Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards a practical measure of interference for reinforcement learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.03807 v1 pith:VZXSZH37 submitted 2020-07-07 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords interferencelearningmeasurearchitecturescontroldefinitionmanymeasures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Catastrophic interference is common in many network-based learning systems, and many proposals exist for mitigating it. But, before we overcome interference we must understand it better. In this work, we provide a definition of interference for control in reinforcement learning. We systematically evaluate our new measures, by assessing correlation with several measures of learning performance, including stability, sample efficiency, and online and offline control performance across a variety of learning architectures. Our new interference measure allows us to ask novel scientific questions about commonly used deep learning architectures. In particular we show that target network frequency is a dominating factor for interference, and that updates on the last layer result in significantly higher interference than updates internal to the network. This new measure can be expensive to compute; we conclude with motivation for an efficient proxy measure and empirically demonstrate it is correlated with our definition of interference.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools