Pith. sign in

REVIEW

DR.GAP: Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models using Gender-Aware Prompting with Decoupled Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.11603 v2 pith:W35TDWA4 submitted 2025-02-17 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords biasgendermodelsreasoninglanguagepromptingdecoupledgender-aware
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong natural language understanding capabilities but also inherit and amplify societal biases, particularly gender bias, raising fairness concerns. Existing prompt-based debiasing strategies share a key limitation: they fail to disentangle gender information from task semantics. Bias steering compels models to overemphasize gender cues, while reasoning-based prompting induces gender-biased reasoning chains. To address these challenges, we propose DR.GAP (Decoupled Reasoning for Gender-Aware Prompting), an automated and model-agnostic pipeline that mitigates gender bias while preserving model performance. DR.GAP generates gender-neutral reasoning traces and applies them as in-context demonstrations during inference, effectively decoupling gender attributes from task semantics without modifying model parameters. Extensive experiments on coreference resolution and question-answering tasks across six LLMs demonstrate DR.GAP's effectiveness, generalizability, and robustness, supported by detailed mechanism analyses. Moreover, DR.GAP can be extended to vision-language models (VLMs), achieving substantial bias reduction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools