Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 43 references

PAMBE growth of GaN nanowires on metallic ZrN buffers -- a critical impact of ZrN layer thickness on the growth temperature

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Thin metallic ZrN buffers shift the real growth temperature by about 17°C during GaN nanowire growth, and an Al-wire melting calibration restores control.

desk verdict Useful calibration method and a genuine thermal effect, but the headline 17°C number depends on an unvalidated model transfer. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11754 v1 pith:VWQDZHQT submitted 2025-06-13 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph

Karol Olszewski , Zbigniew R. Zytkiewicz , Aleksandra Wierzbicka , Marek Guziewicz , Marta Sobanska This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph
keywords GaNnanowiresPAMBEZrbuffersubstratetemperatureopticalpyrometryemissivityincubationtimemolecularbeamepitaxy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that a thin metallic ZrN buffer layer changes the actual surface temperature during plasma-assisted MBE growth of GaN nanowires, and that the effect is large enough to alter nanowire length and density at the same heater power. Using the strongly temperature-dependent incubation time of GaN nucleation as a probe, the authors find about 17°C higher surface temperature on a Si wafer half covered by 40 nm ZrN than on the uncovered half. They trace the origin to emissivity: the emissivity of ZrN-coated Si and sapphire is strongly thickness-dependent and differs sharply from bulk ZrN, so standard pyrometer readings misjudge the temperature by as much as roughly 170°C if thin-film effects are ignored. To fix this, they calibrate the pyrometer by observing the melting of aluminum wires attached to the substrate, which lets them measure true emissivity and grow identical nanowire arrays on substrates with and without ZrN.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing probe is the GaN nanowire incubation time τ, which increases exponentially with growth temperature; a comparatively small temperature change can change τ from tens of minutes to hours, so τ acts as a highly sensitive local thermometer. The paper maps τ to temperature using the self-induced nucleation kinetics established for GaN on nitridated Si and amorphous AlxOy, and checks consistency through the nanowire length deficit under nitrogen-limited growth. The second piece of machinery is the emissivity calibration: thin Al wires bonded to the substrate melt at 660.3°C, and tuning the pyrometer emissivity until its reading equals that known melting point yields the true emissivity of a coated wafer at a temperature close to growth conditions. This gives the measured curve of emissivity versus ZrN thickness, from which the temperature readout error ΔTerr is calculated via Planck's law.

