Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 99 references

Axion inflation in the weak-backreaction regime naturally yields one of the strongest known primordial high-frequency gravitational-wave signals, a billionfold boost in the MHz-GHz band.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 03:26 UTC pith:VVBWNK53

load-bearing objection Worth reading for its numerical treatment of weak-backreaction axion inflation, but the ΩGW conversion in Eq. (5.1) looks off by a (k/aH)^2 factor and the backreaction check skips the headline parameters. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.23152 v1 pith:VVBWNK53 submitted 2026-07-25 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

High-frequency gravitational waves from axion inflation in the weak-backreaction regime

Xun-Jie Xu , Junyu Zhu This is my paper
classification hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords axion inflationChern-Simons couplingtachyonic gauge-field productionhigh-frequency gravitational wavesreheatingweak backreactionN_eff
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether axion inflation can produce observable gravitational waves while staying in the theoretically safe weak-backreaction regime, where gauge-field backreaction is negligible. Tracking the system continuously from slow-roll through the end of inflation and oscillatory reheating to radiation domination, the authors find that the tachyonic amplification of gauge fields peaks at the end of inflation and during reheating, generating an induced tensor spectrum with P_ind/P_vac ~ 10^9 near k ≈ 6 k_ref. This corresponds to gravitational waves in the MHz-GHz range, many orders of magnitude above the vacuum spectrum, and is large enough to matter for future precision measurements of the effective number of neutrino species. A key new ingredient is that the oscillating inflaton makes the instability parameter flip sign repeatedly during reheating, so both helicities of the gauge field are amplified, unlike slow-roll where only one grows. The paper also shows that previous analytical estimates overstate the reach of the strong-backreaction regime, making a full numerical treatment necessary near the end of inflation.

Core claim

The central claim is that, even in the weak-backreaction regime, axion inflation produces a high-frequency gravitational-wave signal that is many orders of magnitude stronger than the vacuum inflationary spectrum, because the tachyonic instability is strongest at the very end of inflation and persists through oscillatory reheating. Concretely, the numerical calculation gives P_ind_T/P_vac_T ≈ 10^9 at k ≈ 6 k_ref (Eq. 4.15, Fig. 6), corresponding to frequencies from roughly MHz to GHz, making the scenario one of the strongest known primordial high-frequency GW sources. The oscillations of the inflaton during reheating cause the instability parameter ξ to flip sign frequently, so both circular

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the Chern-Simons interaction (φ/4Λ)F_μν F~μν, which endows gauge-field modes with an effective mass term −2λξkH in the mode equation A''_λ + (k²−2λξkH)A_λ = 0, where ξ = φdot/(2HΛ) is the instability parameter. When ξ is large and positive, the + helicity grows as e^{πξ}; when ξ oscillates and flips sign during reheating, the − helicity is also exponentially amplified. The induced tensor power spectrum is computed from these mode functions through a retarded Green function (built by solving the adjoint equation backward in time, avoiding numerically dangerous cancellations in de Sitter-like epochs) and a p-q triangle integral over kinematically allowed momenta. A D-parametri

Load-bearing premise

The central premise is that the amplified gauge field does not react back on the inflaton for the exact parameters of the headline spectrum; the paper shows this holds when the inflaton decay rate is 0.1 of its mass, but the headline figure uses a decay rate of 0.05 of its mass, where the exponential growth is stronger and no check is shown.

