Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 128 references

Fanpy 2.0 makes implementing a new wavefunction ansatz as simple as writing a single overlap function, then reuses the same optimization and analysis tools for every method.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-07-31 23:38 UTC pith:WA2H7ZI3

load-bearing objection A credible, well-architected software release that would benefit from a validation section; the central claim (the code works) is plausible but not demonstrated numerically. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.23358 v1 pith:WA2H7ZI3 submitted 2026-07-25 physics.chem-ph

Fanpy 2.0: Wavefunction Implementation and Analysis Tools for Flexible Ansatz Design

classification physics.chem-ph
keywords FanpyFANCIwavefunction prototypingcoupled-cluster geminalsseniority-restricted coupled clusterFANPTprojected Schrödinger equationquantum chemistry software
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents Fanpy 2.0, a Python library built on the FANCI idea that any multideterminant wavefunction is fully specified by its overlap with each Slater determinant. It claims that a researcher can turn a new mathematical ansatz into working code by writing just that overlap function (and its derivatives), reusing the same Hamiltonian, objective, solver, and analysis modules. Version 2.0 adds several new wavefunction families — coupled-cluster-inspired geminals, seniority-restricted coupled cluster, extended-hierarchy CI, and a neural-network ansatz — plus a perturbative continuation method (FANPT) for finding good starting parameters, a redesigned PySCF interface, an optional PyCI backend, and an analysis module. If true, the platform lowers the barrier to testing new wavefunction methods, especially for strongly correlated systems where initialization is hard.

Core claim

The central claim is that Fanpy 2.0 is a working, modular platform for prototyping arbitrary multideterminant wavefunctions. The FANCI formalism expresses any wavefunction as a parameterized expansion in Slater determinants whose coefficient function f(m,P)=⟨m|Ψ⟩ is the overlap with a determinant; implementing a new ansatz reduces to writing get_overlap. The release delivers four new wavefunction families, an implementation of FANPT as a continuation layer on top of projected Schrödinger objectives, an optional PyCI interface that offloads expensive determinant-space operations, and initial analysis tools such as natural-orbital computation and human-readable parameter printers. The BeH2 exa

What carries the argument

The central object is the FANCI overlap function f(m,P)=⟨m|Ψ⟩ (Eq. 2), which defines a wavefunction by its overlaps with Slater determinants. Because objectives (variational energy, projected Schrödinger equation, local energy) are built from overlaps and Hamiltonian matrix elements alone, the entire optimization and analysis pipeline depends only on a wavefunction exposing get_overlap and parameter derivatives. The paper also introduces FANPT, which solves a linear response equation J(λ)x(n)=b(n) with J the Jacobian of the projected FANCI equations, to propagate parameters along a Hamiltonian interpolation; the Jacobian and response machinery are the mechanism that makes the perturbative co

Load-bearing premise

FANPT's usefulness as a convergence aid assumes that the Jacobian J(λ) stays invertible along the path and that the perturbation expansion converges for the strongly correlated systems where the tool is most needed; the paper offers no error bounds or numerical demonstration of either condition.

