Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 96 references

Diabatic Hamiltonian Construction in van der Waals heterostructure complexes

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A wavefunction projection method builds a diabatic Hamiltonian for van der Waals heterostructures, reducing MoS2/WS2 hole transfer to layer-localized states and their couplings.

desk verdict Practical projection diabatization for vdW heterostructures; solid method paper with honest limitations, but coupling numbers need a benchmark and the K-point degeneracy should be clarified. read the letter →

arxiv 1910.05213 v1 pith:WQ37W6UO submitted 2019-08-18 physics.chem-ph quant-ph

classification physics.chem-phquant-ph
keywords diabatizationvanderWaalsheterostructureswavefunctionprojectionholetransferMoS2/WS2plane-wavebasisprojectoraugmentedwavediabaticHamiltonian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish a practical way to build diabatic Hamiltonians for weakly bound two-dimensional heterostructures directly from plane-wave density functional calculations. The key idea is to use the electronic states of each isolated monolayer as reference diabatic states and project the heterostructure's adiabatic states onto them. For MoS2/WS2, the resulting Hamiltonian gives valence-band states localized on each layer and interlayer couplings of 0.330 eV at the Γ point and 0.043 eV at the K point. This matters because a compact diabatic Hamiltonian is exactly what quantum-dynamics simulations need to describe photoinduced hole transfer in extended systems.

What carries the argument

The central object is the adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation matrix $\mathbf{T}$ built from wavefunction overlaps. The reference diabatic states are the single-particle orbitals of the isolated monolayers; the overlap between a heterostructure adiabatic state and a monolayer reference state is evaluated in the plane-wave/PAW representation through the all-electron reconstruction formula, then the raw projection matrix is orthogonalized as $\mathbf{T} = (\mathbf{T}^\dagger \mathbf{T})^{-1/2} \mathbf{T}^\dagger$. The diabatic Hamiltonian follows as $\mathbf{V}^{(d)}_{\rm el} = \mathbf{T} \mathbf{V}^{(a)}_{\rm el} \mathbf{T}^\dagger$. This machinery turns expensive band-structure data for the full complex into a small Hamiltonian whose states are already localized on the donor and acceptor layers, with couplings ready for dynamics.

What would settle it

Recompute the same MoS2/WS2 diabatic Hamiltonian with a reference space expanded to include additional unoccupied bands, and compare with an independent diabatization such as constrained density functional theory; if the Γ-point coupling shifts by more than about 0.1 eV or the diabatic states gain substantial weight outside the monolayer manifold, the assumed reference space is not sufficient.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the wavefunction projection method, implemented with a plane-wave basis and projector augmented wave reconstruction of all-electron wavefunctions, provides a practical route to diabatic Hamiltonians for van der Waals heterostructures within the single-particle picture. Taking the isolated monolayer states of MoS2 and WS2 as reference diabatic states, the adiabatic states of the full heterostructure are transformed through a projection matrix with orthogonalization, producing a diabatic Hamiltonian whose diagonal elements are layer-localized valence band energies and whose off-diagonal elements are the interlayer couplings. For MoS2/WS2 the coupling between the two valence-band states at Γ is 0.330 eV and between those at K is 0.043 eV, explaining both the large Γ-point band splitting (0.67 eV) and the experimental ultrafast hole transfer.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction assumes the heterostructure's relevant electronic states are faithfully described as combinations of the two isolated monolayers' valence and conduction states, so if interlayer interactions heavily rehybridize electrons beyond that space, the diabatic Hamiltonian is incomplete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The MoS2/WS2 diabatic Hamiltonian contains two strongly coupled valence-band states at Γ, with coupling 0.330 eV, so pure electronic two-state dynamics gives a coherent population oscillation with a period around 24.3 fs.
  • Because the coupling at K is only 0.043 eV, direct K-to-K hole transfer is inefficient; the likely route is an indirect pathway through the Γ-point states, consistent with previous phonon-assisted transfer mechanisms.
  • The strong Γ-point interlayer coupling produces a band splitting of 0.67 eV, shifting the heterostructure valence band maximum to Γ, about 0.2 eV above the K-point valence states.
  • The same projection scheme can be applied to other weakly stacked two-dimensional heterostructures to obtain diabatic Hamiltonians for either hole or electron transfer by choosing the appropriate valence or conduction band reference states.
  • Such diabatic Hamiltonians provide a foundation for nonadiabatic dynamics of extended systems using full quantum methods, since the electronic couplings and localized states are already in the required form.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test would compare the projected diabatic couplings with nonadiabatic coupling matrix elements computed from ab initio molecular dynamics at Γ and K; agreement would support using the diabatic Hamiltonian as a dynamics generator, while disagreement would reveal missing reference states.
  • The method should generalize to electron transfer by taking isolated monolayer conduction band states as references, yielding the analogous donor-CB/acceptor-CB couplings without any change to the projection machinery.
  • Because the paper notes the reference states are ill-defined when chemical bonds connect the two parts, a natural extension is to generate fragment-localized orbitals for covalently linked donor-acceptor systems; until then the method's safe domain is genuinely van der Waals stacked complexes.
  • Including excitonic effects would require projecting many-body excited states rather than single-particle orbitals onto layer-localized exciton bases, a step the paper identifies as a future challenge.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a wavefunction-projection diabatization scheme for van der Waals heterostructures computed with plane-wave DFT and the PAW method. The adiabatic Kohn-Sham states of the MoS2/WS2 complex are projected onto reference states built from the Kohn-Sham orbitals of the isolated monolayers; the resulting overlap matrix is Löwdin-orthonormalized and used to rotate the adiabatic Hamiltonian into a diabatic representation. The authors report diabatic state energies and couplings for the valence-band manifold, in particular a coupling of 0.330 eV between MoS2 and WS2 VB@Γ states and 0.043 eV between the VB@K states, and use the former to argue for ultrafast hole transfer with a Rabi-type oscillation period of 24.3 fs.

