Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 55 references

Predicting household socioeconomic position in Mozambique using satellite and household imagery

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Household photos plus satellite views predict asset wealth in Mozambique.

desk verdict The real contribution is the household-level multimodal dataset, not the method; the asset accuracy is partly circular and the evaluation needs spatial blocking before the headline numbers are trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08934 v1 pith:WLFTWFJP submitted 2024-11-13 cs.CV cs.LG

Carles Milà , Teodimiro Matsena , Edgar Jamisse , Jovito Nunes , Quique Bassat , Paula Petrone , Elisa Sicuri , Charfudin Sacoor
show 1 more author
Cathryn Tonne
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords socioeconomicpositionhouseholdimagerysatellitetransferlearningrandomforestSHAPMozambiqueassetindex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a household's socioeconomic position, measured three ways as assets, expenditure, and income, can be read off a small set of photographs: two satellite views of the dwelling plus ground-level photos of eleven household elements. Using 975 households in a semi-rural district of southern Mozambique, the authors find that asset-based socioeconomic position is predictable to a Pearson correlation of 0.85 with a random-forest model using all image types, whereas expenditure and income are predicted less well. A reduced model using only outdoor photos plus the single most informative indoor image nearly matches the full model, which matters because it cuts the data-collection burden. The result demonstrates that ground-level household photographs can move poverty mapping from area-level aggregates to individual households.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a three-stage pipeline: a multi-output VGG16 convolutional neural network, fine-tuned on the household data, converts each of the 13 image types into a 30-dimensional feature vector; a random-forest regressor, with ElasticNet and XGBoost as comparators, maps those features to each socioeconomic-position measure; and treeSHAP, a coalitional-game explanation method, ranks image types by median absolute contribution and enables fitting a reduced model on the few most informative images. The asset-based ground truth is built with multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) on questionnaire asset data.

What would settle it

Evaluate the complete random-forest model on a hold-out set of households located at least a chosen distance, for example 500 m, from every training household, or preferably in a separate district; if the asset-based Spearman correlation falls materially below 0.85, the claim of general household-level accuracy fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that household-level asset-based socioeconomic position can be predicted from a multimodal image set with accuracy comparable to area-level satellite poverty maps: the best model, a random forest on features from all image types, reaches Pearson r=0.85 and Spearman rho=0.85 in held-out test households. Most of this signal comes from ground-level household photographs rather than from satellite context, since satellite-only models reach only about rho=0.52 for assets. Expenditure and income are harder to predict, with Spearman rho=0.58 and 0.50 respectively, in line with the broader SEP-mapping literature. SHAP analysis shows that the light source and kitchen images carry the most weight, and a reduced model using outdoor photos plus the single top indoor element still achieves Spearman rho=0.80 for assets, only slightly below the full model.

Load-bearing premise

The train/test split treats households as independent even though nearby households share satellite image crops and similar built environments, so the headline correlations could be inflated by spatial proximity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Asset-based household socioeconomic position can be estimated to correlation r=0.85 from a full set of satellite and household photographs, with the largest gains over satellite-only models coming from indoor images.
  • A reduced survey that collects outdoor photos plus the single most informative indoor image retains most of the accuracy, with Spearman rho=0.80 for assets, 0.51 for expenditure, and 0.39 for income.
  • Satellite imagery alone performs weakly in this semi-rural setting, so ground-level photos carry information that aerial views miss.
  • SHAP-based explanations identify concrete visual cues, such as fuse boxes versus natural light and roof maintenance, making the models auditable by humans.
  • The workflow can be integrated into routine household surveys, where the same photographs can later serve asset characterization and environmental exposure assessment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not test whether its accuracy survives spatial separation between training and test households; a distance-buffered split or validation in a separate district is the natural next experiment.
  • Because light-source and kitchen images dominate the predictions, a minimal two- or three-photo protocol is plausible for routine surveys, and its cost-benefit could be tested by comparing field-worker time and accuracy against the full protocol.
  • The same photographs encode exposure-relevant information such as fuel type, sanitation, and housing materials, so a photo-based survey could serve dual purposes in environmental epidemiology, a connection the paper mentions but does not quantify.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript assembles a multimodal dataset of 975 households in Manhiça, Mozambique, combining questionnaire-based income, expenditure, and asset-based socioeconomic position (SEP) measures with satellite imagery (25m and 100m buffers) and ground-based photographs of 11 household elements. The authors fine-tune a VGG16 CNN for each image type to extract 30-dimensional feature vectors, then use ElasticNet, Random Forest, and XGBoost regressions to predict the three SEP outcomes under three predictor sets (satellite-only, outdoor-plus-satellite, and complete). The best reported result is a Random Forest model using all image types for asset-based SEP, with Pearson and Spearman correlations of 0.85 on the held-out test set; expenditure and income models perform lower. SHAP analysis identifies the most important image types, and a reduced model using only outdoor images plus the single most important indoor image type achieves performance close to the complete model for expenditure. The paper argues that ground-based household photographs can complement satellite imagery and zoom from area-level to household-level prediction, with explainable ML to minimize data collection effort.