What would settle it

Run the documented BeH2 example exactly as written: if the new AP1roGSDGeneralized wavefunction class, the FANPT driver, or the analysis printers fail to run or the energies do not match the reported nonvariational projected-Schrödinger solution, the paper's central claim of a working, extensible platform fails. Alternatively, apply FANPT to a molecule with a known strongly correlated regime and check whether the propagated parameters actually satisfy the projected Schrödinger equation at λ=1; singular Jacobians or diverging energies would refute the convergence-aid claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A researcher can implement a new wavefunction ansatz by writing one overlap function and immediately use all existing objectives, solvers, and analysis tools without modification.
  • The new coupled-cluster-inspired geminal family generalizes pCCD to broader excitation spaces and yields sixteen newly supported wavefunction forms via s_type and singles variants.
  • Seniority-restricted CC wavefunctions let users interpolate between pair-based and full CC expansions by filtering the cluster operator by excitation rank and seniority.
  • FANPT provides a systematic way to build initial guesses for projected Schrödinger equations by propagating parameters from a Fock reference to the full Hamiltonian, which should reduce initialization sensitivity for strongly correlated systems.
  • The optional PyCI backend allows computationally demanding determinant-space operations to be offloaded while keeping Fanpy's prototyping flexibility.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not include numerical benchmark results for the new wavefunctions or for FANPT beyond a single example; if the new ansätze are accurate on strongly correlated test systems, Fanpy 2.0 would become a convenient testbed for comparing pair-based and excitation-based correlation treatments at scale.
  • FANPT's success hinges on the invertibility of the projected-equation Jacobian and on convergence of the perturbation series; if those fail in difficult regimes, the continuation strategy could be supplemented by homotopy or resummation methods, which the paper leaves open.
  • The analysis module's natural-orbital and parameter-printing tools lay groundwork for more interpretative features; one likely extension is automatic detection of dominant excitations or geminals across a calculation, which would make the workflow more useful for method development.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper describes version 2.0 of Fanpy, an open-source Python library for prototyping multideterminant wavefunctions based on the FANCI formulation. The authors claim new wavefunction families (coupled-cluster-inspired geminals, seniority-restricted coupled cluster, extended-hierarchy CI, and neural-network ansätze), a FANPT perturbative-continuation module, redesigned PySCF and new PyCI interfaces, an analysis module, and an improved development environment. The only worked example is a BeH2 AP1roGSD calculation presented as a code listing; no total energy, convergence diagnostic, or comparison to reference results is reported.

Significance. If the implementation lives up to its description, Fanpy 2.0 would be a valuable platform for quickly prototyping wavefunction methods. Strengths of the manuscript are the modular FANCI architecture, the explicit design that reduces new ansatz implementation to writing an overlap function, the availability of source code on GitHub, and the automated test pipeline. However, the paper's central claim that these features are working and usable is not supported by any numerical evidence in the manuscript. The FANPT convergence-aid claim in particular is purely asserted. Because the manuscript is a software paper, the absence of benchmarks or even a printed energy from the BeH2 example prevents the reader from verifying correctness, and the theoretical content is otherwise a summary of the authors' prior work.

