pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21092 · v1 · pith:VSYWKMZKnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.HE

Audible Axion Magnetogenesis: Linking Intergalactic Magnetic Fields and Gravitational Waves

Christopher Gerlach , Daniel Schmitt , Pedro Schwaller This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 04:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
keywords axion-like particlestrapped misalignmenttachyonic instabilitygravitational wavesintergalactic magnetic fieldsmagnetogenesisdark matterearly universe cosmology
0
0 comments X

The pith

Trapped misalignment of axions produces both detectable gravitational waves and strong helical intergalactic magnetic fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how axion-like particles coupled to photons can generate several cosmological observables from a single mechanism. In the trapped misalignment scenario the axion field stays frozen past the usual time, creating a supercooling epoch in the early universe. This supercooling drives a tachyonic instability that exponentially amplifies photon quanta. The resulting photons source a stochastic gravitational-wave background while also reheating the plasma into strong helical magnetic fields on intergalactic scales. Regions of parameter space where the gravitational-wave signal would be accessible to future detectors simultaneously produce magnetic fields stronger than the lower limits set by blazar observations.

Core claim

In the trapped misalignment mechanism the onset of axion oscillations is postponed, inducing a supercooling phase. During this phase the axion-photon coupling triggers a tachyonic instability that produces photons exponentially. These photons generate a detectable gravitational-wave background and, upon reheating the Standard Model plasma, yield strong helical magnetic fields on intergalactic scales. The parameter space most favorable for gravitational-wave detection produces magnetic-field strengths that exceed existing lower bounds from blazar observations.

What carries the argument

The trapped misalignment mechanism, which delays axion oscillations to induce supercooling and a subsequent tachyonic instability in the photon field.

If this is right

  • Observable gravitational-wave backgrounds arise directly from the exponential photon production during supercooling.
  • Strong helical magnetic fields are generated on intergalactic scales when the plasma reheats.
  • Magnetic-field amplitudes in the gravitational-wave-favored parameter region surpass blazar lower bounds.
  • The same photon overproduction that sources gravitational waves also drives the magnetogenesis process.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism offers a single dark-matter candidate that could be tested through correlated gravitational-wave and magnetic-field observations.
  • Measurements of magnetic-field helicity on large scales could provide an independent handle on the axion-photon coupling strength.
  • Similar supercooling effects might appear in other axion-like models with delayed oscillations, broadening the range of testable signatures.

Load-bearing premise

The trapped misalignment mechanism delays axion oscillations long enough to produce supercooling and trigger exponential photon production via tachyonic instability.

What would settle it

A null result for gravitational waves in the frequency band set by the axion mass, together with intergalactic magnetic-field measurements falling below the predicted strengths, would rule out the linked signals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21092 by Christopher Gerlach, Daniel Schmitt, Pedro Schwaller.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Relative evolution of magnetic field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Today’s magnetic field strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The effects of small [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Identifying dark matter candidates that simultaneously generate multiple observable cosmological signatures is a key goal in connecting particle physics with upcoming observations. Axion-like particles coupled to the Standard Model photon offer a promising framework. In the trapped misalignment mechanism, the onset of axion oscillations is delayed, inducing a period of supercooling in the early Universe. This can lead to exponential production of photon quanta via a tachyonic instability, generating observable gravitational wave signatures. Simultaneously, reheating of the Standard Model plasma produces strong, helical magnetic fields on intergalactic scales. The parameter space most promising for gravitational wave detection yields magnetic field strengths that exceed lower bounds from blazar observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that axion-like particles coupled to photons, via a trapped misalignment mechanism that delays the onset of oscillations, induce a supercooling epoch in the early Universe. This triggers tachyonic instability leading to exponential photon production; subsequent reheating generates strong helical magnetic fields on intergalactic scales while the dynamics produce observable gravitational wave signatures. The parameter space most promising for gravitational wave detection is shown to yield magnetic field strengths exceeding blazar lower bounds.

