Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Deep Generative Modelling: A Comparative Review of VAEs, GANs, Normalizing Flows, Energy-Based and Autoregressive Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.04922 v4 pith:VUJMS3ME submitted 2021-03-08 cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CVstat.ML
keywords modelsdeepgenerativeapproachesautoregressiveenergy-basedflowsnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep generative models are a class of techniques that train deep neural networks to model the distribution of training samples. Research has fragmented into various interconnected approaches, each of which make trade-offs including run-time, diversity, and architectural restrictions. In particular, this compendium covers energy-based models, variational autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, autoregressive models, normalizing flows, in addition to numerous hybrid approaches. These techniques are compared and contrasted, explaining the premises behind each and how they are interrelated, while reviewing current state-of-the-art advances and implementations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adversarial Semantic Augmentation for Training Generative Adversarial Networks under Limited Data

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Adversarial semantic augmentation estimates feature covariances of real and generated images and optimizes an upper bound of the expected adversarial loss, improving limited-data GAN training without image-level augmentation.

  2. Comprehensive Review of EEG-to-Output Research: Decoding Neural Signals into Images, Videos, and Audio

    cs.CV 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A PRISMA-style review of EEG-to-output decoding claims to analyze 1,800 studies but omits the flow diagram, study list, and quantitative synthesis needed to back that claim.

Pith tools