Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

This paper claims that semiclassical black hole evaporation can be reproduced by coarse-graining the exact unitary dynamics of a pure CFT state, and constructs explicit states, probes, and averaging schemes toward that end.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 06:43 UTC pith:W5EMYPA3

load-bearing objection Useful framework paper: exact collisional states and a systematic comparison of coarse-grainings; the evaporating-BH purity claim is conditional on an extrapolation the authors flag. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2601.22077 v2 pith:W5EMYPA3 submitted 2026-01-29 hep-th

A Reverse Black Hole Information Problem

Jan de Boer , Jildou Hollander , Andrew Rolph This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords AdS/CFTblack hole information paradoxHawking radiationcoarse-grainingensemble averagingOPE coefficientssmall AdS black holestwo-point functions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the mixed-state Hawking radiation seen by a semiclassical observer is not a failure of unitarity but a coarse-grained version of an exactly pure CFT state. The authors construct explicit boundary states that describe two particles colliding in AdS to form a small, unstable black hole that later evaporates. They show that boundary two-point functions can distinguish such black holes from thermal gas of the same mass. They then compare several coarse-graining prescriptions—averaging over OPE coefficients, Hamiltonians, and time windows—and find that each reproduces some, but not all, features of the semiclassical bulk state; only a maximum-entropy ensemble matched all tested properties. The central quantitative link is a statistical formula for heavy-light-light OPE coefficients that turns the pure state into a maximally mixed state of purity e^{-S} in the black hole energy window.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that mixed-state Hawking radiation is a coarse-grained image of an exactly pure CFT state, not a violation of unitarity. It constructs a state |ψ(0)⟩ = N^{-1}:ΦΦ:|0⟩ from smeared boundary operators whose evolution is dual to a trans-Planckian particle collision; at suitable ω this forms a small unstable AdS black hole that later evaporates. Coarse-graining maps—averages over OPE coefficients, Hamiltonians, and time windows—turn the pure state into a density matrix with purity 1 below the black hole threshold and e^{-S} in the black hole window; a refined toy model gives decreasing purity during evaporation.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the smeared boundary operators Φ_{ω,e} that create localised bulk wavepackets, so |ψ(0)⟩ = N^{-1}:Φ_{ω,e_S}Φ_{ω,e_N}:|0⟩ is an exact, pure CFT state dual to a zero-impact-parameter collision. Expanded in the spin-dimension eigenbasis, its wavefunction coefficients are Gaussian-peaked at dimension 2ω with zero spin. The argument is carried by three coarse-graining mechanisms: OPE-coefficient averaging, whose key statistical identity c_{φφa}c_{φφb}=f(Δ_a,Δ_φ)δ_{ab}/e^{S(Δ_a)} makes the averaged state diagonal with purity e^{-S}; Hamiltonian-ensemble averaging, whose purity follows the spectral form factor; and the microcanonical decomposition H = ⊕_n H_BH^{(E-n)} ⊗ H_ra

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the OPE-coefficient statistics c_{φφa}c_{φφb}=δ_{ab}f/e^{S(Δ_a)}, proven only at infinite conformal dimension, continue to hold for the small-black-hole dimensions (c^{1/4}≪Δ≪c^{2/3}); if that extrapolation fails, the predicted coarse-grained purity e^{-S} for an evaporating black hole does not follow.