Significance. If the headline accuracy holds under more rigorous validation, the paper makes a useful contribution: it introduces a novel multimodal household-level dataset, demonstrates that ground photographs carry substantial signal for asset-based SEP beyond satellite imagery, and provides an explainable, data-collection-efficient workflow with public code. The multi-output CNN feature extraction and the explicit comparison of three SEP measures are also strengths. However, the central quantitative claims—especially the asset SEP r=0.85 and the reduced-model performance—rest on a single random split that may be affected by spatial leakage, on a construct-level circularity between the photographed elements and the asset questionnaire, and on a SHAP-based model reduction that may use test-set information. These issues must be addressed before the reported accuracies can be considered credible.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.4.1 and Section 2.3.3] The evaluation uses a single random 800/175 train/test split that treats households as independent. However, the satellite crops are 25m and 100m buffers around geocoded residences, and Section 2.1 notes a relatively dense populated area near the main road. For nearby households these buffers overlap substantially, and ground-photo characteristics (housing materials, light sources, latrine types) are spatially autocorrelated. Consequently, test households may share satellite pixels and neighborhood visual context with training households, which can inflate the reported correlations. The limitation section only notes the absence of a separate geographic region for transferability, not this within-study spatial dependence. Please add a spatially blocked or distance-based validation (e.g., exclude test households within a minimum distance of training households, or use cluster cross-validation by spatial units) and report the minimum train-test distance.
  2. [Table S2 and Section 2.3.1] The asset-based SEP is constructed from questionnaire items listed in Table S2: lighting fuel, water source, latrine, kitchen, floor, wall, roof, and other possessions. The photograph survey in Section 2.3.1 collects images of exactly those household elements: light source, water source, latrine, kitchen, stove, floor, wall, roof, front door, street view, and bathroom. The high accuracy of the asset model is therefore partly a recovery of the outcome's definition from the visual signals that define it. The Discussion acknowledges this ('our photograph survey focused on specific elements included in the asset-based SEP construction'), but the abstract's framing that photographs allow 'zooming in' to household SEP overstates the novelty for assets. Please explicitly address this construct-level overlap, and give the non-circular expenditure and income results equal prominence when claiming generalizable household SEP prediction.
  3. [Section 2.4.4 and Table 2] The reduced model is constructed by identifying the most relevant indoor image type from the distributions of absolute SHAP values. The text states that SHAP values were computed in the train and test data, and it is ambiguous which data were used to rank image types. If the ranking is based on test-set SHAP, the reduced model's performance in Table 2 is selected using test information and is optimistic as an out-of-sample estimate; the claim that 'the reduced model is only slightly lower' would not be valid. Please select the added image type using training data only, or via a nested cross-validation procedure, and re-report Table 2 accordingly.
  4. [Tables 1 and 2] All reported accuracies are point estimates from a single split with only 175 test households, and no confidence intervals, bootstrap replicates, or repeated random splits are provided. The differences between predictor sets (e.g., asset SEP Spearman rho: satellite 0.52, outdoor 0.70, complete 0.85) could be within sampling variability for this test size. The comparative claims across model families and predictor sets need uncertainty quantification, for example via bootstrap confidence intervals on the test correlations or repeated splits with paired analysis, before the headline r=0.85 can be taken at face value.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'regression analyzes' should read 'regression analyses'.
  2. [Section 2.4.2] The sentence 'We adapted the VGG16 network to a multi-output classification aiming at predicting predict binary SEP' contains a duplicated word 'predict'; please fix.
  3. [Section 2.4.4] The sentence 'i.e., 13 SHAP values, one per image type, were available for each household after the sum' is slightly confusing because the 13 image types include 11 household elements and 2 satellite buffers; please clarify how the per-image-type SHAP sum is computed.
  4. [Discussion, Limitations] The statement 'the number of features was not much smaller than the number of samples' is imprecise: with 390 features and 800 training households the ratio is about 0.49, which is manageable; please rephrase to reflect this.
  5. [Supplementary Table S4] The SelectKBest hyperparameter is only used in the alternative analysis with the unmodified VGG16 network; the main text would benefit from explicitly stating this to avoid the impression that it applies to the primary pipeline.
  6. [Figure 5 caption] The caption says images were selected 'according to the top and bottom average SHAP value ranks across the three SEP measures'; please clarify whether the ranking is averaged across the three SEP measures or computed per measure.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial circularity in the asset-based SEP result: the photographed elements are the same household attributes that define the asset index, so the top asset accuracy partly recovers the outcome's definition.

