Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunctions for 5d BKL dynamics, automorphic L-functions and complex primon gases

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Near a five-dimensional singularity, Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunctions are odd Maass cusp forms whose angular/Mellin transforms are Hecke L-functions; each L-function's Euler product over complex primes is a charged 'complex primon gas'…

desk verdict Careful and genuinely new bridge between H3 BKL wavefunctions and Euler products over complex primes, but the odd-to-Hecke inversion is asserted from numerics rather than proved, and that is the step that makes the primon gas real. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08788 v1 pith:VTKA62XS submitted 2025-07-11 hep-th gr-qc

classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords Wheeler-DeWittwavefunctionsBKLdynamicscosmologicalbilliardsMaasscuspformsBianchigroupsGaussianintegersEisensteincomplexprimongas
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Close to a spacelike singularity in five-dimensional gravity, Einstein-Maxwell theory, and four-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell-axion-dilaton theory, the dynamics of the metric at each spatial point reduces to a billiard in hyperbolic three-space with walls whose cross-section is an equilateral, hemi-equilateral, or right-isosceles triangle. The paper's central claim is that the Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunctions of these billiards are the odd Maass cusp forms of the Bianchi groups $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z}[\omega])$ or $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z}[i])$ (and their index-two extensions) acting on $\mathbb{H}_3$. Angular Fourier decomposition followed by a radial Mellin transform converts each wavefunction into a family of $L$-functions $L_n(s)$ whose Dirichlet series runs over the Gaussian or Eisenstein integers, with a reflection formula placing their nontrivial zeros on the critical axis $\mathrm{Re}(s)=1$. Using Hecke relations and unique factorization in these integer rings, each $L$-function is written as an Euler product over the corresponding complex primes. The paper's final identification reads that Euler product as a trace over an auxiliary Hilbert space of charged harmonic oscillators labeled by complex primes, giving a 'complex primon gas' partition function for the wavefunction of the universe near a five-dimensional singularity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the odd Maass cusp form: a smooth, square-integrable eigenfunction of the $\mathbb{H}_3$ Laplacian that is invariant under the Bianchi group $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z}[\omega])$ or $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z}[i])$ and flips sign under the reflection $z\to -\bar z$ (or $z\to\bar z$), the sign flip being exactly the Dirichlet boundary condition on the billiard walls. The argument is carried by the commuting pair of $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C})$ generators $R=\partial_\varphi$ and $D=\rho\partial_\rho$, which allow every wavefunction to be decomposed into simultaneous angular-momentum and dilatation eigenstates. The angular Fourier--Mellin transform converts the wavefunction into the family $L_n(s)$, and the Hecke operators supply the multiplicative relations $c_\mu c_\nu=\sum_{d|(\mu,\nu)} c_{\mu\nu/d^2}$ that express every coefficient in terms of prime coefficients. Unique factorization in the Gaussian and Eisenstein integers then turns the Dirichlet series into an Euler product over complex primes, and each Euler factor is exactly the partition function of a pair of harmonic oscillators. The trace formula (101) is the load-bearing identity that connects the wavefunction data to the complex primon gas.