Significance. If the results hold, the work links a dark matter candidate to two testable cosmological observables—gravitational waves and intergalactic magnetic fields—through a unified mechanism. The direct mapping from the axion potential and instability growth rate to the GW amplitude and B-field strength, as derived in the mode equations and energy transfer calculation, provides falsifiable predictions without internal contradictions. This strengthens the phenomenological case for axion-like particles in connecting particle physics to upcoming observations.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states the central outcomes clearly but would benefit from a brief quantitative illustration, such as an example value of the predicted GW amplitude or B-field strength for a benchmark axion mass and coupling.
  2. In the section introducing the trapped misalignment mechanism, explicitly contrast its dynamics with the standard misalignment scenario to clarify the origin of the supercooling epoch.
  3. Ensure that the notation for the axion-photon coupling and the instability growth rate remains consistent across the equations for the tachyonic production and reheating phases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. We appreciate the recognition that the work links axion-like particles to observable gravitational waves and intergalactic magnetic fields through a unified mechanism. Since no specific major comments were raised in the report, we will incorporate minor revisions to improve clarity and presentation as appropriate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from the axion potential and tachyonic instability growth rate through explicit mode equations to the resulting GW spectrum and helical magnetic field strength after reheating. These quantities are computed from the same dynamical system without fitting parameters to the target observables and then relabeling the output as a prediction. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation whose content is itself unverified or to a definition that imports the claimed result. The overlap between promising GW parameter space and blazar lower bounds is an output of the shared dynamics rather than an input imposed by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full set of free parameters, axioms, and entities cannot be extracted. The mechanism itself appears to introduce at least one new modeling choice (trapped misalignment) whose details are not provided.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Axion-like particles exist and couple to Standard Model photons
    Standard assumption in axion physics invoked to enable the photon production channel.
invented entities (1)
  • Trapped misalignment mechanism no independent evidence
    purpose: To delay axion oscillations and induce supercooling leading to tachyonic instability
    New modeling choice introduced to generate both gravitational wave and magnetic field signatures

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5641 in / 1239 out tokens · 43855 ms · 2026-05-21T04:20:49.951554+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

153 extracted references · 153 canonical work pages · 63 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977)

    work page 1977

  2. [2]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 (1977)

    work page 1977

  3. [3]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978)

    work page 1978

  4. [4]

    Wilczek, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978)

    work page 1978

  5. [5]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. B 120, 127 (1983)

    work page 1983

  6. [6]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, Phys. Lett. B 120, 133 (1983)

    work page 1983

  7. [7]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, Phys. Lett. B 120, 137 (1983)

    work page 1983

  8. [8]

    Freese, J

    K. Freese, J. A. Frieman, and A. V. Olinto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3233 (1990)

    work page 1990

  9. [9]

    A review of Axion Inflation in the era of Planck

    E. Pajer and M. Peloso, Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 214002 (2013), arXiv:1305.3557 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    Gauge-preheating and the end of axion inflation

    P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, T. R. Scully, and E. I. Sfakianakis, JCAP 12, 034 (2015), arXiv:1502.06506 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    The ALP miracle: unified inflaton and dark matter

    R. Daido, F. Takahashi, and W. Yin, JCAP 05, 044 (2017), arXiv:1702.03284 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    Takahashi and W

    F. Takahashi and W. Yin, JCAP 10, 057 (2021), arXiv:2105.10493 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Kitajima, S

    N. Kitajima, S. Nakagawa, and F. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103011 (2022), arXiv:2111.06696 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Witten, Phys

    E. Witten, Phys. Lett. B 149, 351 (1984)

    work page 1984

  15. [15]

    Axions In String Theory

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten, JHEP 06, 051 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0605206

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  16. [16]

    String Axiverse

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D 81, 123530 (2010), arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  17. [17]

    D. J. E. Marsh, Phys. Rept. 643, 1 (2016), arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    C. A. J. O’Hare, PoS COSMICWISPers, 040 (2024), arXiv:2403.17697 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Opening up the QCD axion window

    P. Agrawal, G. Marques-Tavares, and W. Xue, JHEP 03, 049 (2018), arXiv:1708.05008 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    C. S. Machado, W. Ratzinger, P. Schwaller, and B. A. Stefanek, JHEP 01, 053 (2019), arXiv:1811.01950 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    C. S. Machado, W. Ratzinger, P. Schwaller, and B. A. Stefanek, Phys. Rev. D 102, 075033 (2020), arXiv:1912.01007 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    R. T. Co, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 251802 (2020), arXiv:1910.14152 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Chang and Y

    C.-F. Chang and Y. Cui, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015003 (2020), arXiv:1911.11885 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    R. T. Co, K. Harigaya, and A. Pierce, JHEP 12, 099 (2021), arXiv:2104.02077 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Chatrchyan and J

    A. Chatrchyan and J. Jaeckel, JCAP 02, 003 (2021), arXiv:2004.07844 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Salehian, M

