Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 38 references

Enhancing Unconventional Spin-Orbit Torque Efficiency: Numerical Study on the Influence of Crystallographic Texture and Polycrystalline Effects on Low-Symmetry Materials

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Grain alignment decides whether out-of-plane spin-orbit torques survive.

desk verdict A practical texture-averaging calculation for unconventional SOT, with a real but fixable gap in the averaging model. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14200 v2 pith:W4BIJ6QT submitted 2025-01-24 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yifei Yang , Jian-Ping Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords spintronicsspin-orbittorqueunconventionalspinHalleffectcrystallographictexturepolycrystallinefilmslow-symmetrymaterialsout-of-planepolarizationMn3GaN
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a low-symmetry material's ability to generate out-of-plane spin currents—the component best suited for switching perpendicular magnets without an external field—depends as much on how the crystal grains are aligned as on the material's intrinsic spin Hall conductivity. Modeling a polycrystalline film as a weighted average of independent grains with a Gaussian orientation distribution, the authors find that for Mn3GaN the out-of-plane spin component averages exactly to zero when grain orientations are random, while conventional in-plane components survive. With texture, the out-of-plane component survives, degrading as the orientation spread widens: a 15° in-plane spread retains 96.7% of the ideal value, while a 15° out-of-plane spread retains 84.6%. The paper concludes that achieving strong crystallographic texture and choosing the right current direction are both essential to make unconventional spin-orbit torque useful in memory and logic devices.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spin Hall conductivity tensor $σ_{jk}^{i}$, whose device-relevant elements are obtained by rotating the crystal tensor with the matrix $D$ (Eq. 6). Texture enters through the orientation distribution function (ODF), a Gaussian $g(θ, θ_0, w_{in})$ over the in-plane angle $θ$ and a two-angle version $g(θ, ψ, θ_0, w_{in}, w_{oop})$ over $θ$ and the out-of-plane angle $ψ$ (Eqs. 4 and 8). The averaging rule $σ_{eff} = ∫ σ(θ) g(θ) dθ / ∫ g(θ) dθ$ (Eq. 5, with the two-angle analogue Eq. 9) converts the orientation-dependent single-crystal response into the effective device response, which is how the paper computes the surviving fraction of out-of-plane spin torque for a given texture spread.