What would settle it

Measure the actual variance of heavy-light-light OPE coefficients in a specific holographic CFT at dimensions in the small black hole window (c^{1/4} ≪ Δ ≪ c^{2/3}); if c_{φφa}c_{φφb} deviates from δ_{ab} f/e^{S(Δ_a)}, or if the coarse-grained purity of the colliding-particle state does not drop to e^{-S}, the central coarse-graining claim for evaporating black holes is refuted.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The exact state (2.22) is a concrete, tunable CFT representation of black hole formation: its overlaps pick out conformal dimension 2ω and zero spin, so kinematics of the bulk collision are encoded in the wavefunction coefficients (2.44).
  • Boundary two-point functions of simple operators can serve as a black-hole detector in the microcanonical ensemble: for fixed mass, black hole geometries give smaller two-point functions than thermal gas, with localised (and then delocalised) black holes intermediate.
  • Coarse-graining over OPE coefficients yields purity 1 below the black-hole threshold and e^{-S} inside it; averaging over Hamiltonian rotations gives an O(1) mixing time but a much later maximal-mixing time, so different prescriptions match the bulk only partially.
  • A maximum-entropy ensemble of density matrices is the only surveyed prescription that satisfies all the listed properties; the paper is explicit that this prescription works only if the desired output is fed in as input.
  • For small, evaporating black holes, the refined toy model predicts that coarse-grained purity falls as the black hole emits Hawking quanta, while pure radiation states remain pure—a signature that coarse-graining, not tracing out a bath, is the right notion of information loss.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This suggests a general dictionary: any low-energy observer's ignorance of heavy CFT data defines a specific CPTP map on the exact state, so the semiclassical bulk state is observer-dependent in a precise, calculable way.
  • A testable extension is to compute the variance of heavy-light-light OPE coefficients at finite Δ in a solvable large-c CFT; if the e^{-S} scaling fails in the small-black-hole window, the evaporating-black-hole purity prediction fails with it.
  • The two-point-function hierarchy, shown in a free matrix model, could be checked in the same strongly coupled gauge theory at finite N; agreement would tie partial deconfinement to the bulk geodesic calculation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Lorentzian AdS/CFT framework for a bathless formulation of the black hole information problem. In §2 it constructs exact CFT states (2.22) from smeared boundary operator insertions, expands them in the spin-dimension basis, and computes the wavefunction coefficients (2.44) that are claimed to describe two bulk particles colliding to form a small, unstable AdS black hole that later evaporates. In §3 it argues that boundary two-point functions distinguish black-hole states from thermal-gas states of the same ADM mass, using the geodesic approximation and a hierarchy of emblackening factors. In §4 the paper analyzes several coarse-graining maps—averaging over OPE coefficients, Hamiltonian eigenstates, energy levels, time windows, and density-matrix ensembles—and compares the resulting purities with semiclassical bulk expectations. A toy model for small evaporating black holes with a sectorized Hilbert space is developed in §4.8 and Appendix A. The central thesis is that the mixedness of the semiclassical bulk state can arise from ensemble-averaging the exact, always-unitary boundary dynamics.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a useful step toward connecting ensemble-averaged holography with the single-sided information problem, and it provides an explicit, tractable family of CFT states dual to black hole formation. The calculation of the wavefunction coefficients in §2.2 is clean, the geodesic inequality in §3.1 is valid under the stated staticity assumption, the comparison table in §4.7 is a genuinely useful organizing device, and the toy model in Appendix A comes with reproducible numerics. The authors are unusually transparent: they flag several steps as conjectural or as extrapolations beyond their proven range. That transparency is a strength, but it also exposes where the central claims are not yet established. In particular, the small-black-hole coarse-graining analysis—the part of the paper most relevant to the reverse information problem—rests on an OPE-statistics extrapolation that the authors themselves label unproven. The significance is therefore conditional: the framework is plausible and worth publishing only after the load-bearing assumptions are either proved, replaced, or explicitly downgraded.