What would settle it

A decisive check would be to measure the actual surface temperature of both wafer halves at the same heater power with an independent contact or optical thermometer, such as embedded thermocouples or band-edge reflectance, and see whether the ZrN-covered half is really about 17°C hotter rather than relying on the incubation-time model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a 40 nm ZrN layer on half of a Si(111) wafer raises the GaN nanowire growth-surface temperature by about 17°C at the same heater power, as read out by the nanowire incubation time: RHEED gives τ = 12 min on the ZrN-free half and τ = 57 min on the ZrN-covered half, which the incubation-time model maps to 819°C and 836°C. The corresponding 45 min nucleation delay quantitatively explains the roughly 675 nm shorter nanowires observed on the ZrN half under nitrogen-limited growth. The paper further shows that this temperature shift is driven by emissivity: for ZrN films thinner than about 100 nm, the emissivity of the coated Si and sapphire wafers is much higher than bulk ZrN and rises sharply as thickness decreases, so a pyrometer calibrated for the bare wafer reads the wrong temperature. With an emissivity calibration based on melting of attached Al wires, the authors compensate for the ZrN buffer and grow nanowire arrays of identical length and density on Si with and without ZrN, then use those matched arrays to show that nanowire in-plane orientation is random on ZrN but aligned on nitridated Si.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's 17°C number rests on assuming the thin SiN cap makes GaN nucleate by the same mechanism on both wafer halves, so every difference in incubation time reflects temperature alone; if that cap nucleates differently on the metallic ZrN surface, the quantitative temperature rise would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Nanowire growth runs on substrates with thin ZrN buffers require a separate temperature calibration for each buffer thickness; recipes that ignore this will not reproduce nanowire length or density.
  • A pyrometer set to the bulk wafer emissivity can misread the substrate temperature by well over 100°C for ZrN films thinner than about 100 nm, which is exactly the thickness range used for buried contacts and mirrors.
  • Using the Al-wire melting calibration, the authors reproduce nanowire arrays with equal length (~1540 nm) and fill factor (~28%) on Si with and without a 100 nm ZrN buffer, showing that deliberate temperature compensation is sufficient to match growth conditions.
  • On the matched arrays, XRD shows the nanowire in-plane orientation is random on ZrN-covered Si but aligned to the Si lattice on nitridated Si, indicating the SiN nucleation layer behaves differently on the two surfaces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the authors do not pursue is using the incubation-time shift as a two-dimensional temperature map across a wafer with patterned buffers, since the same RHEED probe is local.
  • The emissivity curve is measured at 660°C and a wavelength of 1.6 µm; at other pyrometer wavelengths or growth temperatures the thickness dependence could shift, so the calibration may need repeating rather than assuming a fixed emissivity.
  • Because the 17°C shift is measured for a 40 nm film, thinner and thicker ZrN buffers should produce different temperature offsets; the Al-wire method could test this systematically and might show a maximum near the 100 nm crossover.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a study of GaN nanowire growth by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy on Si wafers that are half-covered with a 40 nm ZrN buffer. The central claim is that the ZrN-covered half is about 17°C hotter for the same heater power, as inferred from RHEED incubation times (12 min versus 57 min) that are converted to temperatures of 819°C and 836°C using an incubation-time model from previous work. The paper also introduces an optical pyrometer calibration method based on melting of aluminum wires, reports emissivity values for ZrN-coated Si and sapphire wafers as a function of ZrN thickness, and demonstrates that with calibrated emissivity one can grow nominally identical GaN nanowire arrays on Si and on ZrN/Si substrates at the same pyrometer temperature. Finally, XRD pole figures are used to compare the in-plane arrangement of nanowires on the two substrate types.