What would settle it

Compute δF and δ'KG for 1/Λ = 11.2/M_P and Γφ = 0.05 mφ through the whole reheating phase with the paper's own method; if either reaches O(1) at any time, the weak-backreaction approximation breaks and the P_ind/P_vac ~ 10^9 peak is not self-consistent. A direct lattice simulation that includes backreaction for these parameters would settle whether the peak survives.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Axion inflation in the weak-backreaction regime predicts a high-frequency (MHz–GHz) stochastic GW background far above the vacuum spectrum, one of the strongest known primordial high-frequency signals.
  • The signal should be visible as an extra radiation component in future precision N_eff measurements, providing a cosmological test of axion inflation that does not require a direct GW detector.
  • Because ξ flips sign during reheating, both gauge helicities contribute to the induced tensor spectrum, so the high-frequency GW background is a mixture of both polarizations rather than a purely chiral signal.
  • Analytical slow-roll formulae for backreaction overestimate the strong-backreaction region; numerical evolution from slow-roll through reheating is required to identify the true WB regime.
  • The result motivates the development of high-frequency GW detectors, since planned interferometers cannot reach the MHz–GHz band.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could test the same mechanism in other plateau potentials (e.g., Starobinsky) to see whether the peak location and amplitude of the high-frequency spectrum depend on the reheating equation of state, which would make the spectrum a probe of reheating dynamics.
  • Since the amplification relies only on an oscillating pseudo-scalar condensate coupled to a gauge field, similar high-frequency GW backgrounds may arise from late-time axion oscillations (e.g., axion dark matter or axion-like particles) and could be searched for with the same detectors.
  • A direct falsification is to compute δF and δ'KG for the exact headline parameters (1/Λ = 11.2/M_P, Γφ = 0.05 mφ) through reheating; if either reaches O(1), the sourced spectrum is not self-consistent and the peak would likely be suppressed by backreaction.
  • If the N_eff bound improves to the projected levels, a null detection would start to constrain 1/Λ independently of direct GW searches, turning the spectrum into a potential axion-inflation exclusion tool.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies axion inflation with a Chern-Simons axion-gauge coupling, restricted to the weak-backreaction (WB) regime, and computes the induced gravitational-wave (GW) spectrum by numerically evolving the background, the gauge-field mode functions, and the tensor Green function continuously from slow-roll through reheating into radiation domination. The central quantitative claim is that tachyonic gauge-field amplification near the end of inflation and during oscillatory reheating yields P_ind_T/P_vac_T ~ 1e9 near k ~ 6 k_ref (Eq. 4.15, Fig. 6), producing a MHz–GHz GW spectrum that is one of the strongest known primordial high-frequency signals and may be probed by future Neff measurements (Fig. 8). The paper also argues that previous analytical estimates overestimate the strong-backreaction region, that both gauge-field helicities contribute during reheating because of sign flips of xi, and that the WB regime is therefore not observationally silent at high frequencies.