  1. self definitional [Section 2.3.1 (photograph survey), Section 2.4.1 (asset SEP via MCA, Table S2), Section 4 Discussion (attribution)]
    "We attribute the better performance of asset models to the fact that our photograph survey focused on specific elements included in the asset-based SEP construction. ... The household elements comprised ... roof, floor, light source, kitchen, stove, bathroom, latrine, and water source."

    Asset-based SEP is constructed by MCA from questionnaire variables in Table S2, including type of lighting fuel, water source, latrine, kitchen, floor, and wall (Sec. 2.4.1). The photograph survey (Sec. 2.3.1) collected images of exactly those same elements. The Discussion explicitly attributes the high asset accuracy to this overlap. Thus the headline asset r=0.85 is partly the model re-deriving the index's own input variables from photographs rather than predicting an independent outcome; SHAP finding light source (electricity vs. natural light) as top predictor mirrors the MCA's 'type of lighting fuel' variable.

full rationale

The asset-based SEP measure is a deterministic function of questionnaire items (Table S2), and the photograph survey was deliberately designed around those same items, as the paper admits in the Discussion. That makes the highest-reported result (assets, r=0.85) partly a visual recoding of the index's own definitional inputs, which is a genuine partial circularity. However, the paper is transparent about this overlap, the CNN must still learn to recognize the items, and the expenditure and income predictions (which are not defined by the photographed elements) provide independent content that does not reduce by construction. The fine-tuned CNN is trained on training SEP labels only, and regressions are evaluated on the held-out test set, so the two-stage supervised feature extraction is not itself circular. Minor self-citations (e.g., Grau-Pujol et al. 2022, which shares a co-author) are background and not load-bearing. The spatial-leakage concern raised by the skeptic is a validity and optimism risk, not a circularity of the derivation; it does not affect this score.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several domain assumptions: the questionnaire-derived SEP measures are treated as ground truth, the photographs are assumed to capture the same constructs as the asset questionnaire, and the random train/test split assumes spatial independence. The CNN and regression hyperparameters are tuned or hand-set, and the satellite buffer sizes and embedding dimension are choices made by the authors. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • CNN embedding dimension = 30
    Next-to-last fully connected layer set to 30 nodes by the authors to be 'more parsimonious' (Section 2.4.2). Chosen by hand, not by validation; all downstream regression uses these features.
  • Satellite buffer sizes = 25 m and 100 m
    Two square buffers around each geocode were selected by the authors (Section 2.3.3). Satellite feature importance and model performance depend on this choice.
  • Random forest number of trees = 400
    Number of trees fixed to 400 and not tuned (Supplementary Table S4). This affects variance of the reported correlations.
  • CNN hyperparameters = learning rate 1e-2, batch size 32, L2 1e-4, momentum 0.5
    Selected by random search on four of the thirteen image types and assumed to transfer to all image types (Supplementary Methods S1).
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Multiple correspondence analysis first dimension summarizes asset ownership into a single SEP score.
    Used to construct asset-based SEP (Section 2.4.1); the paper relies on standard MCA properties.
  • domain assumption Self-reported income and expenditure questionnaires provide valid ground truth.
    Section 2.3.1 describes verbally administered questionnaires; Section 2.4.1 treats the resulting sums as ground truth.
  • domain assumption Photographs capture the same constructs as the asset questionnaire.
    The 11 photographed elements overlap with asset categories used in the MCA (e.g., lighting fuel, water source, latrine, kitchen, floor, wall); this overlap drives asset model performance.
  • domain assumption Households are independent in the train/test split.
    Section 2.4.1 randomly assigns households without spatial blocking, despite geocoded locations and satellite crops that overlap for nearby households.
  • domain assumption ImageNet-pretrained VGG16 features transfer to satellite and household photos.
    Section 2.4.2 freezes VGG16 layers and fine-tunes only the last layers, assuming ImageNet representations are useful for these image types.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Predicting household socioeconomic position in Mozambique using satellite and household imagery." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WLFTWFJP