What would settle it

Measure the out-of-plane spin torque efficiency of Mn3GaN films grown with a deliberately graded crystallographic texture, from epitaxial to random, using harmonic Hall or spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance, and compare with the retention curve predicted here: a random film should show no out-of-plane torque at all, and a film with a 15° out-of-plane spread should show about 84.6% of the epitaxial value.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's discovery is that the device-level spin Hall conductivity of a polycrystalline low-symmetry SOT material is the orientation average of the single-crystal tensor, and this average has a sharp symmetry consequence. In the tensor $σ_{jk}^{i}$ (spin polarization $i$, flow $j$, charge current $k$), the device elements $σ_{ZX}^{Z}$ (out-of-plane spins), $σ_{ZX}^{X}$ (Dresselhaus-like in-plane spins), and $σ_{ZX}^{Y}$ (conventional in-plane spins) vary with the in-plane grain angle $θ$ with different periods: $σ_{Z}$ and $σ_{X}$ oscillate about zero with a 360° period while $σ_{Y}$ has a 180° period and a nonzero mean. Hence a random in-plane orientation distribution cancels the unconventional components exactly, leaving only the conventional one. With a Gaussian texture, the effective out-of-plane component is $σ_{eff}^{Z} = ∫ σ_{Z}(θ, ψ) g(θ, ψ) dθ dψ / ∫ g(θ, ψ) dθ dψ$, which for Mn3GaN keeps 96.7% of its ideal value at an in-plane spread of 15° but only 84.6% at an out-of-plane spread of 15°.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a polycrystalline film's spin Hall response is just the average of its individual single-crystal grains, each keeping its intrinsic tensor, with Gaussian spread widths and a symmetric out-of-plane distribution; if grain-boundary scattering, current redistribution, strain, or non-Gaussian textures break that picture, the quantitative retention percentages would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Field-free switching in practical devices will be dominated by the conventional in-plane torque unless the SOT layer is grown with a strong crystallographic texture; a randomly oriented polycrystalline film loses the out-of-plane contribution entirely.
  • For Mn3GaN, aligning the current with the crystal orientation that maximizes the out-of-plane component (the $θ_0=-45°$ direction, i.e., [11̄0]) is as important as the texture quality itself.
  • Out-of-plane texture is the tighter constraint: a 15° out-of-plane spread costs more than four times as much out-of-plane signal as the same in-plane spread (15.4% vs 3.3% loss).
  • X-ray diffraction $φ$- and $ω$-scan peak widths give the Gaussian ODF width directly, so the model turns x-ray measurements into a quantitative growth target for sputtered SOT films.
  • The same orientation-averaging procedure can be applied to any low-symmetry SOT material whose full spin Hall tensor is known, making the result a general design rule rather than a Mn3GaN-specific fit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the exact cancellation of odd orientation components in the random limit follows from sign symmetry, so it should survive non-Gaussian grain distributions; the quantitative retention percentages are the more fragile part of the claim.
  • Beyond the paper: grain-boundary scattering, current redistribution, and strain all change the per-grain response, so a controlled experiment varying only the FWHM of the texture would separate pure orientation averaging from these additional polycrystalline effects.
  • Beyond the paper: the model assumes the out-of-plane orientation is symmetric about 0°; a tilted film with a nonzero mean out-of-plane angle would break the even/odd cancellation and could resurrect or enhance out-of-plane torque in ways not covered here.
  • Beyond the paper: grain size and spin diffusion length are absent from the average; a natural extension is to weight grains not only by orientation but also by size-dependent spin current delivery.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a numerical framework to quantify how the crystallographic texture of a low-symmetry spin-orbit torque (SOT) layer affects unconventional spin Hall conductivity (SHC). Taking a fixed single-crystal SHC tensor as input, the authors rotate it by an in-plane angle θ and an out-of-plane angle ψ, define a Gaussian orientation distribution function (ODF), and compute the ODF-weighted average of the device-relevant SHC components (σ_Z, σ_Y, σ_X). Using Pt as a high-symmetry reference and Mn3GaN as a low-symmetry example, the paper finds that the unconventional out-of-plane (Z) and in-plane (X) spin polarizations average to zero for random in-plane texture, while the conventional Y polarization survives; with Gaussian texture, σ_eff^Z degrades with increasing in-plane and out-of-plane spread, and at 15° spread Mn3GaN retains 96.7% of its maximum σ_eff^Z for an in-plane spread but only 84.6% for an out-of-plane spread. The manuscript concludes by recommending strong texture and a specific current direction ([1-10] of Mn3GaN (001)) to maximize out-of-plane spin torque.

