REVIEW 13 cited by
New strategies for New Physics search in B -> K* nu anti-nu, B -> K nu anti-nu and B -> X(s) nu anti-nu decays
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The rare decay B -> K* nu anti-nu allows a transparent study of Z penguin and other electroweak penguin effects in New Physics (NP) scenarios in the absence of dipole operator contributions and Higgs (scalar) penguin contributions that are often more important than Z contributions in B -> K* l+l- and B(s) -> l+l- decays. We present a new analysis of B -> K* nu anti-nu with improved form factors and of the decays B -> K nu anti-nu and B -> X(s) nu anti-nu in the SM and in a number of NP scenarios like the general MSSM, general scenarios with modified Z/Z' penguins and in a singlet scalar extension of the SM. We also summarize the results in the Littlest Higgs model with T-parity and a Randall-Sundrum (RS) model with custodial protection of left-handed Z-di-dj couplings. Our SM prediction BR(B -> K* nu anti-nu)=(6.8^+1.0_-1.1) x 10^-6 turns out to be significantly lower than the ones present in the literature. Our improved calculation BR(B -> X(s) nu anti-nu)=(2.7+-0.2) x 10^-5 in the SM avoids the normalization to the BR(B -> X(c) e anti-nu(e)) and, with less than 10% total uncertainty, is the most accurate to date. The results for the SM and NP scenarios can be transparently summarized in a (epsilon,eta) plane with a non-vanishing eta signalling the presence of new right-handed down-quark flavour violating couplings which can be ideally probed by the decays in question. Measuring the three branching ratios and one additional polarization observable in B -> K* nu anti-nu allows to overconstrain the resulting point in the (epsilon,eta) plane with (epsilon,eta)=(1,0) corresponding to the SM. The correlations of these three channels with the rare decays K+ -> pi+ nu anti-nu, KL -> pi0 nu anti-nu, B -> X(s) l+ l- and B(s) -> mu+ mu- offer powerful tests of New Physics with new right-handed couplings and non-MFV interactions.
Forward citations
Cited by 13 Pith papers
-
A Dispersive Look at Rare $B$-meson Semileptonic Decays
Lattice-only Dispersive Matrix form factors enlarge large-recoil uncertainties and, with new angular data, favour long-distance hadronic effects over a short-distance C9 New Physics shift.
-
Radiative generation of chiral vector operators in $b\to s \nu\bar{\nu}$ transition
Minimal one-loop models that generate both chiral vector operators for b→sνν̄ are systematically classified but cannot quantitatively explain the Belle II anomaly.
-
New Strategies for New Physics Search with $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda \nu \bar\nu$ Decays
For longitudinally polarized Lambda_b at future Z-pole machines, Lambda_b -> Lambda nu nubar has a forward-backward asymmetry that is independent of new physics at its zero crossing and complements the branching ratio...
-
On the Interplay of Constraints from $B_s$, $D$, and $K$ Meson Mixing in $Z^\prime$ Models with Implications for $b\to s \nu\bar\nu$ Transitions
In Z' models with suppressed B_s mixing, SU(2)L and SMEFT RG correlations tie the B_s, D, and K sectors together and predict B to K(K*) nu nu enhancements of up to 20% when b to s mu mu rates are suppressed.
-
Precision calculations of $B\to K^*$ form factors from SCET sum rules beyond leading-power contributions
New subleading-power corrections to B to K* form factors from SCET sum rules yield SM branching fractions BR(Bbar0 to Kbar*0 nu nubar)=8.09(96)e-6 and F_L=0.44(4).
-
Semileptonic neutral current decays of $\Xi_b$ with dileptons or dineutrinos in the final state
Perturbative QCD calculations find that branching fractions for Ξ_b to Ξ lepton-pair decays lie within LHCb reach and that angular observables plus a specific ratio can constrain Wilson coefficients and extract |V_td/...
-
Belle II Constraints on the Non-Minimal Universal Extra Dimensional Model
Belle II data on the rare B decay constrains the non-minimal UED model to require the inverse compactification radius to be at least ~900 GeV, while the minimal version yields no bound.
-
$\Lambda_b \to \Lambda^{(\ast)}\nu\bar{\nu}$ decays and the recent Belle-II $B^+\to K^+\nu\bar{\nu}$ data
Belle-II's B+ -> K+ nu nubar excess, if due to new physics, constrains the branching ratios and angular observables of Lambda_b -> Lambda(*) nu nubar decays, with the hadronic forward-backward asymmetry the best discr...
-
Probing Signatures of Right-Handed Neutrinos via $b \to s \nu \bar\nu$ Decays
Model-independent constraints on dimension-six vector operators with right-handed neutrinos from Belle II B to K nu nubar data, predicting enhanced rates in related decays and sensitivity via K* polarization.
-
Correlated $b \to s$ and $s \to d$ Rare Semileptonic Transitions in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory
SMEFT global fit to b→s anomalies with complex Wilson coefficients shows left-handed four-fermion operators preferred and demonstrates that U(3)^5 or U(2)^5 flavor symmetry restores consistency with kaon data.
-
The rare decay $B^+ \to K^+\ell^+\ell^-(\nu\bar{\nu})$ under the QCD sum rules approach
A QCD light-cone sum-rule calculation with the authors' kaon distribution amplitudes predicts B(B+ to K+ nu nubar) = 4.14 x 10^-6 and B(B+ to K+ l+l-) around 6.6 x 10^-7, consistent with other SM estimates.
-
Scalar dark matter, Neutrino mass and Leptogenesis in a $\rm U(1)_{B-L}$ model
A U(1)B-L model with four anomaly-cancelling fermions can satisfy dark matter relic density and direct detection bounds, neutrino oscillation data, and the observed baryon asymmetry through resonant leptogenesis.
-
Hunting New Animalcula with Flavour Changing Processes
Review advocating correlations among flavour observables as direct tests for specific new physics models beyond global fits to Wilson coefficients.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.