Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards Fair Recommendation in Two-Sided Platforms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.01180 v1 pith:WAZ4UI3P submitted 2021-12-26 cs.IR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords customersfairnessrecommendationplatformsproducersfairrecguaranteesservices
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Many online platforms today (such as Amazon, Netflix, Spotify, LinkedIn, and AirBnB) can be thought of as two-sided markets with producers and customers of goods and services. Traditionally, recommendation services in these platforms have focused on maximizing customer satisfaction by tailoring the results according to the personalized preferences of individual customers. However, our investigation reinforces the fact that such customer-centric design of these services may lead to unfair distribution of exposure to the producers, which may adversely impact their well-being. On the other hand, a pure producer-centric design might become unfair to the customers. As more and more people are depending on such platforms to earn a living, it is important to ensure fairness to both producers and customers. In this work, by mapping a fair personalized recommendation problem to a constrained version of the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods, we propose to provide fairness guarantees for both sides. Formally, our proposed {\em FairRec} algorithm guarantees Maxi-Min Share ($\alpha$-MMS) of exposure for the producers, and Envy-Free up to One Item (EF1) fairness for the customers. Extensive evaluations over multiple real-world datasets show the effectiveness of {\em FairRec} in ensuring two-sided fairness while incurring a marginal loss in overall recommendation quality. Finally, we present a modification of FairRec (named as FairRecPlus) that at the cost of additional computation time, improves the recommendation performance for the customers, while maintaining the same fairness guarantees.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Equity by Design? On the Trade-Offs in Fairness-Driven Recommendation in Heterogeneous Two-Sided Markets

    cs.GT 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The 'free fairness' result for producer constraints vanishes for multi-item recommendations; a CVaR group-fairness objective and business constraints can be added with moderate trade-offs.

Pith tools