different conduction bands and also generates linear-in-momentum Rashba terms in the effective Hamiltonian. Selection rules are worked out for each of the six high-symmetry stackings. Estimates indicate the resulting electric-dipole spin resonance rate greatly exceeds the conventional magnetic-dipole rate.

Core claim

The central claim is that inter-spin-subband electric dipole spin resonance becomes allowed in TMD heterobilayers because their reduced symmetry permits an electric field to couple the conduction-band spin subbands. The microscopic mechanism is spin-orbit coupling that mixes Bloch states belonging to different conduction bands, thereby creating a finite momentum matrix element between the spin-split states and producing linear-in-wavevector spin-dependent terms in the effective Hamiltonian. Optical selection rules are established for all six high-symmetry stacking configurations, and the electric-dipole spin-flip transition rate is shown to be substantially larger than the magnetic-dipole (E

What carries the argument

Spin-orbit coupling induced mixing of Bloch states from different conduction bands that produces a nonzero momentum matrix element between spin-split subbands and linear-in-k Rashba-like terms.

If this is right

  • Electric fields can replace magnetic fields for resonant spin manipulation in these bilayers.
  • Each of the six high-symmetry stackings obeys its own set of optical selection rules for the spin-flip transition.
  • The same mixing mechanism necessarily generates Rashba spin-orbit terms in the effective low-energy Hamiltonian.
  • Intersubband optical excitation becomes a direct probe of spin-flip processes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Electric control of spins may allow lower-power or higher-speed spintronic operations than magnetic control in van-der-Waals heterostructures.
  • The effect should be testable by applying in-plane THz or microwave electric fields to encapsulated heterobilayer samples while monitoring spin polarization via Kerr rotation.
  • Analogous symmetry lowering in other stacked 2D semiconductors could produce comparable electric-dipole spin resonances.

Load-bearing premise

The reduced symmetry of the heterobilayer is sufficient to allow an electric field to produce a nonzero matrix element between the two conduction-band spin subbands.

What would settle it

A measurement that finds no detectable electric-field-driven spin resonance signal at frequencies corresponding to the conduction-band spin splitting, or finds the electric-dipole rate comparable to or smaller than the magnetic-dipole rate, would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.02111 by K.K. Grigoryan, M.M. Glazov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Top view of the monolayer TMDC lattice struc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Illustration of heterobilayer in AA/Rh h stack￾ing. Orange and magenta balls show transition metal atoms. For clarity two chalcogen atoms are represented by one blue ball. (b) Various possible high-symmetry stacking configura￾tions of two monolayers. In H -type stackings, the layers are rotated relative to each other, while R-type stackings main￾tain unrotated layer alignment [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The theory of inter-spin-subband electric dipole spin resonance in transition metal dichalcogenide heterobilayers is proposed. Our symmetry analysis demonstrates that, in contrast to monolayers, the reduced symmetry of heterobilayers enables coupling between conduction band spin subbands by an electric field. We establish the optical selection rules for all six high-symmetry stacking configurations. The microscopic mechanism of the effect is identified as the spin-orbit coupling induced mixing of Bloch states from different conduction bands, which generates a non-zero momentum matrix element between the spin-split states. It also leads to the linear-in-wavevector spin-dependent terms in the effective Hamiltonian, i.e., the Rashba effect. Our estimates show that the rate of electric-dipole spin-flip transitions exceeds by far that of the magnetic-dipole transitions in transition metal dichalcogenide heterobilayers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theory of intersubband electric-dipole spin resonance in TMD heterobilayers. Symmetry analysis establishes that the reduced symmetry of the heterobilayer (unlike monolayers) permits an in-plane or out-of-plane electric field to couple the spin-split conduction-band subbands. The microscopic origin is traced to SOC-induced mixing of Bloch states belonging to different conduction bands, which produces a finite momentum matrix element between the spin subbands and generates linear-in-k Rashba terms. Optical selection rules are derived for all six high-symmetry stackings, and order-of-magnitude estimates are given showing that the resulting electric-dipole spin-flip rates greatly exceed the magnetic-dipole rates.

