Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Zero Active Mass Condition in Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Cosmologies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1602.01435 v2 pith:W6GGDMVM submitted 2016-02-01 physics.gen-ph

The Zero Active Mass Condition in Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Cosmologies

classification physics.gen-ph
keywords comovingframewhenactivecosmicframesfree-fallingfriedmann-robertson-walker
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many cosmological measurements today suggest that the Universe is expanding at a constant rate. This is inferred from the observed age versus redshift relationship and various distance indicators, all of which point to a cosmic equation of state (EoS) p=-rho/3, where rho and p are, respectively, the total energy density and pressure of the cosmic fluid. It has recently been shown that this result is not a coincidence and simply confirms the fact that the symmetries in the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric appear to be viable only for a medium with zero active mass, i.e., rho+3p=0. In their latest paper, however, Kim, Lasenby and Hobson have provided what they believe to be a counter argument to this conclusion. Here, we show that these authors are merely repeating the conventional mistake of incorrectly placing the observer simultaneously in a comoving frame, where the lapse function g_tt is coordinate dependent when rho+3p is not 0, and a supposedly different, free-falling frame, in which g_tt=1, implying no time dilation. We demonstrate that the Hubble flow is not inertial when rho+3p is not 0, so the comoving frame is generally not in free fall, even though in FRW, the comoving and free-falling frames are supposed to be identical at every spacetime point. So this confusion of frames not only constitutes an inconsistency with the fundamental tenets of general relativity but, additionally, there is no possibility of using a gauge transformation to select a set of coordinates for which g_tt=1 when rho+3p is not 0.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. An intrinsic kinematic relation $\boldsymbol{c=\frac{c_{0}}{H_{0}}\,\dot{a}}\,$ inferred from Type Ia supernovae

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 reject novelty 5.0

    The Pantheon supernova fit in a Dolgov–Barrow varying-speed-of-light cosmology favors the locus (1+ζ)μ=1, interpreted as c∝da/dt.