@misc{pith2026241108934,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Predicting household socioeconomic position in Mozambique using satellite and household imagery},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WLFTWFJP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08934}
}
read the original abstract

Many studies have predicted SocioEconomic Position (SEP) for aggregated spatial units such as villages using satellite data, but SEP prediction at the household level and other sources of imagery have not been yet explored. We assembled a dataset of 975 households in a semi-rural district in southern Mozambique, consisting of self-reported asset, expenditure, and income SEP data, as well as multimodal imagery including satellite images and a ground-based photograph survey of 11 household elements. We fine-tuned a convolutional neural network to extract feature vectors from the images, which we then used in regression analyzes to model household SEP using different sets of image types. The best prediction performance was found when modeling asset-based SEP using random forest models with all image types, while the performance for expenditure- and income-based SEP was lower. Using SHAP, we observed clear differences between the images with the largest positive and negative effects, as well as identified the most relevant household elements in the predictions. Finally, we fitted an additional reduced model using only the identified relevant household elements, which had an only slightly lower performance compared to models using all images. Our results show how ground-based household photographs allow to zoom in from an area-level to an individual household prediction while minimizing the data collection effort by using explainable machine learning. The developed workflow can be potentially integrated into routine household surveys, where the collected household imagery could be used for other purposes, such as refined asset characterization and environmental exposure assessment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08934 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Workflow of the data collection and analysis in the SEP study. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Examples of all image types collected in the study. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Graphical representation of the transformed VGG16 CNN architecture used in the study for feature vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Exploratory analysis of the SEP measures: assets (MCA first dimension), expenditure (metical), and income [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Light source images with the largest positive (top row) and negative (bottom row) SHAP values in random [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Feature importance according to absolute SHAP values in complete random forest models, by SEP measure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Adaptive Explainable Neural Networks (AxNNs)

    Bruna Galobardes, Mary Shaw, Debbie A Lawlor, John W Lynch, and George Davey Smith. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60 0 (1): 0 7--12, 2006. ISSN 0143-005X. doi:10.1136/jech.2004.023531. URL https://jech.bmj.com/content/60/1/7

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  2. [2]

    Adler and Judith Stewart

    Nancy E. Adler and Judith Stewart. Health disparities across the lifespan: Meaning, methods, and mechanisms. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186 0 (1): 0 5--23, 2010. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05337.x. URL https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05337.x

    arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    Kurmi, Wen Qi Fan, Alvaro Avezum, Igbal Azam, Jephat Chifamba, Antonio Dans, Johan L

    Perry Hystad, MyLinh Duong, Michael Brauer, Andrew Larkin, Raphael Arku, Om P. Kurmi, Wen Qi Fan, Alvaro Avezum, Igbal Azam, Jephat Chifamba, Antonio Dans, Johan L. du Plessis, Rajeev Gupta, Rajesh Kumar, Fernando Lanas, Zhiguang Liu, Yin Lu, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo, Prem Mony, Viswanathan Mohan, Deepa Mohan, Sanjeev Nair, Thandi Puoane, Omar Rahman, Ah ...

