Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 83 references

Derangetropy Operators

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Rank-only reweightings of densities are exactly the monotone-equivariant maps, and one canonical kernel makes their dynamics, geometry, and carpets solvable.

desk verdict Real operator calculus from monotone equivariance, with solid 1D dynamics; the BV carpet strong law is the part that still needs a full variance write-up. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.24705 v1 pith:WKNKETYN submitted 2026-07-27 math.PR math-phmath.APmath.DSmath.MPmath.STstat.TH

Masoud Ataei , Sepideh Forouzi This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.APmath.DSmath.MPmath.STstat.TH MSC 60E0537E0535Q5381Q0562H2053D17
keywords derangetropyranktransformationsKoenigslinearizationVirasorocoadjointorbitssine-Gordonquantumcarpetsmultiplicativechaosmaximalcorrelation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper defines derangetropy operators: they multiply a probability density by a fixed profile of its own cumulative distribution, so they act only through ranks. It proves these are precisely the transformations of absolutely continuous laws that commute with monotone changes of variable, so the family is forced by order structure alone rather than chosen ad hoc. Composition collapses to iteration of interval maps, which makes the dynamics exactly solvable: repeated application condenses every continuous law onto its median under a universal Koenigs limit; the continuous flow is closed-form with the Cauchy family as an invariant hyperbolic manifold; and when balanced against diffusion the distribution function obeys an overdamped sine-Gordon equation whose unique steady law is the hyperbolic secant, a globally stable kink. A variational principle selects the canonical kernel as the squared ground state of the Dirichlet Laplacian on the unit interval; its update is a Bayesian posterior that costs exactly one bit for every law. The same structure lifts to isospectral Sturm–Liouville systems, Virasoro coadjoint geometry, randomized exact sampling and multiplicative chaos, quantum carpets whose Schrödinger densities are fractal of dimension 3/2 for arbitrary rough seeds, and a multivariate geometry in which dependence splits into conserved interaction, torsion, and flat Sinkhorn transport. A sympathetic reader cares because one invariance principle organizes distortion calculus, information dynamics, projective geometry, Talbot optics, and dependence into a single operator family with universal constants.

What carries the argument

The derangetropy operator ρ_w[f] = w(F) f, with composition law ρ_v ∘ ρ_w = ρ_{(A_v ∘ A_w)′} reducing density recursion to interval-map dynamics. The canonical kernel w = 2 sin²(πz) is selected variationally as minimal Fisher information among boundary-inert kernels; its transport map A and amplitude lift carry the exact iteration, flow, sine-Gordon reduction, Virasoro potential, and quantum-carpet theorems.

What would settle it

Numerically iterate the canonical operator on several smooth densities, rescale about the median by 2^n f(m), and check whether the empirical distribution converges to one common symmetric law with the predicted compressed-exponential tails and variance asymptotics σ_K² f(m)^{-2} 4^{-n}; failure of universality across laws would refute the central dynamical claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Derangetropy operators exhaust the monotone-equivariant transformations of absolutely continuous laws. With the canonical kernel—the squared Dirichlet ground state on the unit interval—their composition, iteration, flow, diffusion balance, amplitude lift, and coadjoint geometry are exactly solvable: every continuous law condenses to its median under a universal Koenigs law; the flow keeps the Cauchy family as a hyperbolic invariant manifold; diffusion yields a unique globally stable hyperbolic-secant kink; and the unitary carpet proves graph dimension exactly 3/2 for the Schrödinger density of arbitrary real bounded-variation data with a jump.

