Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Guidelines for Systematic Mapping Studies in Security Engineering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1801.06810 v1 pith:W2Q44UQD submitted 2018-01-21 cs.SE cs.CR

classification cs.SEcs.CR
keywords engineeringsecuritymappingstudiessystematicdataneedresearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Security engineering in the software lifecycle aims at protecting information and systems to guarantee confidentiality, integrity, and availability. As security engineering matures and the number of research papers grows, there is an increasing need for papers that summarize results and provide an overview of the area. A systematic mapping study "maps" a research area by classifying papers to identify which topics are well-studied and which need additional study. Therefore, systematic mapping studies are becoming increasingly important in security engineering. This chapter provides methodological support for systematic mapping studies in security engineering based on examples from published security engineering papers. Because security engineering is similar to software engineering in that it bridges research and practice, researchers can use the same basic systematic mapping process, as follows: (1) study planning, (2) searching for studies, (3) study selection, (4) study quality assessment, (5) data extraction, (6) data classification, (7) data analysis, and (8) reporting of results. We use published mapping studies to describe the tailoring of this process for security engineering. In addition to guidance on how to perform systematic mapping studies in security engineering, this chapter should increase awareness in the security engineering community of the need for additional mapping studies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Wikidata from a Research Perspective -- A Systematic Mapping Study of Wikidata

    cs.DL 2019-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic mapping study classifies 67 peer-reviewed Wikidata research papers into five topic areas and identifies gaps such as multilingualism and usability.

Pith tools