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Pritchett

    Deon Filmer and Lant H. Pritchett. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India . Demography, 38 0 (1): 0 115--132, 02 2001. doi:10.1353/dem.2001.0003. URL https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2001.0003

    work page arXiv 2001

  5. [5]

    Assessing asset indices

    Deon Filmer and Kinnon Scott. Assessing asset indices. Demography, 49: 0 359--392, 2012

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Measuring socio-economic position for epidemiological studies in low- and middle-income countries: a methods of measurement in epidemiology paper

    Laura D Howe, Bruna Galobardes, Alicia Matijasevich, David Gordon, Deborah Johnston, Obinna Onwujekwe, Rita Patel, Elizabeth A Webb, Debbie A Lawlor, and James R Hargreaves. Measuring socio-economic position for epidemiological studies in low- and middle-income countries: a methods of measurement in epidemiology paper . International Journal of Epidemiolo...

    work page doi:10.1093/ije/dys037 2012

  7. [7]

    The multiple meanings of prosperity and poverty: a cross-site comparison from tanzania

    Christine Noe Olivia Howland and Dan Brockington. The multiple meanings of prosperity and poverty: a cross-site comparison from tanzania. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 48 0 (1): 0 180--200, 2021. doi:10.1080/03066150.2019.1658080. URL https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1658080

    work page arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Naumova, and William A

    Yan Bai, Elena N. Naumova, and William A. Masters. Seasonality of diet costs reveals food system performance in east africa. Science Advances, 6 0 (49): 0 eabc2162, 2020. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc2162. URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv.abc2162

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc2162 2020

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Lobell, and Stefano Ermon

    Marshall Burke, Anne Driscoll, David B. Lobell, and Stefano Ermon. Using satellite imagery to understand and promote sustainable development. Science, 371 0 (6535): 0 eabe8628, 2021. doi:10.1126/science.abe8628. URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.abe8628

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    Computational socioeconomics

    Jian Gao, Yi-Cheng Zhang, and Tao Zhou. Computational socioeconomics. Physics Reports, 817: 0 1--104, 2019. ISSN 0370-1573. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2019.05.002. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157319301954. Computational Socioeconomics

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    A review of machine learning and satellite imagery for poverty prediction: Implications for development research and applications

    Ola Hall, Francis Dompae, Ibrahim Wahab, and Fred Mawunyo Dzanku. A review of machine learning and satellite imagery for poverty prediction: Implications for development research and applications. Journal of International Development, 35 0 (7): 0 1753--1768, 2023. doi:https://...

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    Elvidge, Paul C

    Christopher D. Elvidge, Paul C. Sutton, Tilottama Ghosh, Benjamin T. Tuttle, Kimberly E. Baugh, Budhendra Bhaduri, and Edward Bright. A global poverty map derived from satellite data. Computers & Geosciences, 35 0 (8): 0 1652--1660, 2009. ISSN 0098-3004. doi:https://doi.org/10...

    2009 doi

  5. [13]

    Can human development be measured with satellite imagery? Ictd, 17: 0 16--19, 2017

    Andrew Head, M \'e lanie Manguin, Nhat Tran, and Joshua E Blumenstock. Can human development be measured with satellite imagery? Ictd, 17: 0 16--19, 2017

    2017

  6. [14]

    Using satellite data to guide urban poverty reduction

    Thomas Pave Sohnesen, Peter Fisker, and David Malmgren-Hansen. Using satellite data to guide urban poverty reduction. Review of Income and Wealth, 68 0 (S2): 0 S282--S294, 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12552. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/roiw.12552

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    Using publicly available satellite imagery and deep learning to understand economic well-being in africa

    Christopher Yeh, Anthony Perez, Anne Driscoll, George Azzari, Zhongyi Tang, David Lobell, Stefano Ermon, and Marshall Burke. Using publicly available satellite imagery and deep learning to understand economic well-being in africa. Nature communications, 11 0 (1): 0 2583, 2020

    2020

  8. [16]

    Open data for algorithms: mapping poverty in belize using open satellite derived features and machine learning

    Ryan Engstrom Jonathan Hersh and Michael Mann. Open data for algorithms: mapping poverty in belize using open satellite derived features and machine learning. Information Technology for Development, 27 0 (2): 0 263--292, 2021. doi:10.1080/02681102.2020.1811945. URL https://doi...