Significance. If the central result is correct, this is a significant and useful contribution: it extends the standard slow-roll analyses of axion-inflation GWs into the non-instantaneous reheating phase in a controlled WB setup, provides a detailed numerical implementation with internal checks against known analytical results (e.g., the Whittaker-function solutions and the Cook–Sorbo formula), and identifies a concrete high-frequency target for future Neff measurements and high-frequency detector development. The calculation is first-principles in the sense that lambda and m_phi are fixed by CMB normalization and no target GW amplitude is inserted. The paper is also careful about numerical issues in constructing the Green function (Appendix B). However, the manuscript currently has a load-bearing inconsistency in the conversion of P_T to Omega_GW and an incomplete validation of the WB premise for the exact headline parameters; these issues prevent acceptance in the present form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5, Eq. (5.1)] The conversion formula (5.1) is the standard relation between the primordial, superhorizon tensor power spectrum and Omega_GW. It is not valid for the P_T(k) shown in Fig. 6 and estimated in Eq. (4.15), because that P_T is evaluated at the end of the simulation, eta_end, for modes with k ~ 6 k_ref that are subhorizon at all times (k > k_ref). For a freely propagating subhorizon tensor mode the energy-density fraction is Omega_GW(eta) = (1/24)(k^2/(a^2 H^2)) P_T(eta,k) [up to g-factor redshift factors], so using Eq. (5.1) with the simulation-time P_T misses a factor (k/(aH))^2 ~ 100 at eta_end for the peak modes. The peak Omega_GW h^2 would consequently shift upward from ~1e-9 to ~1e-7–1e-6, crossing the current Planck bound Omega_GW h^2 <~ 1.6e-6 quoted in Sec. 5 and changing the paper's observational claims. The authors must either apply the correct transfer factor or insert a properly
  2. [Sec. 4.4, Fig. 7 vs Sec. 5, Fig. 8] The backreaction validity check for the post-inflationary epoch is shown in Fig. 7 with Gamma_phi = 0.1 m_phi (caption of Fig. 7), while the headline spectrum and all Sec. 5 results are computed with Gamma_phi = 0.05 m_phi (Figs. 6 and 8) at the same coupling 1/Lambda = 11.2/M_P. Gauge-field production during reheating is exponentially sensitive to the duration of the oscillatory phase and to xi(t), both of which differ between these two decay rates. Since the entire calculation assumes delta_F, delta'_KG << 1, the manuscript needs to show that the WB condition holds for the exact headline parameters. Without this check, the mode functions used for P_ind_T in Fig. 6 are not demonstrated to be self-consistent with the stated weak-backreaction premise.
  3. [Sec. 4.3 and Appendix C] The central numerical result—P_ind_T spanning many orders of magnitude and peaking near k ~ 6 k_ref—is obtained by summing over a discrete p-q mesh using precomputed mode functions. No convergence tests are presented with respect to the momentum-mesh spacing, the UV cutoff, the epsilon threshold used in the rho_A/rho_EB calculation (Appendix C), or the time-integration tolerance. This matters in a calculation where mode functions grow by factors ~1e6 and where Appendix B explicitly warns about exponentially amplified numerical cancellations in the Green function. The authors should provide convergence studies or release the code and data so the robustness of the peak can be independently assessed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.2] Typo: 'tenser power spectrum' should be 'tensor power spectrum' (twice in this section, including Eq. (3.15) vicinity).
  2. [Sec. 4.1, Fig. 4] The blue dashed curve in the upper panel is described as an analytical estimate valid only for k << k_ref. It would help to state explicitly why no analogous comparison is shown for the larger-k modes, since a reader might otherwise interpret the dashed curve as a check for those modes.
  3. [Sec. 4.3, Eq. (4.7)] The text says the integral is 'computed by summing over all kinematically allowed samples, with dp -> Delta p and dq -> Delta q.' It is not stated whether the angular (azimuthal) integration has been included in the prefactor or whether the p-q mesh is chosen such that the triangle inequality in Eq. (4.9) is satisfied exactly. A short clarification of the discretization would improve reproducibility.
  4. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (3.17)] The notation delta_KG is reused for both the original slow-roll definition and the modified Eq. (4.16) with a prime. This is clear enough, but the text sometimes refers to 'delta_KG' without the prime when discussing post-inflationary evolution (e.g., the sentence following Eq. (4.16)); please make the usage uniform.
  5. [Appendix B, Eq. (B.12)] The condition (B.12) is stated as following from the Wronskian condition (B.5) at first order in epsilon. It would be useful to note that this is an expanded result and that the exact condition contains higher-order terms; as written, the equality looks exact.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central high-frequency GW spectrum follows from a parameter-forward numerical evolution with CMB-fixed inputs; the self-citations are cross-checks and tools, not load-bearing identities.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The background parameters are fixed from CMB observables: λ is set by Planck's A_s via Eq. (2.2) and m_phi = sqrt(2λ) M_P, with no GW amplitude inserted as an input. The induced tensor spectrum in Fig. 6 is computed by numerically solving the gauge mode equation (3.4) and the tensor Green function from (4.2)-(4.4); the order-of-magnitude estimate in Eq. (4.15) merely uses the intermediate numerical amplification factor C_k from Fig. 4 to reproduce the same numerical result, which is a consistency check rather than a fitted input called a prediction. The comparison with Eq. (3.16) is against the independent Cook-Sorbo result [40] and serves as an external benchmark. Self-citations appear (Refs. [27], [73], [78], [89], with Ref. [27] sharing author X.-J. Xu), but they provide analytic cross-checks, comparison signals, or the vacuum-spectrum code; the central claim does not reduce to any of these references. Two reviewer concerns were considered but are not circularity: the ΩGW conversion in Eq. (5.1) may omit a (k/aH)^2 factor for the subhorizon peak modes, and the backreaction validation in Fig. 7 uses Γ_phi = 0.1 m_phi while the headline spectrum in Fig. 8 uses Γ_phi = 0.05 m_phi. Both would be propagation- or validation-type physics errors, not a derivation that assumes its conclusion. No circular step meeting the quoted-evidence standard was found.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced. The axion and gauge field are standard model content in this framework. The D-parametrization and adjoint Green function method are numerical tools, not physical entities. The main unvalidated inputs are the chosen coupling and decay rate, the modified backreaction criterion, and neglect of Schwinger/preheating effects.