Significance. If the claims hold, the work is genuinely useful: thin metallic ZrN buffers are of practical interest for GaN nanowire devices, and the proposed Al-wire melting calibration is a simple, MBE-compatible method for obtaining true surface temperatures on substrates with unknown emissivity. The paper has clear strengths: the emissivity-versus-thickness trend for ZrN films is consistent with thin-film theory, the compensation experiment provides an independent validation that the calibrated emissivity values work in practice, and the data are deposited in a repository. The main weakness is that the quantitative 17°C temperature shift rests on transferring a nucleation-kinetics model from nitridated Si and amorphous AlxOy substrates to a SiN(2)/ZrN/Si stack whose structural state differs between the two halves; the qualitative effect is credible, but the specific number is not secured by the present evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results and discussion, Fig. 1] The conversion of the RHEED incubation time τ = 57 min on the ZrN-covered half to a temperature of 836°C relies entirely on the incubation-time model of refs [13,14,29], which was calibrated for nitridated Si and amorphous AlxOy surfaces. The paper's own XRD results (Fig. 5 and the accompanying text) show that SiN(2) deposited on SiN(1)/Si partially maintains the orientational order of the underlying nitridated Si, whereas SiN(2) deposited on ZrN remains amorphous. The two halves therefore differ in the structural state of the nucleation layer, not only in temperature, so the incubation-time difference could be partly kinetic in origin. The 17°C value is model-dependent and not directly measured. I recommend either applying the Al-wire melting calibration directly to a half-covered wafer with wires attached to both halves, or independently calibrating the incubation-time-versus-temperature relation for the actual SiN(2)/ZrN/Si stack.
  2. [Experimental and Fig. 3] The emissivity calibration is anchored at the melting point of aluminum, 660.3°C, and the text justifies this as being close to the temperature range of about 750°C used for GaN growth. However, the central growth experiments are at 819, 836, and 838°C, and the paper assumes without direct evidence that emissivity is temperature-independent between 660°C and 838°C. For metallic films, emissivity can vary with temperature through the temperature dependence of the electrical resistivity, so this assumption needs at least a quantitative estimate or a second calibration point. As written, this affects the reliability of the absolute temperatures in both the 17°C claim and the compensation experiment.
  3. [Results and discussion, length-deficit argument] The statement that a 45 min nucleation delay should lead to approximately 675 nm shorter nanowires, and that this 'exactly corresponds' to the observed length difference, assumes N-limited growth and a constant vertical growth rate during the entire post-nucleation period. Nanowire length evolution during the nucleation and early-growth stages can deviate from such a simple linear-deficit model, and no uncertainties are quoted for the SEM length measurements or the RHEED incubation times. This check is consistent with a qualitative thermal effect but does not independently certify the quantitative 17°C value, because the same kinetic assumptions enter both the incubation-time conversion and the growth-rate integration.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Results and discussion, Fig. 3 reference] In the paragraph after Fig. 3, 'Fig. 2 shows that the emissivity of both substrates decreases drastically' should refer to Fig. 3, since Fig. 2 contains the Al-wire schematic and RHEED images rather than the emissivity data.
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] The red-framed sample in Fig. 4 is labeled 'SiN(2)/ZrN/Si(1)/Si', which is inconsistent with the SiN(2)/ZrN/Si stack described in the text; if a SiN(1) layer is present under the ZrN, this should be stated explicitly, and if not, the caption should be corrected.
  3. [Eq. (2)] In Eq. (2), P(λ,T) is not explicitly defined as the Planck spectral radiance; defining it would make the ΔTerr calculation self-contained for a reader.
  4. [Compensation experiment] The text states that the same RHEED incubation times were detected on both substrates in the compensation experiment, but no numerical values are reported; giving those values would strengthen the claim of identical growth conditions.
  5. [Fig. 3a] The emissivity values in Fig. 3a would benefit from error bars or a reproducibility statement, since the ΔTerr values in Fig. 3b propagate directly from these measurements.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the key temperature shift is inferred with an externally anchored incubation-time model and independently validated by a compensation experiment.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, a ~17°C surface-temperature increase on the ZrN-covered half, is not obtained by fitting a parameter to the outcome it then predicts. The Al-wire melting calibration is pinned to an external benchmark, the melting point of aluminum at 660.3°C, and is used to set pyrometer emissivity before any nanowire growth data are used. The compensation experiment is an independent validation: the emissivity setting for the 100 nm ZrN/Si substrate was fixed from that calibration, and the identical nanowire lengths, fill factors, and RHEED incubation times on Si and ZrN/Si were not used to tune the emissivity. The quantitative 17°C value does rest on transferring the incubation-time-versus-temperature model from refs [13,14,29] to the SiN(2)/ZrN/Si stack, and the paper's own XRD data (Fig. 5) show that the SiN(2) cap is structurally different on ZrN versus nitridated Si, which is a genuine validity concern for that model transfer. However, the model is an independent empirical calibration from prior work, not a parameter fitted in this paper to force the temperature difference. A model-transfer assumption, even a questionable one, is not circularity; it is a correctness risk. No equation in the paper reduces the claimed result to its own inputs, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The derivation chain is therefore not circular, though the numerical precision of the 17°C value relies on an assumption that the nucleation kinetics are identical on both halves.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted in this paper; the emissivity values are measured, not adjusted to match the nanowire outcome. The main unstated premises are the transfer of the incubation-time model from prior work to ZrN-covered substrates and the use of a 660°C emissivity at the 838°C growth temperature. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Planck's law at the pyrometer wavelength λ = 1.6 μm describes the detected radiation, and Eq. (2) correctly converts radiance to temperature.
    Used to compute ΔTerr in Fig. 3b from the measured emissivity values; assumes a single-color pyrometer response and no uncorrected window or background contributions.
  • domain assumption The GaN nanowire incubation-time versus temperature model from refs [13,14,29] applies quantitatively to the SiN(2)/SiN(1)/Si and SiN(2)/ZrN/Si stacks used here.
    The 17°C temperature increase is obtained by mapping the measured τ = 57 min to 836°C using this model; surface chemistry or roughness differences could invalidate the mapping.
  • ad hoc to paper Emissivity is independent of temperature between the Al melting point (660°C) and the growth temperature (838°C).
    Calibration occurs at 660°C while growth occurs near 838°C, and no measurement or discussion of emissivity temperature dependence is provided.
  • domain assumption The ~2 nm SiN(2) layer makes the GaN nucleation mechanism identical on the Si and ZrN parts of the wafer.
    This is stated as the role of SiN(2) in the Experimental section and is the basis for attributing observed differences in incubation time solely to temperature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of PAMBE growth of GaN nanowires on metallic ZrN buffers -- a critical impact of ZrN layer thickness on the growth temperature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VWQDZHQT