Load-bearing premise

Several extensions that carry physical and arithmetic corollaries—terrace slow motion, cross-mode collision variance, and parts of the multivariate geometry—are proved only at sketch level or under bounded-logarithm and correlation restrictions; if those sketches fail, the core rigidity and one-dimensional exact dynamics can still stand while those corollaries weaken.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any transformation of densities intended to depend only on ordinal structure must be a derangetropy operator for some kernel.
  • Iterated canonical derangetropy is a parameter-free dynamical sampler of the W1-optimal equal-mass quantizer (coherent) or of a systematic sample (randomized phases).
  • The intensity carpet behind an arbitrary bounded-variation grating with a jump has graph dimension exactly 3/2 at almost every distance, with critical mass rate fixed by Wiener’s jump statistic—open to box-counting in optics or matter-wave interferometry.
  • Coordinate rank modulation preserves the interaction structure of a joint law and realizes Sinkhorn / iterative proportional fitting as alternating derangetropy moves contracting at squared maximal correlation.
  • Laws correspond to disconjugate Hill potentials on rank space; the Cauchy family is the exceptional coadjoint orbit, and condensation is no-hair relaxation onto it at rate e^{-2t}.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same endpoint Dirichlet mechanism that selects the canonical kernel, saturates the Hardy weight 1/2, and forces carpet Hölder 1/2 suggests a single spectral origin for the paper’s universal constants across variational, geometric, and unitary axes.
  • If the lacunary chaos converges to Gaussian multiplicative chaos in the joint weak-tempering limit as conjectured, derangetropy would give a dynamically generated welding measure on the distortion group at central charge one.
  • The fractal carpet slices at irrational times form a concrete class of Hölder-1/2 rank alternatives whose minimax status for goodness-of-fit testing is a direct statistical question left open by the mosaic/fractal dichotomy.
  • Extending the critical-mass strong law past hyperplane collisions would link the paper’s density-level Talbot statement to the recent field-level higher-dimensional Schrödinger theory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper defines derangetropy operators ρ_w[f] = w(F)f, reweightings of a density by a profile of its own cdf. Its core contributions: (i) a rigidity theorem (Thm 2) showing these exhaust the monotone-equivariant transformations of absolutely continuous laws; (ii) a composition law reducing iteration to interval-map dynamics, yielding exact solvability — condensation onto the median with a Koenigs limit law (Thm 9), a closed-form flow via tan(πF) with the Cauchy family as invariant hyperbolic manifold (Thms 10–11), and an overdamped sine–Gordon reduction under diffusion with the secant law as globally stable kink (Thms 26–29); (iii) a variational selection of the canonical kernel 2 sin²(πz) with exact one-bit information identities; (iv) a Virasoro/coadjoint reading at central charge one (a disclosed normalization); (v) randomized cascades giving exact sampling and a subcritical multiplicative chaos; (vi) a quantum-carpet section whose headline result (Thm 47, Cor 48) is a strong law for the critical Sobolev mass with Wiener jump constant, implying graph dimension 3/2 of the Schrödinger density for arbitrary real BV data with a jump; (vii) a multivariate theory reading dependence as torsion of a flat connection with Sinkhorn as parallel transport.

Significance. The structural core (Thms 1–3, 9–11) is sound, rests on standard tools (Koenigs linearization, Schwarzian cocycle, probability integral transform), and gives a genuinely unified, parameter-free calculus: the rigidity theorem is a clean classification result, and the exact solvability with explicit universal constants (one-bit cost, 4⁻ⁿ variance rate, log₂3 tail exponent, curvature −2π²) provides falsifiable content. The amplitude lift and the equivariance of the Hill potential under the coadjoint action are correct and neatly packaged, though largely reorganizations of classical material (distortion functions, Neyman alternatives, Liouville transformation, Kirillov theory) — a strength as synthesis, not as new objects. Theorem 47, if proved, would be the paper's most substantial external result, closing a case stated open in [79]. The manuscript is unusually broad; several announced extensions are explicitly sketch-level, which tempers the effective contribution.

