Untwinned YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-\delta}$ thin films on MgO substrates: a platform to study strain effects on the local orders in cuprates

Alexei Kalaboukhov; Edoardo Trabaldo; Elsebeth Schr\"oder; Eric Andersson; Floriana Lombardi; Goran Dra\v{z}i\'c; Pasquale Orgiani; Regina Ciancio; Riccardo Arpaia; Thilo Bauch

REVIEW 1 major objections 7 minor 84 references

Untwinned YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-\delta}$ thin films on MgO substrates: a platform to study strain effects on the local orders in cuprates

T0 review · 1 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Pre-annealing (110) MgO at 790°C in oxygen forms faceted surfaces that untwin YBCO films, align the CuO chains, compress the b-axis, and preserve chain anisotropy down to 50 nm.

desk verdict Solid new platform paper: compressively strained, mostly untwinned YBCO on MgO, with a real structural twist, but the 'untwinned' label and the 82% figure need more care. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02637 v2 pith:WD3Q4OFL submitted 2019-08-07 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Riccardo Arpaia , Eric Andersson , Alexei Kalaboukhov , Elsebeth Schröder , Edoardo Trabaldo , Regina Ciancio , Goran Dražić , Pasquale Orgiani

show 2 more authors

Thilo Bauch Floriana Lombardi

This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords YBCOthinfilmstwinningsuppression(110)MgOsubstratescompressivestrainCuchainsunidirectionalbucklingtransportanisotropynanowires

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that pre-annealing (110)-oriented MgO substrates at 790 °C in 0.7 mbar of oxygen reconstructs the surface into shallow, elongated facets, and that films of the cuprate YBCO grown on those facets align their CuO chains in one direction instead of forming twin domains. The resulting films are compressively strained: the b axis shrinks from 3.89 to 3.87 Å, the c axis elongates to 11.71–11.73 Å, and the (001) atomic planes buckle unidirectionally by about 3° along the chain direction. Nanowires patterned from these films keep the chain-driven anisotropy in critical current and resistivity, and in 10 nm underdoped wires an additional strain-induced anisotropy appears. If this growth route is correct, it gives a substrate-based way to tune charge order, nematicity, and related orders in cuprates without applying external pressure.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is the faceted (110) MgO surface produced by the annealing: shallow, elongated (540)/(450) facets that run along the [001] MgO direction and expose under-coordinated edge atoms. Because those atoms strain more easily at the interface, YBCO nucleates with the a axis perpendicular to the facets and the CuO chains along them, in direct analogy to the step edges of vicinal (001) strontium titanate substrates. The same large lattice mismatch (about 9% and 35% along the two MgO directions) then compresses the b axis and tilts the copper-oxygen octahedra, producing the unidirectional buckling. Density-functional calculations support the faceting by showing that it lowers the surface energy relative to the flat (110) surface.

