REVIEW 1 cited by
Domain Adaptation with Conditional Distribution Matching and Generalized Label Shift
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Adversarial learning has demonstrated good performance in the unsupervised domain adaptation setting, by learning domain-invariant representations. However, recent work has shown limitations of this approach when label distributions differ between the source and target domains. In this paper, we propose a new assumption, generalized label shift ($GLS$), to improve robustness against mismatched label distributions. $GLS$ states that, conditioned on the label, there exists a representation of the input that is invariant between the source and target domains. Under $GLS$, we provide theoretical guarantees on the transfer performance of any classifier. We also devise necessary and sufficient conditions for $GLS$ to hold, by using an estimation of the relative class weights between domains and an appropriate reweighting of samples. Our weight estimation method could be straightforwardly and generically applied in existing domain adaptation (DA) algorithms that learn domain-invariant representations, with small computational overhead. In particular, we modify three DA algorithms, JAN, DANN and CDAN, and evaluate their performance on standard and artificial DA tasks. Our algorithms outperform the base versions, with vast improvements for large label distribution mismatches. Our code is available at https://tinyurl.com/y585xt6j.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On the Transferability and Discriminability of Repersentation Learning in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation
RLGLC combines a relaxed Wasserstein alignment with a contrastive local consistency term for UDA and reports SOTA results, but the proof that such a term is necessary is not rigorous.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.