major comments (4)
  1. [§12, Theorem 47 / Corollary 48] Theorem 47, Eq. (128): the almost-sure law rests entirely on Var_t(Y_M) = O(log M). The text asserts that cross-mode collisions 'are constrained to the lattice m∆ = m′∆′ and are sparse in the greatest common divisor,' but no quantitative bound uniform in the jump configuration is exhibited. For arbitrary real jump locations the eightfold sums contain phases that can align in configuration-dependent ways, and rational Gauss-sum arguments do not apply. If the variance were O((log M)²) the Chebyshev/sparse-subsequence upgrade fails and only the mean asymptotic survives. Since Corollary 48 (dimension 3/2 for arbitrary BV seeds, the abstract's headline extension beyond [79]) depends on this, the estimate must be proved in full, or Corollary 48 downgraded to an expectation-level statement. Note the within-mode mean estimate and the Wiener constant κ_g are not in doubt.
  2. [§10, Theorem 32] Theorem 32 is stated as a theorem but its Carr–Pego slow-motion component is 'adapted here at sketch level,' and the construction in [69] is for bounded intervals while the terrace here lives on the line with exponentially small interactions among k standing kinks. Either the adaptation (existence of the slow manifold, logarithmic separation growth, no coarsening) must be carried out, or the statement should be regraded to a proposition/conjecture with the proved part (zero-speed terrace existence via [68]) clearly separated.
  3. [§12, Proposition 49 and Remark 20] Proposition 49 (temporal halving, Airy doubling) is labeled 'sketch level' in its own statement, yet Remark 20 uses its constants to advertise the critical mass as 'an exactly measurable probe of resonance structure.' The variance combinatorics behind the halving/doubling factors should be completed, or the remark scaled back to match what is proved. The same applies to the product-law dimension 5/2 claim in Remark 20, currently 'recorded at remark level.'
  4. [§§13–14, Theorems 50–59] The multivariate stratum works only in the bounded-logarithm, ρ_max < 1 regime on bounded rectangles, and its three 'exact layers' are, respectively, the Holland–Wang interaction function (Thm 53(iv) = [57]), the conditional-expectation operator whose norm is maximal correlation (classical), and Csiszár's I-projection with von Neumann's alternating-projection rate (Thm 56(ii)–(iii) = [61–63]). The packaging as foliation/torsion/flat transport is elegant and Theorem 50's converse is a nice addition, but the abstract's claim that 'dependence stratifies into a conserved interaction, a torsion..., and a flat Sinkhorn transport' overstates the novelty. The section should state plainly which layers are identifications of known objects.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2, Eq. (5)] The normalization of w_I, w_II as probability densities is cited to contour integrals in [1,2] (the authors' prior work); since these kernels motivate the family, a self-contained verification or at least the integral values should be reproduced.
  2. [§5, §13] Numerical constants quoted in the text — σ²_K ≈ 0.166, excess kurtosis ≈ 0.164 (Thm 9), c_Lie ≈ 0.210, c_map ≈ 0.345, κ₂ ≈ −0.742 (Eqs. 136–138) — are given without details of the quadrature or Koenigs-function numerics; reproducibility would benefit from a short appendix or code.
  3. [global] The manuscript is very long and the notation load is heavy (A_w, A_k, A_{k,α}, A(t), A_f(t,k) all denote different objects). A notation table would help; also check that 'K' is used consistently for the Koenigs law vs. the coadjoint operator K*_B.
  4. [§2, Proposition 4] Proposition 4's 'spectrum' of the linearization is explicitly the L²-realization on primitives; since the operator is not self-adjoint on L¹, a sentence warning the reader earlier (at first use, not in the proof) would avoid confusion.
  5. [§8–9, Remarks 8–9] The SYK/JT-gravity remarks (Remark 9) and the 'Breitenlohner–Freedman' analogy (Remark 8) are analogies only; they are flagged as such in the text, which is good, but the abstract phrase 'identifies laws with disconjugate Hill potentials, tails with conformal weights' could be read as physics content — consider tightening.
  6. [Appendix A] Several displayed claims in the truncated portion (proof of Theorem 35(iv), Lemma 44, Theorem 46, Appendix A second half) could not be checked in this review; the editor may wish to ensure the full appendix is in the posted version.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: canonical objects are selected variationally or derived, not fitted; mild historical self-citation of the original functionals only.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 1–2, eqs. (1a–c), (5a–c); citations [1,2]]
    "Three operators of this form were introduced in [1, 2] as models of cyclical information flow... The present work detaches the construction from its original setting, takes the reweighing architecture itself as the definition"

    The named Type I–III kernels and the word derangetropy originate in the authors' prior papers. This is ordinary historical self-citation of the objects, not a load-bearing uniqueness or prediction chain: rigidity (Thm 2), variational selection of w_III (Thm 5), and all dynamical/geometric theorems are proved in this manuscript from the architecture definition without importing an unverified uniqueness theorem from [1,2] as an external fact. Flagged only as minor non-load-bearing self-reference.

