Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Error-tolerant witnessing of divergences in classical and quantum statistical complexity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.03661 v2 pith:WIV5QH7M submitted 2017-11-10 quant-ph

Error-tolerant witnessing of divergences in classical and quantum statistical complexity

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumclassicalcomplexitydivergencesinformationprocessesstatisticalstochastic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

How much information do we need about a process' past to faithfully simulate its future? The statistical complexity is a prominent quantifier of structure for stochastic processes. Quantum machines, however, can simulate classical stochastic processes while storing significantly less information than their optimal classical counterparts. This implies qualitative divergences between classical and quantum statistical complexity. Here, we develop error-tolerant techniques to witness such divergences, enabling us to account for the inevitable imperfections in realising quantum stochastic simulators with present-day quantum technology. We apply these tools to experimentally verify the quantum memory advantage in simulating an Ising spin chain, even when accounting for experimental distortion. This then leads us to observe a recently conjectured effect, the ambiguity of simplicity$\unicode{x2013}$the notion that the relative complexity of two different processes can depend on whether we model the process using classical or quantum means of information processing.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.