What would settle it

Grow YBCO on two identically annealed MgO substrates, then remove the facets from one, for example by gentle polishing or ion etching, before deposition; if that film still shows the same high untwinning degree, the facets are not the controlling cause. A complementary check is cross-sectional electron microscopy of the first unit cells to see whether the a/b orientation at the interface tracks the facet edges directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the usual twinning of YBCO films can be suppressed on a substrate that simultaneously compresses the film. Annealing (110) MgO creates (540)/(450) facets that run along the MgO [001] direction; YBCO deposited on this surface grows with its a axis perpendicular to the facet elongation and its b axis (the CuO chains) along it, so one twin orientation reaches 82% occupancy, against 50% on unannealed substrates. The same interface compresses the b axis from 3.89 to 3.87 Å while leaving a near its bulk value of 3.82 Å, elongates c to 11.71–11.73 Å, and tilts the (001) planes by about 3° in a unidirectional buckling along the chain direction, which electron microscopy shows as a waving of the planes with a roughly 30 nm period. This strain pattern is attributed to tilted copper-oxygen octahedra accommodating the large MgO–YBCO mismatch, and it relaxes by a film thickness of 200 nm. Transport on nanowires confirms the orthorhombic anisotropy survives at the nanoscale: critical current is 1.2 times larger along b than a, matching the chain-related penetration-depth anisotropy of untwinned single crystals, and the room-temperature resistivity anisotropy in underdoped 50 nm wires matches the single-crystal value while doubling in 10 nm wires.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the annealed facets themselves orient the YBCO film because their edge atoms are under-coordinated and therefore strain more easily; if another property produced by the annealing, such as surface stoichiometry, roughness, or contamination, actually controls the alignment, the mechanism would be wrong even if the growth recipe still works.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Chain-related anisotropy in critical current and resistivity survives in nanowires down to 50 nm, so nanoscale devices can be made that probe the intrinsic orthorhombicity of YBCO.
The ~3° unidirectional buckling and the compressed b axis create a built-in uniaxial strain field along the CuO chains, which should modify charge order and electronic nematicity in a controlled way as thickness and doping are varied.
Because the films can be grown down to a few unit cells and doped across most of the superconducting dome, the same platform can map strain effects over a wide region of the cuprate phase diagram.
The disappearance of buckling by 200 nm film thickness provides a relaxation threshold, allowing comparisons between strained and bulk-like behavior on the same substrate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the facet mechanism is correct, tuning the annealing conditions should raise the untwinning degree beyond the reported 82%, and the untwinning degree should track facet coverage rather than saturating at an arbitrary value.
A testable extension of the strain picture is that the ~30 nm buckling period should leave an imprint on charge-density-wave correlations, with the CDW locked to the chain direction and strengthened in thinner, more strained films.
The doubled resistivity anisotropy in 10 nm wires can be read as a strain-stabilized nematic signal; if so, its magnitude should scale with the b-axis compression and disappear in films thicker than the relaxation threshold.
The same faceted-surface approach may transfer to other orthorhombic functional oxides and to microwave devices, where MgO's low dielectric loss gives it an advantage over strontium titanate substrates.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First impression: this is a useful new platform, not a breakthrough physics result. The authors show that pre-annealing (110) MgO produces faceted surfaces that align YBCO chains, giving films with up to 82% untwinning (by their metric) under compressive strain, plus a unidirectional ~3° buckling of the (001) planes. That combination—compressively strained and largely untwinned—is new, and the transport data in nanowires down to 50 nm support the structural picture: the chain-related anisotropy survives, and twinned films don't show it. The buckling observation is nicely supported by rocking curves and STEM.

The paper does a lot right. The growth recipe is described clearly, and the structural characterization is multi-technique. Using twinned films as a control is a good move. The authors also resist overclaiming the 10 nm result, calling it 'hints' in the conclusion. The DFT surface energies for the facets are a reasonable supporting argument.

The soft spots are real but not fatal. The biggest one is the quantification of untwinning. The degree is just the raw integrated intensity of the stronger (038)/(308) peak divided by the sum, with no correction for the different structure factors, Lorentz-polarization, or absorption, and no error bars. For orthorhombic YBCO those reflections are not equivalent, so the raw ratio isn't necessarily the twin fraction. The fact that the tann=0 film gives exactly 50% could be a lucky coincidence. This doesn't change the qualitative conclusion—annealing clearly changes the texture—but it means the absolute number '82%' is not robust, and the title's 'untwinned' overstates it. If I were the referee, I'd ask for a calibration (e.g., using a fully detwinned crystal or calculating the correction factors) or at least a conservative error estimate.

The second issue is that the in-plane lattice parameters (a=3.82, b=3.87 Å) are reported without uncertainties, which matters for a strain thesis. The third is that the facet-untwinning mechanism is inferred from the correlation between annealing time and untwinning, plus DFT. It's plausible, but alternative explanations (stoichiometry, roughness) aren't ruled out. Minor point: the 10 nm transport anisotropy is based on two thickness points and labeled preliminary, which is fair.

Overall, the core claim—that this growth method yields compressively strained, mostly untwinned YBCO films and nanostructures with preserved anisotropy—holds up in outline. The paper deserves peer review. I'd send it with the expectation of revisions that tighten the diffraction analysis and the language. If I worked on strain effects in cuprates, I'd cite it.

Referee Report

1 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a growth method for c-axis oriented YBCO thin films on (110)-oriented MgO substrates that are pre-annealed in oxygen. The pre-annealing produces a faceted surface, and the authors report that this favors a preferential alignment of the CuO chains, yielding films with an untwinning degree up to 82%, compressive strain along the b axis (3.89 to 3.87 Å), elongation of the c axis (11.71–11.73 Å), and a unidirectional buckling of the (001) planes. The authors further show that the chain-related transport anisotropy is preserved in nanowires down to 50 nm width and observe an additional resistivity anisotropy in 10 nm thick wires. The paper proposes these films as a platform for studying strain effects on local orders in cuprates.