full rationale

This is a pure operator-theory paper whose main claims are theorems proved from definitions and classical tools (Koenigs linearization, Schwarzian cocycle, Sturm disconjugacy, Wiener jump formula, Csiszár I-projection). The rigidity theorem classifies monotone-equivariant maps as derangetropy operators by an equivariance argument, not by assuming the conclusion. The canonical kernel is selected by a Rayleigh/Fisher minimization on H¹₀(0,1) (Theorem 5), independently of any target limit law; Cauchy, Koenigs, and hyperbolic-secant objects then appear as derived consequences of the flow, Schröder equation, and sine–Gordon reduction. Central charge one is explicitly declared a normalization fixed by the unit Schwarzian coefficient, not a dynamical prediction. The one-bit identities are rank integrals evaluated by Fourier series. Self-citations [1,2] only introduce the historical Type I–III functionals; the present rigidity, composition, dynamics, Virasoro lift, carpet strong law, and multivariate geometry are developed and proved here. Correctness risks (sketch-level variance for Theorem 47, Carr–Pego terraces) are proof-gap issues, not circular reductions of outputs to inputs. Score 1 only for non-load-bearing origin self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The paper is a definition-heavy pure-math development. Load-bearing background is standard analysis/probability (Koenigs linearization, Sturm disconjugacy, Schwarzian cocycle, Virasoro coadjoint action, classical bistable front theory, Wiener jump theorem, Csiszár IPF). No empirical free parameters enter the central claims. 'Derangetropy' names a defined operator family, not a new physical substance; independent evidence is mathematical (theorems) rather than experimental, except for the optional optical box-counting prediction.

assumptions (9)
  • standard math Koenigs linearization theorem for analytic interval maps at a repelling fixed point with multiplier 2 (used for universal limit law).
    Invoked in Theorem 9 / Appendix proof Steps 1–2; classical [5,6].
  • standard math Banach–Zarecki criterion for absolute continuity of compositions of monotone maps.
    Used in composition law (Theorem 3) and torsor map (Theorem 21).
  • standard math Čencov's uniqueness of the Fisher–Rao metric among sufficient-statistic-invariant Riemannian metrics on densities.
    Makes the variational selection of the canonical kernel well-posed (Section 3).
  • standard math Classical Sturm disconjugacy / Hill equation criteria and Hardy inequality on the interval for inverse-square endpoint weights.
    Realization of potentials as laws (Theorem 16) and tail conformal weights (Theorem 19).
  • standard math Schwarzian cocycle and classification of local continuous cocycles as multiples of the Schwarzian (circle/interval).
    Equivariance of rank Hill potential and rigidity of the coadjoint anomaly (Theorem 15, Remark 6).
  • standard math Classical existence/stability theory of monotone bistable reaction–diffusion fronts and Modica–Mortola sharp-interface Gamma-convergence.
    Traveling laws, energy, condensation as D→0 (Theorems 26–30, Proposition 28).
  • standard math Wiener's quantitative theorem on jump content of BV functions; Gauss–Weyl bounds on quadratic exponential sums.
    Strong law for critical mass and generic smoothing (Theorem 47, Lemma 43).
  • domain assumption Working on D+ (continuous strictly positive densities on an interval) and related regularity (C²/C³, exponential tails, ρ_max<1, bounded log-density) for geometric and spectral statements.
    Standing hypotheses throughout dynamical, Virasoro, carpet, and multivariate sections; needed for quantiles, Hill potentials, and frame isomorphisms.
  • ad hoc to paper Central charge fixed to c=1 by unit coefficient of the Schwarzian in the Hill potential (normalization, not dynamical charge).
    Stated explicitly in Section 8; determines the coadjoint pairing dictionary. Alternative normalizations would rescale the dictionary.
invented entities (3)
  • Derangetropy operator ρ_w (rank-multiplicative reweighting by kernel w) independent evidence
    purpose: Define the ordinal operator family whose rigidity, composition, and dynamics organize the paper.
    Mathematical definition (Definition 1), not a postulated particle/force. Prior named functionals appear in authors' [1,2]; the general family and calculus are developed here.
  • Rank Hill potential U_f = {Q_f, z} as coadjoint vector at c=1 independent evidence
    purpose: Identify laws with disconjugate potentials and dynamics with coadjoint transport/Virasoro geometry.
    Dictionary built from the quantile Schwarzian; existence tied to classical disconjugacy. Falsifiable within math via orbit/isotropy theorems.
  • Derangetropy connection (horizontal = leafwise coordinate modulations) on joint laws independent evidence
    purpose: Interpret Sinkhorn/IPF as parallel transport and bracket as torsion of a parallelism.
    Geometric packaging of separable tilts and conditional-expectation gauge field P; reduces to known IPF when stripped of language.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Derangetropy Operators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WKNKETYN

