Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Vulnerabilities of Electric Vehicle Battery Packs to Cyberattacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.04822 v3 pith:WF6S55RF submitted 2017-11-01 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords cyberattacksbatteryattackscomponentselectricleadriskssafety
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Electric Vehicles (EVs), like all modern vehicles, are entirely controlled by electronic devices embedded within networks that are exposed to the threat of cyberattacks. Cyber vulnerabilities are magnified with EVs due to unique risks associated with EV battery packs. Current batteries have well-known issues with specific energy, cost and fire-related safety risks. In this study, we develop a systematic framework to assess the impact of cyberattacks on EVs. While the current focus of automotive cyberattacks is on short-term physical safety, it is crucial to consider long-term cyberattacks that aim to cause financial losses through accrued impact, especially in the context of EVs. Faulty components of battery management systems such as a compromised voltage regulator could lead to cyberattacks that can overdischarge or overcharge the battery. Overdischarge could lead to failures such as internal shorts in the timescale of minutes through cyberattacks that compromise energy-intensive EV subsystems like auxiliary components. Attacks that overcharge the pack could shorten the lifetime of a new battery pack to less than a year. Further, such attacks also pose physical safety risks via the triggering of thermal (fire) events. Attacks on auxiliary components lead to battery drain, which could be up to 20% of the state-of-charge per hour. Lastly, we develop a heuristic for the stealthiness of a cyberattack to augment traditional threat models. The methodology presented here will help in building the foundational principles of electric vehicle cybersecurity: a nascent but critical topic in the coming years.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Automation is no barrier to light vehicle electrification

    cs.CY 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding Level 4-5 automation to light-duty electric vehicles is estimated to reduce range by roughly 4-14% depending on sensors and drive cycle, with small effects on battery life, so automation need not block electrification.

Pith tools