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.1, Eq. (4.17) and §4.8] The quantitative bridge between coarse-graining and semiclassical black-hole purity is Eq. (4.17), c_ϕϕa c_ϕϕb = f(Δa,Δϕ)δ_ab/e^{S(Δa)}. The text explicitly states that this form is proven only in the Δ→∞ limit and that using it for dimensions in the small unstable black-hole range (e.g. c^{1/4} ≪ Δ ≪ c^{2/3} for AdS3×S3) is an unproven extrapolation. This is not a minor technicality: the δ_ab/e^S structure is what makes the averaged ρ_H diagonal and its purity e^{-S}. If off-diagonal correlations survive or the variance is not exponentially suppressed in S at these intermediate dimensions, the claimed match with the semiclassical purity of an evaporating small black hole fails. The toy model in Appendix A uses Haar/GUE averaging rather than OPE-coefficient statistics and does not independently justify Eq. (4.17). This concern directly affects the paper's main claim about the small-black
  2. [§3.2, Eqs. (3.24)–(3.25)] The detection hierarchy for localised ten-dimensional black holes depends on the assumption h_BH(r) > h_gas(r) for all r. The paper checks only the asymptotic regimes r≪1 and r≫1 and then states 'let us assume that it holds for all r.' The geodesic length integral samples the full range of r, so an intermediate-r crossing would change the inequality between the two-point functions. In addition, the effective mass function m_BH(r) for the localised black hole at the antipodal point of the internal sphere is put in by hand rather than derived from the known localized geometry. Without either a proof or numerical verification over the full radial range, the claimed hierarchy of two-point functions (thermal gas > localised black hole > delocalised black hole) is not established. This is load-bearing for the detection claim in §3.
  3. [§4.5.1 and Table 1] The maximum-entropy coarse-graining map is presented in Table 1 as satisfying all the listed properties, but the text immediately admits that the map is guaranteed to reproduce a desired density matrix or entropy curve only if that desired output is inserted as a constraint. This is circular as a constructive proposal: it does not predict the semiclassical coarse-graining, it encodes it. The table's 'Yes' entries for this row should be read as 'possible in principle, given the right input', not as an established matching between a natural boundary prescription and the bulk semiclassical state. Since this is the only map that passes all columns, the summary conclusion that a single coarse-graining can reconcile unitarity with mixed Hawking radiation is weaker than the table suggests.
  4. [§4.6] The replica-wormhole rescue argument is carried out by analogy with the authors' earlier random-dynamics model [87], not by a computation in the OPE-coefficient-averaged CFT state considered here. The diagrammatic discussion of ρ^n and Wick contractions is suggestive, but no replica calculation is shown for the OPE-averaging prescription, and the role of the e^{-S}-suppressed non-Gaussian corrections is only discussed qualitatively. As the authors note, such corrections can be leading order after summing over e^S states, so the claim that replica wormholes restore unitarity for the present coarse-graining maps is not demonstrated. This is secondary to the main purity comparison, but it should be flagged because the paper presents it as a resolution mechanism.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.1] There are several typos: 'not necessariliy' in the first line, 'thermodynamicallyunstable' near Eq. (2.3), and 'funtions' in §3.2. These are harmless but should be corrected.
  2. [§2.3 and §4.1] The bipartition H = H_L ⊕ H_H is introduced as a heuristic with a tolerance parameter, and the paper acknowledges this. However, the tolerance parameter is never made precise, and the later coarse-graining results in §4.1 assume that the separation is sharp. A short discussion of how the results depend on the tolerance would help the reader assess robustness.
  3. [§3.1] The sentence 'In the previous section, it was found that f_gas ≥ f_BH for all r' is confusing: the inequality was derived in the introductory paragraph of §3, not in the previous numbered subsection. Adjusting the cross-reference would improve readability.
  4. [§4.4] The time-window averaging entropy curve discussion is brief and the plot is not shown. Since the subsection introduces two inequivalent time-averaging maps, a small figure comparing their purities would help the reader track the difference between them.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Max-entropy coarse-graining is admitted to feed the target in as input; replica-wormhole rescue leans on authors' own [87].