@misc{pith2026260724705,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Derangetropy Operators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WKNKETYN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.24705}
}
read the original abstract

A derangetropy operator reweighs a probability density by a fixed profile of its own cumulative distribution function, acting through ranks alone. We prove that these operators are precisely the transformations of absolutely continuous laws equivariant under monotone changes of variable, and that they compose through interval maps, making their dynamics exactly solvable: iteration condenses every law onto its median with a universal Koenigs limit law, the continuous flow is solvable in closed form with the Cauchy family as invariant hyperbolic manifold, and balanced against diffusion the distribution function obeys an overdamped sine-Gordon equation whose unique steady law, the hyperbolic secant, is a globally stable kink. A variational principle selects the canonical kernel, the squared ground state of the Dirichlet Laplacian on the unit interval, whose update is a Bayesian posterior costing exactly one bit for every law, and a unitary lift equips each law with an isospectral Sturm-Liouville system and a quantum carpet: a strong law of large numbers for the critical Sobolev mass, with sharp constant given by Wiener's jump statistic, proves the fractality of the Schr\"odinger density for arbitrary real bounded-variation data with a jump, previously known only for rational step data. A lift to the dual of the Virasoro algebra, at central charge one, a normalization, identifies laws with disconjugate Hill potentials, tails with conformal weights, and the Cauchy family with the exceptional orbit. Randomized phases yield an exact sampler and a multiplicative chaos, log-correlated in the weakly tempered regime; in several dimensions, dependence stratifies into a conserved interaction, a torsion driven by maximal correlation, and a flat Sinkhorn transport.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references

  1. [79]

    Chousionis,V.,Erdoğan,M.B.,Tzirakis,N.:Fractalsolutionsoflinearandnonlin- ear dispersive partial differential equations. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.110, 543–564 (2015)

    2015

  2. [69]

    Carr, J., Pego, R.L.: Metastable patterns in solutions ofut =ϵ 2uxx−f(u). Comm. Pure Appl. Math.42, 523–576 (1989)

    1989

  3. [68]

    Ducrot, A., Giletti, T., Matano, H.: Existence and convergence to a propagating terrace in one-dimensional reaction-diffusion equations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366, 5541–5566 (2014)

    2014

  4. [57]

    Holland, P.W., Wang, Y.J.: Dependence function for continuous bivariate densi- ties. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods16, 863–876 (1987)

    1987

  5. [1]

    Entropy26(11), 996 (2024)

    Ataei, M., Wang, X.: Derangetropy in probability distributions and information dynamics. Entropy26(11), 996 (2024)

    2024

  6. [2]

    Entropy27(6), 608 (2025)

    Ataei, M., Wang, X.: Generalized derangetropy functionals for modeling cyclical information flow. Entropy27(6), 608 (2025)

    2025

  7. [3]

    Rosenblatt, M.: Remarks on a multivariate transformation. Ann. Math. Statist. 23, 470–472 (1952)

    1952

  8. [4]

    Čencov, N.N.: Statistical Decision Rules and Optimal Inference. Transl. Math. Monographs, vol. 53. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence (1982)

    1982

Show all 83 references
  1. [5]

    Koenigs, G.: Recherches sur les intégrales de certaines équations fonctionnelles. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér.1, 3–41 (1884)

  2. [6]

    Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)

    Milnor, J.: Dynamics in One Complex Variable, 3rd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)

    2006

  3. [7]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Ovsienko, V., Tabachnikov, S.: Projective Differential Geometry Old and New: From the Schwarzian Derivative to the Cohomology of Diffeomorphism Groups. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    2005

  4. [8]

    Chernozhukov, V., Galichon, A., Hallin, M., Henry, M.: Monge–Kantorovich depth, quantiles, ranks and signs. Ann. Statist.45(1), 223–256 (2017)