Significance. If the central model assumptions hold, the paper provides a useful and easily reproducible estimate of texture-induced degradation of unconventional SHC and a concrete bridge between XRD texture measurements and SOT device performance. The tensor-rotation formalism is transparent and does not fit the target quantities; it uses published SHC tensors as inputs, which is a strength. The falsifiable predictions (e.g., the retention percentages) can be tested experimentally. However, the significance is limited by the single-crystal-grain averaging model, which ignores charge-conductivity anisotropy, grain-boundary scattering, and non-ideal textures; these limitations mean the numerical values should be treated as order-of-magnitude estimates rather than exact device predictions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II, Eqs. (5) and (9) and Abstract] The effective SHC is defined as a simple ODF-weighted average of the single-crystal SHC. This is only the device-level value if every grain carries the same current density. In a polycrystalline film, the charge current distribution is controlled by the orientation-dependent ordinary conductivity; the correct torque-per-current figure is a current-weighted average, ⟨σ_SH σ_c⟩/⟨σ_c⟩ (for a parallel-grain network), and the spin Hall angle is σ_SH/σ_c. The paper does not justify the isotropy of the charge conductivity of Mn3GaN, and the claim that switching efficiency is 'directly proportional to SHC' (Introduction) is too strong. The quantitative results—the exact cancellation of σ_eff^Z in the random limit and the retention values 96.7% and 84.6%—depend on this averaging choice. The in-plane random cancellation of σ^Z likely survives because σ^Z(θ) contains only first harmonics while σ_c is π-periodic, but the textured and out-of-plane cases need an explicit check. Please add a current-weighted calculation or a robustness test.
  2. [Sec. II, Eq. (8) and Fig. 4] The OOP orientation distribution is assumed to be Gaussian and symmetric about ψ=0, and only even-in-ψ terms of σ_Z are retained. This assumption drives the conclusion that odd ψ-components cancel and that the OOP-spin SHC degrades monotonically with OOP spread. Real sputtered films can have tilted or non-Gaussian mosaics, and grain boundaries can alter the local SHC tensor. The paper should either extend the calculation to non-symmetric ODFs and non-zero mean ψ or explicitly state that the predictions are restricted to the symmetric-Gaussian idealization. Without this, the 'entirely cancelled' statement in the random limit and the specific percentage 84.6% are conditional on an assumption with limited experimental grounding.
  3. [Title and Conclusion] The abstract and conclusion frame the work as enhancing 'spin-orbit torque efficiency', but the calculation yields the spin Hall conductivity tensor, not the torque efficiency. The experimentally relevant efficiency typically involves the spin-to-charge current ratio, which depends on the ordinary charge conductivity. The authors should clarify how σ_eff maps to measured torque efficiencies and avoid implying that the SHC value alone sets the efficiency.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II, Eq. (10)] There are several typesetting artifacts, e.g., Eq. (10) appears as 'FWHM = 2√2𝐼𝐼𝑠𝑠2 width' and should read 'FWHM = 2√(2 ln 2) w' (≈ 2.355w).
  2. [Sec. II, Fig. 3] Fig. 3(b)-(d) include a vertical dashed line at width = 360°, which is off scale; please adjust the axis or use a logarithmic width scale to show the convergence to zero.
  3. [Sec. II, Fig. 4 discussion] The sentence 'For Mn3GaN, the USHC shows good tolerance to in-plane spread width ... (Fig. 4(d))' should reference Fig. 3(d), not Fig. 4(d), which plots the out-of-plane spread dependence.
  4. [Sec. II, Eqs. (4), (5), (9)] The Gaussian ODF should specify that θ is periodic over 2π and that the normalization and integrals are taken over one full period; otherwise the large-width limit of the Gaussian is not exactly the uniform distribution used in the random-texture discussion.
  5. [Sec. II, Fig. 4] The phrase 'It is evidence that...' should read 'It is evident that...'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the effective-SHC averaging is a self-contained calculation from externally published tensor inputs and an assumed Gaussian ODF.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a forward calculation: single-crystal spin Hall conductivity tensors for Pt and Mn3GaN are taken from the published literature ([22] and [12]); they are rotated to device coordinates via Eqs. (1)-(3) and Eq. (6); and the device-level effective values are obtained by normalized orientation averaging over a Gaussian or uniform ODF in Eqs. (5) and (9). None of the target quantities—sigma_eff^Z in the random limit, the width dependence in Figs. 3 and 4, or the 96.7% and 84.6% retention figures—are used as inputs or fitted parameters; they are computed integrals of the stated model. The cancellation of OOP spin components for a random texture is a mathematical consequence of the assumed uniform orientation distribution and the sin/cos angular structure of Eq. (3), not a hidden restatement of the input. The same holds for the OOP-spread result. Self-citations ([16]-[18], and the data source [12] if from the same group) are either supporting examples or published input data that is externally anchored and not derived within this paper; no uniqueness theorem and no same-author result is invoked to force the central conclusion. The equal-current-density averaging assumption in Eq. (5) is a physical modeling choice that may affect quantitative accuracy, but it is not an exhibitable case in which a derived result reduces to an input by definition. Under the stated rules, the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities or fitted parameters are introduced. The calculation consumes literature SHC tensor values (Table I from refs [12,22]) and a hand-chosen Gaussian ODF model. The main axioms are the standard tensor rotation law, the assumption that grains contribute additively via a weighted average, and the assumption that the OOP texture is symmetric about 0°. The ODF widths and preferred angles are model inputs, not fitted outputs.

free parameters (3)
  • In-plane ODF width w_in = 1°, 15°, 360° (illustrative)
    Hand-chosen values representing epitaxial, textured, and random polycrystalline films; the quantitative retention claims (96.7%) depend on this choice.
  • Out-of-plane ODF width w_oout = swept, with 15° used for comparison
    Hand-chosen spread parameter; controls the claimed higher sensitivity to OOP texture.
  • Preferred in-plane orientation theta_0 = -45°, 0°, 45°
    Scanned values; the optimal -45° result depends on the crystal axis convention and the signs of the SHC tensor elements.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The effective device SHC is the arithmetic mean over grains, weighted by the ODF (Eq. 5, Eq. 9), with no inter-grain corrections.
    This is the core modeling assumption; grain boundaries, current shunting, and interfacial spin loss are not included.
  • standard math The crystal-to-device SHC transformation follows the standard third-rank tensor rotation rule (Eq. 6).
    Assumed without derivation; standard for axial (spin-current) tensors under proper rotations.
  • domain assumption The OOP orientation distribution is symmetric about 0° and has zero mean (Section II, after Eq. 7).
    This removes odd components of psi; tilted or skewed columnar growth would violate it.
  • domain assumption Crystallographic texture is described by a single Gaussian ODF with width parameters w_in and w_oout (Eqs. 4 and 8).
    Real textures can be non-Gaussian, multi-modal, or fiber textures; the Gaussian model is an idealization.
  • domain assumption The intrinsic SHC tensor of the single crystal is unchanged in the polycrystalline film.
    Strain, finite-size, and surface effects that alter the band structure would change the tensor values used from refs [12,22].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhancing Unconventional Spin-Orbit Torque Efficiency: Numerical Study on the Influence of Crystallographic Texture and Polycrystalline Effects on Low-Symmetry Materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W4BIJ6QT