free parameters (3)
  • Λ^{-1} (axion-gauge coupling) = 11.2/M_P headline; 10/M_P and 12/M_P in scans
    Chosen by hand; the GW amplitude and backreaction are exponentially sensitive to ξ ∝ Λ^{-1} (Figs. 7, 8). Not fixed by CMB data; the headline value sits close to the WB/SB boundary.
  • Γφ/mφ (inflaton decay rate) = 0.05 (headline) and 0.1 (WB check)
    Chosen ad hoc to model non-instantaneous reheating. It controls how many oscillations occur and therefore the high-frequency GW yield and backreaction evolution.
  • ε (mode-amplification cutoff in ρA calculation) = unspecified
    Appendix C subtracts the vacuum and sums modes with |1+D|>1+ε. The paper states the results are broadly insensitive to ε but does not show a convergence scan.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Chern-Simons axion-gauge Lagrangian with a single-field inflaton
    Eq. (2.1) defines the model; no additional sectors are considered.
  • domain assumption α-attractor T-model is representative of plateau potentials
    Sec. 2 and footnote 2 assert most plateau models share the increasing-ξ behavior, but no other potential is tested.
  • ad hoc to paper Modified backreaction measure δ'_KG = |ρ_EB/Λ| / X with X=max{(3H+Γ)φdot, dV/dφ} captures WB validity during reheating
    Eq. (4.16) differs from the standard slow-roll δ_KG; no independent validation is provided for oscillatory reheating.
  • domain assumption Inflaton reheats through a constant decay rate Γφ to radiation, with a quadratic potential bottom
    Eqs. (2.4)–(2.5) neglect parametric resonance, non-perturbative decay, and thermalization details.
  • domain assumption Schwinger effect and fermionic backreaction are neglected
    The mode equations and energy densities include only the Abelian gauge field; pair production is not included despite large ξ and strong fields during reheating.
  • standard math Bunch-Davies vacuum and free-field mode normalization
    Eqs. (3.2)–(3.3) set initial conditions; standard in this literature.
  • standard math Linearized sourced-GW formula with retarded Green function in the unperturbed FLRW background
    Eqs. (3.12)–(3.14) and Sec. 4.2 assume the gauge field sources tensor perturbations without backreaction on the metric.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 22408 in / 14856 out tokens · 155984 ms · 2026-08-01T03:26:21.813506+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Axion inflation, characterized by a Chern-Simons interaction between the inflaton and a gauge field, provides a powerful mechanism for generating primordial gravitational waves (GWs) through tachyonic enhancement of the gauge field. While recent literature has predominantly focused on the Strong Backreaction (SB) regime to maximize GW signals for future interferometers, this regime suffers from computational complexities as well as the risk of overproducing scalar perturbations. In this work, we investigate gauge field amplification and GW production strictly within the theoretically safer Weak Backreaction (WB) regime, with a particular focus on the largely unexplored non-instantaneous reheating phase. Because the tachyonic enhancement during slow-roll typically increases as inflation approaches its end, it is crucial to investigate how the production of GWs behaves at the very end of inflation and thereafter. By continuously tracking the evolution from slow-roll through reheating to radiation domination, we present a complete picture of inflationary and post-inflationary GW production in this framework. A particularly interesting feature of the post-inflationary phase is that the oscillatory behavior of the inflaton during reheating leads to frequent sign-flips of the instability parameter $\xi$, exciting both helical modes of the gauge field. Our analysis reveals that axion inflation can naturally generate one of the strongest known primordial GW signals at high-frequency bands. The yield is relevant for future precision measurements of the effective number of neutrino species, $N_{{\rm eff}}$, and also strongly motivates the development of novel high-frequency GW detectors.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 92 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Caprini and D

