Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Detecting Table Region in PDF Documents Using Distant Supervision

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1506.08891 v6 pith:WLPAMJL3 submitted 2015-06-29 cs.CV cs.IR

Detecting Table Region in PDF Documents Using Distant Supervision

classification cs.CV cs.IR
keywords tabledocumentsparadigmregionfeaturestablesclassifiersdetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Superior to state-of-the-art approaches which compete in table recognition with 67 annotated government reports in PDF format released by {\it ICDAR 2013 Table Competition}, this paper contributes a novel paradigm leveraging large-scale unlabeled PDF documents to open-domain table detection. We integrate the paradigm into our latest developed system ({\it PdfExtra}) to detect the region of tables by means of 9,466 academic articles from the entire repository of {\it ACL Anthology}, where almost all papers are archived by PDF format without annotation for tables. The paradigm first designs heuristics to automatically construct weakly labeled data. It then feeds diverse evidences, such as layouts of documents and linguistic features, which are extracted by {\it Apache PDFBox} and processed by {\it Stanford NLP} toolkit, into different canonical classifiers. We finally use these classifiers, i.e. {\it Naive Bayes}, {\it Logistic Regression} and {\it Support Vector Machine}, to collaboratively vote on the region of tables. Experimental results show that {\it PdfExtra} achieves a great leap forward, compared with the state-of-the-art approach. Moreover, we discuss the factors of different features, learning models and even domains of documents that may impact the performance. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that our paradigm is compatible enough to leverage various features and learning models for open-domain table region detection within PDF files.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Benchmarking Table Extraction from Heterogeneous Scientific PDF Documents

    cs.DB 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    A new benchmark with two new datasets and end-to-end metrics shows that table extraction from PDFs is still unreliable across heterogeneous layouts.