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Sec. 4.5.1 (Eq. (4.69) and surrounding text); see also Table 1 row 'Maximum entropy μ(ρ)' and Sec. 5]
    "A trivial way for the coarse-graining map (4.69) to give a ρ which matches any given density matrix on a set of quantities (like the observables in (4.69), or an entropy curve like in Fig. 5) is to condition the maximisation of S(µρ) on matching those quantities. This is guaranteed to work and give the desired matching between density matrices, but it is feeding in the desired output as input."

    The maximum-entropy prescription is defined by maximizing entropy subject to matching specified observables to the exact/semiclassical state. When the desired entropy curve is itself among the matched quantities, the coarse-grained state reproduces that curve by construction. The paper explicitly admits this ('feeding in the desired output as input'), so the Table 1 entry showing this map as satisfying all desired properties is not an independent prediction but a tautological construction.

  2. self citation load bearing [Sec. 4.6 (Entropies and replica wormholes)]
    "Indeed, as evidence to back up this claim, in [87] we showed explicitly that this mechanism holds in a setup similar to Sec. 4.2.1, where we averaged over Hamiltonian rotation unitaries in a dynamical random matrix model of black hole evaporation."

    The claim that replica-wormhole-like connected diagrams 'rescue' unitarity for the coarse-graining maps is supported only by a citation to the authors' own prior work [87], which uses a setup similar to this paper's Sec. 4.2.1. No independent derivation or externally verified computation is presented in this manuscript for this load-bearing step; as written, the argument's force rests on the authors' self-citation rather than on an independent check.

full rationale

The central OPE-coefficient averaging result in Sec. 4.1 is not itself circular: Eq. (4.17) is presented as a proven asymptotic formula extrapolated to a new regime, with the extrapolation explicitly flagged as unproven. That is an honest assumption, not a renaming or fitted-input-as-prediction. The particle-collision state construction in Sec. 2 is a self-contained use of the holographic dictionary and WKB wavepackets. The two-point-function detection argument rests on an unproven interpolation (h_BH > h_gas for all r), but this is again an assumption rather than a circular reduction. However, two elements do warrant circularity flags: (1) the maximum-entropy coarse-graining of Sec. 4.5.1 is admitted by the authors to feed the desired output in as input, yet it is the only prescription listed as satisfying all Table 1 properties; (2) the replica-wormhole unitarity-rescue argument leans on the authors' own [87] rather than an independent computation. These are real but localized; the main semiclassical-vs-coarse-grained purity comparison has independent content, so the score is 4 rather than higher.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's central constructions depend on standard AdS/CFT and semiclassical EFT inputs, plus a small number of explicitly acknowledged extrapolations (OPE statistics at small black-hole dimensions, all-r mass-function inequality, heuristic bipartition). The toy model contains hand-set parameters but is explicitly illustrative. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • ω (bulk particle frequency) = tunable; small-BH range c^α (α<1)
    Sets CoM energy s=4ω²/ℓ_AdS²; the paper's evaporation scenario requires it in the unstable window, but no value is fitted to data.
  • σ² (variance of mixing/hopping Hamiltonians) = 50
    Chosen by hand in App. A toy model; sets mixing and evaporation timescales. Not fitted to data.
  • Toy Hilbert-space dimensions N_BH^(n), N_rad^(n) = {1,2,8}, {1,16,64}; E=2
    Handpicked in App. A to satisfy N^(n)≪N^(n+1); illustrative, not derived.
  • Bipartition tolerance parameter (HL/HH split)
    Sec. 2.3 acknowledges the split depends on an arbitrary tolerance for 1/c corrections; used in the Sec. 4 coarse-graining prescriptions.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence: exact unitary boundary CFT is dual to semiclassical bulk gravity in AdS.
    Used throughout to equate boundary state (2.22) with bulk colliding wavepackets and to interpret coarse-grained states.
  • domain assumption Gravitational EFT valid for r_h≫ℓ_p; final evaporation stage leaves no high-entropy remnant.
    Sec. 2.1 mass range and Sec. 4 footnote; needed for semiclassical evaporation picture.
  • domain assumption Two free wavepackets propagate without backreaction until separation ~ Schwarzschild radius, then form a trapped surface.
    Sec. 2.2; underpins the claim that (2.22)'s unitary evolution is dual to black hole formation.
  • ad hoc to paper Eq. (4.17): averaged HLL OPE coefficient product is f δ_ab / e^{S}, extended from Δ→∞ to small BH range.
    Sec. 4.1; explicitly flagged as unproven extrapolation; needed for purity e^{-S} in the evaporating regime.
  • ad hoc to paper h_BH(r)>h_gas(r) for all r in AdS×compact geometry.
    Sec. 3.2; only asymptotic arguments are given; needed for two-point-function hierarchy for localised black holes.
  • ad hoc to paper Hilbert space splits as H_L⊕H_H (knowable vs statistically-known primary data).
    Sec. 2.3; heuristic, depends on arbitrary tolerance; structure used by all coarse-graining maps.
  • ad hoc to paper Toy model Hilbert space decomposition H=⊕_n H_BH^{(E-n)}⊗H_rad^{(n)} with nearest-neighbour hopping.
    App. A; illustrative model, not derived from CFT; used to exhibit evaporation purity curve.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 55766 in / 16780 out tokens · 172001 ms · 2026-08-03T06:43:28.535033+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the formation, detection and coarse-graining of black holes in AdS/CFT, with an emphasis on the tension between boundary unitarity and the production of mixed state Hawking radiation in the bulk. We construct CFT states dual to black hole formation and evaporation by colliding bulk particle wavepackets at trans-Planckian energy. We propose boundary probes which are able to distinguish small AdS black holes from other states within the microcanonical ensemble. We investigate different coarse-graining prescriptions acting on the evolving CFT state, including averaging over CFT data, Hamiltonians and time windows, and compare their purities to those expected from the bulk semiclassical description. Our results clarify how semiclassical black hole behaviour can arise from an ensemble-averaging of the exact unitary dynamics, and take a step towards a better understanding of coarse-graining in the single-sided black hole information problem.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bulk Motion in Global AdS$_3$ from the Boundary Energy-Density Perspective

