Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Counterfactual Risk Minimization: Learning from Logged Bandit Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1502.02362 v2 pith:WCSQQ5AB submitted 2015-02-09 cs.LG stat.ML

Counterfactual Risk Minimization: Learning from Logged Bandit Feedback

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords learningbanditcounterfactualfeedbackpoemriskalgorithmbounds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We develop a learning principle and an efficient algorithm for batch learning from logged bandit feedback. This learning setting is ubiquitous in online systems (e.g., ad placement, web search, recommendation), where an algorithm makes a prediction (e.g., ad ranking) for a given input (e.g., query) and observes bandit feedback (e.g., user clicks on presented ads). We first address the counterfactual nature of the learning problem through propensity scoring. Next, we prove generalization error bounds that account for the variance of the propensity-weighted empirical risk estimator. These constructive bounds give rise to the Counterfactual Risk Minimization (CRM) principle. We show how CRM can be used to derive a new learning method -- called Policy Optimizer for Exponential Models (POEM) -- for learning stochastic linear rules for structured output prediction. We present a decomposition of the POEM objective that enables efficient stochastic gradient optimization. POEM is evaluated on several multi-label classification problems showing substantially improved robustness and generalization performance compared to the state-of-the-art.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Concrete Problems in AI Safety

    cs.AI 2016-06 accept novelty 7.0

    The paper categorizes five concrete AI safety problems arising from flawed objectives, costly evaluation, and learning dynamics.

  2. Hierarchical Residual Policy Optimization for Generative Recommendations

    cs.IR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    HRPO decomposes item-level rewards into token-level 'residual credits' along semantic identifier hierarchies and optimizes the generator with a PPO-style objective, improving session utility in KuaiSim and production ...