major comments (3)
  1. [III, Example calculation] The only numerical demonstration is a code listing that ends with the least_squares call. No total energy, gradient norm, or comparison to FCI or pCCD is printed. A software paper claiming 'working' implementations must show at least one complete, reproducible calculation with a verifiable output. Please add the computed energy and a reference comparison for this example, and ideally a small benchmark for each new wavefunction family.
  2. [II.B, Eq. (6)] FANPT's advertised role as a convergence aid for strongly correlated systems is not demonstrated. Each step requires solving J(lambda)x^(n)=b^(n); if J is singular or ill-conditioned along the homotopy path, the propagated guess is undefined or unstable. No condition numbers, step-size selection, or fallback behavior are reported, and no numerical comparison of optimization with vs. without FANPT is given. Provide a concrete case study and report these diagnostics.
  3. [II.D, New wavefunctions] The four new wavefunction families (geminal CC-inspired, sr-CC, ehCI, NN) are described with equations and code snippets, but no validation is presented. For each family there is no test calculation showing that overlaps/derivatives are correct or that optimization converges to a sensible energy. Since the paper's thesis is that users can rely on this infrastructure to prototype new ansätze, at least one representative numerical test per family is required to support the claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [II.B, Figure reference] 'The overall workflow is shown in Fig 2' should refer to Fig. 3; Fig. 2 is the bitstring illustration.
  2. [I, II.A, II.E] Typos: 'easly' -> 'easily', 'flexibilty' -> 'flexibility', 'sensivity' -> 'sensitivity', 'safe guard' -> 'safeguard', 'numpyarrays' -> 'numpy arrays'.
  3. [II.D.4] The claim that the multiplicative readout 'ensures size consistency' is stated without proof or demonstration; at minimum give a short explanation or a numerical check.
  4. [Note 61] Reference 61 is incomplete: 'The Journal of Physical Chemistry A0, null (0)' lacks volume and page numbers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular reduction: Fanpy 2.0 is a software implementation paper; its central claims are supported by the public code and test suite, while the heavy self-citation pattern (refs 59–63) is not load-bearing for any derivation in this manuscript.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that Fanpy 2.0 exists as an extensible platform implementing new wavefunction families (geminal CC, sr-CC, ehCI, NN) and FANPT within the FANCI framework. No equation in this paper is fitted to an output of the same paper, and no 'prediction' is obtained by construction from a fitted parameter. Equations (5)–(6) restate the FANPT continuation equations from the authors' prior work (ref. 59), but the paper presents them as an implementation of that method, not as an independent derivation; the availability of the source code and automated tests makes the software claim checkable independently. The new wavefunction implementations are instantiations of the FANCI overlap representation (Eq. 2), which is a definitional software-abstraction identity rather than a circular scientific derivation. The ansatz forms (Eqs. 7, 10–13) are inherited from prior literature, including several same-group papers, but citing prior theoretical work for an implementation is standard practice and does not reduce the current paper's deliverable to its own inputs. The self-citation pattern (refs 59–63) is heavy but non-load-bearing: the paper's contribution is working code, not a theorem forced by those citations. The absence of a reported final energy in the only example (§III) and the lack of a Jacobian-conditioning/convergence study for FANPT are validation gaps, not circularity. Correctness risk is therefore a separate concern from the circularity score. Overall, I find no circular step that would require a score above 2; the minor credit reflects the unusually heavy same-group citation pattern, not a reduction of the central claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or fitted parameters. Its content is implementation of previously published methods, mostly by the same authors, so the ledger is light.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Any multideterminant wavefunction can be represented as a linear combination of Slater determinants with coefficient function f(m,P) (Eq. 1).
    Standard FCI expansion; presented as FANCI framework from ref 7.
  • standard math The Hamiltonian acts via one- and two-electron integrals in the determinant basis (Eq. 3).
    Second-quantized electronic Hamiltonian; standard.
  • domain assumption The new geminal ansätze are defined by the excitation pools in Eqs. (8)-(9) and their APG/APsetG/APIG variants.
    These operator pools are taken from prior literature (refs 60, 69); the paper treats them as definitions.
  • domain assumption The FANPT update assumes the projected-equation Jacobian J(λ) in Eq. (6) is invertible along the λ path.
    No proof or numerical check of invertibility/well-posedness is given.
  • standard math Neural networks can represent the overlap function f(m) (universal approximation).
    Invoked with refs 83-86; standard result.
  • domain assumption Seniority number and excitation degree organize the CI space in ehCI (Eq. 12).
    Definitional from refs 62, 82.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 18503 in / 10271 out tokens · 93501 ms · 2026-07-31T23:38:08.004922+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Fanpy is a Python library for developing new wavefunction methods. It enables users to quickly convert mathematical expressions into working code through a modular design based on the Flexible Ansatz for N-electron Configuration Interaction (FANCI) theory. This architecture facilitates a straightforward extension of the codebase. Here we present version 2.0 of the Fanpy package. This release includes several new wavefunction implementations, including coupled- cluster-inspired geminal approaches. A new analysis module enables a more detailed inspection of computational results and lays the groundwork for future features. In addition, the PySCF interface has been redesigned, and an interface to the PyCI package has been introduced to offload computationally expensive components. Finally, we introduce an improved software development environment, including automated testing and issue tracking.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23358 by Carlos E. V. de Moura, Daniel F. Calero-Osorio, Krisztina Zsigmond, Marco Mart\'inez-Gonz\'alez, Michelle Richer, Paul W. Ayers, Pratiksha B. Gaikwad, Ram\'on Alain Miranda-Quintana, Rugwed Lokhande.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Modularity of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Bitstring representation in the FanPy package. The example [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Schematic workflow of the FANPT implementation in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. D. Birell and P. C. W. Davies , year = 1982, title =

  2. [2]

    R. P. Feynman. Phys.\ Rev. 1954

  3. [3]

    Einstein and Yu Podolsky and N

    A. Einstein and Yu Podolsky and N. Rosen. Phys.\ Rev. 1935

  4. [4]

    Berman, Jr., G. P. and Izrailev, Jr., F. M. Stability of nonlinear modes. Physica D. 1983

  5. [5]

    E. B. Davies and L. Parns. Trapped modes in acoustic waveguides. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 1988

  6. [6]

    Edward Witten. 2001. hep-th/0106109

  7. [7]

    E. Beutler. Williams Hematology. 1994

  8. [8]

    Donald E. Knuth. Fundamental Algorithms. 1973b 1973

  9. [9]