Significance. If the reported couplings are physically meaningful, the method would provide a practical, parameter-free route to diabatic Hamiltonians for photoinduced charge transfer in vdW heterostructures using only plane-wave electronic-structure output. The approach is transparent, is based on a standard projection-diabatization logic, and yields the expected physical trend (strong interlayer hybridization at Γ, weak at K), consistent with prior band-structure analyses. The paper also performs convergence checks on supercell size and the number of included bands. However, the central quantitative claim—that the rotated Kohn-Sham matrix elements equal the hole-transfer couplings—is not benchmarked against other diabatization schemes, and at least one derived dynamical consequence appears arithmetically inconsistent. These issues must be resolved before the numbers can be used as quantitative predictions.

major comments (4)
  1. [Eqs. (2)-(5) and Fig. 3] The paper's central quantitative claim, that the diabatic coupling is 0.330 eV at Γ and 0.043 eV at K, is never validated as a physical charge-transfer coupling. These values are matrix elements of the Kohn-Sham Hamiltonian in a Löwdin-orthonormalized projection of neutral-monolayer Kohn-Sham orbitals; no comparison is made with other diabatization methods (e.g., CDFT, FODFT, or generalized Mulliken-Hush), nor with values extracted from experimental transfer rates. The convergence checks in Figure S4 address the stability of diabatic energies with respect to the number of bands, but not the correctness of the coupling as a descriptor of hole transfer. Because the abstract and the dynamical conclusions rely on these two numbers, the manuscript should either add such a benchmark or substantially soften the quantitative claims.
  2. [Fig. 3 and the discussion of VB@K states] The reported K-point coupling of 0.043 eV is not well-defined as stated. The diabatic states D2/D3 (MoS2_VB@K) and A1/A2 (WS2_VB@K) are degenerate pairs, and the off-diagonal block of the diabatic Hamiltonian is not invariant under unitary rotations within each degenerate subspace. The paper reports a single number without specifying whether it is the largest singular value, an average over the degenerate manifold, or a particular matrix element after a chosen canonical rotation. This ambiguity is especially relevant because the K-point value is used as evidence of weak interlayer coupling. Please specify the convention and report the full 2×2 off-diagonal block or the singular values.
  3. [Rabi period estimate (text near Fig. 4)] The stated Rabi oscillation period of 24.3 fs appears inconsistent with the quoted coupling of 0.330 eV. For a two-state system with off-diagonal coupling V and diagonal energy difference Δ, the population oscillation period is h/sqrt(Δ² + 4V²), which for any Δ is at most h/(2V) ≈ 6.3 fs when V = 0.330 eV. A period of 24.3 fs corresponds to an energy scale of about 0.170 eV, not 0.660 eV. Either the formula used for the period, the value of the coupling, or the energy difference entering the two-state model is misreported, and the text should be corrected.
  4. [Discussion of limitations (p. 18-19)] The paper asserts that monolayer ground-state Kohn-Sham orbitals are adequate reference states for vdW complexes, but the only support is that adding more bands leaves the frontier diabatic energies approximately unchanged. This tests the completeness of the active space, not the appropriateness of the reference states for describing a localized hole. The references are neutral-monolayer orbitals and carry no orbital relaxation or density response to a hole, and the diagonal diabatic energies are Kohn-Sham eigenvalues rather than total energies of charge-localized states. The authors themselves note that chemically bonded cases require localized-orbital construction; the vdW case is asserted without an analogous test. A concrete check would be a CDFT calculation of the hole-localized states in the same plane-wave framework, or a comparison of the projected diabatic state densities with the self-consistent layer-projected densities of the complex.
minor comments (5)