    C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa,Cosmological backgrounds of gravitational waves,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018), no. 16 163001, [1801.04268]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Schmitz,New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions,JHEP01(2021) 097, [2002.04615]

    K. Schmitz,New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions,JHEP01(2021) 097, [2002.04615]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    N. Seto, S. Kawamura, and T. Nakamura,Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space,Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 221103, [astro-ph/0108011]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  4. [4]

    Kudoh, A

    H. Kudoh, A. Taruya, T. Hiramatsu, and Y. Himemoto,Detecting a gravitational-wave background with next-generation space interferometers,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 064006, [gr-qc/0511145]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    Crowder and N

    J. Crowder and N. J. Cornish,Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions, Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 083005, [gr-qc/0506015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    Corbin and N

    V. Corbin and N. J. Cornish,Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer,Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 2435–2446, [gr-qc/0512039]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Sesanaet al.,Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies,Exper

    A. Sesanaet al.,Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies,Exper. Astron.51 (2021), no. 3 1333–1383, [1908.11391]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    W. D. Garretson, G. B. Field, and S. M. Carroll,Primordial magnetic fields from pseudoGoldstone bosons,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 5346–5351, [hep-ph/9209238]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  9. [9]

    M. M. Anber and L. Sorbo,N-flationary magnetic fields,JCAP10(2006) 018, [astro-ph/0606534]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  10. [10]

    M. M. Anber and L. Sorbo,Naturally inflating on steep potentials through electromagnetic dissipation,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 043534, [0908.4089]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    Barnaby and M

    N. Barnaby and M. Peloso,Large Nongaussianity in Axion Inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 181301, [1011.1500]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  12. [12]

    Barnaby, E

    N. Barnaby, E. Pajer, and M. Peloso,Gauge Field Production in Axion Inflation: Consequences for Monodromy, non-Gaussianity in the CMB, and Gravitational Waves at Interferometers,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 023525, [1110.3327]. – 23 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    Barnaby, R

    N. Barnaby, R. Namba, and M. Peloso,Phenomenology of a Pseudo-Scalar Inflaton: Naturally Large Nongaussianity,JCAP04(2011) 009, [1102.4333]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  14. [14]

    Barnaby, R

    N. Barnaby, R. Namba, and M. Peloso,Observable non-gaussianity from gauge field production in slow roll inflation, and a challenging connection with magnetogenesis,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 123523, [1202.1469]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  15. [15]

    Barnaby, J

    N. Barnaby, J. Moxon, R. Namba, M. Peloso, G. Shiu, and P. Zhou,Gravity waves and non-Gaussian features from particle production in a sector gravitationally coupled to the inflaton,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 103508, [1206.6117]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  16. [16]

    Linde, S

    A. Linde, S. Mooij, and E. Pajer,Gauge field production in supergravity inflation: Local non-Gaussianity and primordial black holes,Phys. Rev. D87(2013), no. 10 103506, [1212.1693]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  17. [17]

    P. D. Meerburg and E. Pajer,Observational Constraints on Gauge Field Production in Axion Inflation,JCAP02(2013) 017, [1203.6076]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  18. [18]

    Bamba,Generation of large-scale magnetic fields, non-Gaussianity, and primordial gravitational waves in inflationary cosmology,Phys

    K. Bamba,Generation of large-scale magnetic fields, non-Gaussianity, and primordial gravitational waves in inflationary cosmology,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 043509, [1411.4335]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    Durrer, L

    R. Durrer, L. Hollenstein, and R. K. Jain,Can slow roll inflation induce relevant helical magnetic fields?,JCAP03(2011) 037, [1005.5322]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  20. [20]

    M. M. Anber and E. Sabancilar,Hypermagnetic Fields and Baryon Asymmetry from Pseudoscalar Inflation,Phys. Rev. D92(2015), no. 10 101501, [1507.00744]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    Fujita, R