@misc{pith2026250611754,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: PAMBE growth of GaN nanowires on metallic ZrN buffers -- a critical impact of ZrN layer thickness on the growth temperature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VWQDZHQT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11754}
}
read the original abstract

An impact of thin metallic ZrN layers on Si and sapphire wafers on substrate temperature during MBE growth of GaN nanowires is studied. Using nucleation kinetics of GaN as a sensitive probe we show that a thin ZrN layer strongly increases the substrate temperature, which significantly affects the dimensions and density of the nanowires. To quantify the effect we developed a technique of optical pyrometer calibration that allows reliable determination of emissivity, and thus precise measurement of temperature of substrates with unknown optical parameters, such as ZrN buffers of various thicknesses. Our results show that emissivity of ZrN-coated Si and sapphire wafers differs significantly from the bulk ZrN and increases drastically for films thinner than ~100 nm. Simple calculations indicate that ignoring the influence of the thin film may lead to huge errors in temperature readings and consequently to losing the growth control. Then, we show that we can compensate for the impact of ZrN buffer on substrate temperature and grow identical nanowire arrays on Si substrates with and without ZrN layers. Finally, having identical arrays of GaN nanowires we used X-ray diffraction to compare nanowire arrangements on Si and ZrN/Si substrates with a thin SiN nucleation layer.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ristić, E

    J. Ristić, E. Calleja, S. Fernández-Garrido, L. Cerutti, A. Trampert, U. Jahn, K.H. Ploog, On the mechanisms of spontaneous growth of III -nitride nanocolumns by plasma -assisted molecular beam epitaxy, J. Cryst. Growth 310 (2008) 4035–4045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.05.057

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.05.057 2008

  2. [2]

    Glas, Critical dimensions for the plastic relaxation of strained axial heterostructures in free -standing nanowires, Phys

    F. Glas, Critical dimensions for the plastic relaxation of strained axial heterostructures in free -standing nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 74 (2006) 121302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.121302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.121302 2006

  3. [3]

    H. Sun, X. Li, Recent Advances on III -Nitride Nanowire Light Emitters on Foreign Substrates – Toward Flexible Photonics, Phys. Status Solidi A 216 (2019) 1800420. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201800420

    work page doi:10.1002/pssa.201800420 2019

  4. [4]

    Carnevale, J

    S.D. Carnevale, J. Yang, P.J. Phillips, M.J. Mills, R.C. Myers, Three -Dimensional GaN/AlN Nanowire Heterostructures by Separating Nucleation and Growth Processes, Nano Lett. 11 (2011) 866 –871. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl104265u

    work page doi:10.1021/nl104265u 2011

  5. [5]

    Calarco, R.J

    R. Calarco, R.J. Meijers, R.K. Debnath, T. Stoica, E. Sutter, Hans. Lüth, Nucleation and Growth of GaN Nanowires on Si(111) Performed by Molecular Beam Epitaxy, Nano Le tt. 7 (2007) 2248 –2251. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0707398

    work page doi:10.1021/nl0707398 2007

  6. [6]

    Consonni, M

    V. Consonni, M. Knelangen, L. Geelhaar, A. Trampert, H. Riechert, Nucleation mechanisms of epitaxial GaN nanowires: Origin of their self -induced formation and initial radius, Phys. Rev. B 81 (2 010) 085310. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.085310

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.085310

  7. [7]

    Park, S.-H

    Y.S. Park, S.-H. Lee, J.-E. Oh, C.-M. Park, T.-W. Kang, Self-assembled GaN nano-rods grown directly on (111) Si substrates: Dependence on growth conditions, J. Cryst. Growth 282 (2005) 313 –319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.05.058