  1. [p. 18, first paragraph of the discussion section] The sentence beginning 'projection-operator approach and block diago nalization of Fock matrix, constrained density functional theory ( CDFT), molecular orbital based fragmentatio n approaches As pointed out...' appears to be a leftover fragment from the introduction and should be removed or rewritten.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'Femi level' (Figures 1 and 2 captions), 'Hatree' in 'multilayer multiconfiguratio n time-dependent Hatree (ML-MCTDH)', and inconsistent spacing in words like 'diago nalization' and 'fragmentatio n'. These should be corrected before publication.
  3. [Computational Details] The statement 'All calculations were performed at the Γ point' is potentially confusing because the text discusses VB@K states. In the 6×6 and 9×9 supercells the primitive-cell K point folds to Γ, so this is consistent, but the manuscript should explain this explicitly so that readers do not misinterpret the k-point sampling.
  4. [Eq. (3) and surrounding text] The definition of the projection matrix t_ij would be clearer if the bra-ket notation and the PAW overlap correction in Eq. (9) were explicitly connected to the Hermitian conjugate of the overlap matrix, especially since the PAW transformation is not unitary in the pseudo-wavefunction space.
  5. [Figure 3 caption] The caption lists donor and acceptor labels but does not explain how the reported 'absolute values of diabatic couplings' were extracted from the diabatic Hamiltonian matrix; a brief statement of the convention (e.g., the matrix element of the rotated Hamiltonian, or the singular value of the off-diagonal block) would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the diabatic Hamiltonian is a unitary transformation of the ab initio adiabatic Hamiltonian, with no fitted parameters and no load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The method defines adiabatic states of the MoS2/WS2 complex and reference states from isolated monolayer Kohn–Sham orbitals, then builds the transformation matrix via overlaps [Eqs. (2)–(3)], orthogonalizes it [Eq. (4)], and rotates the adiabatic Hamiltonian into the diabatic representation [Eq. (5)]. The reported quantities (0.330 eV at Gamma, 0.043 eV at K) are outputs of this unitary transformation, not fitted inputs. No parameter is adjusted to reproduce a target coupling, and no 'prediction' is defined in terms of the quantity it claims to predict. The monolayer reference states are physical choices, not derived from the target result. The paper cites prior work by the same authors for the projection framework (ref. 19) and for the PIETAS code (refs. 95–96), but the method is also anchored in independently established projection-diabatization literature (refs. 59–60, 64) and is fully described in the text, so these self-citations are not load-bearing. The paper explicitly acknowledges limitations: the single-particle picture omits excitonic effects, the method is intended for vdW systems and faces difficulty when chemical bonds exist between parts, and future benchmarking against other approaches is needed (pp. 18–19). These are validation or correctness concerns, not circularity. Accordingly, no circular step is present and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities and fits no parameters. It relies on standard DFT (PBE, PAW, D2) and the assumption that monolayer wavefunctions form a valid diabatic reference basis.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The single-particle (orbital) picture adequately describes hole transfer in MoS2/WS2; excitonic effects are neglected.
    The paper explicitly states this approximation and identifies excitonic effects as future work (p. 18).
  • domain assumption Isolated monolayer wavefunctions are a complete enough reference space for the complex's frontier states.
    The projection method assumes the diabatic states can be written as linear combinations of monolayer states; the paper tests convergence with 10-40 states.
  • domain assumption PBE functional with D2 vdW correction provides accurate electronic structure for the couplings.
    Used in all DFT calculations; no benchmark against higher-level methods is provided.
  • standard math The PAW transformation and the overlap approximation in Eq. (9) are valid for computing projections.
    Standard PAW formalism (refs 71-72); the paper provides the approximation but no numerical validation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Diabatic Hamiltonian Construction in van der Waals heterostructure complexes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WQ37W6UO