    T. Fujita, R. Namba, Y. Tada, N. Takeda, and H. Tashiro,Consistent generation of magnetic fields in axion inflation models,JCAP05(2015) 054, [1503.05802]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    Adshead, J

    P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, T. R. Scully, and E. I. Sfakianakis,Magnetogenesis from axion inflation,JCAP10(2016) 039, [1606.08474]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    E. V. Gorbar, K. Schmitz, O. O. Sobol, and S. I. Vilchinskii,Hypermagnetogenesis from axion inflation: Model-independent estimates,Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 4 043530, [2111.04712]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    O. O. Sobol, E. V. Gorbar, and S. I. Vilchinskii,Backreaction of electromagnetic fields and the Schwinger effect in pseudoscalar inflation magnetogenesis,Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 6 063523, [1907.10443]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Sharma, A

    R. Sharma, A. Brandenburg, K. Subramanian, and A. Vikman,Lattice simulations of axion-U(1) inflation: gravitational waves, magnetic fields, and scalar statistics,JCAP05 (2025) 079, [2411.04854]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Iarygina, E

    O. Iarygina, E. I. Sfakianakis, and A. Brandenburg,Schwinger effect in axion inflation on a lattice,2506.20538

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Jiménez, K

    D. Jiménez, K. Kamada, K. Schmitz, and X.-J. Xu,Baryon asymmetry and gravitational waves from pseudoscalar inflation,JCAP12(2017) 011, [1707.07943]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    Domcke and K

    V. Domcke and K. Mukaida,Gauge Field and Fermion Production during Axion Inflation, JCAP11(2018) 020, [1806.08769]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    Domcke, K

    V. Domcke, K. Kamada, K. Mukaida, K. Schmitz, and M. Yamada,Wash-in leptogenesis after axion inflation,JHEP01(2023) 053, [2210.06412]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Cado and M

    Y. Cado and M. Quirós,Numerical study of the Schwinger effect in axion inflation,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 12 123527, [2208.10977]. – 24 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Bugaev and P

    E. Bugaev and P. Klimai,Axion inflation with gauge field production and primordial black holes,Phys. Rev. D90(2014), no. 10 103501, [1312.7435]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  32. [32]

    Peloso, L

    M. Peloso, L. Sorbo, and C. Unal,Rolling axions during inflation: perturbativity and signatures,JCAP09(2016) 001, [1606.00459]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Garcia-Bellido, M

    J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Peloso, and C. Unal,Gravitational waves at interferometer scales and primordial black holes in axion inflation,JCAP12(2016) 031, [1610.03763]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Domcke, F

    V. Domcke, F. Muia, M. Pieroni, and L. T. Witkowski,PBH dark matter from axion inflation,JCAP07(2017) 048, [1704.03464]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    Özsoy and Z

    O. Özsoy and Z. Lalak,Primordial black holes as dark matter and gravitational waves from bumpy axion inflation,JCAP01(2021) 040, [2008.07549]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Domcke, V

    V. Domcke, V. Guidetti, Y. Welling, and A. Westphal,Resonant backreaction in axion inflation,JCAP09(2020) 009, [2002.02952]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    C. Unal, A. Papageorgiou, and I. Obata,Axion-gauge dynamics during inflation as the origin of pulsar timing array signals and primordial black holes,Phys. Lett. B856(2024) 138873, [2307.02322]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Özsoy and G

    O. Özsoy and G. Tasinato,Inflation and Primordial Black Holes,Universe9(2023), no. 5 203, [2301.03600]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Domcke, Y

    V. Domcke, Y. Ema, and S. Sandner,Perturbatively including inhomogeneities in axion inflation,JCAP03(2024) 019, [2310.09186]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    J. L. Cook and L. Sorbo,Particle production during inflation and gravitational waves detectable by ground-based interferometers,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 023534, [1109.0022]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 86, 069901 (2012)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  41. [41]

    Sorbo,Parity violation in the Cosmic Microwave Background from a pseudoscalar inflaton,JCAP06(2011) 003, [1101.1525]