Significance. If the central claims are confirmed, the work is significant for spintronics and quantum control in 2D materials: it identifies a symmetry-allowed, electrically driven spin-flip channel that is parametrically stronger than the conventional magnetic-dipole mechanism. The exhaustive treatment of selection rules across the six stackings supplies concrete, falsifiable predictions for experiment. The explicit link between SOC mixing, the Rashba Hamiltonian, and the intersubband matrix element constitutes a clean microscopic derivation that can be checked by ab-initio or tight-binding calculations.

major comments (1)
  1. §4 (rate estimates): the statement that electric-dipole rates 'exceed by far' the magnetic-dipole rates is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the comparison is presented only as an order-of-magnitude estimate without explicit numerical values for the Rashba coefficient, the interband momentum matrix element, or the applied electric-field strength. A short table or paragraph giving the concrete parameters and the resulting ratio would make the quantitative superiority verifiable.
minor comments (3)
  1. Figure 2: the schematic of the six stackings would benefit from an explicit indication of the coordinate axes and the direction of the applied electric field for each panel.
  2. Eq. (12): the definition of the effective Rashba parameter should be cross-referenced to the microscopic momentum matrix element derived in §3.2 so that the connection between the two is immediate.
  3. References: several recent experimental papers on electric-dipole spin resonance in TMD monolayers and bilayers are absent; adding them would place the heterobilayer prediction in clearer context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and the recommendation of minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [—] §4 (rate estimates): the statement that electric-dipole rates 'exceed by far' the magnetic-dipole rates is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the comparison is presented only as an order-of-magnitude estimate without explicit numerical values for the Rashba coefficient, the interband momentum matrix element, or the applied electric-field strength. A short table or paragraph giving the concrete parameters and the resulting ratio would make the quantitative superiority verifiable.

    Authors: We agree that providing explicit numerical values would make the comparison more verifiable and strengthen the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a short table (or dedicated paragraph) in §4 that lists the specific values employed for the Rashba coefficient, the interband momentum matrix element, and the applied electric-field strength, together with the resulting ratio of electric-dipole to magnetic-dipole transition rates. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper's central derivation begins with symmetry analysis of reduced symmetry in heterobilayers (contrasted to monolayers) and the microscopic SOC-induced mixing of Bloch states, which directly yields nonzero momentum matrix elements and Rashba terms. Optical selection rules for the six stackings and the rate comparison follow from these without any fitted input renamed as prediction, self-definitional loop, or load-bearing self-citation. The final estimate that electric-dipole spin-flip rates exceed magnetic-dipole rates is a direct consequence of the established coupling strength, not a reduction to the inputs by construction. No steps match the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the premise that heterobilayer symmetry is sufficiently reduced to allow electric-field coupling and on the standard role of spin-orbit coupling in mixing conduction-band Bloch states.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Reduced symmetry of heterobilayers enables coupling between conduction band spin subbands by an electric field
    Invoked in the symmetry analysis that contrasts heterobilayers with monolayers.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5687 in / 1335 out tokens · 55519 ms · 2026-05-21T13:48:31.598065+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. V. Kolobov and J. Tominaga,Two-Dimensional Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides(Springer Interna- tional Publishing, 2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    G. Wang, A. Chernikov, M. M. Glazov, T. F. Heinz, X. Marie, T. Amand, and B. Urbaszek, Colloquium: Excitons in atomically thin transition metal dichalco- genides, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 021001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    M. V. Durnev and M. M. Glazov, Excitons and trions in two-dimensional semiconductors based on transition metal dichalcogenides, Physics-Uspekhi61, 825 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Glazov, A

    M. Glazov, A. Arora, A. Chaves, and Y. G. Gobato, Exci- tons in two-dimensional materials and heterostructures: Optical and magneto-optical properties, MRS Bulletin 49, 899 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Schneider, M

    C. Schneider, M. M. Glazov, T. Korn, S. H¨ ofling, and B. Urbaszek, Two-dimensional semiconductors in the regime of strong light-matter coupling, Nature Commu- nications9, 2695 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    G. Kipp, H. M. Bretscher, B. Schulte, D. Herrmann, K. Kusyak, M. W. Day, S. Kesavan, T. Matsuyama, X. Li, S. M. Langner, J. Hagelstein, F. Sturm, A. M. Potts, C. J. Eckhardt, Y. Huang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Rubio, D. M. Kennes, M. A. Sentef, E. Baudin, G. Meier, M. H. Michael, and J. W. McIver, Cavity electrodynamics of van der Waals heterostruc- ...

