Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning to Incentivize Other Learning Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.06051 v2 pith:WB3NBGQY submitted 2020-06-10 cs.LG cs.GTcs.MAstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.GTcs.MAstat.ML
keywords agentslearningagentfunctionmulti-agentenvironmentextrinsicimpact
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The challenge of developing powerful and general Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents has received increasing attention in recent years. Much of this effort has focused on the single-agent setting, in which an agent maximizes a predefined extrinsic reward function. However, a long-term question inevitably arises: how will such independent agents cooperate when they are continually learning and acting in a shared multi-agent environment? Observing that humans often provide incentives to influence others' behavior, we propose to equip each RL agent in a multi-agent environment with the ability to give rewards directly to other agents, using a learned incentive function. Each agent learns its own incentive function by explicitly accounting for its impact on the learning of recipients and, through them, the impact on its own extrinsic objective. We demonstrate in experiments that such agents significantly outperform standard RL and opponent-shaping agents in challenging general-sum Markov games, often by finding a near-optimal division of labor. Our work points toward more opportunities and challenges along the path to ensure the common good in a multi-agent future.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. InvestESG: A multi-agent reinforcement learning benchmark for studying climate investment as a social dilemma

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    InvestESG is a MARL benchmark showing that ESG-conscious investors, not the disclosure mandate itself, drive corporate mitigation in long-run simulated markets.

Pith tools