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.05.058 2005

  8. [8]

    Bertness, A

    K.A. Bertness, A. Roshko, N.A. Sanford, J.M. Barker, A.V. Davydov, Spontaneously grown GaN and AlGaN nanowires, J. Cryst. Growth 287 (2006) 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.11.079

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.11.079 2006

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Consonni, M

    V. Consonni, M. Hanke, M. Knelangen, L. Geelhaar, A. Trampert, H. Riechert, Nucleation mechanisms of self-induced GaN nanowires grown on an amorphous interlayer, Phys. Rev. B 83 (2011) 035310. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.035310

    2011 doi

  2. [10]

    Zhao, M.G

    S. Zhao, M.G. Kibr ia, Q. Wang, H.P.T. Nguyen, Z. Mi, Growth of large -scale vertically aligned GaN nanowires and their heterostructures with high uniformity on SiOx by catalyst-free molecular beam epitaxy, Nanoscale 5 (2013) 5283–5287. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR00387F

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    Stoica, E

    T. Stoica, E. Sutter, R.J. Meijers, R.K. Debnath, R. Calarco, H. Lüth, D. Grützmacher, Interface and Wetting Layer Effect on the Catalyst -Free Nucleation and Growth of GaN Nanowires, Small 4 (2008) 751 –754. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200700936

    2008 doi

  4. [12]

    Sobanska, S

    M. Sobanska, S. Fernández-Garrido, Z.R. Zytkiewicz, G. Tchutchulashvili, S. Gieraltowska, O. Brandt, L. Geelhaar, Self-assembled growth of GaN nanowires on amorphous AlxOy: from nucleation to the formation of dense nanowire ensembles, Nanotechnology 27 (2016 ) 325601. https://...

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    Sobanska, K.P

    M. Sobanska, K.P. Korona, Z.R. Zytkiewicz, K. Klosek, G. Tchutchulashvili, Kinetics of self -induced nucleation and optical properties of GaN nanowires grown by plasma -assisted molecular beam epitaxy on amorphous AlxOy, J. Appl. Phys. 118 (2015) 184303. https://doi.org/10.106...

    2015 doi

  6. [14]

    Sobanska, Z.R

    M. Sobanska, Z.R. Zytkiewicz, G. Calabrese, L. Geelhaar, S. Fernández -Garrido, Comprehensive analysis of the self -assembled formation of GaN nanowires on am orphous AlxOy: in situ quadrupole mass spectrometry studies, Nanotechnology 30 (2019) 154002. https://doi.org/10.1088/...

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    Janjua, H

    B. Janjua, H. Sun, C. Zhao, D.H. Anjum, F. Wu, A.A. Alhamoud, X. Li, A.M. Albadri, A.Y. Alyamani, M.M. El-Desouki, T.K. Ng, B.S. Ooi, Self -planarized quantum-disks-in-nanowires ultraviolet-B emitters utilizing pendeo-epitaxy, Nanoscale 9 (2017) 7805–7813. https://doi.org/10.1...

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    Sarwar, S.D

    A.G. Sarwar, S.D. Carnevale, F. Yang, T.F. Kent, J.J. Jamison, D.W. McComb, R.C. Myers, Semiconductor Nanowire Light -Emitting Diodes Grown on Metal: A Direction Toward Large -Scale Fabrication of Nanowire Devices, Small 11 (2015) 5402–5408. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201501909

    2015 doi

  9. [17]

    M. Wölz, C. Hauswald, T. Flissikowski, T. Got schke, S. Fernández -Garrido, O. Brandt, H.T. Grahn, L. Geelhaar, H. Riechert, Epitaxial Growth of GaN Nanowires with High Structural Perfection on a Metallic TiN Film, Nano Lett. 15 (2015) 3743–3747. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.na...