    2017

  5. [9]

    Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol

    Villani, C.: Topics in Optimal Transportation. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 58. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence (2003)

    2003

  6. [10]

    Econometrica55(1), 95–115 (1987)

    Yaari, M.E.: The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica55(1), 95–115 (1987)

    1987

  7. [11]

    Wang, S.S.: A class of distortion operators for pricing financial and insurance risks. J. Risk Insur.67(1), 15–36 (2000)

    2000

  8. [12]

    Smooth test

    Neyman, J.: “Smooth test” for goodness of fit. Skand. Aktuarietidskr.20, 149–199 (1937) 106

    1937

  9. [13]

    Sklar, A.: Fonctions de répartition àndimensions et leurs marges. Publ. Inst. Statist. Univ. Paris8, 229–231 (1959)

    1959

  10. [14]

    Bogachev, V.I., Kolesnikov, A.V., Medvedev, K.V.: Triangular transformations of measures. Sb. Math.196(3), 309–335 (2005)

    2005

  11. [15]

    Papamakarios, G., Nalisnick, E., Rezende, D.J., Mohamed, S., Lakshmi- narayanan, B.: Normalizing flows for probabilistic modeling and inference. J. Mach. Learn. Res.22(57), 1–64 (2021)

    2021

  12. [16]

    Berry, M.V., Klein, S.: Integer, fractional and fractal Talbot effects. J. Mod. Opt. 43(10), 2139–2164 (1996)

    1996

  13. [17]

    Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol

    Zettl, A.: Sturm–Liouville Theory. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 121. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence (2005)

    2005

  14. [18]

    Frederick Ungar, New York (1955)

    Natanson, I.P.: Theory of Functions of a Real Variable. Frederick Ungar, New York (1955)

    1955

  15. [19]

    Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol

    Graf, S., Luschgy, H.: Foundations of Quantization for Probability Distributions. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1730. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    2000

  16. [20]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Hofbauer, J., Sigmund, K.: Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    1998

  17. [21]

    Wang, R., Zitikis, R.: An axiomatic foundation for the Expected Shortfall. Manage. Sci.67(3), 1413–1429 (2021)

    2021

  18. [22]

    Ledwina, T.: Data-driven version of Neyman’s smooth test of fit. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.89(427), 1000–1005 (1994)

    1994

  19. [23]

    Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol

    Amari, S.: Information Geometry and Its Applications. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 194. Springer, Tokyo (2016)

    2016

  20. [24]

    Panaretos, V.M., Zemel, Y.: Statistical aspects of Wasserstein distances. Annu. Rev. Stat. Appl.6, 405–431 (2019)

    2019

  21. [25]

    Hallin,M.,delBarrio,E.,Cuesta-Albertos,J.,Matrán,C.:Distributionandquan- tile functions, ranks and signs in dimensiond: a measure transportation approach. Ann. Statist.49(2), 1139–1165 (2021)

    2021

  22. [26]

    Ghosal, P., Sen, B.: Multivariate ranks and quantiles using optimal transport: consistency, rates and nonparametric testing. Ann. Statist.50(2), 1012–1037 (2022)

    2022

  23. [27]

    Maldacena, J., Stanford, D.: Remarks on the Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model. Phys. Rev. D94, 106002 (2016) 107

    2016

  24. [28]

    Lazutkin, V.F., Pankratova, T.F.: Normal forms and versal deformations for Hill’s equation. Funct. Anal. Appl.9, 306–311 (1975)

    1975

  25. [29]

    The geometry of moments

    Kirillov, A.A.: Infinite dimensional Lie groups: their orbits, invariants and repre- sentations. The geometry of moments. In: Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 970, pp. 101–123. Springer, Berlin (1982)

    1982

  26. [30]

    Segal, G.: Unitary representations of some infinite dimensional groups. Comm. Math. Phys.80, 301–342 (1981)

    1981

  27. [31]

    Witten, E.: Coadjoint orbits of the Virasoro group. Comm. Math. Phys.114, 1–53 (1988)

    1988

  28. [32]

    Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Khesin, B., Wendt, R.: The Geometry of Infinite-Dimensional Groups. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    2009

  29. [33]