@misc{pith2026250114200,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhancing Unconventional Spin-Orbit Torque Efficiency: Numerical Study on the Influence of Crystallographic Texture and Polycrystalline Effects on Low-Symmetry Materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W4BIJ6QT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14200}
}
read the original abstract

Spin-orbit torque (SOT) has been extensively studied as a key mechanism in spintronics applications. However, conventional SOT materials limit the spin polarization direction to the in-plane orientation, which is suboptimal for efficient magnetization switching. Recently, spin currents with spin polarization along multiple directions have been observed in low-symmetry materials, offering a promising energy-efficient strategy for the field-free switching of magnetic materials with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. However, the efficiency of this mechanism is highly dependent on the crystallographic texture of the SOT materials, a critical factor that, to date, has not been quantitatively investigated. In this study, we present a comprehensive numerical investigation into the impact of both in-plane and out-of-plane crystallographic textures of SOT materials on the unconventional SOT generated by Dresselhaus-like and out-of-plane spin polarizations. By employing a theoretical orientation distribution function, we calculate the effective unconventional SOT values for SOT materials with tunable crystallographic texture. This analysis provides a framework for the synthesis and optimization of future low-symmetry SOT materials, which can enhance operational efficiency for spintronics applications in magnetoresistive random-access memory and spin logic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.14200 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of a SOT device composed of a SOT layer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. (a) Computed dependence of SHC of Z-spin on the out￾of-plane orientation (𝜓𝜓) for three different 𝜃𝜃0 values. (b) Computed effective SHC values of Z-spin as a function of the out-of-plane orientation spread width (𝑤𝑤𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 ) for Mn3GaN. The in-plane orientation spread width (𝑤𝑤𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖) is set as 15°. The calculations are based on SHC values of Mn3GaN [12]. The width value of the ODF can be measured experimentally by X-ra… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. Ryu, S. Lee, K. J. Lee, and B. G. Park, ‘Current-Induced Spin– Orbit Torques for Spintronic Applications’, Adv. Mater., vol. 32, no. 35, p. 1907148, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1002/ADMA.201907148

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201907148 2020

  2. [2]

    Wang et al., ‘A Pathway to Enable Exponential Scaling for the Beyond-CMOS Era’, Proceedings of the 54th Annual Design Automation Conference, pp

    J.-P. Wang et al., ‘A Pathway to Enable Exponential Scaling for the Beyond-CMOS Era’, Proceedings of the 54th Annual Design Automation Conference, pp. 1–6, Jun. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3061639.3072942

    work page arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Manchon et al

    A. Manchon et al. , ‘Current -induced spin -orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems’, Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 91, no. 3, p. 35 004, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035004

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.035004 2019

  4. [4]

    Ikeda et al., ‘A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB--MgO magnetic tunnel junction’, Nat

    S. Ikeda et al., ‘A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB--MgO magnetic tunnel junction’, Nat. Mater., p. 11, 2010, doi: 10.1038/NMAT2804

    doi:10.1038/nmat2804 2010

  5. [5]

    Yu et al., ‘Switching of perpendicular magnetization by spin-orbit torques in the absence of external magnetic fields’, Nat

    G. Yu et al., ‘Switching of perpendicular magnetization by spin-orbit torques in the absence of external magnetic fields’, Nat. Nanotechnol.|, vol. 9, 2014, doi: 10.1038/NNANO.2014.94

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.94 2014

  6. [6]

    You et al

    L. You et al. , ‘Switching of perpendicularly polarized nanomagnets with spin orbit torque without an external magnetic field by engineering a tilted anisotropy’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 112, no. 33, pp. 10310–10315, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1073/PNAS.1507474112

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1507474112 2015

  7. [7]