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Thakar and S

    K. Thakar and S. Lodha, Optoelectronic and photonic devices based on transition metal dichalcogenides, Mate- 7 rials Research Express7, 014002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Xiao, G.-B

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Cou- pled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 196802 (2012)

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    Kormanyos, G

    A. Kormanyos, G. Burkard, M. Gmitra, J. Fabian, V. Z´ olyomi, N. D. Drummond, and V. Fal’ko,k·pthe- ory for two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors, 2D Materials2, 022001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    K. F. Mak, K. He, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS2 by optical helicity, Nat Nano7, 494 (2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Kioseoglou, A

    G. Kioseoglou, A. T. Hanbicki, M. Currie, A. L. Fried- man, D. Gunlycke, and B. T. Jonker, Valley polarization and intervalley scattering in monolayer MoS2, Applied Physics Letters101, 221907 (2012)

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Lagarde, L

    D. Lagarde, L. Bouet, X. Marie, C. R. Zhu, B. L. Liu, T. Amand, P. H. Tan, and B. Urbaszek, Carrier and po- larization dynamics in monolayer MoS2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 047401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Tokman, Y

    M. Tokman, Y. Wang, and A. Belyanin, Valley entan- glement of excitons in monolayers of transition-metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B92, 075409 (2015)

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    M. M. Glazov and E. L. Ivchenko, Valley orientation of electrons and excitons in atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers (brief review), JETP Letters 113, 7 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Mourzidis, V

    K. Mourzidis, V. Jindal, M. Glazov, A. Balocchi, C. Robert, D. Lagarde, P. Renucci, L. Lombez, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, T. Amand, S. Francoeur, and X. Marie, Exciton formation in two-dimensional semiconductors, Phys. Rev. X15, 031078 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    A. K. Geim and I. V. Grigorieva, Van der Waals het- erostructures, Nature499, 419 (2013)

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    J. Kang, S. Tongay, J. Zhou, J. Li, and J. Wu, Band offsets and heterostructures of two-dimensional semicon- ductors, Applied Physics Letters102, 012111 (2013)

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    Castellanos-Gomez, X

    A. Castellanos-Gomez, X. Duan, Z. Fei, H. R. Gutierrez, Y. Huang, X. Huang, J. Quereda, Q. Qian, E. Sutter, and P. Sutter, Van der Waals heterostructures, Nature Reviews Methods Primers2, 58 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Hagel, S

    J. Hagel, S. Brem, C. Linder¨ alv, P. Erhart, and E. Malic, Exciton landscape in van der Waals heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 043217 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Zhang, C.-P

    C. Zhang, C.-P. Chuu, X. Ren, M.-Y. Li, L.-J. Li, C. Jin, M.-Y. Chou, and C.-K. Shih, Interlayer couplings, Moir´ e patterns, and 2D electronic superlattices in MoS2/WSe2 hetero-bilayers, Science Advances3, e1601459 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Y. Xu, S. Liu, D. A. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, V. Elser, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Correlated in- sulating states at fractional fillings of moir´ e superlattices, Nature587, 214 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    T. Li, S. Jiang, L. Li, Y. Zhang, K. Kang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Chowdhury, L. Fu, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Continuous Mott transition in semiconductor moir´ e superlattices, Nature597, 350 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    H. Baek, M. Brotons-Gisbert, A. Campbell, V. Vitale, J. Lischner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and B. D. Ger- ardot, Optical read-out of Coulomb staircases in a moir´ e superlattice via trapped interlayer trions, Nature Nan- otechnology16, 1237 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Ciorciaro, T

    L. Ciorciaro, T. Smole´ nski, I. Morera, N. Kiper, S. Hies- tand, M. Kroner, Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Demler, and A.˙Imamo˘ glu, Kinetic magnetism in tri- angular moir´ e materials, Nature623, 509 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Q. Tan, A. Rasmita, Z. Zhang, H. Cai, X. Cai, X. Dai, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDon- ald, and W. Gao, Layer-dependent correlated phases in WSe2/MoS2 moir´ esuperlattice,NatureMaterials22,605 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Yu, G.-B

    H. Yu, G.-B. Liu, and W. Yao, Brightened spin-triplet interlayer excitons and optical selection rules in van der Waals heterobilayers, 2D Materials5, 035021 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    F¨ org, L

    M. F¨ org, L. Colombier, R. K. Patel, J. Lindlau, A. D. Mohite, H. Yamaguchi, M. M. Glazov, D. Hunger, and A. H¨ ogele, Cavity-control of interlayer excitons in van der Waals heterostructures, Nature Communications10, 3697 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    S. Zhao, Z. Li, X. Huang, A. Rupp, J. G¨ oser, I. A. Vovk, S. Y. Kruchinin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, I. Bilgin, A. S. Baimuratov, and A. H¨ ogele, Excitons in mesoscop- ically reconstructed moir´ e heterostructures, Nature Nan- otechnology18, 572 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Song and H