    J. S. Smith and G. W. Johnson. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B. 2005

  10. [10]

    W. J. Smith and T. J. Johnson and B. G. Miller. Surface chemistry and preferential crystal orientation on a silicon surface

  11. [11]

    V. K. Smith and K. Johnson and M. O. Klein. Surface chemistry and preferential crystal orientation on a silicon surface

  12. [12]

    Lower Bounds for Wishful Research Results

    Ulrich \" U nderwood and Ned \ N et and Paul \= P ot. Lower Bounds for Wishful Research Results

  13. [13]

    M. P. Johnson and K. L. Miller and K. Smith. 2007

  14. [14]

    AIP Conf. Proc. 2007

  15. [15]

    Fifteenth Annual

    Proc. Fifteenth Annual

  16. [16]

    Y. Burstyn. Proceedings of the 5th International Molecular Beam Epitaxy Conference, Santa Fe, NM. 2004

  17. [17]

    Proceedings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference, Portland, OR, 12-16 May 2005. 2001

  18. [18]

    A. G. Agarwal. Proceedings of the Fifth Low Temperature Conference, Madison, WI, 1999. Semiconductors. 2001

  19. [19]

    R. Smith. Hummingbirds are our friends

  20. [20]

    J. Smith. Proc. SPIE. 2007

  21. [21]

    An O(n n / \! n) Sorting Algorithm

    Tom T \' e rrific. An O(n n / \! n) Sorting Algorithm

  22. [22]

    Mastering Thesis Writing

    \' E douard Masterly. Mastering Thesis Writing

  23. [23]

    S. R. Kawa and S.-J. Lin. J. Geophys. Res. 2003

  24. [24]

    Phidias Phony-Baloney

    F. Phidias Phony-Baloney. Fighting Fire with Fire: Festooning F rench Phrases

  25. [25]

    Donald E. Knuth. Seminumerical Algorithms. 1973c 1981

  26. [26]

    Jill C. Knvth. The Programming of Computer Art

  27. [28]

    Opechowski and R

    W. Opechowski and R. Guccione. Introduction to the Theory of Normal Metals. Magnetism

  28. [29]

    Opechowski and R

    W. Opechowski and R. Guccione. Introduction to the Theory of Normal Metals. Magnetism. 1965

  29. [30]

    J. M. Smith. Molecular Dynamics. 1980

  30. [31]

    V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat. Exact theory of two-dimensional self-focusing and one-dimensional self-modulation of waves in nonlinear media. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 1971

  31. [32]

    Ballagh and C.M

    R. Ballagh and C.M. Savage. Bose-Einstein condensation: from atomic physics to quantum fluids. Proceedings of the 13th Physics Summer School. 2000. cond-mat/0008070

  32. [33]

    Daniel D. Lincoll. Semigroups of Recurrences. High Speed Computer and Algorithm Organization

  33. [34]

    Oaho and Jeffrey D

    Alfred V. Oaho and Jeffrey D. Ullman and Mihalis Yannakakis. On Notions of Information Transfer in VLSI Circuits. Proc. Fifteenth Annual ACM

  34. [35]

    The Definitive Computer Manual

    Larry Manmaker. The Definitive Computer Manual

  35. [36]

    Molecular Physics , volume=

    The history and evolution of configuration interaction , author=. Molecular Physics , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

  36. [37]

    2013 , publisher=

    Molecular electronic-structure theory , author=. 2013 , publisher=

  37. [38]

    2012 , publisher=

    Modern quantum chemistry: introduction to advanced electronic structure theory , author=. 2012 , publisher=

  38. [39]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=

    Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry , author=. Reviews of Modern Physics , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

  39. [40]

    and Verstraete, F

    Perez-Garcia, D. and Verstraete, F. and Wolf, M. M. and Cirac, J. I. , title =. Quantum Info. Comput. , month = jul, pages =. 2007 , issue_date =

  40. [41]

    Toward a geminal model chemistry , author=

    Geminal-based electronic structure methods in quantum chemistry. Toward a geminal model chemistry , author=. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  41. [42]

    Systematic Approach to Multideterminant Wavefunction Development , school=

    Kim, Taewon , year=. Systematic Approach to Multideterminant Wavefunction Development , school=

  42. [43]

    Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science , volume=

    PySCF: the Python-based simulations of chemistry framework , author=. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  43. [44]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=

    PyCI: A Python-scriptable library for arbitrary determinant CI , author=. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  44. [45]

    and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and

    Virtanen, Pauli and Gommers, Ralf and Oliphant, Travis E. and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and. Nature Methods , year =

  45. [46]

    Computational and Theoretical Chemistry , volume=

    Flexible ansatz for N-body configuration interaction , author=. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  46. [47]

    Journal of Computational Chemistry , volume=

    Fanpy: A python library for prototyping multideterminant methods in ab initio quantum chemistry , author=. Journal of Computational Chemistry , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  47. [48]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=

    Coupled cluster-inspired geminal wavefunctions , author=. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  48. [49]

    Journal of chemical theory and computation , volume=

    A new mean-field method suitable for strongly correlated electrons: Computationally facile antisymmetric products of nonorthogonal geminals , author=. Journal of chemical theory and computation , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  49. [50]

    and Lokhande, Rugwed A

    Miranda-Quintana, Ramón Alain and Kim, Taewon D. and Lokhande, Rugwed A. and Richer, M. and Sánchez-Díaz, Gabriela and Gaikwad, Pratiksha B. and Ayers, Paul W. , title =. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume =. 2024 , doi =

  50. [51]

    Lokhande, Rugwed and de Moura, Carlos E. V. and Zsigmond, Krisztina and Ayers, Paul W. and Miranda-Quintana, Ramón Alain , title =. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume =. 0 , doi =

  51. [52]

    and de Moura, Carlos E

    Lokhande, Rugwed A. and de Moura, Carlos E. V. and Gaikwad, Pratiksha B. and Miranda-Quintana, Ramón Alain , title =. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume =. 2026 , doi =

  52. [53]

    M. J. Frisch and G. W. Trucks and H. B. Schlegel and G. E. Scuseria and M. A. Robb and J. R. Cheeseman and G. Scalmani and V. Barone and G. A. Petersson and H. Nakatsuji and X. Li and M. Caricato and A. V. Marenich and J. Bloino and B. G. Janesko and R. Gomperts and B. Mennucci and H. P. Hratchian and J. V. Ortiz and A. F. Izmaylov and J. L. Sonnenberg an...

  53. [54]

    and Knizia, Gerald and Manby, Frederick R

    Werner, Hans-Joachim and Knowles, Peter J. and Knizia, Gerald and Manby, Frederick R. and Sch. Molpro: A General-Purpose Quantum Chemistry Program Package , shorttitle =. WIREs Computational Molecular Science , volume =. doi:10.1002/wcms.82 , urldate =

  54. [55]

    and Wormit, Michael and Kussmann, Joerg and Lange, Adrian W

    Shao, Yihan and Gan, Zhengting and Epifanovsky, Evgeny and Gilbert, Andrew T.B. and Wormit, Michael and Kussmann, Joerg and Lange, Adrian W. and Behn, Andrew and Deng, Jia and Feng, Xintian and Ghosh, Debashree and Goldey, Matthew and Horn, Paul R. and Jacobson, Leif D. and Kaliman, Ilya and Khaliullin, Rustam Z. and Ku. Advances in Molecular Quantum Chem...

  55. [56]

    Smith, Daniel G. A. and Burns, Lori A. and Simmonett, Andrew C. and Parrish, Robert M. and Schieber, Matthew C. and Galvelis, Raimondas and Kraus, Peter and Kruse, Holger and Di Remigio, Roberto and Alenaizan, Asem and James, Andrew M. and Lehtola, Susi and Misiewicz, Jonathon P. and Scheurer, Maximilian and Shaw, Robert A. and Schriber, Jeffrey B. and Xi...