@misc{pith2026191005213,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Diabatic Hamiltonian Construction in van der Waals heterostructure complexes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WQ37W6UO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1910.05213}
}
read the original abstract

A diabatization method is developed for the approximated description of the photoinduced charge separation/transfer processes in the van der Waals (vdW) heterostructure complex, which is based on the wavefunction projection approach using a plane wave basis set in the framework of the single-particle picture. We build the diabatic Hamiltonian for the description of the interlayer photoinduced hole-transfer process of the two-dimensional vdW MoS2/WS2 heterostructure complexes. The diabatic Hamiltonian gives the energies of the localized valence band states (located at MoS2 and valence band states (located at WS2), as well as the couplings between them. The wavefunction projection method provides a practical and reasonable approach to construct the diabatic model in the description of photoinduced charge transfer processes in the vdW heterostructure complexes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K.; Grigorieva, I

    Geim, A. K.; Grigorieva, I. V ., V an der Waals heterostructures. Nature 2013, 499 (7459), 419-425

  2. [2]

    L.; Cao, Q.; Wang, F

    Li, C. L.; Cao, Q.; Wang, F. Z.; Xiao, Y . Q.; Li, Y . B.; Delaunay , J. J.; Zhu, H. W., Engineering graphene and TMDs based van der Waals heterostructures for photovoltaic and photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47 (13), 4981-5037

  3. [3]

    H.; Ma, E

    Jin, C. H.; Ma, E. Y .; Karni, O.; Regan, E. C.; Wang, F.; Heinz, T. F., Ultrafast dynamics in van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13 (11), 994-1003

  4. [4]

    M.; Heinz, T

    Wang, G.; Chernikov , A.; Glazov , M. M.; Heinz, T. F.; Marie, X.; Amand, T.; Urbaszek, B., Colloquium: Excitons in atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018, 90 (2), 021001

  5. [5]

    Wang, H.; Bang, J.; Sun, Y .; Liang, L.; West, D.; Meunier, V .; Zhang, S., The role of collective motion in the ultrafast charge transfer in van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11504

  6. [6]

    A.; Xie, Y .; Lan, Z.; Prezhdo, O

    Zheng, Q.; Saidi, W. A.; Xie, Y .; Lan, Z.; Prezhdo, O. V .; Petek, H.; Zhao, J., Phonon-Assisted Ultrafast Charge Transfer at van der Waals Heterostructure Interface. Nano Lett. 2017, 17 (10), 6435-6442

  7. [7]

    Advanced Science 2017, 4 (9), 1700086

    Zhang, J.; Hong, H.; Lian, C.; Ma, W.; Xu, X.; Zhou, X.; Fu, H.; Liu, K.; Meng, S., Interlayer-State-Coupling Dependent Ultrafast Charge Transfer in MoS2 /WS2 Bilayers. Advanced Science 2017, 4 (9), 1700086

  8. [8]

    Nano Lett

    Zhang, J.; Hong, H.; Zhang, J.; Fu, H.; Y ou, P.; Lischner, J.; Liu, K.; Kaxiras, E.; Meng, S., New Pathway for Hot Electron Relaxation in Two -Dimensio nal Heterostructures. Nano Lett. 2018, 18 (9), 6057-6063

Show all 96 references
  1. [9]

    ACS Nano 2017, 11 (12), 12020-12026

    Ji, Z.; Hong, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, W.; Cao, T.; Qiao, R.; Liu, C.; Liang, J.; Jin, C.; Jiao, L.; Shi, K.; Meng, S.; Liu, K., Robust Stacking-Independent Ultrafast Charge Transfer in MoS2/WS2 Bilayers. ACS Nano 2017, 11 (12), 12020-12026

  2. [10]

    V ., Quantum Coherence Facilitates Efficient Charge Separation at a MoS2/MoSe2 van der Waals Junction

    Long, R.; Prezhdo, O. V ., Quantum Coherence Facilitates Efficient Charge Separation at a MoS2/MoSe2 van der Waals Junction. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (3), 1996- 2003

  3. [11]

