Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 28 references

Towards Localized and Disentangled Knowledge Editing for Multimodal Large Language Models

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A framework localizes fact-specific layers in multimodal models and disentangles relevant inputs to make knowledge edits generalize without unintended changes.

desk verdict LDKE formalizes two failure modes in MKE and adds localization plus disentanglement modules, but the abstract supplies zero numbers or controls to check if they work. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.29826 v1 pith:WJUH3KKN submitted 2026-05-28 cs.CL cs.AI

Leijiang Gu , Zhen Zeng , Feng Li , Xinjian Gao , Zenglin Shi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords multimodalknowledgeeditinglargelanguagemodelsmodeldisentanglementlocalizationcausalmisalignmentfeatureentanglement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper seeks to overcome two failure modes in multimodal knowledge editing where updates stay confined to single examples and mix up unrelated visual or semantic features. It formalizes Causal Misalignment and Feature Entanglement as the root problems, then introduces modules that locate the right layers for editing and route inputs to protect unrelated knowledge. If successful, edits would spread correctly to related queries while leaving other model behavior intact. This would matter for keeping large multimodal systems current without repeated full retraining or widespread side effects. Experiments on benchmarks claim better propagation of changes and higher locality than prior methods.

What carries the argument

Fast Localization module that identifies critical layers for efficient updates, paired with a Disentanglement Classifier that routes inputs to preserve unrelated knowledge.

What would settle it

An experiment in which the Fast Localization module and Disentanglement Classifier produce no measurable gain in edit propagation or locality compared with baseline editing methods on the same benchmarks would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

LDKE achieves precise and generalized editing by localizing fact-specific model layers and disentangling target-relevant inputs from irrelevant ones, with superior performance in propagating edits to related contexts while maintaining high locality.

Load-bearing premise

The two failure modes of Causal Misalignment and Feature Entanglement are the main reasons existing methods fail at generalization and locality, and the new modules can fix them without creating fresh problems or trade-offs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Edits propagate accurately to logically related queries while unrelated but visually or semantically linked information stays unchanged.
  • The method applies across multiple benchmarks and different multimodal large language models without loss of locality.
  • Updates become confined to fact-specific layers rather than affecting the entire model.
  • Input routing prevents feature entanglement that previously caused unintended alterations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same localization-plus-disentanglement pattern might transfer to non-multimodal language models or vision-only systems facing similar editing issues.
  • If the modules prove stable, they could reduce reliance on expensive full-model retraining for keeping deployed multimodal systems up to date.
  • Combining the approach with parameter-efficient fine-tuning techniques could further lower the cost of repeated edits.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper identifies two failure modes in existing Multimodal Knowledge Editing (MKE) methods for MLLMs—Causal Misalignment (edits confined to specific samples) and Feature Entanglement (unintended changes to coupled irrelevant information)—and proposes Localized and Disentangled Knowledge Editing (LDKE). LDKE uses a Fast Localization module to identify and update critical layers and a Disentanglement Classifier to route target-relevant inputs, claiming this yields precise edits that generalize to related contexts while preserving high locality, as shown in experiments across benchmarks and MLLMs.

Significance. If the experimental claims hold with proper controls and baselines, LDKE could meaningfully advance knowledge editing for MLLMs by providing a more targeted mechanism that reduces side effects and improves generalization, which is valuable for applications requiring reliable factual updates in multimodal systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of 'superior performance' and 'extensive experiments' demonstrating better edit propagation and locality is load-bearing, yet the text provides no quantitative results, baselines, error bars, or implementation details, preventing verification of whether the modules actually resolve the diagnosed failure modes without new trade-offs.
  2. [Introduction / Method] The assumption that Causal Misalignment and Feature Entanglement are the dominant causes (and that the proposed modules address them without side effects) is not isolated empirically; without ablation studies or controls showing these are primary over other factors, the motivation for the specific Fast Localization and Disentanglement Classifier design remains under-supported.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Method] Clarify the exact routing mechanism of the Disentanglement Classifier with pseudocode or an equation, as the high-level description leaves implementation ambiguous.
  2. [Experiments] Ensure all benchmarks and MLLMs used are explicitly listed with citation, and add a limitations section discussing potential computational overhead of the localization step.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We appreciate the referee's constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and outline the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of 'superior performance' and 'extensive experiments' demonstrating better edit propagation and locality is load-bearing, yet the text provides no quantitative results, baselines, error bars, or implementation details, preventing verification of whether the modules actually resolve the diagnosed failure modes without new trade-offs.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from including key quantitative results to support the claims. In the revised manuscript, we will update the abstract to highlight specific metrics from our experiments, such as improvements in edit generalization and locality compared to baselines. The full results with error bars, baselines, and implementation details are presented in the Experiments section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Introduction / Method] The assumption that Causal Misalignment and Feature Entanglement are the dominant causes (and that the proposed modules address them without side effects) is not isolated empirically; without ablation studies or controls showing these are primary over other factors, the motivation for the specific Fast Localization and Disentanglement Classifier design remains under-supported.