    2021 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Matthew Davis, David B

    Neal Jean, Marshall Burke, Michael Xie, W. Matthew Davis, David B. Lobell, and Stefano Ermon. Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science, 353 0 (6301): 0 790--794, 2016. doi:10.1126/science.aaf7894. URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/...

    2016 doi

  10. [18]

    Estimation of poverty using random forest regression with multi-source data: A case study in bangladesh

    Xizhi Zhao, Bailang Yu, Yan Liu, Zuoqi Chen, Qiaoxuan Li, Congxiao Wang, and Jianping Wu. Estimation of poverty using random forest regression with multi-source data: A case study in bangladesh. Remote Sensing, 11 0 (4), 2019. ISSN 2072-4292. doi:10.3390/rs11040375. URL https:...

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    Generating interpretable poverty maps using object detection in satellite images

    Kumar Ayush, Burak Uzkent, Marshall Burke, David Lobell, and Stefano Ermon. Generating interpretable poverty maps using object detection in satellite images. arXiv preprint, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01612

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Poverty from space: Using high resolution satellite imagery for estimating economic well-being

    Ryan Engstrom, Jonathan Hersh, and David Newhouse. Poverty from space: Using high resolution satellite imagery for estimating economic well-being. The World Bank Economic Review, 36 0 (2): 0 382--412, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Measuring urban poverty using multi-source data and a random forest algorithm: A case study in guangzhou

    Tong Niu, Yimin Chen, and Yuan Yuan. Measuring urban poverty using multi-source data and a random forest algorithm: A case study in guangzhou. Sustainable Cities and Society, 54: 0 102014, 2020. ISSN 2210-6707. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102014. URL https://www.sci...

    2020

  14. [22]

    Duque, Jorge E

    Juan C. Duque, Jorge E. Patino, Luis A. Ruiz, and Josep E. Pardo-Pascual. Measuring intra-urban poverty using land cover and texture metrics derived from remote sensing data. Landscape and Urban Planning, 135: 0 11--21, 2015. ISSN 0169-2046. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landu...

    2015 doi

  15. [23]

    Transfer learning from deep features for remote sensing and poverty mapping

    Michael Xie, Neal Jean, Marshall Burke, David Lobell, and Stefano Ermon. Transfer learning from deep features for remote sensing and poverty mapping. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 30, 2016

    2016

  16. [24]

    Blumenstock

    Guanghua Chi, Han Fang, Sourav Chatterjee, and Joshua E. Blumenstock. Microestimates of wealth for all low- and middle-income countries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119 0 (3): 0 e2113658119, 2022. doi:10.1073/pnas.2113658119. URL https://www.pnas.org/doi/a...

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    Socioecologically informed use of remote sensing data to predict rural household poverty

    Gary R Watmough, Charlotte LJ Marcinko, Clare Sullivan, Kevin Tschirhart, Patrick K Mutuo, Cheryl A Palm, and Jens-Christian Svenning. Socioecologically informed use of remote sensing data to predict rural household poverty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116...

    2019

  18. [26]

    Barrett, Christopher Browne, Leiqiu Hu, Yanyan Liu, David S

    Linden McBride, Christopher B. Barrett, Christopher Browne, Leiqiu Hu, Yanyan Liu, David S. Matteson, Ying Sun, and Jiaming Wen. Predicting poverty and malnutrition for targeting, mapping, monitoring, and early warning. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 44 0 (2): 0 879...

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    Using deep learning and google street view to estimate the demographic makeup of neighborhoods across the united states

    Timnit Gebru, Jonathan Krause, Yilun Wang, Duyun Chen, Jia Deng, Erez Lieberman Aiden, and Li Fei-Fei. Using deep learning and google street view to estimate the demographic makeup of neighborhoods across the united states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 ...