Significance. If the claims are substantiated, this work would provide a valuable platform that combines compressive strain with untwinning in YBCO, which is not achieved on the commonly used STO substrates. The structural characterization is extensive, including XRD reciprocal-space maps, RHEED, AFM (tapping and PFQNM), and HAADF-STEM, and the transport data support preservation of chain-related anisotropy at the nanoscale. The DFT surface-energy calculations add independent support for the faceting interpretation. However, the central quantitative claim of 'untwinned' films rests on an uncalibrated intensity analysis that needs to be addressed before the platform claim is fully established.

major comments (1)

[Section IV, Fig. 6] The untwinning degree is defined as the integrated intensity of the stronger (038) or (308) reflection divided by the sum of the two integrated intensities. These two reflections are not symmetry-equivalent in orthorhombic YBCO: their structure factors, Lorentz-polarization factors, and absorption corrections differ. Therefore the raw integrated-intensity ratio is not a direct measure of twin-domain volume fraction, and the reported values (74% at tann = 2 h, 82% at tann = 5 h) are not established as volume fractions. The paper does not report any calibration, background-subtraction or peak-fitting procedure, or uncertainties. The tann = 0 case (50%) cannot serve as a calibration because equal raw intensities in a fully twinned film imply equal volumes only if the corrected cross-sections of the two reflections happen to be equal. Please provide a quantitative conversion, for example by calculating the structure-factor ratio for equal twin volumes, using a reflection pair that is truly symmetry-related, or cross-calibrating with a known partially detwinned sample, and report confidence intervals for all untwinning degrees. This is load-bearing for the paper's central claim of having grown 'untwinned' films and for the quantitative comparison with single-crystal anisotropies in Section VI.

minor comments (7)

[Section IV, Fig. 5 inset] The c-axis parameter is reported as a function of annealing time without error bars; please specify the uncertainty from the (00l) peak fitting, especially because the observed change (11.73 to 11.71 Å) is small.
[Section IV, Fig. 6] The color scale of the XRD maps is not defined; please state how the intensities are normalized and how the background was treated.
[Section VI, Fig. 8(c)] The resistivity ratio rho_a/rho_b for the 10 nm thick nanowires appears to be a single data point; please state the number of devices measured and provide the statistical uncertainty before claiming an additional strain-induced anisotropy.
[Section VI, text after Eq. (12) (or near 'consirering')] The word 'consirering' is a typo and should be 'considering'.
[Throughout] The term 'untwinned' is used for films with an untwinning degree of 82%; consider using 'highly untwinned' or 'predominantly untwinned' to avoid overstating the degree of detwinning.
[Section III, Table II] The DFT calculations would benefit from explicit computational details (plane-wave cutoff, k-point mesh, slab thickness convergence, and the specific vdW-DF functional version) to be reproducible.
[Section III, Fig. 4] The caption states the facets are 'compatible with (540)/(450) planes' while the text says 'or similar high Miller index planes'; please clarify how uniquely the facet orientation is determined from the AFM data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the untwinning and strain claims are supported by direct XRD, AFM, STEM, and transport measurements, with external single-crystal benchmarks; self-citations are auxiliary rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central result is an experimental growth outcome: pre-annealed (110) MgO substrates produce YBCO films with suppressed twinning and compressive strain. The untwinning degree is operationally defined as the integrated-intensity ratio of the (038)/(308) reflections (Section IV), and the quoted 82% is that measured ratio, not a value produced by a fitted model. Whether the raw intensity ratio should be corrected for the different structure factors or absorption of the two non-equivalent reflections is a legitimate metrology question, but it does not make the derivation circular: no parameter is fitted to a subset of the data and then renamed as a prediction. The compressive-strain and buckling claims rest on independent measurements: the c-axis elongation from symmetric XRD, the splitting of (00l) rocking curves, and HAADF-STEM images. The transport anisotropies in Section VI are compared with external untwinned single-crystal data (Refs. 70, 75, 76), providing outside benchmarks. The paper cites its own prior work extensively (e.g., Refs. 49, 51-53, 62-69, 77), especially for growth parameters, nanopatterning, hole-doping calibration, and observation of charge order, but these citations are auxiliary to the main untwinning and strain claims and do not themselves supply the load-bearing evidence. No step in the claimed derivation chain reduces by construction to its own inputs, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The free parameters are hole-doping calibrations used for comparison with single crystals, not fitted to the central claim. The main conceptual load is the facet-untwinning mechanism, which is assumed rather than directly demonstrated.

free parameters (2)