    Authors: The failure modes are identified through analysis of existing methods' behaviors on multimodal data, as detailed in the Introduction. To strengthen the empirical isolation of these factors, we will incorporate additional ablation studies in the revision that separately control for localization and disentanglement effects, showing their specific role in the observed issues and the design's effectiveness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper presents a methodological framework (LDKE) consisting of a Fast Localization module and Disentanglement Classifier to address two diagnosed failure modes in existing MKE methods. No equations, closed-form derivations, parameter fits, or predictions are described that reduce to inputs by construction. Claims rest on experimental benchmarks rather than self-referential definitions or load-bearing self-citations. The derivation chain is self-contained as an engineering proposal without the circular patterns enumerated.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no equations, parameters, or implementation details are provided to identify free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Towards Localized and Disentangled Knowledge Editing for Multimodal Large Language Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WJUH3KKN

@misc{pith2026260529826,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Towards Localized and Disentangled Knowledge Editing for Multimodal Large Language Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WJUH3KKN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.29826}
}
read the original abstract

Existing methods in Multimodal Knowledge Editing (MKE) have advanced the ability to correct outdated or inaccurate knowledge in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). However, they exhibit a critical limitation: while effectively modifying target factual pairs, they fail to generalize edits to logically related queries and often cause unintended alterations to unrelated but visually or semantically linked information. We identify and formalize two underlying failure modes causing this issue: Causal Misalignment, which confines edits to the specific sample, and Feature Entanglement, which causes unintended alterations to coupled but irrelevant information. To address these issues, we propose Localized and Disentangled Knowledge Editing (LDKE), a new framework that achieves precise and generalized editing by localizing fact-specific model layers and disentangling target-relevant inputs from irrelevant ones. Our approach introduces a Fast Localization module to identify and update critical layers efficiently, along with a Disentanglement Classifier that routes inputs appropriately to preserve unrelated knowledge. Extensive experiments across various benchmarks and MLLMs demonstrate that LDKE achieves superior performance in propagating edits to related contexts while maintaining high locality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.29826 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the generalization-localization challenge in multimodal knowledge editing. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The overall framework of LDKE. LDKE consists of a Fast Localization module and a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Average results in sequential editing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows more results on sequential editing. Reliability 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 1 10 100 (a) Average Reliability I-Generality 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 1 10 100 (c) Average Image Generality I-Locality 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 1 10 100 (e) Average Image Locality MSCKE LiveEd…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    MM-REACT: Prompting ChatGPT for Multimodal Reasoning and Action

    Z. Yang, L. Li, J. Wang, K. Lin, E. Azarnasab, F. Ahmed, Z. Liu, C. Liu, M. Zeng, and L. Wang, “Mm-react: Prompting chatgpt for multimodal reasoning and action,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11381, 2023

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning,

    J.-B. Alayrac, J. Donahue, P. Luc, A. Miech, I. Barr, Y . Hasson, K. Lenc, A. Mensch, K. Millican, M. Reynoldset al., “Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 35, pp. 23 716–23 736, 2022

    2022

  3. [3]

    Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models,

    H. T. Llama, “Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models,” 2023

    2023

  4. [4]

    Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Editing for Language Models

    A. Mishra, A. Asai, V . Balachandran, Y . Wang, G. Neubig, Y . Tsvetkov, and H. Ha- jishirzi, “Fine-grained hallucination detection and editing for language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.06855, 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Knowledge sanitization of large language models,

    Y . Ishibashi and H. Shimodaira, “Knowledge sanitization of large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11852, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Woodpecker: Hallucination correction for multimodal large language models,

    S. Yin, C. Fu, S. Zhao, T. Xu, H. Wang, D. Sui, Y . Shen, K. Li, X. Sun, and E. Chen, “Woodpecker: Hallucination correction for multimodal large language models,”Science China Information Sciences, vol. 67, no. 12, p. 220105, 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Knowledgeable or educated guess? revisiting language models as knowledge bases,

    B. Cao, H. Lin, X. Han, L. Sun, L. Yan, M. Liao, T. Xue, and J. Xu, “Knowledgeable or educated guess? revisiting language models as knowledge bases,” inProceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), 2021, pp. 1860–1874

    2021

  8. [8]

    Zhang, Y

    N. Zhang, Y . Yao, B. Tian, P. Wang, S. Deng, M. Wang, Z. Xi, S. Mao, J. Zhang, Y . Ni et al., “A comprehensive study of knowledge editing for large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01286, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

Show all 28 references
  1. [9]

    Editing conceptual knowledge for large language models,

    X. Wang, S. Mao, S. Deng, Y . Yao, Y . Shen, L. Liang, J. Gu, H. Chen, and N. Zhang, “Editing conceptual knowledge for large language models,” inFindings of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, 2024, pp. 706–724

    2024

  2. [10]

    Aging with grace: Lifelong model editing with discrete key-value adaptors,

    T. Hartvigsen, S. Sankaranarayanan, H. Palangi, Y . Kim, and M. Ghassemi, “Aging with grace: Lifelong model editing with discrete key-value adaptors,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 47 934–47 959, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Attribution analysis meets model edit- ing: Advancing knowledge correction in vision language models with visedit,