    Liang, Y .; Li, J.; Jin, H.; Huang, B.; Dai, Y ., Photoexcitation Dynamics in Janus- MoSSe/WSe2 Heterobilayers: Ab Initio Time-Domain Study . J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9 (11), 2797-2802

  4. [12]

    P.; Kim, J.; Shi, S

    Hong, X. P.; Kim, J.; Shi, S. F.; Zhang, Y .; Jin, C. H.; Sun, Y . H.; Tongay , S.; Wu, J. Q.; Zhang, Y . F.; Wang, F., Ultrafast charge transfer in atomically thin MoS2/WS2 heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9 (9), 682-686. 23

  5. [13]

    M.; Chen, W.; Li, Y .; Han, M.; Cui, X.; Arefe, G.; Nuckolls, C.; Heinz, T

    Lee, C.-H.; Lee, G.-H.; van der Zande, A. M.; Chen, W.; Li, Y .; Han, M.; Cui, X.; Arefe, G.; Nuckolls, C.; Heinz, T. F.; Guo, J.; Hone, J.; Kim, P., Atomically thin p–n junctions with van der Waals heterointerfaces. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 676

  6. [14]

    Z.; Chiu, H.-Y .; Zhao, H., Ultrafast Charge Separation and Indirect Exciton Formation in a MoS2 –MoSe2 van der Waals Heterostructure

    Ceballos, F.; Bellus, M. Z.; Chiu, H.-Y .; Zhao, H., Ultrafast Charge Separation and Indirect Exciton Formation in a MoS2 –MoSe2 van der Waals Heterostructure. ACS Nano 2014, 8 (12), 12717-12724

  7. [15]

    R.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, H.; Williams, K

    Zhu, X.; Monahan, N. R.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, H.; Williams, K. W.; Nelson, C. A., Charge Transfer Excitons at van der Waals Interfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (26), 8313-8320

  8. [16]

    Wiley-VCH V erlag GmbH & Co.: KGaA,Boschstr

    May , V .; Kühn, O., Charge and Energy Transfer Dynamics in Molecular Systems. Wiley-VCH V erlag GmbH & Co.: KGaA,Boschstr. 12, 69469 Weinheim, Germany, 2011

  9. [17]

    R.; Köppel, H., Conical Intersections: Electronic Structure, Dynamics & Spectroscopy

    Domcke, W.; Y arkony , D. R.; Köppel, H., Conical Intersections: Electronic Structure, Dynamics & Spectroscopy. World Scientific: Singapore, 2004

  10. [18]

    Q.; Hsu, C

    Y ou, Z. Q.; Hsu, C. P., Theory and Calculation for the Electronic Coupling in Exciation Energy Transfer. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2014, 114 (2), 102-115

  11. [19]

    Xie, Y .; Jiang, S.; Zheng, J.; Lan, Z., Construction of Vibronic Diabatic Hamiltonian for Excited-State Electron and Energy Transfer Processes. J. Phys. Chem. A 2017, 121 (50), 9567-9578

  12. [20]

    X.; Subotnik, J

    Jin, Z. X.; Subotnik, J. E., Localized diabatization applied to excitons in molecular crystals. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 146 (24), 244110

  13. [21]

    V enghaus, F.; Eisfeld, W., Block -Diagonalization as a Tool for the Robust Diabatization of High-Dimensional Potential Energy Surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144 (11), 114110

  14. [22]

    F.; Köhn, A., A General Ansatz for Constructing Quasi -Diabatic States in Electronically Excited Aggregated Systems

    Liu, W.; Lunkenheimer, B.; Settels, V .; Engels, B.; Fink, R. F.; Köhn, A., A General Ansatz for Constructing Quasi -Diabatic States in Electronically Excited Aggregated Systems. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143 (8), 084106

  15. [23]

    Tamura, H.; Burghardt, I.; Tsukada, M., Exciton Dissociation at Thiophene/Fullerene Interfaces: The Electronic Structures and Quantum Dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115 (20), 10205-10210

  16. [24]

    A., Electronic Couplings for Photoinduced Electron Transfer and Excitation Energy Transfer Computed Using Excited States of Noninteracting Molecules

    V oityuk, A. A., Electronic Couplings for Photoinduced Electron Transfer and Excitation Energy Transfer Computed Using Excited States of Noninteracting Molecules. J. Phys. Chem. A 2017, 121 (29), 5414-5419

  17. [25]