Hole doping p of slightly overdoped nanowires = 0.17
Inferred indirectly from c-axis length and Tc using the authors' own calibration (Refs 51, 53, 71); used to compare Jc and London-penetration anisotropy with single-crystal values.
Hole doping p of underdoped nanowires = 0.125
Inferred by the same indirect method; used to compare the 300 K resistivity anisotropy with untwinned single-crystal data from Ref. 70.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Upon cooling in oxygen, YBCO transforms from tetragonal to orthorhombic, and the in-plane a/b orientation is set by substrate symmetry and interfacial strain.
Section II; standard picture supported by refs 15-20, 23-24.
domain assumption Anisotropic strain from vicinal or faceted surfaces suppresses twinning by favoring alignment of the longer b axis along the less strained direction.
Section II; prior STO-vicinal work; the paper extends it to MgO facets.
domain assumption (110) surfaces of fcc ionic crystals such as MgO are unstable and facet into elongated domains under annealing.
Section III; refs 33-40.
ad hoc to paper The shallow (540)/(450) facets cause the preferential YBCO orientation through under-coordinated edge atoms, analogous to STO step edges.
Sections III-IV; inferred from correlation and DFT surface energies, not directly verified.
domain assumption Buckling of the (001) planes is the strain-relaxation mechanism in perovskite films via oxygen-octahedra distortion.
Section V; refs 54-59.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Untwinned YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-\delta}$ thin films on MgO substrates: a platform to study strain effects on the local orders in cuprates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WD3Q4OFL

@misc{pith2026190802637,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Untwinned YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_7-\delta$ thin films on MgO substrates: a platform to study strain effects on the local orders in cuprates},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WD3Q4OFL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02637}
}

abstract

We have grown untwinned YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-\delta}$ (YBCO) films on (110) MgO substrates that were pre-annealed at high temperature in oxygen atmosphere. The annealing results in surface reconstruction with shallow facets, which induce the suppression of the YBCO twinning domains, and the preferential alignment of the CuO chains along one of the in-plane directions of the substrate. Because of the large mismatch between the in-plane lattice parameters of film and substrate, the strain induced by the MgO into the YBCO layer is strong and very peculiar. The YBCO film is compressed, with respect to the bulk, and presents a unidirectional buckling of the atomic planes, along the chains' direction, due to a deformation of the copper-oxygen octahedra. The YBCO films, which can be grown with thicknesses down to few unit cells and oxygen doping levels spanning most of the superconducting dome, are patterned into nanowires with dimensions down to 50 nm. The anisotropies due to the untwinning state are preserved in these structures; moreover, additional anisotropies appear, in ultrathin structures where strain effects become more pronounced. Such untwinned and compressively strained films can therefore be used as a platform to study the interplay between strain and the various local orders in the normal state of YBCO.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.02637 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: , the results along the [1¯10] direction are presented for films deposited on differently annealed substrates. For films deposited on substrates without annealing [see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

[1]

Keimer, S

B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, Nature 518, 179 (2015)

2015
[2]

(b) Cross section of the (001) terraces on the STO surface, after a YBCO ﬁlm is deposited: a compressive strain occurs, perpendicular to the step edges

STO direction leads to (001) terraces with width wT and height hT. (b) Cross section of the (001) terraces on the STO surface, after a YBCO ﬁlm is deposited: a compressive strain occurs, perpendicular to the step edges. (c) Top view of a (001) terrace of the STO surface (in the region close to the step), both in its unstrained condition ( left) and after ...
[3]

J. Wu, A. Bollinger, X. He, and I. Boˇ zovi´ c, Nature547, 432 (2017)

work page 2017
[4]

Ivashko, M

O. Ivashko, M. Horio, W. Wan, N. Christensen, D. Mc- Nally, E. Paris, Y. Tseng, N. Shaik, H. Rønnow, H. Wei, C. Adamo, C. Lichtensteiger, M. Gibert, M. Beasley, K. Shen, J. Tomczak, T. Schmitt, and J. Chang, Nat. Commun. 10, 786 (2019)

work page 2019
[5]

Hardy, N

F. Hardy, N. Hillier, C. Meingast, D. Colson, Y. Li, N. Bariˇ si´ c, G. Yu, X. Zhao, M. Greven, and J. Schilling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 167002 (2010)

work page 2010
[6]

Huang, H

H. Huang, H. Jang, M. Fujita, T. Nishizaki, Y. Lin, J. Wang, J. Ying, J. Smith, C. Kenney-Benson, G. Shen, W. Mao, C.-C. Kao, Y.-J. Liu, and J.-S. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 97, 174508 (2018)

work page 2018
[7]

H.-H. Kim, S. Souliou, M. Barber, E. Lefran¸ cois, M. Mi- nola, M. Tortora, R. Heid, N. Nandi, R. Borzi, G. Gar- barino, A. Bosak, J. Porras, T. Loew, M. K¨ onig, P. Moll, A. Mackenzie, B. Keimer, C. Hicks, and M. Le Tacon, Science 362, 1040 (2018)

work page 2018
[8]

