Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Package for the Automated Classification of Periodic Variable Stars

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1512.01611 v2 pith:WDN3W3JT submitted 2015-12-05 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.SR
keywords modelperiodicvariableclassificationlightprecisionrecallstars
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a machine learning package for the classification of periodic variable stars. Our package is intended to be general: it can classify any single band optical light curve comprising at least a few tens of observations covering durations from weeks to years, with arbitrary time sampling. We use light curves of periodic variable stars taken from OGLE and EROS-2 to train the model. To make our classifier relatively survey-independent, it is trained on 16 features extracted from the light curves (e.g. period, skewness, Fourier amplitude ratio). The model classifies light curves into one of seven superclasses - Delta Scuti, RR Lyrae, Cepheid, Type II Cepheid, eclipsing binary, long-period variable, non-variable - as well as subclasses of these, such as ab, c, d, and e types for RR Lyraes. When trained to give only superclasses, our model achieves 0.98 for both recall and precision as measured on an independent validation dataset (on a scale of 0 to 1). When trained to give subclasses, it achieves 0.81 for both recall and precision. In order to assess classification performance of the subclass model, we applied it to the MACHO, LINEAR, and ASAS periodic variables, which gave recall/precision of 0.92/0.98, 0.89/0.96, and 0.84/0.88, respectively. We also applied the subclass model to Hipparcos periodic variable stars of many other variability types that do not exist in our training set, in order to examine how much those types degrade the classification performance of our target classes. In addition, we investigate how the performance varies with the number of data points and duration of observations. We find that recall and precision do not vary significantly if the number of data points is larger than 80 and the duration is more than a few weeks. The classifier software of the subclass model is available from the GitHub repository (https://goo.gl/xmFO6Q).

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Morphological classification of eclipsing binary stars using computer vision methods

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned ResNet50 and vision transformers on polar-hexbin images classify eclipsing binaries as detached or overcontact with high accuracy on real data, but cannot reliably detect starspots.

  2. Lightcurves of stars in the Chamaeleon I Association

    astro-ph.SR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new optical and infrared variability catalog for the Chamaeleon I association, with 73 astrometric members and periods plus variability types for 28 objects.

  3. From stellar light to astrophysical insight: automating variable star research with machine learning

    astro-ph.IM 2025-07 unverdicted

    An invited review of machine learning for automated variable star research, covering data cleaning, variability classification, stellar parameter inference, and foundation models.

Pith tools