    E.; Parker, K.; Gagliardi, L.; Truhlar, D

    Hoyer, C. E.; Parker, K.; Gagliardi, L.; Truhlar, D. G., The DQ and DQ Phi Electronic Structure Diabatization Methods: V alidation for General Applications. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144 (19), 194101

  18. [26]

    Z.; Zhang, Y .; Bao, P.; Yi, Y

    Liu, J. Z.; Zhang, Y .; Bao, P.; Yi, Y . P., Evaluating Electronic Couplings for Excited State Charge Transfer Based on Maximum Occupation Method Delta SCF Quasi - Adiabatic States. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13 (2), 843-851

  19. [27]

    Z.; Zhang, Y .; Liu, W

    Liu, J. Z.; Zhang, Y .; Liu, W. J., Photoexcitation of Light-Harvesting C -P-C-60 Triads: A FLMO-TD-DFT Study . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10 (6), 2436-2448

  20. [28]

    G.; Li, H.; Gao, J., Diabatic-At-Construction Method 24 for Diabatic and Adiabatic Ground and Excited States Based on Multistate Dens ity Functional Theory

    Grofe, A.; Qu, Z.; Truhlar, D. G.; Li, H.; Gao, J., Diabatic-At-Construction Method 24 for Diabatic and Adiabatic Ground and Excited States Based on Multistate Dens ity Functional Theory . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13 (3), 1176-1187

  21. [29]

    F.; Y ou, Z

    Morrison, A. F.; Y ou, Z. Q.; Herbert, J. M., Ab Initio Implementation of the Frenkel-Davydov Exciton Model: A Naturally Parallelizable Approach to Computing Collective Excitations in Crystals and Aggregates. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10 (12), 5366-5376

  22. [30]

    Yi, Y .; Coropceanu, V .; Brédas, J.-L., Exciton -Dissociation and Charge - Recombination Processes in Pentacene/C-60 Solar Cells: Theoretical Insight into the Impact of Interface Geometry . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131 (43), 15777-15783

  23. [31]

    M.; Liu, F.; Kokkila Schumacher, S

    Li, X.; Parrish, R. M.; Liu, F.; Kokkila Schumacher, S. I. L.; Martínez, T. J., An Ab Initio Exciton Model Including Charge -Transfer Excited States. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13 (8), 3493–3504

  24. [32]

    Kaduk, B.; Kowalczyk, T.; V an V oorhis, T., Constrained Density Functional Theory . Chem. Rev. 2012, 112 (1), 321-370

  25. [33]

    B.; Thoss, M., Quantum dynamics of photoinduced electron -transfer reactions in dye -semiconductor systems: First - principles description and application to coumarin 343 -TiO2

    Kondov , I.; Čížek, M.; Benesch, C.; Wang, H. B.; Thoss, M., Quantum dynamics of photoinduced electron -transfer reactions in dye -semiconductor systems: First - principles description and application to coumarin 343 -TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111 (32), 11970-11981

  26. [34]

    J.; Ernstorfer, R.; Goddard, W

    Persson, P.; Lundqvist, M. J.; Ernstorfer, R.; Goddard, W. A.; Willig, F., Quantum chemical calculations of the influence of anchor -cum-spacer groups on femtosecond electron transfer times in dye-sensitized semiconductor nanocrystals. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2006, 2 (2), 441-451

  27. [35]

    E.; Cave, R

    Subotnik, J. E.; Cave, R. J.; Steele, R. P.; Shenvi, N., The Initial and Final States of Electron and Energy Transfer Processes: Diabatization as Motivated by System - Solvent Interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130 (23), 234102

  28. [36]

    E.; Y eganeh, S.; Cave, R

    Subotnik, J. E.; Y eganeh, S.; Cave, R. J.; Ratner, M. A., Constructing diabatic states from adiabatic states: Extending generalized Mulliken-Hush to multiple charge centers with Boys localization. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129 (24), 244101

  29. [37]

    R., Nonadiabatic Quantum Chemistry-Past, Present, and Future

    Y arkony , D. R., Nonadiabatic Quantum Chemistry-Past, Present, and Future. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112 (1), 481-498

  30. [38]

    J.; Nilsing, M.; Persson, P.; Lunell, S., DFT study of bare and dye- sensitized TiO2 clusters and nanocrystals