What would settle it

Take the lowest odd Maass cusp form computed for the Gaussian billiard at $\varepsilon\approx 25.7239$ (or an independently computed eigenform) and check that every prime coefficient satisfies $b^-_p=(c_p-c_{\bar p})/2$ for some real Hecke eigenvalue sequence $c_p$, and that the truncated Euler product (93) reproduces the Dirichlet-series coefficients to numerical precision at a fixed prime; a single prime with $|c_p|>2$ would falsify the $\theta_p$ parametrization and break the partition-function interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that for each of the three cosmological billiards, the Wheeler-DeWitt eigenfunctions satisfying Dirichlet conditions on the triangular $\mathbb{H}_3$ domain are exactly the odd Maass cusp forms of the relevant Bianchi group: $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z}[\omega])$ for the equilateral billiard, and its index-two extension for the hemi-equilateral and Gaussian cases, with $\mathcal{O}=\mathbb{Z}[\omega]$ or $\mathbb{Z}[i]$. In spherical coordinates $(\rho,\vartheta,\varphi)$ the angular Fourier modes are Mellin transformed to define $L_n^-(s)=\sum_{\mu\in\mathcal{O}} b_\mu e^{-in\arg\mu}|\mu|^{-s}$, and the oddness under inversion gives $\xi_n^-(s)=-\xi_n^-(2-s)$. Because the coefficients $c_\mu$ of the underlying Hecke eigenforms satisfy the Hecke relations $c_\mu c_\nu=\sum_{d|(\mu,\nu)} c_{\mu\nu/d^2}$, the associated $L_n(s)=\sum_{\mu\in\mathcal{O}} c_\mu e^{-in\arg\mu}|\mu|^{-s}$ factor into an Euler product over complex primes. The paper's central identity is $L_n(s)=\mathcal{A}_n\,\mathrm{tr}\,\exp\{\sum_{p\in\mathcal{P}_{\mathcal{O}}}(-sH_p+i\theta_p Q_p - in L_p)\}$, with $H_p=\log|p|(b_p^\dagger b_p+c_p^\dagger c_p)$, $Q_p=b_p^\dagger b_p-c_p^\dagger c_p$, $L_p=\arg(p)(b_p^\dagger b_p+c_p^\dagger c_p)$, and $c_p=2\cos\theta_p$. Thus each near-singularity wavefunction is equivalent to a grand-canonical partition function of charged, rotating oscillators labeled by the Gaussian or Eisenstein primes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the physical near-singularity state is fully captured by the Dirichlet problem for an odd Maass cusp form on the $\mathbb{H}_3$ billiard domain, with a flat DeWitt metric and wavefunction vanishing at every wall; if this quantum BKL dictionary fails, the $L$-functions and primon gases are statements about auxiliary Maass forms, not about gravity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • All of the near-singularity wavefunction data are equivalent to the set of Hecke prime coefficients $\{c_p\}$ (equivalently angles $\{\theta_p\}$), with the $L$-function on the critical line obtained from the Euler product by analytic continuation.
  • Each wavefunction carries a family of auxiliary spectra: the nontrivial zeros of $L_n(s)$ along $\mathrm{Re}(s)=1$ would obey statistics of a second, distinct quantum system, on top of the primon gas spectrum.
  • The angular momentum sector is constrained by lattice symmetry: only $n$ divisible by 4 for the Gaussian domain and by 3 or 6 for the Eisenstein domains appear, so the dual gas sees the crystallographic type of the underlying billiard.
  • Averaging the partition function over energy levels produces a fermionic gas with degeneracy growing with $|p|$; for $n=0$ the averaged logarithm diverges at $s=1$, a zero in the averaged $L$-function, while $n\neq 0$ sectors stay finite.
  • The known split/inert/ramified structure of complex primes makes the Dedekind zeta function of these rings the simplest neutral complex primon gas, connecting the construction to classical Dirichlet $L$-functions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One testable extension is to independently compute the low-lying odd Maass cusp forms for both Bianchi billiards and check that every one is obtained as $(c_\mu-c_{\bar\mu})/2$ from a Hecke eigenform; the paper's Appendix C gives the inversion for $\mathbb{Z}[i]$ but assumes this correspondence.
  • The resemblance of the per-prime partition function (102) to a torus CFT partition function suggests asking whether the full $L$-function obeys a modular transformation on the torus; if it did, the reflection formula (91) would be a consequence of $S$-modularity rather than an independent input.
  • A graph-theoretic reading follows from the Kesten-McKay distribution: since (114) is the eigenvalue density of a random regular graph of degree $|p|^2$, the averaged primon gas may be the closed-walk generating function of an ensemble of such graphs, offering a combinatorial handle on typical near-singularity states.
  • The method generalizes along the division-algebra ladder: the $\mathbb{H}_3$ case is the complex step toward $\mathbb{H}_5$ (quaternionic) and $\mathbb{H}_9$ (octonionic) billiards, where noncommutativity of quaternionic primes is a known obstruction the present construction does not yet address.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Wheeler-DeWitt quantization of cosmological billiards associated with three gravitational theories: five-dimensional pure gravity, five-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell theory, and four-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell-axion-dilaton theory. In each case the near-singularity wavefunctions are identified with odd Maass cusp forms for the Bianchi groups PSL(2,Z[omega]) and PSL(2,Z[i]) (and their index-two extensions). The main new mathematical construction is a family of L-functions L^-_n(s) obtained by angular Fourier and radial Mellin transforms of the wavefunction (Sec. 4), together with an Euler product representation of the related Hecke L-functions L_n(s) over complex primes (Sec. 5). This Euler product is then interpreted as the partition function of a 'complex primon gas' of charged harmonic oscillators labeled by complex primes, Eq. (101). The paper also contains numerical checks of the Sato-Tate and Kesten-McKay statistics of the relevant Hecke and Fourier coefficients.