    2017 doi

  20. [28]

    Measuring social, environmental and health inequalities using deep learning and street imagery

    Esra Suel, John W Polak, James E Bennett, and Majid Ezzati. Measuring social, environmental and health inequalities using deep learning and street imagery. Scientific reports, 9 0 (1): 0 6229, 2019

    2019

  21. [29]

    Zhuangyuan Fan, Fan Zhang, Becky P. Y. Loo, and Carlo Ratti. Urban visual intelligence: Uncovering hidden city profiles with street view images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120 0 (27): 0 e2220417120, 2023. doi:10.1073/pnas.2220417120. URL https://www.pnas....

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    The dollar street dataset: Images representing the geographic and socioeconomic diversity of the world

    William A Gaviria Rojas, Sudnya Diamos, Keertan Ranjan Kini, David Kanter, Vijay Janapa Reddi, and Cody Coleman. The dollar street dataset: Images representing the geographic and socioeconomic diversity of the world. In Thirty-sixth Conference on Neural Information Processing ...

    2022

  23. [31]

    A review of explainable ai in the satellite data, deep machine learning, and human poverty domain

    Ola Hall, Mattias Ohlsson, and Thorsteinn R \"o gnvaldsson. A review of explainable ai in the satellite data, deep machine learning, and human poverty domain. Patterns, 3 0 (10), 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Interpretable socioeconomic status inference from aerial imagery through urban patterns

    Jacob Levy Abitbol and Marton Karsai. Interpretable socioeconomic status inference from aerial imagery through urban patterns. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2 0 (11): 0 684--692, 2020

    2020

  25. [33]

    Cohort Profile Update: Manhiça Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) of the Manhiça Health Research Centre (CISM)

    Ariel Nhacolo, Edgar Jamisse, Orvalho Augusto, Teodomiro Matsena, Aura Hunguana, Inácio Mandomando, Carlos Arnaldo, Khátia Munguambe, Eusébio Macete, Pedro Alonso, Francisco Saúte, and Charfudin Sacoor. Cohort Profile Update: Manhiça Health and Demographic Surveillance System ...

    2021 doi

  26. [34]

    Capturing What Matters: Essential Guidelines for Designing Household Surveys

    Gbemisola Oseni, Amparo Palacios-Lopez, Harriet Kasidi Mugera, and Josefine Durazo. Capturing What Matters: Essential Guidelines for Designing Household Surveys. World Bank, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Neighbors’ use of water and sanitation facilities can affect children’s health: a cohort study in mozambique using a spatial approach

    Berta Grau-Pujol, Jorge Cano, Helena Marti-Soler, Aina Casellas, Emanuele Giorgi, Ariel Nhacolo, Francisco Saute, Ricard Gin \'e , Lloren c Quint \'o , Charfudin Sacoor, et al. Neighbors’ use of water and sanitation facilities can affect children’s health: a cohort study in mo...

    2022

  28. [36]

    Systematic comparison of household income, consumption, and assets to measure health inequalities in low-and middle-income countries

    Mathieu JP Poirier. Systematic comparison of household income, consumption, and assets to measure health inequalities in low-and middle-income countries. Scientific Reports, 14 0 (1): 0 3851, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    Pierre Traissac and Yves Martin-Prevel. Alternatives to principal components analysis to derive asset-based indices to measure socio-economic position in low- and middle-income countries: the case for multiple correspondence analysis . International Journal of Epidemiology, 41...

    2012 doi

  30. [38]

    Deep learning for vision systems

    Mohamed Elgendy. Deep learning for vision systems. Simon and Schuster, 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition

    Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Cnn features off-the-shelf: An astounding baseline for recognition

    Ali Sharif Razavian, Hossein Azizpour, Josephine Sullivan, and Stefan Carlsson. Cnn features off-the-shelf: An astounding baseline for recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, June 2014

    2014

  33. [41]

    Regularization and Variable Selection Via the Elastic Net

    Hui Zou and Trevor Hastie. Regularization and Variable Selection Via the Elastic Net . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 67 0 (2): 0 301--320, 03 2005. ISSN 1369-7412. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x. URL https://doi.org/10.1111/j...