    Y. Song and H. Dery, Transport theory of mono- layer transition-metal dichalcogenides through symme- try, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 026601 (2013)

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    Lagarde, M

    D. Lagarde, M. Glazov, V. Jindal, K. Mourzidis, I. Ger- ber, A. Balocchi, L. Lombez, P. Renucci, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, C. Robert, and X. Marie, Efficient electron spin relaxation by chiral phonons inWSe2 monolayers, Phys. Rev. B110, 195403 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    G. Wang, C. Robert, M. M. Glazov, F. Cadiz, E. Cour- tade, T. Amand, D. Lagarde, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, B. Urbaszek, and X. Marie, In-plane propagation of light in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers: Op- tical selection rules, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 047401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Z. Y. Zhu, Y. C. Cheng, and U. Schwingenschl¨ ogl, Gi- ant spin-orbit-induced spin splitting in two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenide semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B84, 153402 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    Ko´ smider, J

    K. Ko´ smider, J. W. Gonz´ alez, and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Large spin splitting in the conduction band of transi- tion metal dichalcogenide monolayers, Phys. Rev. B88, 245436 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    J. P. Echeverry, B. Urbaszek, T. Amand, X. Marie, and I. C. Gerber, Splitting between bright and dark exci- tonsintransitionmetaldichalcogenidemonolayers,Phys. Rev. B93, 121107 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Ganichev and W

    S. Ganichev and W. Prettl,Intense terahertz excitation of semiconductors(Oxford Science Publications, 2006)

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    Leinß, T

    S. Leinß, T. Kampfrath, K. v. Volkmann, M. Wolf, J. T. Steiner, M. Kira, S. W. Koch, A. Leitenstorfer, and R. Huber, Terahertz coherent control of optically dark paraexcitons in Cu2O, Physical Review Letters101, 246401 (2008)

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    Poellmann, P

    C. Poellmann, P. Steinleitner, U. Leierseder, P. Nagler, G. Plechinger, M. Porer, R. Bratschitsch, C. Schuller, T. Korn, and R. Huber, Resonant internal quantum tran- sitions and femtosecond radiative decay of excitons in monolayer WSe2, Nat Mater14, 889 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    E. J. Sie, C. H. Lui, Y.-H. Lee, L. Fu, J. Kong, and N. Gedik, Large, valley-exclusive bloch-siegert shift in monolayer WS2, Science355, 1066 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    C.-K. Yong, M. I. B. Utama, C. S. Ong, T. Cao, E. C. Regan, J. Horng, Y. Shen, H. Cai, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, H. Deng, A. Zettl, S. G. Louie, and F. Wang, Valley-dependent exciton fine struc- 8 ture and Autler–Townes doublets from Berry phases in monolayer MoSe2, Nature Materials18, 1065 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Langer, C

    F. Langer, C. P. Schmid, S. Schlauderer, M. Gmitra, J.Fabian, P.Nagler, C.Sch¨ uller, T.Korn, P.G.Hawkins, J. T. Steiner, U. Huttner, S. W. Koch, M. Kira, and R.Huber,Lightwavevalleytronicsinamonolayeroftung- sten diselenide, Nature557, 76 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Venanzi, M

    T. Venanzi, M. Selig, S. Winnerl, A. Pashkin, A. Knorr, M. Helm, and H. Schneider, Terahertz-induced energy transfer from hot carriers to trions in a MoSe2 monolayer, ACS Photonics8, 2931 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Erkensten, T

    T.Venanzi, M.Cuccu, R.Perea-Causin, X.Sun, S.Brem, D. Erkensten, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, E. Malic, M.Helm, S.Winnerl,andA.Chernikov,Ultrafastswitch- ingoftrionsin2Dmaterialsbyterahertzphotons,Nature Photonics18, 1344 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Cuccu, T

    M. Cuccu, T. Venanzi, E. Wietek, X. Sun, R. Perea- Causin, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, E. Malic, M. Helm, S. Winnerl, and A. Chernikov, Terahertz-induced popu- lation transfer between exciton complexes in monolayer wse2, Phys. Rev. B112, 205302 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    E. I. Rashba and V. I. Sheka, Symmetry of energy bands in crystals of wurtzite type. II. Symmetry of bands with spin-orbit interaction included, Fiz. Tverd. Tela: Col- lected Papers2, 162 (1959)

    work page 1959

  45. [45]

    E. I. Rashba, Properties of semiconductors with an ex- tremum loop. I. Cyclotron and combinational resonance in a magnetic field perpendicular to the plane of the loop, Sov. Phys. Solid State2, 1109 (1960)

    work page 1960

  46. [46]