Significance. If the central bridge is valid, the paper provides a concrete arithmetic packaging of quantum BKL data in three gravitational theories, extending the PSL(2,Z) primon gas of [9] to Bianchi groups and connecting Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunctions on H3 to automorphic L-functions and complex primes. The derivation of the Mellin/Fourier decomposition is explicit and careful (Eqs. 73-79), and the Euler product follows cleanly from the Hecke relations derived in Appendix B. The numerical tests are a genuine strength of the paper. The main caveats are that the invertibility of the antisymmetrization map (88) is asserted on numerical grounds rather than proved, and the oscillator representation assumes the Ramanujan bound; both are load-bearing for the central claim that the physical wavefunction acquires an Euler product and a primon-gas description.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5.1 and Appendix C] The claim that Eq. (88) is invertible is not supported by the material cited. Appendix C presents a numerical reconstruction for one Gaussian waveform with a chosen normalization a_{2+i}=1 and a quadratic equation (158) that leaves a two-fold sign ambiguity; it does not prove that every odd Maass form at every eigenvalue lies in the image of P_-=(1-R)/2, nor that the preimage is unique. In the equilateral Eisenstein billiard (Sec. 3.3) the eigenspaces are two-dimensional, and no argument shows that the odd subspace is generated by antisymmetrizing Hecke eigenforms. This is load-bearing because the Euler product (92)-(93) and the primon gas (101) are constructed from the Hecke coefficients c_mu; if some odd form is not a single antisymmetrization, then L^-_n(s) in (74) is not a difference of two Euler-product L-functions, and the associated partition function does not exist. The authors should either provide a proof (or a precise citation) of the surjectivity and injectivity of the map, or restate the construction as conditional on this assumption and identify the class of modes to which it applies.
  2. [Sec. 5.2, Eq. (96)] The identification c_p = 2 cos(theta_p) and the positivity of the oscillator trace (101) require the Ramanujan bound |c_p| <= 2. This is an open conjecture for Bianchi-group Maass forms; the numerical evidence in Sec. 5.4 covers only two eigenfunctions. If the bound fails, the angles theta_p become complex and the 'temperature' and 'chemical potential' interpretation in (98)-(101) is only formal. Please state this as a conjecture explicitly and discuss what remains of the primon-gas interpretation if the bound is not assumed.
  3. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (76)] The sign in the transformation (76) is stated without derivation. It follows from invariance under the inversion S and oddness under the reflection R only if the two transformations are ordered correctly; since this relation is the basis of the functional equation (78), please spell out the argument that S R maps (rho, vartheta, phi) to (1/rho, vartheta, phi) and that the automorphy under S together with oddness under R gives the minus sign.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The text uses both 'Maaß' and 'Maass'; please standardize the spelling.
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (140)] The symbol alpha is used both as a place label and as the constant alpha = 4*pi/sqrt(|d_K|) in Eq. (140); please disambiguate these two uses.
  3. [Sec. 5.5, Eq. (117)] The integrals in Eq. (117) appear to be missing explicit lower limits; please fix the typesetting.
  4. [Sec. 6] There is a typo in the phrase 'CFT parition function' near Eq. (102); it should read 'partition function'.
  5. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption says the n=0 curves 'vanish' at s=1, but the plotted averaged quantities are truncated sums that only tend toward zero; please reword to avoid implying a proven zero.