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Boundary energy densities in CFT2 encode the periodic boundary-to-boundary propagation of null excitations in global AdS3 via chiral peaks whose weights and timing track bulk geodesics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 90 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini,Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation, JHEP2020(May, 2020) 13, [arXiv:1911.12333]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  2. [2]

    Penington, S

    G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang,Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, JHEP03(2022) 205, [arXiv:1911.11977]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford,A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity, arXiv:1806.06840

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    J. M. Maldacena and L. Maoz,Wormholes in AdS, JHEP02(2004) 053, [hep-th/0401024]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  5. [5]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford,JT gravity as a matrix integral, arXiv:1903.11115

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  6. [6]

    Belin, J

    A. Belin, J. de Boer, D. L. Jafferis, P. Nayak, and J. Sonner,Approximate CFTs and Random Tensor Models, JHEP2024(May, 2024) 163, [arXiv:2308.03829]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Chandra, S

    J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman, and A. Maloney,Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs, JHEP2022(Dec., 2022) 69, [arXiv:2203.06511]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    de Boer, D

    J. de Boer, D. Liska, B. Post, and M. Sasieta,A principle of maximum ignorance for semiclassical gravity, JHEP2024(2024) 003, [arXiv:2311.08132]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle creation by black holes, Communications in mathematical physics 43(1975), no. 3 199–220

    1975

  10. [10]

    S. W. Hawking,Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D14 (1976), no. 10 2460

    1976

  11. [11]

    S. B. Giddings and A. Nudelman,Gravitational collapse and its boundary description in AdS, JHEP02(2002) 003, [hep-th/0112099]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  12. [12]

    U. H. Danielsson, E. Keski-Vakkuri, and M. Kruczenski,Black hole formation in AdS and thermalization on the boundary, JHEP02(2000) 039, [hep-th/9912209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  13. [13]

    U. H. Danielsson, E. Keski-Vakkuri, and M. Kruczenski,Spherically collapsing matter in AdS, holography, and shellons, Nucl. Phys. B563(1999) 279–292, [hep-th/9905227]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  14. [14]

    Heemskerk, D

    I. Heemskerk, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully,Bulk and Transhorizon Measurements in AdS/CFT, JHEP10(2012) 165, [arXiv:1201.3664]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  15. [15]

    Bhattacharyya and S

    S. Bhattacharyya and S. Minwalla,Weak Field Black Hole Formation in Asymptotically AdS Spacetimes, JHEP09(2009) 034, [arXiv:0904.0464]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  16. [16]

    Arsiwalla, J

    X. Arsiwalla, J. de Boer, K. Papadodimas, and E. Verlinde,Degenerate Stars and Gravitational Collapse in AdS/CFT, JHEP01(2011) 144, [arXiv:1010.5784]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [17]

    Anous, T

    T. Anous, T. Hartman, A. Rovai, and J. Sonner,Black hole collapse in the 1/c expansion, JHEP07(2016) 123, [arXiv:1603.04856]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Banerjee and G

    S. Banerjee and G. Vos,Signatures of Bulk Black Hole Merger from Semi-classical 2d CFT, JHEP2025(Feb., 2025) 11, [arXiv:2501.00405]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Bizon and A

    P. Bizon and A. Rostworowski,On weakly turbulent instability of anti-de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 031102, [arXiv:1104.3702]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  20. [20]

    O. J. C. Dias, G. T. Horowitz, and J. E. Santos,Gravitational Turbulent Instability of Anti-de Sitter Space, Class. Quant. Grav.29(2012) 194002, [arXiv:1109.1825]. – 71 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  21. [21]

    Polchinski,S-matrices from AdS space-time, arXiv preprint (1, 1999) [hep-th/9901076]

    J. Polchinski,S-matrices from AdS space-time, arXiv preprint (1, 1999) [hep-th/9901076]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  22. [22]

