Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the relationship between multitask neural networks and multitask Gaussian Processes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.05723 v1 pith:VXOGKQTM submitted 2019-12-12 cs.LG stat.ML

On the relationship between multitask neural networks and multitask Gaussian Processes

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords multitaskneuralsharedmtdnndeepinformationkernelsnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the effectiveness of multitask deep neural network (MTDNN), there is a limited theoretical understanding on how the information is shared across different tasks in MTDNN. In this work, we establish a formal connection between MTDNN with infinitely-wide hidden layers and multitask Gaussian Process (GP). We derive multitask GP kernels corresponding to both single-layer and deep multitask Bayesian neural networks (MTBNN) and show that information among different tasks is shared primarily due to correlation across last layer weights of MTBNN and shared hyper-parameters, which is contrary to the popular hypothesis that information is shared because of shared intermediate layer weights. Our construction enables using multitask GP to perform efficient Bayesian inference for the equivalent MTDNN with infinitely-wide hidden layers. Prior work on the connection between deep neural networks and GP for single task settings can be seen as special cases of our construction. We also present an adaptive multitask neural network architecture that corresponds to a multitask GP with more flexible kernels, such as Linear Model of Coregionalization (LMC) and Cross-Coregionalization (CC) kernels. We provide experimental results to further illustrate these ideas on synthetic and real datasets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.