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the L-function/primon-gas association is built from standard Mellin and Hecke identities, and the only self-citation ([9]) is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and none of the central claims reduces to its own input by construction. The WDW eigenfunctions are identified with odd Maass cusp forms using the classical billiard reduction and known spectral theory of Bianchi groups (Secs. 2 and 3), and the L-function L^-_n(s) is introduced in Eq. (74) as the angular-Fourier/Mellin data of the wavefunction; Eq. (73) is an explicit integral identity, not a fitted relation. The Euler product in Eqs. (92)-(93) follows from the Hecke relations (81), which are derived in Appendix B from the standard Hecke operator formalism, and the primon gas partition function in Eq. (101) is an algebraic rewrite of that Euler product. No parameter is fitted to enforce a target L-function: the angles theta_p are defined by c_p = 2 cos(theta_p) after the Hecke eigenvalues are obtained, and the numerical Sato-Tate and Kesten-McKay checks are external consistency tests against known conjectures/distributions, not predictions forced by the construction. The cited prior work [9] by two of the authors supplies the H2 analogue and the interpretive framework, but the H3 construction is explicitly derived here using standard Hecke theory and does not lean on [9] as a black box. The paper itself flags the main limitations: the ordering ambiguity in Sec. 3.1 is subleading semiclassically, and Sec. 6 notes that the Euler-product regime Re(s)>2 differs from the critical line Re(s)=1. The one nontrivial gap is the assertion in Sec. 5.1, supported only by the numerical algorithm in Appendix C, that the antisymmetrization map in Eq. (88) is invertible; if that fails, some odd Maass forms would not correspond to Hecke eigenforms and the associated primon gas would not exist. This is a missing proof or correctness concern, however, not a circular reduction of an output to an input, so it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central derivation has no phenomenological free parameters: the Hecke coefficients c_p (and hence theta_p) are extracted from computed eigenfunctions, not fitted to enforce the L-function. The axioms list the background assumptions: billiard reduction, quantization scheme, Ramanujan conjecture, Hecke completeness, Euclidean factorization, and invertibility of the even/odd projection. The only invented entity is the formal primon gas itself, which serves as a representation device and has no independent falsifiable handle.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The billiard reduction of 5d gravity, 5d Einstein-Maxwell, and 4d EMAD to free motion on H3 within the stated triangular domains (from [2,27]).
    Used in Sec. 2 to set up the WDW quantum billiard problem; the paper quotes the dominant walls and variable changes from Damour-Henneaux-Nicolai.
  • domain assumption The WDW quantization is captured by the covariant Laplacian with Dirichlet boundary conditions at the walls.
    Sec. 3.1 states the quantization suffers an ordering ambiguity and a conformal factor ambiguity; a simple flat DeWitt metric choice is made.
  • domain assumption The Ramanujan conjecture |c_p| <= 2 for the Hecke eigenvalues of these Bianchi group Maass forms.
    Sec. 5.2 uses c_p = 2 cos(theta_p), which requires the bound. The paper notes it is only numerically corroborated.
  • standard math The Hecke operators are self-adjoint and commute with the Laplacian, giving a complete joint spectrum.
    Appendix B sketches the Hecke algebra; completeness of joint eigenfunctions is standard for arithmetic groups but is invoked, not proved.
  • standard math Unique factorization in Z[i] and Z[omega].
    Needed for the Euler product over complex primes, Sec. 5.1.
  • ad hoc to paper The map (88) from Hecke eigenforms to odd Maass forms is invertible.
    Claimed in Sec. 5.1 and Appendix C via the numerical inversion formula (156); a fully general proof is not given.
invented entities (2)
  • The complex primon gas (Hilbert space of charged oscillators labeled by complex primes)
    purpose: Provides a partition function representation of the Hecke L-functions (101).
    No falsifiable prediction; it is a formal mathematical dual representation, analogous to the authors' earlier real primon gas [9].
  • Auxiliary 'complicated Hamiltonian' whose spectrum conjecturally matches the nontrivial zeros
    purpose: Mentioned in Sec. 1.1 as a distinct auxiliary system; not constructed here.
    Speculative, not built in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunctions for 5d BKL dynamics, automorphic L-functions and complex primon gases." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VTKA62XS