    Consultants Bureau, New York (1986)

    Fuks, D.B.: Cohomology of Infinite-Dimensional Lie Algebras. Consultants Bureau, New York (1986)

    1986

  30. [34]

    Birkhäuser, Boston (1982)

    Hartman, P.: Ordinary Differential Equations, 2nd edn. Birkhäuser, Boston (1982)

    1982

  31. [35]

    Interscience, New York (1966)

    Magnus, W., Winkler, S.: Hill’s Equation. Interscience, New York (1966)

    1966

  32. [36]

    McKean, H.P., van Moerbeke, P.: The spectrum of Hill’s equation. Invent. Math. 30, 217–274 (1975)

    1975

  33. [37]

    Maldacena, J., Stanford, D., Yang, Z.: Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional nearly anti-de-Sitter space. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2016, 12C104 (2016)

    2016

  34. [38]

    Stanford, D., Witten, E.: Fermionic localization of the Schwarzian theory. J. High Energy Phys.2017(10), 008 (2017)

    2017

  35. [39]

    Vestnik Leningrad

    Antonov, V.A.: Modeling of processes of cyclic evolution type: synchronization by a random signal. Vestnik Leningrad. Univ. Mat. Mekh. Astronom.1984(2), 67–76 (1984)

    1984

  36. [40]

    Kleptsyn,V.A.,Nalskii,M.B.:Contractionoforbitsinrandomdynamicalsystems on the circle. Funct. Anal. Appl.38, 267–282 (2004)

    2004

  37. [41]

    Acta Math.199, 199–262 (2007)

    Deroin, B., Kleptsyn, V., Navas, A.: Sur la dynamique unidimensionnelle en régularité intermédiaire. Acta Math.199, 199–262 (2007)

    2007

  38. [42]

    Springer, New York (2004) 108

    Del Moral, P.: Feynman–Kac Formulae: Genealogical and Interacting Particle Systems with Applications. Springer, New York (2004) 108

    2004

  39. [43]

    Kahane, J.-P., Peyrière, J.: Sur certaines martingales de Benoît Mandelbrot. Adv. Math.22, 131–145 (1976)

    1976

  40. [44]

    Academic Press, New York (1980)

    Hall, P., Heyde, C.C.: Martingale Limit Theory and Its Application. Academic Press, New York (1980)

    1980

  41. [45]

    Kahane, J.-P.: Sur le chaos multiplicatif. Ann. Sci. Math. Québec9, 105–150 (1985)

    1985

  42. [46]

    Rhodes, R., Vargas, V.: Gaussian multiplicative chaos and applications: a review. Probab. Surv.11, 315–392 (2014)

    2014

  43. [47]

    Acta Math.207, 203–254 (2011)

    Astala, K., Jones, P., Kupiainen, A., Saksman, E.: Random conformal weldings. Acta Math.207, 203–254 (2011)

    2011

  44. [48]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Mattila, P.: Geometry of Sets and Measures in Euclidean Spaces: Fractals and Rectifiability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    1995

  45. [49]

    Berry, M.V.: Quantum fractals in boxes. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.29, 6617–6629 (1996)

    1996

  46. [50]

    Rodnianski, I.: Fractal solutions of the Schrödinger equation. Contemp. Math. 255, 181–187 (2000)

    2000

  47. [51]

    London Mathematical Society Student Texts, vol

    Erdoğan, M.B., Tzirakis, N.: Dispersive Partial Differential Equations: Wellposed- ness and Applications. London Mathematical Society Student Texts, vol. 86. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)

    2016

  48. [52]

    CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol

    Montgomery, H.L.: Ten Lectures on the Interface Between Analytic Number The- ory and Harmonic Analysis. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 84. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1994)

    1994

  49. [53]

    Wiley, New York (1998)

    Berndt, B.C., Evans, R.J., Williams, K.S.: Gauss and Jacobi Sums. Wiley, New York (1998)

    1998

  50. [54]

    Wiley, Chichester (2014)

    Falconer, K.: Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester (2014)

    2014

  51. [55]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Katznelson, Y.: An Introduction to Harmonic Analysis, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    2004

  52. [56]

    Academic Press, New York (1970)

    Duren, P.L.: Theory ofHp Spaces. Academic Press, New York (1970)

