Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey of End-to-End Modeling for Distributed DNN Training: Workloads, Simulators, and TCO

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.09275 v1 pith:W353UFFM submitted 2025-06-10 cs.DC

A Survey of End-to-End Modeling for Distributed DNN Training: Workloads, Simulators, and TCO

classification cs.DC
keywords distributedtrainingdesignsimulationsimulatorssurveyacrosscommon
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Distributed deep neural networks (DNNs) have become a cornerstone for scaling machine learning to meet the demands of increasingly complex applications. However, the rapid growth in model complexity far outpaces CMOS technology scaling, making sustainable and efficient system design a critical challenge. Addressing this requires coordinated co-design across software, hardware, and technology layers. Due to the prohibitive cost and complexity of deploying full-scale training systems, simulators play a pivotal role in enabling this design exploration. This survey reviews the landscape of distributed DNN training simulators, focusing on three major dimensions: workload representation, simulation infrastructure, and models for total cost of ownership (TCO) including carbon emissions. It covers how workloads are abstracted and used in simulation, outlines common workload representation methods, and includes comprehensive comparison tables covering both simulation frameworks and TCO/emissions models, detailing their capabilities, assumptions, and areas of focus. In addition to synthesizing existing tools, the survey highlights emerging trends, common limitations, and open research challenges across the stack. By providing a structured overview, this work supports informed decision-making in the design and evaluation of distributed training systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TileSight: A First-Principles Tile-Centric Analytical GPU Performance Model from Cores to Clusters

    cs.DC 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A tile-centric analytical model predicts GPU kernel latency and cache behavior purely from microbenchmark-calibrated hardware rates, reaching about 12% GEMM error and 13% end-to-end LLM serving error across five GPU lines.

  2. DeepStack: Scalable and Accurate Design Space Exploration for Distributed 3D-Stacked AI Accelerators

    cs.AR 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    DeepStack introduces a fast performance model and hierarchical search method for co-optimizing 3D DRAM stacking, interconnects, and distributed scheduling in AI accelerators, delivering up to 9.5x throughput gains ove...