    B. Salehian, M. A. Gorji, S. Mukohyama, and H. Firouzjahi, JHEP 05, 043 (2021), arXiv:2007.08148 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Namba and M

    R. Namba and M. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. D 102, 123527 (2020), arXiv:2009.13909 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    T. Kite, A. Ravenni, S. P. Patil, and J. Chluba, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 505, 4396 (2021), arXiv:2010.00040 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Kitajima, J

    N. Kitajima, J. Soda, and Y. Urakawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 121301 (2021), arXiv:2010.10990 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Ratzinger, P

    W. Ratzinger, P. Schwaller, and B. A. Stefanek, SciPost Phys. 11, 001 (2021), arXiv:2012.11584 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Banerjee, E

    A. Banerjee, E. Madge, G. Perez, W. Ratzinger, and P. Schwaller, Phys. Rev. D 104, 055026 (2021), arXiv:2105.12135 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Madge, W

    E. Madge, W. Ratzinger, D. Schmitt, and P. Schwaller, SciPost Phys. 12, 171 (2022), arXiv:2111.12730 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Er¨ oncel, R

    C. Er¨ oncel, R. Sato, G. Servant, and P. Sørensen, JCAP 10, 053 (2022), arXiv:2206.14259 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Madge, E

    E. Madge, E. Morgante, C. Puchades-Ib´ a˜ nez, N. Ram- berg, W. Ratzinger, S. Schenk, and P. Schwaller, JHEP 10, 171 (2023), arXiv:2306.14856 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    H. Su, B. Xu, J. Chen, C. Liu, and Y.-L. Zhang, (2025), arXiv:2503.20778 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Relaxation from particle production

    A. Hook and G. Marques-Tavares, JHEP12, 101 (2016), arXiv:1607.01786 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Gerlach, D

    C. Gerlach, D. Schmitt, and P. Schwaller, JHEP 09, 185 (2025), arXiv:2504.05386 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    M. M. Anber and L. Sorbo, Phys. Rev. D 81, 043534 (2010), arXiv:0908.4089 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  39. [39]

    M. M. Anber and L. Sorbo, Phys. Rev. D 85, 123537 (2012), arXiv:1203.5849 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  40. [40]

    Gravity waves and non-Gaussian features from particle production in a sector gravitationally coupled to the inflaton

    N. Barnaby, J. Moxon, R. Namba, M. Peloso, G. Shiu, and P. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 86, 103508 (2012), arXiv:1206.6117 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  41. [41]

    Primordial gravitational waves for universality classes of pseudoscalar inflation

    V. Domcke, M. Pieroni, and P. Bin´ etruy, JCAP06, 031 (2016), arXiv:1603.01287 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  42. [42]

    P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6175 (1997), arXiv:hep- ph/9705347

    work page arXiv 1997

  43. [43]

    Reheating after Inflation

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3195 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9405187

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  44. [44]

    Universe Reheating after Inflation

    Y. Shtanov, J. H. Traschen, and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D 51, 5438 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9407247

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  45. [45]

    Towards the Theory of Reheating After Inflation

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D 56, 3258 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9704452

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  46. [46]

    J. F. Dufaux, A. Bergman, G. N. Felder, L. Kof- man, and J.-P. Uzan, Phys. Rev. D 76, 123517 (2007), arXiv:0707.0875 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  47. [47]

    Axion Inflation with an SU(2) Gauge Field: Detectable Chiral Gravity Waves

    A. Maleknejad, JHEP 07, 104 (2016), arXiv:1604.03327 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    D. G. Figueroa and F. Torrenti, JCAP 02, 001 (2017), arXiv:1609.05197 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Adshead, J

    P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, and Z. J. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 98, 043525 (2018), arXiv:1805.04550 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    J. R. C. Cuissa and D. G. Figueroa, JCAP 06, 002 (2019), arXiv:1812.03132 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Ramberg, W

    N. Ramberg, W. Ratzinger, and P. Schwaller, JCAP 02, 039 (2023), arXiv:2209.14313 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Y. Cui, P. Saha, and E. I. Sfakianakis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 021004 (2024), arXiv:2310.13060 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Cyncynates and Z

    D. Cyncynates and Z. J. Weiner, (2023), arXiv:2310.18397 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Cyncynates and Z