    Lundqvist, M. J.; Nilsing, M.; Persson, P.; Lunell, S., DFT study of bare and dye- sensitized TiO2 clusters and nanocrystals. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2006, 106 (15), 3214- 3234

  31. [39]

    L.; Malbon, C

    Zhu, X. L.; Malbon, C. L.; Y arkony , D. R., An Improved Quasi -Diabatic Representation of the 1, 2, 3 1A Coupled Adiabatic Potential Energy Surfaces of Phenol in the Full 33 Internal Coordinates. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144 (12), 124312

  32. [40]

    W.; Robertson, C.; Habershon, S., Improved on -the-Fly MCTDH Simulations with Many -Body-Potential Tensor Decomposition and Projection Diabatization

    Richings, G. W.; Robertson, C.; Habershon, S., Improved on -the-Fly MCTDH Simulations with Many -Body-Potential Tensor Decomposition and Projection Diabatization. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15 (2), 857-870

  33. [41]

    A.; Chalasinski, G.; Szczsniak, M

    Klos, J. A.; Chalasinski, G.; Szczsniak, M. M.; Werner, H. J., Ab initio calculatio ns of adiabatic and diabatic potential energy surfaces of Cl(P -2)center dot HCl((1)Sigma(+)) van der Waals complex. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115 (7), 3085-3098. 25

  34. [42]

    C.; Mo, Y

    Cembran, A.; Song, L. C.; Mo, Y . R.; Gao , J. L., Block -Localized Density Functional Theory (BLDFT), Diabatic Coupling, and Their Use in V alence Bond Theory for Representing Reactive Potential Energy Surfaces. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5 (10), 2702-2716

  35. [43]

    M.; Chernyak, V .; Mukamel, S., Excitonic couplings and electronic coherence in bridged naphthalene dimers

    Tretiak, S.; Zhang, W. M.; Chernyak, V .; Mukamel, S., Excitonic couplings and electronic coherence in bridged naphthalene dimers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96 (23), 13003-13008

  36. [44]

    Ambrosek, D.; Köhn, A.; Schulze, J.; Kühn, O., Quantum Chemical Parametrization and Spectroscopi c Characterization of the Frenkel Exciton Hamiltonian for a J-Aggregate Forming Perylene Bisimide Dye. J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116 (46), 11451-11458

  37. [45]

    Rego, L. G. C.; Batista, V . S., Quantum dynamics simulations of interfacial electron transfer in sensitized TiO2 semiconductors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125 (26), 7989-7997

  38. [46]

    Futera, Z.; Blumberger, J., Electronic Couplings for Charge Transfer across Molecule/Metal and Molecule/Semiconductor Interfaces: Performance of the Projector Operator-Based Diabatization Approach. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121 (36), 19677 - 19689

  39. [47]

    Wu, Q.; V an V oorhis, T., Direct Optimization Method to Study Constrained Systems within Density-Functional Theory . Phys. Rev. A 2005, 72 (2), 024502

  40. [48]

    Oberhofer, H.; Blumberger, J., Electronic coupling matrix elements from charge constrained density functional theory calculations using a plane wave basis set. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133 (24), 244105

  41. [49]

    V ., Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics with Tight-Binding Fragment Molecular Orbitals

    Akimov , A. V ., Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics with Tight-Binding Fragment Molecular Orbitals. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12 (12), 5719-5736

  42. [50]

    J Mater Chem A 2018, 6 (25), 11985-11993

    He, F.; Cheng, C.; Geng, H.; Yi, Y .; Shuai, Z., Effect of donor length on electronic structures and charge transport polarity for DTDPP -based D -A copolymers: a computational study based on a super-exchange model. J Mater Chem A 2018, 6 (25), 11985-11993

  43. [51]

    Holmberg, N.; Laasonen, K., Efficient Constrained Density Functional Theory Implementation for Simulation of Condensed Phase Electron Transfer Reactions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13 (2), 587-601

  44. [52]

    WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2014, 4 (1), 15-25

    Hutter, J.; Iannuzzi, M.; Schiffmann, F.; V andeV ondele, J., cp2k: atomistic simulations of condensed matter systems. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2014, 4 (1), 15-25

  45. [53]

    M.; Rungger, I.; Pemmaraju, C

    Souza, A. M.; Rungger, I.; Pemmaraju, C. D.; Schwingenschloegl, U.; Sanvito, S., Constrained-DFT method for accurate energy -level alignment of metal /molecule interfaces. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88 (16), 165112