    E. I. Rashba and A. L. Efros, Orbital mechanisms of electron-spin manipulation by an electric field, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 126405 (2003)

    work page 2003

  47. [47]

    Rashba and V

    E. Rashba and V. Sheka, Electric-dipole spin resonances, inModern Problems in Condensed Matter Sciences, Vol. 27, edited by G. Landwehr and E. I. Rashba (El- sevier, 1991) Chap. 4, pp. 131–206

    work page 1991

  48. [48]

    M. I. Dyakonov, ed.,Spin physics in semiconductors, 2nd ed., Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences 157 (Springer International Publishing, 2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Barr´ e, O

    E. Barr´ e, O. Karni, E. Liu, A. L. O’Beirne, X. Chen, H. B. Ribeiro, L. Yu, B. Kim, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Barmak, C. H. Lui, S. Refaely- Abramson, F. H. da Jornada, and T. F. Heinz, Opti- cal absorption of interlayer excitons in transition-metal dichalcogenide heterostructures, Science376, 406 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Wietek, M

    E. Wietek, M. Florian, J. G¨ oser, T. Taniguchi, K.Watan- abe, A. H¨ ogele, M. M. Glazov, A. Steinhoff, and A. Chernikov, Nonlinear and negative effective diffusivity of interlayer excitons in moir´ e-free heterobilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 016202 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Steinhoff, E

    A. Steinhoff, E. Wietek, M. Florian, T. Schulz, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Zhao, A. H¨ ogele, F. Jahnke, and A. Chernikov, Exciton-exciton interac- tions in van der Waals heterobilayers, Phys. Rev. X14, 031025 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Burkard, and V

    A.Korm´ anyos, V.Z´ olyomi, N.D.Drummond, P.Rakyta, G. Burkard, and V. I. Fal’ko, Monolayer MoS2: Trigo- nal warping, theγvalley, and spin-orbit coupling effects, Phys. Rev. B88, 045416 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    M. M. Glazov, E. L. Ivchenko, G. Wang, T. Amand, X. Marie, B. Urbaszek, and B. L. Liu, Spin and valley dynamics of excitons in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, physica status solidi (b)252, 2349 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    G. F. Koster, R. G. Wheeler, J. O. Dimmock, and H. Statz,Properties of the thirty-two point groups(MIT Press, 1963)

    work page 1963

  55. [55]

    G. Wang, C. Robert, A. Suslu, B. Chen, S. Yang, S. Alamdari, I. C. Gerber, T. Amand, X. Marie, S. Ton- gay,andB.Urbaszek,Spin-orbitengineeringintransition metal dichalcogenide alloy monolayers, Nature Commu- nications6, 10110 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Korm´ anyos, V

    A. Korm´ anyos, V. Z´ olyomi, N. D. Drummond, and G. Burkard, Spin-orbit coupling, quantum dots, and qubits in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. X4, 011034 (2014)

    work page 2014

  57. [57]

    Robert, B

    C. Robert, B. Han, P. Kapuscinski, A. Delhomme, C. Faugeras, T. Amand, M. R. Molas, M. Bartos, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Urbaszek, M. Potemski, and X. Marie, Measurement of the spin-forbidden dark excitons in MoS2 and MoSe2 monolayers, Nature Com- munications11, 4037 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    G. E. Pikus, V. A. Maruschak, and A. Titkov, Spin split- ting of energy-bands and spin relaxation of carriers in cu- bic III-V crystals, Sov. Phys. Semicond.22, 115 (1988)

    work page 1988

  59. [59]

    L. Ren, C. Robert, M. Glazov, M. Semina, T. Amand, L. Lombez, D. Lagarde, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and X. Marie, Control of the bright-dark exciton splitting us- ing the Lamb shift in a two-dimensional semiconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 116901 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    L. V. Keldysh, Ionization in the field of a strong electro- magnetic wave, JETP20, 1307 (1965)

    work page 1965

  61. [61]

    F. J. Ohkawa and Y. Uemura, Quantized surface states of a narrow-gap semiconductor, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan37, 1325 (1974)

    work page 1974

  62. [62]

    F. T. Vas’ko, Spin splitting in the spectrum of two- dimensional electrons due to the surface potential, JETP Lett.30, 541 (1980)

    work page 1980

  63. [63]

    Bychkov and E

    Y. Bychkov and E. Rashba, Oscillatory effects and the magnetic susceptibility of carriers in inversion layers, J. Phys. C: Solid State17, 6039 (1984)

    work page 1984