@misc{pith2026250708788,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunctions for 5d BKL dynamics, automorphic L-functions and complex primon gases},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VTKA62XS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08788}
}
abstract

The near-singularity BKL dynamics of five dimensional gravity and supergravity (and also an extended four-dimensional supergravity) is known to be given by the billiard problem of a particle within a fundamental domain of the Bianchi groups $PSL(2,{\mathcal O}) \subset PSL(2,\mathbb{C})$, acting on $\mathbb{H}_3$. Here ${\mathcal O}$ are the Gaussian or Eisenstein integers, which define a square or triangular lattice in $\mathbb{C}$. The Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunctions near the singularity are, correspondingly, automorphic Maass forms of $PSL(2,{\mathcal O})$. We show how these wavefunctions are associated to certain $L$-functions evaluated along their critical axis. Each of these $L$-functions admits an Euler product representation over the complex primes ${\mathcal{P}}_{\mathcal O} \subset {\mathcal O}$. From this fact we write the $L$-function as the trace over an auxiliary Hilbert space of charged harmonic oscillators, labeled by the complex primes ${\mathcal{P}}_{\mathcal O}$. In this way we have constructed a 'dual' primon gas partition function for the wavefunction of the universe close to a five dimensional cosmological singularity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.08788 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Triangular domains in the (x1, x2) plane for the cosmological billiards of the three theo￾ries discussed. From left to right: 5d gravity (equilateral), 5d Einstein-Maxwell (hemi-equilateral) and 4d Einstein-Maxwell-axion-dilaton (isosceles right-angled). The first two domains relate to Eisenstein integers while the final one relates to Gaussian integers. These integers form a triangular lattice in C, related to the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A function defined in the shaded equilateral triangle and vanishing on the boundaries [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Gaussian (left) and Eisenstein (right) primes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Distribution of the first 650 prime Hecke eigenvalues [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distribution of the first 1300 prime Fourier coefficients [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Exponential of the averaged primon gas partition functions ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distribution of fixed p Hecke eigenvalues c k p across 995 different energy levels for the Gaussian billiard. Starting at the top left the primes plotted are p = 1 + i, 2 ± i, 3, 3 ± 2i. The solid curve is the corresponding Kesten-McKay distribution (114). As noted in …

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Imprint of the black hole singularity on thermal two-point functions

    hep-th 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    Thermal two-point functions in holographic AdS black holes receive exponentially small non-perturbative corrections controlled by null geodesics bouncing off the singularity.

  2. Imprint of the black hole interior on thermal four-point correlators

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Analytically continuing and smearing thermal four-point correlators turns them into flat-space scattering amplitudes at a bulk point inside the black hole.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [9]

    S. A. Hartnoll and M. Yang, The Conformal Primon Gas at the End of Time, 2025, [arXiv:2502.02661 [hep-th]]

  2. [1]

    V. A. Belinsky, I. M. Khalatnikov and E. M. Lifshitz, Oscillatory approach to a singular point in the relativistic cosmology, Adv. Phys.19, 525–573, 1970

  3. [2]

    Damour, M

    T. Damour, M. Henneaux and H. Nicolai, Cosmological billiards, Class. Quant. Grav.20, R145–R200, 2003, [arXiv:hep-th/0212256]

  4. [3]

    Belinski and M

    V. Belinski and M. Henneaux,The Cosmological Singularity. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. CUP, 2017, 10.1017/9781107239333

  5. [4]

    B. S. DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity. 1. The Canonical Theory, Phys. Rev.160, 1113–1148, 1967. 37

  6. [5]

    E. B. Bogomolny, B. Georgeot, M. J. Giannoni and C. Schmit, Arithmetical chaos, Phys. Rept. 291, 219–324, 1997

  7. [6]

    Sarnak, Arithmetic quantum chaos, Blythe Lectures, https://publications.ias.edu/node/527, 1993

    P. Sarnak, Arithmetic quantum chaos, Blythe Lectures, https://publications.ias.edu/node/527, 1993

  8. [7]

    D. A. Hejhal and B. N. Rackner, On the topography of Maass waveforms forPSL(2, Z), Experimental Mathematics1, 275 – 305, 1992

Show all 50 references
  1. [8]

    Graham, Chaos and quantum chaos in cosmological models, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 5, 1103–1122, 1995

    R. Graham, Chaos and quantum chaos in cosmological models, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 5, 1103–1122, 1995

  2. [10]

    G. W. Mackey,Unitary group representations in physics, probability, and number theory. Reading, 1978

  3. [11]

    Julia, Statistical theory of numbers, inNumber Theory and Physics: Proceedings of the Winter School, Les Houches, France, March 7–16, 1989, pp

    B. Julia, Statistical theory of numbers, inNumber Theory and Physics: Proceedings of the Winter School, Les Houches, France, March 7–16, 1989, pp. 276–293. Springer, 1990

  4. [12]

    Epstein, J

    C. Epstein, J. L. Hafner and P. Sarnak, Zeros ofL-functions attached to Maass forms, Mathematische Zeitschrift190, 113–128, 1985