    2015 doi

  10. [18]

    May, A.T.M.G

    B.J. May, A.T.M.G. Sarwar, R.C. Myers, Nanowire LEDs grown directly on flexible metal foil, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 (2016) 141103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4945419

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    Calabrese, P

    G. Calabrese, P. Corfdir, G. Gao, C. Pfüller, A. Trampert, O. Brandt, L. Geelhaar, S. Fernán dez-Garrido, Molecular beam epitaxy of single crystalline GaN nanowires on a flexible Ti foil, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 (2016) 202101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4950707

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    Zhao, T.K

    C. Zhao, T.K. Ng, N. Wei, A. Prabaswara, M.S. Alias, B. Janjua, C. Shen, B.S. Ooi, F acile Formation of High-Quality InGaN/GaN Quantum-Disks-in-Nanowires on Bulk-Metal Substrates for High-Power Light- Emitters, Nano Lett. 16 (2016) 1056–1063. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanole...

    2016 doi

  13. [21]

    Calabrese, S.V

    G. Calabrese, S.V. Pettersen, C. Pfüller, M. Ram steiner, J.K. Grepstad, O. Brandt, L. Geelhaar, S. Fernández-Garrido, Effect of surface roughness, chemical composition, and native oxide crystallinity on the orientation of self -assembled GaN nanowires on Ti foils, Nanotechnol...

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    Calabrese, G

    G. Calabrese, G. Gao, D. van Treeck, P. Corfdir, C. Sinito, T. Auzelle, A. Trampert, L. Geelhaar, O. Brandt, S. Fernández -Garrido, Interfacial reactions during the molecular beam epitaxy of GaN nanowires on Ti/Al2O3, Nanotechnology 30 (2019) 114001. https://doi.org/10.1088/13...

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    Mudiyanselage, K

    K. Mudiyanselage, K. Katsiev, H. Idriss, Effects of experimental parameters on the growth of GaN nanowires on Ti-film/Si(100) and Ti-foil by molecular beam epitaxy, J. Cryst. Growth 547 (2020) 125818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2020.125818

    2020

  16. [24]

    Auzelle, M

    T. Auzelle, M. Azadmand, T. Flissikowski, M. Ramsteiner, K. Morgenroth, C. Stemmler, S. Fernández - Garrido, S. Sanguinetti, H.T. Grahn, L. Geelhaar, O. Brandt, Enhanced Radiative Efficiency in GaN Nanowires Grown on Sputtered TiNx: Effects of Surface Electric Fields, ACS Phot...

    2021

  17. [25]

    Waseem, I.V

    A. Waseem, I.V. Bagal, A. Abdullah, M.A. Kulkarni, H. Thaalbi, J. -S. Ha, J.K. Lee , S. -W. Ryu, High Performance, Stable, and Flexible Piezoelectric Nanogenerator Based on GaN:Mg Nanowires Directly Grown on Tungsten Foil, Small 18 (2022) 2200952. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll....

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    Olszewski, M

    K. Olszewski, M. Sobanska, V.G. Dubrovskii, E.D . Leshchenko, A. Wierzbicka, Z.R. Zytkiewicz, Geometrical Selection of GaN Nanowires Grown by Plasma-Assisted MBE on Polycrystalline ZrN Layers, Nanomaterials 13 (2023) 2587. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13182587

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    Tiagulskyi, R

    S. Tiagulskyi, R. Yatskiv, M. Sobanska , K. Olszewski, Z.R. Zytkiewicz, J. Grym, ZrN nucleation layer provides backside ohmic contact to MBE -grown GaN nanowires, Nanoscale (2025). https://doi.org/10.1039/D5NR00321K

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    Fernández-Garrido, J

    S. Fernández-Garrido, J. Grandal, E. Calleja, M.A. Sánchez -García, D. López-Romero, A growth diagram for plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy of GaN nanocolumns on Si(111), J. Appl. Phys. 106 (2009) 126102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3267151

    2009 doi

  21. [29]

    Fernández-Garrido, J.K

    S. Fernández-Garrido, J.K. Zettler, L. Geelhaar, O. Brandt, Monitoring the Formation of Nanowires by Line- of-Sight Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry: A Comprehensive Description of the Temporal Evolution of GaN Nanowire Ensembles, Nano Lett. 15 (2015) 1930–1937. https://doi.org/10...