    L. Sorbo,Parity violation in the Cosmic Microwave Background from a pseudoscalar inflaton,JCAP06(2011) 003, [1101.1525]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  42. [42]

    M. M. Anber and L. Sorbo,Non-Gaussianities and chiral gravitational waves in natural steep inflation,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 123537, [1203.5849]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  43. [43]

    R. Z. Ferreira and M. S. Sloth,Universal Constraints on Axions from Inflation,JHEP12 (2014) 139, [1409.5799]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  44. [44]

    Adshead, J

    P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, and Z. J. Weiner,Gravitational waves from gauge preheating, Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 4 4, [1805.04550]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Adshead, J

    P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, M. Pieroni, and Z. J. Weiner,Constraining Axion Inflation with Gravitational Waves across 29 Decades in Frequency,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020), no. 17 17, [1909.12843]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Mirbabayi, L

    M. Mirbabayi, L. Senatore, E. Silverstein, and M. Zaldarriaga,Gravitational Waves and the Scale of Inflation,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 063518, [1412.0665]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    Adshead, J

    P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, M. Pieroni, and Z. J. Weiner,Constraining axion inflation with gravitational waves from preheating,Phys. Rev. D101(2020), no. 8 8, [1909.12842]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Dimastrogiovanni, M

    E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello, and T. Fujita,Primordial Gravitational Waves from Axion-Gauge Fields Dynamics,JCAP01(2017) 019, [1608.04216]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Namba, M

    R. Namba, M. Peloso, M. Shiraishi, L. Sorbo, and C. Unal,Scale-dependent gravitational waves from a rolling axion,JCAP01(2016) 041, [1509.07521]. – 25 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    Domcke, M

    V. Domcke, M. Pieroni, and P. Binétruy,Primordial gravitational waves for universality classes of pseudoscalar inflation,JCAP06(2016) 031, [1603.01287]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    Domcke, Y

    V. Domcke, Y. Ema, and K. Mukaida,Chiral Anomaly, Schwinger Effect, Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian, and application to axion inflation,JHEP02(2020) 055, [1910.01205]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    Garcia-Bellido, A

    J. Garcia-Bellido, A. Papageorgiou, M. Peloso, and L. Sorbo,A flashing beacon in axion inflation: recurring bursts of gravitational waves in the strong backreaction regime,JCAP 01(2024) 034, [2303.13425]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Mukohyama, R

    S. Mukohyama, R. Namba, M. Peloso, and G. Shiu,Blue Tensor Spectrum from Particle Production during Inflation,JCAP08(2014) 036, [1405.0346]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  54. [54]

    Niu and M

    X. Niu and M. H. Rahat,NANOGrav signal from axion inflation,Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 11 115023, [2307.01192]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    S. P. Corbà and L. Sorbo,Correlated scalar perturbations and gravitational waves from axion inflation,JCAP10(2024) 024, [2403.03338]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    von Eckardstein, K

    R. von Eckardstein, K. Schmitz, and O. Sobol,Gravitational waves from axion inflation in the gradient expansion formalism. Part I. Pure axion inflation,JHEP01(2026) 018, [2508.00798]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    von Eckardstein, K

    R. von Eckardstein, K. Schmitz, and O. Sobol,Gravitational waves from axion inflation in the gradient expansion formalism. Part II. Fermionic axion inflation,JHEP03(2026) 072, [2509.25013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    J. R. C. Cuissa and D. G. Figueroa,Lattice formulation of axion inflation. Application to preheating,JCAP06(2019) 002, [1812.03132]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    Caravano, E

    A. Caravano, E. Komatsu, K. D. Lozanov, and J. Weller,Lattice simulations of Abelian gauge fields coupled to axions during inflation,Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 12 123530, [2110.10695]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    Caravano, E

    A. Caravano, E. Komatsu, K. D. Lozanov, and J. Weller,Lattice simulations of axion-U(1) inflation,Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 4 043504, [2204.12874]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    D. G. Figueroa, J. Lizarraga, N. Loayza, A. Urio, and J. Urrestilla,Nonlinear dynamics of axion inflation: A detailed lattice study,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 6 063545, [2411.16368]

    arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Papageorgiou, M

    A. Papageorgiou, M. Peloso, and C. Unal,Nonlinear perturbations from axion-gauge fields dynamics during inflation,JCAP07(2019) 004, [1904.01488]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  63. [63]