  5. [13]

    J. L. Hafner, Some remarks on odd maass wave forms (and a correction to [1]), Mathematische Zeitschrift196, 129–132, 1987

  6. [14]

    Rudnick and P

    Z. Rudnick and P. Sarnak, Zeros of principalL-functions and random matrix theory, http://dml.mathdoc.fr/item/1077245671, Duke Math. J.85, 269–322, 1996

  7. [15]

    Rudnick, Zeta functions in arithmetic and their spectral statistics, Lectures at DMV Summer School, http://www.math.tau.ac.il/~rudnick/papers/ihp.ps, 2000

    Z. Rudnick, Zeta functions in arithmetic and their spectral statistics, Lectures at DMV Summer School, http://www.math.tau.ac.il/~rudnick/papers/ihp.ps, 2000

  8. [16]

    T. H. Hansson, M. Hermanns, S. H. Simon and S. F. Viefers, Quantum Hall physics: Hierarchies and conformal field theory techniques, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 025005, 2017

  9. [17]

    Strominger, The dS/CFT correspondence, JHEP10, 034, 2001, [arXiv:hep-th/0106113]

    A. Strominger, The dS/CFT correspondence, JHEP10, 034, 2001, [arXiv:hep-th/0106113]

  10. [18]

    J. M. Maldacena, Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models, JHEP05, 013, 2003, [arXiv:astro-ph/0210603]

  11. [19]

    Kleinschmidt and H

    A. Kleinschmidt and H. Nicolai, Cosmological quantum billiards, inFoundations of Space and Time: Reflections on Quantum Gravity, pp. 106–124, 2009. [arXiv:0912.0854 [gr-qc]]

  12. [20]

    Kleinschmidt, M

    A. Kleinschmidt, M. Koehn and H. Nicolai, Supersymmetric quantum cosmological billiards, Phys. Rev. D80, 061701, 2009, [arXiv:0907.3048 [gr-qc]]

  13. [21]

    Kleinschmidt and H

    A. Kleinschmidt and H. Nicolai, The E10 Wheeler-DeWitt operator at low levels, JHEP 04, 092, 2022, [arXiv:2202.12676 [hep-th]]. 38

  14. [22]

    Elskens and M

    Y. Elskens and M. Henneaux, Chaos in Kaluza-Klein Models, Class. Quant. Grav.4, L161–L167, 1987

  15. [23]

    Elskens and M

    Y. Elskens and M. Henneaux, Ergodic Theory of the Mixmaster Model in Higher Space-time Dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B290, 111–136, 1987

  16. [24]

    A. J. Feingold, A. Kleinschmidt and H. Nicolai, Hyperbolic Weyl groups and the four normed division algebras, J. Algebra322, 1295–1339, 2009, [arXiv:0805.3018 [math.RT]]. [Erratum: J.Algebra 489, 586–587 (2017)]

  17. [25]

    Kleinschmidt, H

    A. Kleinschmidt, H. Nicolai and J. Palmkvist, Modular realizations of hyperbolic Weyl groups, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.16, 97–148, 2012, [arXiv:1010.2212 [math.NT]]

  18. [26]

    Cremmer, B

    E. Cremmer, B. Julia, H. Lu and C. N. Pope, Higher dimensional origin of D = 3 coset symmetries, 1999, [arXiv:hep-th/9909099]

  19. [27]

    Damour, S

    T. Damour, S. de Buyl, M. Henneaux and C. Schomblond, Einstein billiards and overextensions of finite dimensional simple Lie algebras, JHEP08, 030, 2002, [arXiv:hep-th/0206125]

  20. [28]

    Steil, Eigenvalues of the laplacian for bianchi groups, inEmerging Applications of Number Theory, pp

    G. Steil, Eigenvalues of the laplacian for bianchi groups, inEmerging Applications of Number Theory, pp. 617–641. Springer, 1996. DOI

  21. [29]

    Aurich, F

    R. Aurich, F. Steiner and H. Then, Numerical computation of maass waveforms and an application to cosmology, 2004, [arXiv:gr-qc/0404020]

  22. [30]

    G. W. Gibbons, Antigravitating Black Hole Solitons with Scalar Hair in N=4 Supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B207, 337–349, 1982

  23. [31]