    Polchinski, L

    J. Polchinski, L. Susskind, and N. Toumbas,Negative energy, superluminosity and holography, Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 084006, [hep-th/9903228]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  23. [23]

    O. J. Dias, J. E. Santos, and B. Way,Localised AdS 5 ×S 5 black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (Oct, 2016) 151101, [arXiv:1605.04911]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Balasubramanian and S

    V. Balasubramanian and S. F. Ross,Holographic Particle Detection, Phys. Rev. D61(Jan.,

  25. [26]

    Takayanagi and T

    T. Takayanagi and T. Ugajin,Measuring Black Hole Formations by Entanglement Entropy via Coarse-Graining, JHEP2010(Nov., 2010) 54, [arXiv:1008.3439]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  26. [27]

    Balasubramanian, A

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Bernamonti, J. de Boer, N. Copland, B. Craps, E. Keski-Vakkuri, B. M¨ uller, A. Sch¨ afer, M. Shigemori, and W. Staessens,Thermalization of strongly coupled field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011), no. 19 191601, [arXiv:1012.4753]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  27. [28]

    Balasubramanian, A

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Bernamonti, J. De Boer, N. Copland, B. Craps, E. Keski-Vakkuri, B. M¨ uller, A. Sch¨ afer, M. Shigemori, and W. Staessens,Holographic thermalization,Phys. Rev. D84(2011), no. 2 026010, [arXiv:1103.2683]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  28. [29]

    Berenstein,LargeNBPS states and emergent quantum gravity, JHEP2006(2006), no

    D. Berenstein,LargeNBPS states and emergent quantum gravity, JHEP2006(2006), no. 01 125, [hep-th/0507203]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  29. [30]

    Asplund and D

    C. Asplund and D. Berenstein,Small AdS black holes from SYM, Phys. Lett. B673(2009), no. 4-5 264–267, [0809.0712]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  30. [31]

    Hanada and J

    M. Hanada and J. Maltz,A proposal of the gauge theory description of the small Schwarzschild black hole in AdS 5 ×S 5, JHEP2017(2017), no. 2 1–21, [arXiv:1608.03276]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [32]

    Berenstein,Submatrix deconfinement and small black holes in AdS, JHEP2018(2018), no

    D. Berenstein,Submatrix deconfinement and small black holes in AdS, JHEP2018(2018), no. 9 1–19, [arXiv:1806.05729]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [33]

    Hanada, G

    M. Hanada, G. Ishiki, and H. Watanabe,Partial deconfinement, JHEP2019(2019), no. 3 1–25, [arXiv:1812.05494]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [34]

    Hanada, A

    M. Hanada, A. Jevicki, C. Peng, and N. Wintergerst,Anatomy of deconfinement, JHEP 2019(2019), no. 12 1–21, [arXiv:1909.09118]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [35]

    Hollowood, S

    T. Hollowood, S. P. Kumar, and A. Naqvi,Instabilities of the small black hole: a view from N= 4SYM, JHEP2007(2007), no. 01 001, [hep-th/0607111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  35. [36]

    Pappadopulo, S

    D. Pappadopulo, S. Rychkov, J. Espin, and R. Rattazzi,OPE Convergence in Conformal Field Theory, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 105043, [arXiv:1208.6449]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [37]

    Chang and Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin,Bootstrapping 2D CFTs in the Semiclassical Limit, JHEP 2016(Aug., 2016) 56, [arXiv:1510.02464]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [38]

    Chang and Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin,Bootstrap, universality and horizons, JHEP2016(Oct., 2016) 68, [arXiv:1604.01774]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [39]

    Cardy, A

    J. Cardy, A. Maloney, and H. Maxfield,A new handle on three-point coefficients: OPE asymptotics from genus two modular invariance, JHEP2017(Oct., 2017) 136, [arXiv:1705.05855]. – 72 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [40]

    Kraus and A

    P. Kraus and A. Maloney,A Cardy Formula for Three-Point Coefficients: How the Black Hole Got its Spots, JHEP2017(May, 2017) 160, [arXiv:1608.03284]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [41]

    D. Das, S. Datta, and S. Pal,Modular crossings, OPE coefficients and black holes, Phys. Rev. D98(Nov., 2018) 101901, [arXiv:1712.01842]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [42]