    2005

  34. [42]

    Random forests

    Leo Breiman. Random forests. Machine learning, 45: 0 5--32, 2001

    2001

  35. [43]

    Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system

    Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '16, page 785–794, New York, NY, USA, 2016. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 978145034...

    2016

  36. [44]

    Interpretable machine learning

    Christoph Molnar. Interpretable machine learning. Lulu. com, 2020

    2020

  37. [45]

    Lundberg, Gabriel Erion, Hugh Chen, Alex DeGrave, Jordan M

    Scott M. Lundberg, Gabriel Erion, Hugh Chen, Alex DeGrave, Jordan M. Prutkin, Bala Nair, Ronit Katz, Jonathan Himmelfarb, Nisha Bansal, and Su-In Lee. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable ai for trees. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2 0 (1): 0 2522--5...

    2020

  38. [46]

    R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing

    R Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2022. URL https://www.R-project.org/

    2022

  39. [47]

    Guido Van Rossum and Fred L. Drake. Python 3 Reference Manual. CreateSpace, Scotts Valley, CA, 2009. ISBN 1441412697

    2009

  40. [48]

    Approaches and alternatives to the wealth index to measure socioeconomic status using survey data: a critical interpretive synthesis

    Mathieu JP Poirier, Karen A Gr \'e pin, and Michel Grignon. Approaches and alternatives to the wealth index to measure socioeconomic status using survey data: a critical interpretive synthesis. Social Indicators Research, 148 0 (1): 0 1--46, 2020

    2020

  41. [49]

    The consumption, income, and wealth of the poorest: An empirical analysis of economic inequality in rural and urban sub-saharan africa for macroeconomists

    Leandro De Magalhães and Raül Santaeulàlia-Llopis. The consumption, income, and wealth of the poorest: An empirical analysis of economic inequality in rural and urban sub-saharan africa for macroeconomists. Journal of Development Economics, 134: 0 350--371, 2018. ISSN 0304-387...

    2018 doi

  42. [50]

    Is the wealth index a proxy for consumption expenditure? a systematic review

    L D Howe, J R Hargreaves, S Gabrysch, and S R A Huttly. Is the wealth index a proxy for consumption expenditure? a systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 63 0 (11): 0 871--877, 2009. ISSN 0143-005X. doi:10.1136/jech.2009.088021. URL https://jech.bmj.com...

    2009 arXiv

  43. [51]

    How transferable are features in deep neural networks? Advances in neural information processing systems, 27, 2014

    Jason Yosinski, Jeff Clune, Yoshua Bengio, and Hod Lipson. How transferable are features in deep neural networks? Advances in neural information processing systems, 27, 2014

    2014

  44. [52]

    Viirs night-time lights

    Christopher D Elvidge, Kimberly Baugh, Mikhail Zhizhin, Feng Chi Hsu, and Tilottama Ghosh. Viirs night-time lights. International journal of remote sensing, 38 0 (21): 0 5860--5879, 2017

    2017

  45. [53]

    Validity of rapid estimates of household wealth and income for health surveys in rural africa

    Saul S Morris, Calogero Carletto, John Hoddinott, and Luc J M Christiaensen. Validity of rapid estimates of household wealth and income for health surveys in rural africa. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 54 0 (5): 0 381--387, 2000. ISSN 0143-005X. doi:10.1136/jech....

    doi

  46. [54]

    A picture tells a thousand…exposures: Opportunities and challenges of deep learning image analyses in exposure science and environmental epidemiology

    Scott Weichenthal, Marianne Hatzopoulou, and Michael Brauer. A picture tells a thousand…exposures: Opportunities and challenges of deep learning image analyses in exposure science and environmental epidemiology. Environment International, 122: 0 3--10, 2019. ISSN 0160-4120. do...

    2019 doi

  47. [55]

    dos Santos, and Francisco Chiaravalloti-Neto

    Camila Laranjeira, Matheus Pereira, Raul Oliveira, Gerson Barbosa, Camila Fernandes, Patricia Bermudi, Ester Resende, Eduardo Fernandes, Keiller Nogueira, Valmir Andrade, José Alberto Quintanilha, Jefersson A. dos Santos, and Francisco Chiaravalloti-Neto. Automatic mapping of ...

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.