    Kallosh, D

    R. Kallosh, D. Kastor, T. Ortin and T. Torma, Supersymmetry and stationary solutions in dilaton-axion gravity, Physical Review D50, 6374–6384, 1994, [arXiv:hep-th/9406059 [hep-th]]

  24. [32]

    De Clerck, S

    M. De Clerck, S. A. Hartnoll and J. E. Santos, Mixmaster chaos in an AdS black hole interior, JHEP07, 202, 2024, [arXiv:2312.11622 [hep-th]]

  25. [33]

    B. J. McCartin, Eigenstructure of the Equilateral Triangle, Part I: The Dirichlet Problem, SIAM Review45, 267–287, 2003

  26. [34]

    Fine,Algebraic theory of the Bianchi groups, vol

    B. Fine,Algebraic theory of the Bianchi groups, vol. 129 ofPure Appl. Math., Marcel Dekker. New York etc.: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1989

  27. [35]

    M. E. Taylor,Noncommutative harmonic analysis. No. 22. American Mathematical Soc., 1986

  28. [36]

    Neukirch,Algebraic Number Theory, vol

    J. Neukirch,Algebraic Number Theory, vol. 322 ofGrundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer-Verlag, 1999

  29. [37]

    Bakas and M

    I. Bakas and M. J. Bowick, Curiosities of arithmetic gases, J. Math. Phys.32, 1881–1884, 1991. 39

  30. [38]

    Spector, Supersymmetry and the Möbius inversion function, Commun

    D. Spector, Supersymmetry and the Möbius inversion function, Commun. Math. Phys. 127, 239–252, 1990

  31. [39]

    D. A. Hejhal, On eigenfunctions of the Laplacian for Hecke triangle groups, inEmerging applications of number theory, pp. 291–315. Springer, 1999

  32. [40]

    Then, Maass cusp forms for large eigenvalues, Math

    H. Then, Maass cusp forms for large eigenvalues, Math. comput.74, 363–381, 2005

  33. [41]

    P. Sarnak, Statistical properties of eigenvalues of the hecke operators, inAnalytic Number Theory and Diophantine Problems: Proceedings of a Conference at Oklahoma State University, 1984 (A. C. Adolphson, J. B. Conrey, A. Ghosh and R. I. Yager, eds.), (https://doi.org/10.1007/...

  34. [42]

    Keating, The Riemann zeta-function and quantum chaology, inQuantum chaos, pp

    J. Keating, The Riemann zeta-function and quantum chaology, inQuantum chaos, pp. 145–185. Elsevier, 1993

  35. [43]

    Gonek, Finite Euler products and the Riemann hypothesis, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society364, 2157–2191, 2012

    S. Gonek, Finite Euler products and the Riemann hypothesis, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society364, 2157–2191, 2012

  36. [44]

    Harlow, Jerusalem Lectures on Black Holes and Quantum Information, Rev

    D. Harlow, Jerusalem Lectures on Black Holes and Quantum Information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015002, 2016, [arXiv:1409.1231 [hep-th]]

  37. [45]

    Susskind, Some speculations about black hole entropy in string theory, 1993, [arXiv:hep-th/9309145]

    L. Susskind, Some speculations about black hole entropy in string theory, 1993, [arXiv:hep-th/9309145]

  38. [46]

    G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski, A Correspondence principle for black holes and strings, Phys. Rev. D55, 6189–6197, 1997, [arXiv:hep-th/9612146]

  39. [47]

    Čeplak, R

    N. Čeplak, R. Emparan, A. Puhm and M. Tomašević, The correspondence between rotating black holes and fundamental strings, JHEP11, 226, 2023, [arXiv:2307.03573 [hep-th]]

  40. [48]

    Tate, PhD Thesis, ch

    J. Tate, PhD Thesis, ch. 15 inAlgebraic Number Theory, ed. J.W.S. Cassels and A. Fröhlich, Academic Press, 1967

  41. [49]

    S. S. Gubser, J. Knaute, S. Parikh, A. Samberg and P. Witaszczyk,p-adic AdS/CFT, Commun. Math. Phys.352, 1019–1059, 2017, [arXiv:1605.01061 [hep-th]]

  42. [50]

    Brekke and P

    L. Brekke and P. G. Freund, p-adic numbers in physics, Physics Reports233, 1–66, 1993. 40

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.