    Collier, A

    S. Collier, A. Maloney, H. Maxfield, and I. Tsiares,Universal Dynamics of Heavy Operators in CFT 2, JHEP2020(July, 2020) 74, [arXiv:1912.00222]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  42. [43]

    D. Das, Y. Kusuki, and S. Pal,Universality in asymptotic bounds and its saturation in 2D CFT, JHEP2021(Apr., 2021) 288, [arXiv:2011.02482]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  43. [44]

    Belin and J

    A. Belin and J. de Boer,Random Statistics of OPE Coefficients and Euclidean Wormholes, Class. Quant. Grav.38(Aug., 2021) 164001, [arXiv:2006.05499]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  44. [45]

    Anous, A

    T. Anous, A. Belin, J. de Boer, and D. Liska,OPE statistics from higher-point crossing, JHEP2022(June, 2022) 102, [arXiv:2112.09143]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  45. [46]

    Belin, J

    A. Belin, J. de Boer, P. Nayak, and J. Sonner,Generalized Spectral Form Factors and the Statistics of Heavy Operators, JHEP2022(Nov., 2022) 145, [arXiv:2111.06373]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  46. [47]

    Belin, J

    A. Belin, J. de Boer, and D. Liska,Non-Gaussianities in the Statistical Distribution of Heavy OPE Coefficients and Wormholes, JHEP2022(June, 2022) 116, [arXiv:2110.14649]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  47. [48]

    Benjamin, J

    N. Benjamin, J. Lee, H. Ooguri, and D. Simmons-Duffin,Universal Asymptotics for High Energy CFT Data, JHEP2024(Mar., 2024) 115, [arXiv:2306.08031]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [49]

    de Boer, D

    J. de Boer, D. Liska, and B. Post,Multiboundary wormholes and OPE statistics, JHEP 2024(Oct., 2024) 207, [arXiv:2405.13111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [50]

    G. T. Horowitz,Comments on black holes in string theory, Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 1107–1116, [hep-th/9910082]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  50. [51]

    G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski,A Correspondence principle for black holes and strings, Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 6189–6197, [hep-th/9612146]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  51. [52]

    D. M. Eardley and S. B. Giddings,Classical black hole production in high-energy collisions, Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 044011, [gr-qc/0201034]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  52. [53]

    S. B. Giddings and V. S. Rychkov,Black holes from colliding wavepackets, Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 104026, [hep-th/0409131]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  53. [54]

    Chowdhury, F

    P. Chowdhury, F. M. Haehl, A. S´ anchez-Garrido, and Y. Zhao,Holographic black hole formation and scrambling in time-ordered correlators,arXiv:2511.03784

    arXiv

  54. [55]

    Hernandez and A

    J. Hernandez and A. Rolph,Scrambling or Stalling: Angular Momentum Barriers to Chaos in Holographic CFTs, arXiv preprint (11, 2025) [arXiv:2511.03633]

    arXiv 2025

  55. [56]

    J. R. Gott III,Closed timelike curves produced by pairs of moving cosmic strings: Exact solutions, Phys. Rev. Lett.66(Mar, 1991) 1126–1129

    1991

  56. [57]

    S. B. Giddings,The gravitational S-matrix: Erice lectures, Phys. Rev. D81(Jan, 2010) 025002, [arXiv:1105.2036]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  57. [58]

    Gary and S

    M. Gary and S. B. Giddings,Constraints on a fine-grained AdS/CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. D94(2016), no. 6 065017, [arXiv:1106.3553]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  58. [59]

    Banks, M

    T. Banks, M. R. Douglas, G. T. Horowitz, and E. Martinec,AdS dynamics from conformal field theory, arXiv preprint (1998) [hep-th/9808016]. – 73 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  59. [60]

    Gregory and R

    R. Gregory and R. Laflamme,Black strings and p-branes are unstable, Phys. Rev. Lett.70 (1993) 2837–2840, [hep-th/9301052]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  60. [61]

    Sachdeva,Study of Information Restoring Effects in Virasoro Blocks, Master’s thesis, Harish-Chandra Res

    S. Sachdeva,Study of Information Restoring Effects in Virasoro Blocks, Master’s thesis, Harish-Chandra Res. Inst., 8, 2024

    2024

  61. [62]

