REVIEW 2 cited by
On the depth overhead incurred when running quantum algorithms on near-term quantum computers with limited qubit connectivity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
This paper addresses the problem of finding the depth overhead that will be incurred when running quantum circuits on near-term quantum computers. Specifically, it is envisaged that near-term quantum computers will have low qubit connectivity: each qubit will only be able to interact with a subset of the other qubits, a reality typically represented by a qubit interaction graph in which a vertex represents a qubit and an edge represents a possible direct 2-qubit interaction (gate). Thus the depth overhead is unavoidably incurred by introducing swap gates into the quantum circuit to enable general qubit interactions. This paper proves that there exist quantum circuits where a depth overhead in $\Omega(\log n)$ must necessarily be incurred when running quantum circuits with $n$ qubits on quantum computers whose qubit interaction graph has finite degree, but that such a logarithmic depth overhead is achievable. The latter is shown by the construction of a 4-regular qubit interaction graph and associated compilation algorithm that can execute any quantum circuit with only a logarithmic depth overhead.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Circuit Design Informed Adaptive Variational Quantum Algorithms
Hadamard-test and hardware constraints prune adaptive VQA gate pools, cutting measurement overhead 25–55% while still yielding high-fidelity low-depth ansätze for the nonlinear Schrödinger ground state.
-
Introducing the Quantum Economic Advantage Online Calculator
An open-access web calculator forecasts when quantum computers will beat price-equivalent classical machines, and its robustness analysis shows Shor-style advantage dates are stable while Grover-style dates depend hea...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.