    Fukami, C

    S. Fukami, C. Zhang, S. Duttagupta, A. Kurenkov, and H. Ohno, ‘Magnetization switching by spin-orbit torque in an antiferromagnet- ferromagnet bilayer system’, Nat. Mater. , p. 15, 2016, doi: 10.1038/NMAT4566

    doi:10.1038/nmat4566 2016

  8. [8]

    Zhao et al

    Z. Zhao et al. , ‘External -Field-Free Spin Hall Switching of Perpendicular Magnetic Nanopillar with a Dipole -Coupled Composite Structure’, Adv. Electron. Mater., 2020, doi: 10.1002/aelm.201901368

    work page doi:10.1002/aelm.201901368 2020

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    S.-H. C. Baek et al. , ‘Spin currents and spin -orbit torques in ferromagnetic trilayers’, Nat. Mater., vol. 17, pp. 509–513, 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41563-018-0041-5

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    Wang et al

    M. Wang et al. , ‘Field-free switching of a perpendicula r magnetic tunnel junction through the interplay of spin -orbit and spin -transfer torques’, Nat. Electron., 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41928-018-0160-7

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    MacNeill, G

    D. MacNeill, G. M. Stiehl, M. H. D Guimaraes, R. A. Buhrman, J. Park, and D. C. Ralph, ‘Control of spin-orbit torques through crystal symmetry in WTe 2/ferromagnet bilayers’, Nat. Phys., 2017, doi: 10.1038/NPHYS3933

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    Nan et al., ‘Controlling spin current polarization through non - collinear antiferromagnetism’, Nat

    T. Nan et al., ‘Controlling spin current polarization through non - collinear antiferromagnetism’, Nat. Commun. , 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17999-4

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    Bose et al

    A. Bose et al. , ‘Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide’, Nat. Electron., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 267–274, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41928-022-00744-8

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    DC et al

    M. DC et al. , ‘Observation of anti -damping spin–orbit torques generated by in-plane and out-of-plane spin polarizations in MnPd3’, Nat. Mater., pp. 1–8, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41563-023-01522-3. GQ-02 6

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    Liu et al., ‘Field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization at room temperature using out -of-plane spins from TaIrTe 4’, Nat

    Y. Liu et al., ‘Field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization at room temperature using out -of-plane spins from TaIrTe 4’, Nat. Electro., vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 732–738, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41928-023- 01039-2

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    J.-P. Wang, T. Low, Y. Yang, and S. Lee, ‘Materials generating multi spin components for magnetization switching and dynamics’, US Patent, vol. US20240172565A1, Oct. 2023, Accessed: Jun. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20240172565A1/en

    2023

  9. [17]

    Yang et al

    Y. Yang et al. , ‘Giant spin Hall effect with multi -directional spin components in Ni 4W’, Nov. 2024, Accessed: Nov. 09, 202 4. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.05682v1

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Yang et al., ‘Coexistence of unconventional spin Hall effect and antisymmetric planar Hall effect in IrO2’, Nov

    Y. Yang et al., ‘Coexistence of unconventional spin Hall effect and antisymmetric planar Hall effect in IrO2’, Nov. 2024, Accessed: Nov. 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.05688v1

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    A. Roy, M. H. D. Guimarães, and J. Sławińska, ‘Unconventional spin Hall effects in nonmagnetic solids’, Phys. Rev. Mater., vol. 6, no. 4, p. 045004, 2022, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVMATERIALS.6.045004/FIGURES/3/MEDIUM

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    D. J. P. De Sousa, P. M. Haney, J. P. Wang, and T. Low, ‘Field-Free- Switching State Diagram of Perpendicular Magnetization Subjected to Conventional and Unconventional Spin-Orbit Torques’, Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 18, no. 5, p. 054020, 2022, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVAPPLIED.18.05402...

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    D. K. Lee and K. J. Lee, ‘Spin -orbit Torque Switching of Perpendicular Magnetization in Ferromagnetic Trilayers’, Sci. Rep., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58669-1

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    L. Zhu, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman , ‘Maximizing spin -orbit torque generated by the spin Hall effect of Pt’, Appl. Phys. Rev., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 031308, 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0059171

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Dc et al

    M. Dc et al. , ‘Room -temperature high spin –orbit torque due to quantum confinement in sputtered Bi xSe(1–x) films’, Nat. Mater., vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 800–807, 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41563-018-0136-z

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    Zhang et al., ‘Robust negative longitudinal magnetoresistance and spin–orbit torque in sputtered Pt 3Sn and Pt 3SnxFe1-x topological semimetal’, Nat

