Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Correction with Backtracking Reduces Hallucination in Summarization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.16176 v3 pith:WBMDNCHM submitted 2023-10-24 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords summarizationhallucinationcobaabstractivebacktrackingdocumenteffectiveefficient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Abstractive summarization aims at generating natural language summaries of a source document that are succinct while preserving the important elements. Despite recent advances, neural text summarization models are known to be susceptible to hallucinating (or more correctly confabulating), that is to produce summaries with details that are not grounded in the source document. In this paper, we introduce a simple yet efficient technique, CoBa, to reduce hallucination in abstractive summarization. The approach is based on two steps: hallucination detection and mitigation. We show that the former can be achieved through measuring simple statistics about conditional word probabilities and distance to context words. Further, we demonstrate that straight-forward backtracking is surprisingly effective at mitigation. We thoroughly evaluate the proposed method with prior art on three benchmark datasets for text summarization. The results show that CoBa is effective and efficient in reducing hallucination, and offers great adaptability and flexibility. Code can be found at https://github.com/zhenzhel/CoBa.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Adaptive Backtracking for Privacy Protection in Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A training-free backtracking defense that rewrites RAG output at the first sign of privacy leakage improves privacy utility scores by up to 15% over sanitization and prompting baselines on a new healthcare and finance...

Pith tools