Bluschke, A

M. Bluschke, A. Frano, E. Schierle, D. Putzky, F. Ghor- bani, R. Ortiz, H. Suzuki, G. Christiani, G. Logvenov, E. Weschke, R. Birgeneau, E. da Silva Neto, M. Minola, S. Blanco-Canosa, and B. Keimer, Nat. Commun. 9, 2978 (2018)

work page 2018

Show all 84 references

[9]

Chang, E

J. Chang, E. Blackburn, A. Holmes, N. B. Christensen, J. Larsen, J. Mesot, R. Liang, D. Bonn, W. Hardy, A. Watenphul, M. Zimmermann, E. Forgan, and S. Hay- den, Nat. Phys. 8, 871 (2012)

2012
[10]

(or the [100]) direction exhibits a periodic sequence of steps, with very straight edges and a heighthT, spaced by (001) terraces, whose widthwT decreases with increas- ingα [see Fig. 1(a)]. When a thin ﬁlm is deposited on top (a) (b) (c) [100] [001] [010] n [001] [010] [010]w...
[11]

Ghiringhelli, M

G. Ghiringhelli, M. Le Tacon, M. Minola, S. Blanco- Canosa, C. Mazzoli, N. Brookes, G. De Luca, A. Frano, D. Hawthorn, F. He, T. Loew, M. Moretti Sala, D. Peets, M. Salluzzo, E. Schierle, R. Sutarto, G. Sawatzky, E. Weschke, B. Keimer, and L. Braicovich, Science 337, 821 (2012)

2012
[12]

Loret, N

B. Loret, N. Auvray, Y. Gallais, M. Cazayous, A. For- get, D. Colson, M.-H. Julien, I. Paul, M. Civelli, and A. Sacuto, Nat. Phys. 15, 771 (2019)

2019
[13]

Gerber, H

S. Gerber, H. Jang, H. Nojiri, S. Matsuzawa, H. Ya- sumura, D. Bonn, R. Liang, W. Hardy, Z. Islam, A. Mehta, S. Song, M. Sikorski, D. Stefanescu, Y. Feng, S. Kivelson, T. Devereaux, Z.-X. Shen, C.-C. Kao, W.-S. Lee, D. Zhu, and J.-S. Lee, Science 350, 949 (2015)

2015
[14]

Comin and A

R. Comin and A. Damascelli, Annu. Rev. Condens. Mat- ter Phys. 7, 369 (2016)

2016
[15]

Steinborn, G

T. Steinborn, G. Miehe, J. Wiesner, E. Brecht, H. Fuess, G. Wirth, B. Schulte, M. Speckmann, H. Adrian, M. Maul, K. Petersen, W. Blau, and M. McConnel, Physica C 220, 219 (1994)

1994
[16]

Sadewasser, J

S. Sadewasser, J. Schilling, A. Paulikas, and B. Veal, Phys. Rev. B 61, 741 (2000)

2000
[17]

Cyr-Choini` ere, D

O. Cyr-Choini` ere, D. LeBoeuf, S. Badoux, S. Dufour- Beaus´ ejour, D. Bonn, W. Hardy, R. Liang, D. Graf, N. Doiron-Leyraud, and L. Taillefer, Phys. Rev. B 98, 064513 (2018)

2018
[18]

Frano, S

A. Frano, S. Blanco-Canosa, E. Schierle, Y. Lu, M. Wu, M. Bluschke, M. Minola, G. Christiani, H. Habermeier, G. Logvenov, et al. , Nat. Mater. 15, 831 (2016)

2016
[19]

Schweitzer, T

D. Schweitzer, T. Bollmeier, B. Stritzker, and B. Rauschenbach, Thin Solid Films 280, 147 (1996)

1996
[20]

Bernstein and J

P. Bernstein and J. Hamet, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 2569 (2004)

2004
[21]

W. K. Kwok, U. Welp, V. M. Vinokur, S. Fleshler, J. Downey, and G. W. Crabtree, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 390 (1991)

1991
[22]

H. J. H. Smilde, A. A. Golubov, Ariando, G. Rijnders, J. M. Dekkers, S. Harkema, D. H. A. Blank, H. Rogalla, and H. Hilgenkamp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 257001 (2005)

2005
[23]

J. M. Dekkers, G. Rijnders, S. Harkema, H. J. H. Smilde, H. Hilgenkamp, H. Rogalla, and D. H. A. Blank, Appl. 10 Phys. Lett. 83, 5199 (2003)

2003
[24]

Zegenhagen, T

J. Zegenhagen, T. Haage, and Q. Jiang, Appl. Phys. A 67, 711 (1998)

1998
[25]