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    Arthur, Molecular beam epitaxy, Su rf

    J.R. Arthur, Molecular beam epitaxy, Su rf. Sci. 500 (2002) 189 –217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039 - 6028(01)01525-4

    2002 doi

  23. [31]

    Asahi, Y

    H. Asahi, Y. Horikoshi, Molecular Beam Epitaxy: Materials and Applications for Electronics and Optoelectronics, John Wiley & Sons, 2019

    2019

  24. [32]

    Nouaoura, L

    M. Nouaoura, L. Lassabatere, N. B ertru, J. Bonnet, A. Ismail, Problems relevant to the use of optical pyrometers for substrate temperature measurements and controls in molecular beam epitaxy, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Microelectron. Nanometer Struct. Process. Meas. Phenom. 13 (...

    1995 doi

  25. [33]

    Lévêque, M

    G. Lévêque, M. Nouaoura, Temperature measurements by optical pyrometryduring the epitaxial growth ofsemiconductors, Eur. Phys. J. - Appl. Phys. 4 (1998) 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap:1998264

    1998 doi

  26. [34]

    Boebel, H

    F.G. Boebel, H. Möller, B. Hertel, H. Grothe, G. Schraud, St. Schröder, P. Chow, In situ film thickness and temperature control of molecular beam epitaxy growth by pyrometric interferometry, J. Cryst. Growth 150 (1995) 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(95)80180-K

    1995 doi

  27. [35]

    Katzer, B.V

    D.S. Katzer, B.V. Shanabrook, Comparison of optical pyrometry and infrared transmission measurements on indium ‐free mounted substrates during molecular ‐beam epitaxial growth, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Microelectron. Nanometer Struct. Process. Meas. Phenom. 11 (1993) 1003 –1006...

    1993 doi

  28. [36]

    Klosek, M

    K. Klosek, M. Sobanska, G. Tchutchulashvili, Z.R. Zytkiewicz, H. Teisseyre, L. Klopotowski, Optimization of nitrogen plasma source parameters by measurements of emitted light intensity fo r growth of GaN by molecular beam epitaxy, Thin Solid Films 534 (2013) 107–110. https://d...

    2013 doi

  29. [37]

    Wierzbicka, Z.R

    A. Wierzbicka, Z.R. Zytkiewicz, S. Kret, J. Borysiuk, P. Dluzewski, M. Sobanska, K. Klosek, A. Reszka, G. Tchutchulashvili, A. C abaj, E. Lusakowska, Influence of substrate nitridation temperature on epitaxial alignment of GaN nanowires to Si(111) substrate, Nanotechnology 24 ...

    2012 doi

  30. [38]

    Sobanska, A

    M. Sobanska, A. Wierzbicka, K. Klosek, J. Borysiuk, G. Tchutchulashvili, S. Gieraltowska, Z.R. Zytkiewicz, Arrangement of GaN nanowires grown by plasma -assisted molecular beam epitaxy on silicon substrates with amorphous Al2O3 buffers, J. Cryst. Growth 401 (2014) 657 –660. ht...

    2014 doi

  31. [39]

    Hirabayashi, First Observation of the Si(111) -7×7↔1×1 Phase Transition by the Optical Second Harmonic Generation, Jpn

    T.S. Hirabayashi, First Observation of the Si(111) -7×7↔1×1 Phase Transition by the Optical Second Harmonic Generation, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32 (1993) L610. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.32.L610

    1993 doi

  32. [40]

    Ravindra, B

    N.M. Ravindra, B. Sopori, O.H. Gokce, S.X. Cheng, A. Shenoy, L. Jin, S. Abedrabbo, W. Chen, Y. Zhang, Emissivity Measurements and Modeling of Silicon-Related Materials: An Overview, Int. J. Thermophys. 22 (2001) 1593–1611. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012869710173

    2001 doi

  33. [41]

    Edalatpour, M

    S. Edalatpour, M. Francoeur, Size effect on the emissivity of thin films, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 118 (2013) 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.12.012

    2013 doi

  34. [42]

    https://imagej.net/ij/ (accessed December 5, 2024)

    ImageJ, (n.d.). https://imagej.net/ij/ (accessed December 5, 2024)

    2024

  35. [1725]

    https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.1c00224

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.