    D. G. Figueroa, J. Lizarraga, A. Urio, and J. Urrestilla,Strong Backreaction Regime in Axion Inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023), no. 15 151003, [2303.17436]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Peloso and L

    M. Peloso and L. Sorbo,Instability in axion inflation with strong backreaction from gauge modes,JCAP01(2023) 038, [2209.08131]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Barman, N

    B. Barman, N. Bernal, Y. Xu, and Ó. Zapata,Gravitational wave from graviton Bremsstrahlung during reheating,JCAP05(2023) 019, [2301.11345]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Barman, N

    B. Barman, N. Bernal, Y. Xu, and Ó. Zapata,Bremsstrahlung-induced gravitational waves in monomial potentials during reheating,Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 8 083524, [2305.16388]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Bernal, S

    N. Bernal, S. Cléry, Y. Mambrini, and Y. Xu,Probing reheating with graviton bremsstrahlung,JCAP01(2024) 065, [2311.12694]. – 26 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Kanemura and K

    S. Kanemura and K. Kaneta,Gravitational waves from particle decays during reheating, Phys. Lett. B855(2024) 138807, [2310.12023]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Tokareva,Gravitational waves from inflaton decay and bremsstrahlung,Phys

    A. Tokareva,Gravitational waves from inflaton decay and bremsstrahlung,Phys. Lett. B 853(2024) 138695, [2312.16691]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Barman, N

    B. Barman, N. Bernal, S. Cléry, Y. Mambrini, Y. Xu, and Ó. Zapata,Probing Reheating with Gravitational Waves from Graviton Bremsstrahlung, in58th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories, 5, 2024.2405.09620

    arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Jiang and T

    Y. Jiang and T. Suyama,Spectrum of high-frequency gravitational waves from graviton bremsstrahlung by the decay of inflaton: case with polynomial potential,JCAP02(2025) 041, [2410.11175]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    D. Das, M. Sanghi, and Sourav,Stochastic gravitational wave from graviton bremsstrahlung in inflaton decay into massive spin 3/2 particles,2511.01579

    arXiv

  73. [73]

    Bernal, Q.-f

    N. Bernal, Q.-f. Wu, X.-J. Xu, and Y. Xu,Probing Bose-enhanced Inflaton Decay with Gravitational Waves,2601.20939

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [74]

    G. Choi, W. Ke, and K. A. Olive,Minimal production of prompt gravitational waves during reheating,Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 8 083516, [2402.04310]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Xu,Ultra-high frequency gravitational waves from scattering, Bremsstrahlung and decay during reheating,JHEP10(2024) 174, [2407.03256]

    Y. Xu,Ultra-high frequency gravitational waves from scattering, Bremsstrahlung and decay during reheating,JHEP10(2024) 174, [2407.03256]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Bernal and Y

    N. Bernal and Y. Xu,Thermal gravitational waves during reheating,JHEP01(2025) 137, [2410.21385]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Bernal, Q.-f

    N. Bernal, Q.-f. Wu, X.-J. Xu, and Y. Xu,Pre-thermalized gravitational waves,JHEP08 (2025) 125, [2503.10756]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    X.-J. Xu, Y. Xu, Q. Yin, and J. Zhu,Full-spectrum analysis of gravitational wave production from inflation to reheating,JHEP10(2025) 141, [2505.08868]

    arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Aggarwalet al.,Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies,Living Rev

    N. Aggarwalet al.,Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies,Living Rev. Rel.24(2021), no. 1 4, [2011.12414]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    Domcke,Electromagnetic high-frequency gravitational wave detection, in57th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories, 6, 2023.2306.04496

    V. Domcke,Electromagnetic high-frequency gravitational wave detection, in57th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories, 6, 2023.2306.04496

    arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.