    Guo, F.-L

    W.-z. Guo, F.-L. Lin, and J. Zhang,Note on ETH of descendant states in 2D CFT, JHEP 2019(Jan., 2019) 152, [arXiv:1810.01258]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  62. [63]

    Heemskerk, J

    I. Heemskerk, J. Penedones, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully,Holography from Conformal Field Theory, JHEP10(2009) 079, [arXiv:0907.0151]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  63. [64]

    Kaviraj, K

    A. Kaviraj, K. Sen, and A. Sinha,Universal anomalous dimensions at large spin and large twist, JHEP2015(July, 2015) 26, [arXiv:1504.00772]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  64. [65]

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin,Effective Conformal Theory and the Flat-Space Limit of AdS, JHEP2011(July, 2011) 23, [arXiv:1007.2412]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  65. [66]

    Grabovsky,Heavy states in 3d gravity and 2d CFT, JHEP07(2024) 287, [arXiv:2403.13757]

    D. Grabovsky,Heavy states in 3d gravity and 2d CFT, JHEP07(2024) 287, [arXiv:2403.13757]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  66. [67]

    Abajian, F

    J. Abajian, F. Aprile, R. C. Myers, and P. Vieira,Correlation functions of huge operators in AdS3/CFT2: domes, doors and book pages, JHEP03(2024) 118, [arXiv:2307.13188]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  67. [68]

    O. J. C. Dias, G. T. Horowitz, D. Marolf, and J. E. Santos,On the Nonlinear Stability of Asymptotically Anti-de Sitter Solutions, Class. Quant. Grav.29(Dec., 2012) 235019, [arXiv:1208.5772]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  68. [69]

    G. T. Horowitz and J. E. Santos,Geons and the Instability of Anti-de Sitter Spacetime, Surveys Diff. Geom.20(2015) 321–335, [arXiv:1408.5906]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  69. [70]

    G. T. Horowitz and V. E. Hubeny,Quasinormal modes of AdS black holes and the approach to thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 024027, [hep-th/9909056]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  70. [71]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Black holes and the butterfly effect, JHEP03(2014) 067, [arXiv:1306.0622]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  71. [72]

    Balasubramanian, B

    V. Balasubramanian, B. Czech, V. E. Hubeny, K. Larjo, M. Rangamani, and J. Simon, Typicality versus thermality: An Analytic distinction, Gen. Rel. Grav.40(2008) 1863–1890, [hep-th/0701122]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  72. [73]

    Hayden, M

    P. Hayden, M. Headrick, and A. Maloney,Holographic Mutual Information is Monogamous, Phys. Rev. D87(2013), no. 4 046003, [arXiv:1107.2940]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  73. [74]

    Vaganov,Self-gravitating radiation in AdS d, arXiv preprint (2007) [arXiv:0707.0864]

    V. Vaganov,Self-gravitating radiation in AdS d, arXiv preprint (2007) [arXiv:0707.0864]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  74. [75]

    Witten,Anti-de sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories, Int

    E. Witten,Anti-de sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16(1998) 2747–2769, [hep-th/9803131]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  75. [76]

    Aharony, S

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz,LargeNfield theories, string theory and gravity, Physics Reports323(2000), no. 3-4 183–386, [hep-th/9905111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  76. [77]

    R. d. M. Koch, M. Kim, and A. L. Mahu,A pedagogical introduction to restricted Schur polynomials with applications to heavy operators, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A (2024) [arXiv:2409.15751]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  77. [78]

    Azeyanagi, M

    T. Azeyanagi, M. Hanada, T. Hirata, and H. Shimada,On the shape of a D-brane bound state and its topology change, JHEP2009(2009), no. 03 121, [arXiv:0901.4073]. – 74 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  78. [79]

    Witten,Bound states of strings and p-branes, Nucl

    E. Witten,Bound states of strings and p-branes, Nucl. Phys. B460(1996), no. 2 335–350, [hep-th/9510135]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  79. [80]

    A. M. Polyakov,Thermal Properties of Gauge Fields and Quark Liberation, Phys. Lett. B 72(1978) 477–480

    1978

  80. [81]

    Alkalaev and P

    K. Alkalaev and P. Litvinov,A note on the large-c conformal block asymptotics andα-heavy operators, Nucl. Phys. B1009(2024) 116741, [arXiv:2407.12986]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.