However, the strain induced in YBCO is tensile, as on vicinal angle (001) ori- ented STO substrates [28]

Partially detwinned ﬁlms have also been achieved on (001) oriented NdGaO 3 substrates. However, the strain induced in YBCO is tensile, as on vicinal angle (001) ori- ented STO substrates [28]. Moreover, 45 ◦ grain bound- aries and defects, inﬂuencing the transport properties, ...
[26]

Br¨ otz and H

J. Br¨ otz and H. Fuess, Physica C339, 75 (2000)

2000
[27]

H. J. Scheel, M. Berkowski, and B. Chabot, Physica C 185, 2095 (1991)

1991
[28]

Zhuravel, S

A. Zhuravel, S. M. Anlage, S. K. Remillard, A. Lukashenko, and A. Ustinov, J. Appl. Phys. 108, 033920 (2010)

2010
[29]

Mazierska, D

J. Mazierska, D. Ledenyov, M. V. Jacob, and J. Krupka, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 18, 18 (2005)

2005
[30]

Bdikin, P

I. Bdikin, P. Mozhaev, G. Ovsyannikov, P. Komissinski, and I. Kotelyanskii, Physica C 377, 26 (2002)

2002
[31]

Villard, G

C. Villard, G. Koren, D. Cohen, E. Polturak, B. Thrane, and D. Chateignier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3913 (1996)

1996
[32]

Dubourdieu, J

C. Dubourdieu, J. Senateur, O. Thomas, F. Weiss, B. Thrane, and M. Brunel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 1942 (1996)

1996
[33]

Ho and K

K.-M. Ho and K. Bohnen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1833 (1987)

1987
[34]

J. Nam, R. Hughes, J. Castellan, B. Gaulin, J. Britten, and J. Preston, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 123906 (2005)

2005
[35]

Salluzzo, G

M. Salluzzo, G. De Luca, D. Marr` e, M. Putti, M. Tro- peano, U. S. Di Uccio, and R. Vaglio, Phys. Rev. B 72, 134521 (2005)

2005
[36]

V. E. Henrich, Surf. Sci. 57, 385 (1976)

1976
[37]

Gritsch, D

T. Gritsch, D. Coulman, R. Behm, and G. Ertl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1086 (1989)

1989
[38]

R. Koch, M. Borbonus, O. Haase, and K. Rieder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3416 (1991)

1991
[39]

Chern, J

G. Chern, J. Huang, and T. Leung, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 964 (1998)

1998
[40]

De Leeuw, G

N. De Leeuw, G. Watson, and S. Parker, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 17219 (1995)

1995
[41]

Giese, F

D. Giese, F. Lamelas, H. Owen, R. Plass, and M. Gajdardziska-Josifovska, Surf. Sci. 457, 326 (2000)

2000
[42]

M. Dion, H. Rydberg, E. Schr¨ oder, D. C. Langreth, and B. I. Lundqvist, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 246401 (2004)

2004
[43]

Sugawara and K

A. Sugawara and K. Mae, Surf. Sci. 558, 211 (2004)

2004
[44]

Ciancio, A

R. Ciancio, A. Vittadini, A. Selloni, R. Arpaia, C. Aruta, F. M. Granozio, U. S. Di Uccio, G. Rossi, and E. Carlino, J. Nanoparticle Res. 15, 1735 (2013)

2013
[45]

Berland, V

K. Berland, V. R. Cooper, K. Lee, E. Schr¨ oder, T. Thon- hauser, P. Hyldgaard, and B. I. Lundqvist, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 066501 (2015)

2015
[46]

Thonhauser, V

T. Thonhauser, V. R. Cooper, S. Li, A. Puzder, P. Hyldgaard, and D. C. Langreth, Phys. Rev. B 76, 125112 (2007)

2007
[47]

K. Lee, ´E. D. Murray, L. Kong, B. I. Lundqvist, and D. C. Langreth, Phys. Rev. B 82, 081101(R) (2010)

2010
[48]

Rom´ an-P´ erez and J

G. Rom´ an-P´ erez and J. M. Soler, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 096102 (2009)

2009
[49]

Berland and P

K. Berland and P. Hyldgaard, Phys. Rev. B 89, 035412 (2014)

2014
[50]

Giannozzi, S

P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, et al. , J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009)

2009
[51]

Baghdadi, R

R. Baghdadi, R. Arpaia, T. Bauch, and F. Lombardi, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 25, 1100104 (2015)

2015
[52]

R. Arpaia, YBa2Cu3O7−δ Nanowires to Study Nanoscale Ordering in High-T C Superconductors (PhD thesis, De- partment of Microtechnology and Nanoscience, Chalmers University of Technology, 2016)