    Q. Chen, T. Zhang, C. Wang, X. He, D. Wang, and T. Liu, “Attribution analysis meets model edit- ing: Advancing knowledge correction in vision language models with visedit,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, no. 2, 2025, pp. 2168–2176

    2025

  4. [12]

    Causal tracing of object representations in large vision language models: Mechanistic interpretability and hallucination mitigation,

    Q. Li, Z. Ye, X. Feng, W. Zhong, W. Ma, and X. Feng, “Causal tracing of object representations in large vision language models: Mechanistic interpretability and hallucination mitigation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.05923, 2025

    2025

  5. [13]

    Understanding information storage and transfer in multi-modal large language models,

    S. Basu, M. Grayson, C. Morrison, B. Nushi, S. Feizi, and D. Massiceti, “Understanding information storage and transfer in multi-modal large language models,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 7400–7426, 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Memory-based model editing at scale,

    E. Mitchell, C. Lin, A. Bosselut, C. D. Manning, and C. Finn, “Memory-based model editing at scale,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2022, pp. 15 817–15 831

    2022

  7. [15]

    Transformer-patcher: One mistake worth one neuron,

    Z. Huang, Y . Shen, X. Zhang, J. Zhou, W. Rong, and Z. Xiong, “Transformer-patcher: One mistake worth one neuron,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.09785, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Calibrating factual knowledge in pretrained language models,

    Q. Dong, D. Dai, Y . Song, J. Xu, Z. Sui, and L. Li, “Calibrating factual knowledge in pretrained language models,” inFindings of the association for computational linguistics: EMNLP 2022, 2022, pp. 5937–5947

    2022

  9. [17]

    Can we edit factual knowledge by in-context learning?

    C. Zheng, L. Li, Q. Dong, Y . Fan, Z. Wu, J. Xu, and B. Chang, “Can we edit factual knowledge by in-context learning?” inProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2023, pp. 4862–4876. 10

    2023

  10. [18]

    Fast model editing at scale,

    E. Mitchell, C. Lin, A. Bosselut, C. Finn, and C. D. Manning, “Fast model editing at scale,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.11309, 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    Locating and editing factual associations in gpt,

    K. Meng, D. Bau, A. Andonian, and Y . Belinkov, “Locating and editing factual associations in gpt,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 35, pp. 17 359–17 372, 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    Mass-editing memory in a transformer,

    K. Meng, A. S. Sharma, A. Andonian, Y . Belinkov, and D. Bau, “Mass-editing memory in a transformer,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.07229, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Visual-oriented fine-grained knowl- edge editing for multimodal large language models,

    Z. Zeng, L. Gu, X. Yang, Z. Duan, Z. Shi, and M. Wang, “Visual-oriented fine-grained knowl- edge editing for multimodal large language models,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision, 2025, pp. 2491–2500

    2025

  14. [22]

    Lifelong knowledge editing for vision language models with low-rank mixture-of-experts,

    Q. Chen, C. Wang, D. Wang, T. Zhang, W. Li, and X. He, “Lifelong knowledge editing for vision language models with low-rank mixture-of-experts,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference (CVPR), June 2025, pp. 9455–9466

    2025

  15. [23]

    Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models,

    J. Li, D. Li, S. Savarese, and S. Hoi, “Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models,” inInternational conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 19 730–19 742

    2023

  16. [24]

    Gemma 3 technical report,

    G. Team, A. Kamath, J. Ferret, S. Pathak, N. Vieillard, R. Merhej, S. Perrin, T. Matejovicova, A. Ramé, M. Rivière, L. Rouillard, T. Mesnard, G. Cideron, J. bastien Grillet al., “Gemma 3 technical report,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19786, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Internvl3. 5: Advancing open-source multimodal models in versatility, reasoning, and efficiency,

    W. Wang, Z. Gao, L. Gu, H. Pu, L. Cui, X. Wei, Z. Liu, L. Jing, S. Ye, J. Shaoet al., “Internvl3. 5: Advancing open-source multimodal models in versatility, reasoning, and efficiency,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18265, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Modifying memories in transformer models,

    C. Zhu, A. S. Rawat, M. Zaheer, S. Bhojanapalli, D. Li, F. Yu, and S. Kumar, “Modifying memories in transformer models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.00363, 2020

    2012

  19. [27]

    Vlkeb: A large vision- language model knowledge editing benchmark,

    H. Huang, H. Zhong, T. Yu, Q. Liu, S. Wu, L. Wang, and T. Tan, “Vlkeb: A large vision- language model knowledge editing benchmark,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 9257–9280, 2024. 11 A Limitations A primary limitation of LDKE lies in its subopti...

    2024

  20. [28]

    Guidelines: • The answer [N/A] means that the paper does not involve crowdsourcing nor research with human subjects

    Institutional review board (IRB) approvals or equivalent for research with human subjects Question: Does the paper describe potential risks incurred by study participants, whether such risks were disclosed to the subjects, and whether Institutional Review Board (IRB) approvals...

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.