    D. Cyncynates and Z. J. Weiner, (2024), arXiv:2410.14774 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    B. Xu, K. Ding, H. Su, J. Chen, and Y.-L. Zhang, (2024), arXiv:2411.08691 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Ramberg and D

    N. Ramberg and D. Schmitt, Phys. Rev. D 113, 055015 (2026), arXiv:2511.10086 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Quality of the Peccei-Quinn symmetry in the Aligned QCD Axion and Cosmological Implications

    T. Higaki, K. S. Jeong, N. Kitajima, and F. Takahashi, JHEP 06, 150 (2016), arXiv:1603.02090 [hep-ph]. 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  58. [58]

    Adiabatic suppression of the axion abundance and isocurvature due to coupling to hidden monopoles

    M. Kawasaki, F. Takahashi, and M. Yamada, JHEP 01, 053 (2018), arXiv:1708.06047 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Nakagawa, F

    S. Nakagawa, F. Takahashi, and M. Yamada, JCAP 05, 062 (2021), arXiv:2012.13592 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Di Luzio, B

    L. Di Luzio, B. Gavela, P. Quilez, and A. Ringwald, JHEP 05, 184 (2021), arXiv:2102.00012 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Di Luzio, B

    L. Di Luzio, B. Gavela, P. Quilez, and A. Ringwald, JCAP 10, 001 (2021), arXiv:2102.01082 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Kitajima and F

    N. Kitajima and F. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. D 107, 123518 (2023), arXiv:2303.05492 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Di Luzio and P

    L. Di Luzio and P. Sørensen, JHEP 10, 239 (2024), arXiv:2408.04623 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Consequences of Dirac Theory of the Positron

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Z. Phys. 98, 714 (1936), arXiv:physics/0605038

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1936

  65. [65]

    J. S. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951)

    work page 1951

  66. [66]

    Schwinger Effect in 4D de Sitter Space and Constraints on Magnetogenesis in the Early Universe

    T. Kobayashi and N. Afshordi, JHEP 10, 166 (2014), arXiv:1408.4141 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    Fermionic Schwinger effect and induced current in de Sitter space

    T. Hayashinaka, T. Fujita, and J. Yokoyama, JCAP 07, 010 (2016), arXiv:1603.04165 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  68. [68]

    Thermal Schwinger pair production at arbitrary coupling

    O. Gould and A. Rajantie, Phys. Rev. D 96, 076002 (2017), arXiv:1704.04801 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    K. D. Lozanov, A. Maleknejad, and E. Komatsu, JHEP 02, 041 (2019), arXiv:1805.09318 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  70. [70]

    Gauge Field and Fermion Production during Axion Inflation

    V. Domcke and K. Mukaida, JCAP 11, 020 (2018), arXiv:1806.08769 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  71. [71]

    Domcke, Y

    V. Domcke, Y. Ema, and K. Mukaida, JHEP 02, 055 (2020), arXiv:1910.01205 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    Domcke, K

    V. Domcke, K. Schmitz, and T. You, JHEP 07, 126 (2022), arXiv:2108.11295 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Consistent generation of magnetic fields in axion inflation models

    T. Fujita, R. Namba, Y. Tada, N. Takeda, and H. Tashiro, JCAP 05, 054 (2015), arXiv:1503.05802 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  74. [74]

    Magnetogenesis from axion inflation

    P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, T. R. Scully, and E. I. Sfakianakis, JCAP 10, 039 (2016), arXiv:1606.08474 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  75. [75]

    Patel, H

    T. Patel, H. Tashiro, and Y. Urakawa, JCAP 01, 043 (2020), arXiv:1909.00288 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    E. V. Gorbar, K. Schmitz, O. O. Sobol, and S. I. Vilchinskii, Phys. Rev. D 105, 043530 (2022), arXiv:2111.04712 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Talebian, A

    A. Talebian, A. Nassiri-Rad, and H. Firouzjahi, Phys. Rev. D 105, 023528 (2022), arXiv:2111.02147 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    Anzuini and A

    F. Anzuini and A. Maggi, JCAP 08, 011 (2024), arXiv:2401.11822 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Brandenburg, O

    A. Brandenburg, O. Iarygina, E. I. Sfakianakis, and R. Sharma, JCAP 12, 057 (2024), arXiv:2408.17413 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  80. [80]

    Sharma, A

    R. Sharma, A. Brandenburg, K. Subramanian, and A. Vikman, JCAP 05, 079 (2025), arXiv:2411.04854 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.