2016
[53]

the diﬀerence in length between the a and the b axes, is strongest [81]

Slightly overdoped ﬁlms are the best systems where to study the twinning state, since at this oxygen doping level the in-plane orthorhombicity of the YBCO unit cell, i.e. the diﬀerence in length between the a and the b axes, is strongest [81]
[54]

P. M. Woodward, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B53, 32 (1997)

1997
[55]

Arpaia, D

R. Arpaia, D. Golubev, R. Baghdadi, R. Ciancio, G. Draˇ zi´ c, P. Orgiani, D. Montemurro, T. Bauch, and F. Lombardi, Phys. Rev. B 96, 064525 (2017)

2017
[56]

Arpaia, E

R. Arpaia, E. Andersson, E. Trabaldo, T. Bauch, and F. Lombardi, Phys. Rev. Materials 2, 024804 (2018)

2018
[57]

Vailionis, H

A. Vailionis, H. Boschker, E. Houwman, G. Koster, G. Rijnders, and D. H. Blank, Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 152508 (2009)

2009
[58]

P. M. Woodward, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B53, 44 (1997)

1997
[59]

ﬁlms the distortion of the oxygen octahedra repre- sents the main strain relaxation mechanism, requiring a lower energy cost than the compression/stretching of the in-plane bond lengths. In particular, by plotting in the reciprocal space the rocking curves of the diﬀerent (00𝓁...

2017
[60]

Gebhardt, N

U. Gebhardt, N. Kasper, A. Vigliante, P. Wochner, H. Dosch, F. Razavi, and H.-U. Habermeier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 096101 (2007)

2007
[61]

Vailionis, H

A. Vailionis, H. Boschker, W. Siemons, E. P. Houwman, D. H. Blank, G. Rijnders, and G. Koster, Phys. Rev. B 83, 064101 (2011)

2011
[62]

Weber, M

M. Weber, M. Guennou, N. Dix, D. Pesquera, F. S´ anchez, G. Herranz, J. Fontcuberta, L. L´ opez-Conesa, S. Estrad´ e, F. Peir´ o, , J. I˜ niguez, and J. Kreisel, Phys. Rev. B94, 014118 (2016)

2016
[63]

Chisholm and S

M. Chisholm and S. Pennycook, Nature 351, 47 (1991)

1991
[64]

Lombardi, Z

F. Lombardi, Z. Ivanov, G. Fischer, E. Olsson, and T. Claeson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 249 (1998)

1998
[65]

Arpaia, S

R. Arpaia, S. Nawaz, F. Lombardi, and T. Bauch, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 23, 1101505 (2013)

2013
[66]

Baghdadi, R

R. Baghdadi, R. Arpaia, S. Charpentier, D. Golubev, T. Bauch, and F. Lombardi, Phys. Rev. Applied 4, 014022 (2015)

2015
[67]

Nawaz, R

S. Nawaz, R. Arpaia, F. Lombardi, and T. Bauch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 167004 (2013)

2013
[68]

Arpaia, M

R. Arpaia, M. Arzeo, S. Nawaz, S. Charpentier, F. Lom- bardi, and T. Bauch, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 072603 (2014)

2014
[69]

Arzeo, R

M. Arzeo, R. Arpaia, R. Baghdadi, F. Lombardi, and T. Bauch, J. Appl. Phys. 119, 174501 (2016)

2016
[70]

Arpaia, M

R. Arpaia, M. Arzeo, R. Baghdadi, E. Trabaldo, F. Lom- bardi, and T. Bauch, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30, 014008 (2016)

2016
[71]

Trabaldo, R

E. Trabaldo, R. Arpaia, M. Arzeo, E. Andersson, D. Gol- ubev, F. Lombardi, and T. Bauch, Supercond. Sci. Tech- nol. 32, 073001 (2019)

2019
[72]

Arpaia, S

R. Arpaia, S. Charpentier, R. Toskovic, T. Bauch, and F. Lombardi, Physica C 506, 184 (2014). 11

2014
[73]

Y. Ando, K. Segawa, S. Komiya, and A. Lavrov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 137005 (2002)

2002
[74]

A detailed description of the analysis we have applied is presented in Ref

The hole doping p, number of holes for planar copper atom, has been determined in our ﬁlms indirectly, com- bining the knowledge of the c-axis parameter, estimated via XRD with that of the critical temperature Tc, de- termined via resistance vs temperature measurements. A deta...
[75]

Arpaia, D

R. Arpaia, D. Golubev, R. Baghdadi, M. Arzeo, G. Ku- nakova, S. Charpentier, S. Nawaz, F. Lombardi, and T. Bauch, Physica C 506, 165 (2014)

