REVIEW 1 cited by
SGOOD: Substructure-enhanced Graph-Level Out-of-Distribution Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Graph-level representation learning is important in a wide range of applications. Existing graph-level models are generally built on i.i.d. assumption for both training and testing graphs. However, in an open world, models can encounter out-of-distribution (OOD) testing graphs that are from different distributions unknown during training. A trustworthy model should be able to detect OOD graphs to avoid unreliable predictions, while producing accurate in-distribution (ID) predictions. To achieve this, we present SGOOD, a novel graph-level OOD detection framework. We find that substructure differences commonly exist between ID and OOD graphs, and design SGOOD with a series of techniques to encode task-agnostic substructures for effective OOD detection. Specifically, we build a super graph of substructures for every graph, and develop a two-level graph encoding pipeline that works on both original graphs and super graphs to obtain substructure-enhanced graph representations. We then devise substructure-preserving graph augmentation techniques to further capture more substructure semantics of ID graphs. Extensive experiments against 11 competitors on numerous graph datasets demonstrate the superiority of SGOOD, often surpassing existing methods by a significant margin. The code is available at https://github.com/TommyDzh/SGOOD.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bounded and Uniform Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detection for Graphs
NODESAFE adds two logit variance penalties to GNN training, cutting FPR95 for node-level OOD detection dramatically compared with GNNSAFE on citation and social-network graphs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.