    D. Zhang et al., ‘Robust negative longitudinal magnetoresistance and spin–orbit torque in sputtered Pt 3Sn and Pt 3SnxFe1-x topological semimetal’, Nat. Commun. , vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1 –8, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39408-2

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    Fan et al

    Y. Fan et al. , ‘Observation and enhancement of room temperature bilinear magnetoelectric resistance in sputtered topological semimetal Pt 3Sn’, npj Spintronics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1 –6, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s44306-024-00036-1

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    Van Pamel, G

    A. Van Pamel, G. Sha, and M. J. S. Lowe, ‘Attenuation and Phase Velocity of Elastic Wave in Textured Polycrystals with Ellipsoidal Grains of Arbitrary Crystal Symmetry’, Acoustics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 51–72, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ACOUSTICS2010005

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    Paritosh, D. J. Srolovitz, C. C. Battaile, X. Li, and J. E. Butler, ‘Simulation of faceted film growth in two -dimensions: microstructure, morphology and texture’, Acta Mater., vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 2269–2281, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00086-5

    1999 doi

  20. [28]

    U. F. Kocks, C. N. Tomé, and H.- R. Wenk, ‘Plasticity Modeling in Minerals and Rocks’, Texture and Anisotropy: Preferred Orientations in Polycrystals and Their Effect on Materials Properties, pp. 560–596, 2000

    2000

  21. [29]

    Kreisk ott et al

    S. Kreisk ott et al. , ‘Reel -to-reel preparation of ion -beam assisted deposition (IBAD)-MgO based coated conductors’, Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 17, no. 5, p. S132, 2004, doi: 10.1088/0953 - 2048/17/5/008

    2004 doi

  22. [30]

    Mahieu, P

    S. Mahieu, P. Ghekiere, D. Depla, and R. De Gryse, ‘Bi axial alignment in sputter deposited thin films’, Thin Solid Films, vol. 515, no. 4, pp. 1229–1249, 2006, doi: 10.1016/J.TSF.2006.06.027

    2006 doi

  23. [31]

    Sahu et al

    P. Sahu et al. , ‘Room Temperature Spin -to-Charge Conversion in Amorphous Topological Insulating Gd -Alloyed Bi xSe1-x/CoFeB Bilayers’, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces , vol. 15, no. 32, pp. 38592 – 38602, 2023, doi: 10.1021/ACSAMI.3C07695

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    M. Kam, Q. Zhang, D. Zhang, and Z. Fan, ‘Room -Temperature Sputtered SnO2 as Robust Electron Transport Layer for Air -Stable and Effic ient Perovskite Solar Cells on Rigid and Flexible Substrates’, Sci. Rep., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1 –10, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42962-9

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    Matias and R

    V. Matias and R. H. Hammond, ‘Ion beam induced crystalline texturing during thin film deposition’, Surf. Coat Technol., vol. 264, pp. 1–8, 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.SURFCOAT.2014.12.018

    2015 doi

  26. [34]

    J. C. Gallagher et al., ‘Epitaxial growth of iridate pyrochlore Nd2Ir2O7 films’, Sci. Rep. 2016 6:1, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1 –7, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1038/srep22282

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    Peters et al., ‘Epitaxial films of Heusler compound Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5 with high crystalline quality grown by off -axis sputtering’, Appl

    B. Peters et al., ‘Epitaxial films of Heusler compound Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5 with high crystalline quality grown by off -axis sputtering’, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 103, no. 16, p. 162404, 2013, doi: 10.1063/1.4825338

    2013 doi

  28. [36]

    P. W. Swatek et al., ‘Room temperature spin-orbit torque efficiency in sputtered low -temperature superconductor δ -TaN’, Phys. Rev. Mater., vol. 6, no. 7, p. 074206, 2022, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVMATERIALS.6.074206/FIGURES/7/MEDIUM

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    Y. Wan, J. H. Fu, C. P. Chuu, V. Tung, Y. Shi, and L. J. Li, ‘Wafer- scale single-orientation 2D layers by atomic edge -guided epitaxial growth’, Chem. Soc. Rev., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 803 –811, 2022, doi: 10.1039/D1CS00264C

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    Zhang, X

    Z. Zhang, X. Yang, K. Liu, and R. Wang, ‘Epitaxy of 2D Materials toward Single Crystals’, Adv. Sci., vol. 9, no. 8, p. 2105201, 2022, doi: 10.1002/ADVS.202105201

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.