2014
[76]

Charpentier, R

S. Charpentier, R. Arpaia, J. Gaudet, D. Matte, R. Bagh- dadi, T. L¨ ofwander, D. Golubev, P. Fournier, T. Bauch, and F. Lombardi, Phys. Rev. B 94, 060503(R) (2016)

2016
[77]

Baghdadi, R

R. Baghdadi, R. Arpaia, E. Stepantsov, M. Arzeo, D. Golubev, D. Montemurro, E. Andersson, T. Bauch, and F. Lombardi, Phys. Rev. B 95, 184505 (2017)

2017
[78]

Basov, R

D. Basov, R. Liang, D. Bonn, W. Hardy, B. Dabrowski, M. Quijada, D. Tanner, J. Rice, D. Ginsberg, and T. Timusk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 598 (1995)

1995
[79]

Ishida, K

T. Ishida, K. Okuda, H. Asaoka, Y. Kazumata, K. Noda, and H. Takei, Phys. Rev. B 56, 11897 (1997)

1997
[80]

Arpaia, S

R. Arpaia, S. Caprara, R. Fumagalli, G. De Vec- chi, Y. Peng, E. Andersson, D. Betto, G. De Luca, N. Brookes, F. Lombardi, M. Salluzzo, L. Braicovich, C. Di Castro, M. Grilli, and G. Ghiringhelli, Science 365, 906 (2019)

2019
[81]

Scherer, P

T. Scherer, P. Marienhoﬀ, R. Herwig, M. Neuhaus, and W. Jutzi, Physica C 197, 79 (1992)

1992
[82]

Klemenz, I

C. Klemenz, I. Utke, and H. Scheel, J. Cryst. Growth 207, 62 (1999)

1999
[83]

Khanof, J

S. Khanof, J. Mannhart, and H. Boschker, Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 022605 (2018)

2018
[84]

Ye and K

J. Ye and K. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. B 48, 7554 (1993)

1993

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Keimer, S

B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, Nature 518, 179 (2015)

2015

[2] [2]

(b) Cross section of the (001) terraces on the STO surface, after a YBCO ﬁlm is deposited: a compressive strain occurs, perpendicular to the step edges

STO direction leads to (001) terraces with width wT and height hT. (b) Cross section of the (001) terraces on the STO surface, after a YBCO ﬁlm is deposited: a compressive strain occurs, perpendicular to the step edges. (c) Top view of a (001) terrace of the STO surface (in the region close to the step), both in its unstrained condition ( left) and after ...

[3] [3]

J. Wu, A. Bollinger, X. He, and I. Boˇ zovi´ c, Nature547, 432 (2017)

work page 2017

[4] [4]

Ivashko, M

O. Ivashko, M. Horio, W. Wan, N. Christensen, D. Mc- Nally, E. Paris, Y. Tseng, N. Shaik, H. Rønnow, H. Wei, C. Adamo, C. Lichtensteiger, M. Gibert, M. Beasley, K. Shen, J. Tomczak, T. Schmitt, and J. Chang, Nat. Commun. 10, 786 (2019)

work page 2019

[5] [5]

Hardy, N

F. Hardy, N. Hillier, C. Meingast, D. Colson, Y. Li, N. Bariˇ si´ c, G. Yu, X. Zhao, M. Greven, and J. Schilling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 167002 (2010)

work page 2010

[6] [6]

Huang, H

H. Huang, H. Jang, M. Fujita, T. Nishizaki, Y. Lin, J. Wang, J. Ying, J. Smith, C. Kenney-Benson, G. Shen, W. Mao, C.-C. Kao, Y.-J. Liu, and J.-S. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 97, 174508 (2018)

work page 2018

[7] [7]

H.-H. Kim, S. Souliou, M. Barber, E. Lefran¸ cois, M. Mi- nola, M. Tortora, R. Heid, N. Nandi, R. Borzi, G. Gar- barino, A. Bosak, J. Porras, T. Loew, M. K¨ onig, P. Moll, A. Mackenzie, B. Keimer, C. Hicks, and M. Le Tacon, Science 362, 1040 (2018)

work page 2018

[8] [8]

Bluschke, A

M. Bluschke, A. Frano, E. Schierle, D. Putzky, F. Ghor- bani, R. Ortiz, H. Suzuki, G. Christiani, G. Logvenov, E. Weschke, R. Birgeneau, E. da Silva Neto, M. Minola, S. Blanco-Canosa, and B. Keimer, Nat. Commun. 9, 2978 (2018)

work page 2018