Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.01885 v1 pith:VW3NP5P4 submitted 2023-03-03 cs.CR

A tool assisted methodology to harden programs against multi-faults injections

classification cs.CR
keywords applicationsattackscountermeasuresapplicationassistedfaulthardenmethodology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fault attacks consist in changing the program behavior by injecting faults at run-time in order to break some expected security properties. Applications are hardened against fault attack adding countermeasures. According to the state of the art, applications must now be protected against multi-fault injection. As a consequence developing applications which are robust becomes a very challenging task, in particular because countermeasures can be also the target of attacks. The aim of this paper is to propose an assisted methodology for developers allowing to harden an application against multi-fault attacks, addressing several aspects: how to identify which parts of the code should be protected and how to choose the most appropriate countermeasures, making the application more robust and avoiding useless runtime checks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.