    1970

  53. [58]

    Acta Math

    Rényi, A.: On measures of dependence. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar.10, 441– 451 (1959) 109

    1959

  54. [59]

    Gebelein, H.: Das statistische Problem der Korrelation als Variations- und Eigen- wertproblem und sein Zusammenhang mit der Ausgleichsrechnung. Z. Angew. Math. Mech.21, 364–379 (1941)

    1941

  55. [60]

    Wiley, New York (1969)

    Lancaster, H.O.: The Chi-Squared Distribution. Wiley, New York (1969)

    1969

  56. [61]

    Csiszár, I.:I-divergence geometry of probability distributions and minimization problems. Ann. Probab.3, 146–158 (1975)

    1975

  57. [62]

    Rüschendorf, L.: Convergence of the iterative proportional fitting procedure. Ann. Statist.23, 1160–1174 (1995)

    1995

  58. [63]

    Springer, New York (2001)

    Deutsch, F.: Best Approximation in Inner Product Spaces. Springer, New York (2001)

    2001

  59. [64]

    Aronson, D.G., Weinberger, H.F.: Multidimensional nonlinear diffusion arising in population genetics. Adv. Math.30, 33–76 (1978)

    1978

  60. [65]

    Fife, P.C., McLeod, J.B.: The approach of solutions of nonlinear diffusion equations to travelling front solutions. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.65, 335–361 (1977)

    1977

  61. [66]

    Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol

    Henry, D.: Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 840. Springer, Berlin (1981)

    1981

  62. [67]

    Modica, L.: The gradient theory of phase transitions and the minimal interface criterion. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.98, 123–142 (1987)

    1987

  63. [70]

    Deift, P., Trubowitz, E.: Inverse scattering on the line. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 32, 121–251 (1979)

    1979

  64. [71]

    In: Progress in Approximation Theory, Springer Ser

    Oskolkov,K.I.:AclassofI.M.Vinogradov’sseriesanditsapplicationsinharmonic analysis. In: Progress in Approximation Theory, Springer Ser. Comput. Math., vol. 19, pp. 353–402. Springer, New York (1992)

    1992

  65. [72]

    In: Approximation and Probability, Banach Center Publ., vol

    Oskolkov, K.I.: The Schrödinger density and the Talbot effect. In: Approximation and Probability, Banach Center Publ., vol. 72, pp. 189–219. Polish Acad. Sci., Warsaw (2006)

    2006

  66. [73]

    Kapitanski, L., Rodnianski, I.: Does a quantum particle know the time? In: Emerging Applications of Number Theory, IMA Vol. Math. Appl., vol. 109, pp. 110 355–371. Springer, New York (1999)

    1999

  67. [74]

    Berry, M.V., Marzoli, I., Schleich, W.: Quantum carpets, carpets of light. Phys. World14(6), 39–44 (2001)

    2001

  68. [75]

    Academic Press, New York (1967)

    Hájek, J., Šidák, Z.: Theory of Rank Tests. Academic Press, New York (1967)

    1967

  69. [76]

    Carlier, G.: On the linear convergence of the multimarginal Sinkhorn algorithm. SIAM J. Optim.32, 786–794 (2022)

    2022

  70. [77]

    Cho, G., Kim, J., Kim, S., Kwon, Y., Seo, I.: Quantum revivals and fractality for the Schrödinger equation. Rep. Math. Phys.93(2) (2024)

    2024

  71. [78]

    Erdoğan, M.B., Huynh, C., McConnell, R.: Talbot effect on the sphere and torus ford≥2. Math. Z.306(3), 52 (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    Wiener, N.: The quadratic variation of a function and its Fourier coefficients. J. Math. Phys.3, 72–94 (1924)

    1924

  73. [81]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Zygmund, A.: Trigonometric Series, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    2002

  74. [82]

    Selecta Math.25, 11 (2019)

    Erdoğan, M.B., Shakan, G.: Fractal solutions of dispersive partial differential equations on the torus. Selecta Math.25, 11 (2019)

    2019

  75. [83]

    Springer, Berlin (2004) 111

    Braun, O.M., Kivshar, Y.S.: The Frenkel–Kontorova Model: Concepts, Methods, and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2004) 111

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.