  56. [57]

    doi:10.1063/5.0057515 , urldate =

    Lemmens, Laurent and De Vriendt, Xeno and Van Hende, Daria and Huysentruyt, Tobias and Bultinck, Patrick and Acke, Guillaume , year = 2021, month = aug, journal =. doi:10.1063/5.0057515 , urldate =

  57. [58]

    International Journal of Quantum Chemistry , volume =

    Variational Configuration Interaction Methods and Comparison with Perturbation Theory , author =. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry , volume =. doi:10.1002/qua.560120820 , urldate =

  58. [59]

    Boys, S. F. , year = 1950, month = feb, journal =. Electronic Wave Functions -. doi:10.1098/rspa.1950.0036 , urldate =

  59. [60]

    Annals of Physics , series =

    The Density-Matrix Renormalization Group in the Age of Matrix Product States , author =. Annals of Physics , series =. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012 , urldate =

  60. [61]

    Hurley, A. C. and. The Molecular Orbital Theory of Chemical Valency. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences , volume =. doi:10.1098/rspa.1953.0198 , urldate =

  61. [62]

    and Ellison, Frank O

    Parr, Robert G. and Ellison, Frank O. and Lykos, Peter G. , year = 1956, month = may, journal =. Generalized. doi:10.1063/1.1742692 , urldate =

  62. [63]

    and Parr, Robert G

    Parks, Joe M. and Parr, Robert G. , year = 1958, month = feb, journal =. Theory of. doi:10.1063/1.1744119 , urldate =

  63. [64]

    and Shull, Harrison , year = 1962, month = dec, journal =

    Allen, Thomas L. and Shull, Harrison , year = 1962, month = dec, journal =. doi:10.1021/j100818a001 , urldate =

  64. [65]

    Kutzelnigg, Werner , year = 1964, month = jun, journal =. Direct. doi:10.1063/1.1725065 , urldate =

  65. [66]

    and Sengupta, S

    Paldus, J. and Sengupta, S. and. Diagrammatical. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. doi:10.1063/1.1678297 , urldate =

  66. [67]

    Paldus, J. and. Geminal. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. doi:10.1063/1.1676433 , urldate =

  67. [68]

    Shull, Harrison , year = 1959, month = jun, journal =. Natural. doi:10.1063/1.1730212 , urldate =

  68. [69]

    An Introduction to the Theory of Geminals , booktitle =

    Surj. An Introduction to the Theory of Geminals , booktitle =. doi:10.1007/3-540-48972-X_4 , abstract =

  69. [70]

    Assessing the

    Tecmer, Pawe. Assessing the. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume =. doi:10.1021/jp502127v , urldate =

  70. [71]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =

    On the. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. doi:10.1063/1.1727484 , urldate =

  71. [72]

    , year = 2011, month = jun, journal =

    Evangelista, Francesco A. , year = 2011, month = jun, journal =. Alternative Single-Reference Coupled Cluster Approaches for Multireference Problems:. doi:10.1063/1.3598471 , urldate =

  72. [73]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =

    Exact Parameterization of Fermionic Wave Functions via Unitary Coupled Cluster Theory , author =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. doi:10.1063/1.5133059 , urldate =

  73. [74]

    Paldus, Josef and Li, Xiangzhu , year = 1999, pages =. A. Advances in. doi:10.1002/9780470141694.ch1 , urldate =

  74. [75]

    , year = 2009, series =

    Shavitt, Isaiah and Bartlett, Rodney J. , year = 2009, series =. Many-. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511596834 , urldate =

  75. [76]

    Chemical Physics , volume =

    Generalized Valence Bond Solutions from a Constrained Coupled Cluster Method , author =. Chemical Physics , volume =. doi:10.1016/0301-0104(95)00321-5 , urldate =

  76. [77]

    and Limacher, Peter A

    Johnson, Paul A. and Limacher, Peter A. and Kim, Taewon D. and Richer, Michael and. Strategies for Extending Geminal-Based Wavefunctions:. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry , series =. doi:10.1016/j.comptc.2017.05.010 , urldate =

  77. [78]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =

    A New Wavefunction Hierarchy for Interacting Geminals , author =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. doi:10.1063/1.4967367 , urldate =

  78. [79]

    Richardson, R. W. , year = 1967, month = jul, journal =. Eigenstates of the \. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.159.792 , urldate =

  79. [80]

    Theoretical Chemistry Accounts , volume =

    Seniority-Zero Wavefunction Parameterizations , author =. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts , volume =. doi:10.1007/s00214-025-03245-x , urldate =

  80. [81]

    , year = 2013, month = apr, publisher =

    Cramer, Christopher J. , year = 2013, month = apr, publisher =. Essentials of

Showing first 80 references.