  46. [54]

    B.; Brawand, N

    Goldey , M. B.; Brawand, N. P.; Vörös, M.; Galli, G., Charge Transport in Nanostructured Materials: Implementation and V erification of Constrained Density Functional Theory . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13 (6), 2581-2590

  47. [55]

    A.; Ali, S.; Fronzi, M.; Kianinia, M.; Tran, T

    Tawfik, S. A.; Ali, S.; Fronzi, M.; Kianinia, M.; Tran, T. T.; Stampfl, C.; Aharonovich, I.; Toth, M.; Ford, M. J., First -principles investigation of quantum 26 emission from hBN defects. Nanoscale 2017, 9 (36), 13575-13582

  48. [56]

    Ö.; Mortensen, J

    Melander, M.; Jónsson, E. Ö.; Mortensen, J. J.; V egge, T.; García Lastra, J. M., Implementation of Constrained DFT for Computing Charge Transfer Rates within the Projector Augmented Wave Method. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12 (11), 5367- 5378

  49. [57]

    B., Theoretical study of ultrafast heterogeneous electron transfer reactions at dye-semiconductor interfaces: Coumarin 343 at titanium oxide

    Kondov , I.; Thoss, M.; Wang, H. B., Theoretical study of ultrafast heterogeneous electron transfer reactions at dye-semiconductor interfaces: Coumarin 343 at titanium oxide. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110 (4), 1364-1374

  50. [58]

    B., Theoretical study of ultrafast heterogeneous electron transfer reactions at dye-semiconductor interfaces

    Thoss, M.; Kondov , I.; Wang, H. B., Theoretical study of ultrafast heterogeneous electron transfer reactions at dye-semiconductor interfaces. Chem. Phys. 2004, 304 (1- 2), 169-181

  51. [59]

    S.; Köppel, H., Approximately Diabatic States from Block Diagonalization of the Electr onic Hamiltonian

    Pacher, T.; Cederbaum, L. S.; Köppel, H., Approximately Diabatic States from Block Diagonalization of the Electr onic Hamiltonian. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 89 (12), 7367-7381

  52. [60]

    S., Quasidiabatic States from Abinitio Calculations by Block Diagonalization of the Electronic Hamiltonian - Use of Frozen Orbitals

    Pacher, T.; Köppel, H.; Cederbaum, L. S., Quasidiabatic States from Abinitio Calculations by Block Diagonalization of the Electronic Hamiltonian - Use of Frozen Orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95 (9), 6668-6680

  53. [61]

    G., The Direct Calculation of Diabatic States Based on Configurational Uniformity

    Nakamura, H.; Truhlar, D. G., The Direct Calculation of Diabatic States Based on Configurational Uniformity . J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115 (22), 10353-10372

  54. [62]

    Domcke, W.; Woywod, C.; Stengle, M., Diabatic CASSCF Orbitals and Wave - Functions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 226 (3-4), 257-262

  55. [63]

    J., A Quantum-Chemical Determination of Diabatic States

    Ruedenberg, K.; Atchity , G. J., A Quantum-Chemical Determination of Diabatic States. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99 (5), 3799-3803

  56. [64]

    Tamura, H., Diabatization for Time -Dependent Density Functional Theory: Exciton Transfers and Related Conical Intersections. J. Phys. Chem. A 2016, 120 (46), 9341-9347

  57. [65]

    Polkehn, M.; Eisenbrandt, P.; Tamura, H.; Burghardt, I., Quantum dynamical studies of ultrafast charge separation in nanostructured organic polymer materials: Effects of vibronic interactions and molecular packing. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2018, 118 (1), e25502

  58. [66]

    Jiang, S.; Zheng, J.; Yi, Y .; Xie, Y .; Y uan, F.; Lan, Z., Ultrafast Excited-State Energy Transfer in DTDCTB Dimers Embedded in a Crystal Environment: Quantum Dynamics with the Multilayer Multiconfigurational Time-Dependent Hartree Method. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121 (49), 27...

  59. [67]

    B.; Thoss, M., Multilayer formulation of the multiconfiguration time - dependent Hartree theory

    Wang, H. B.; Thoss, M., Multilayer formulation of the multiconfiguration time - dependent Hartree theory . J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119 (3), 1289-1299

  60. [68]

    Tanimura, Y ., Stochastic Lionville, Langevin, Fokker-Planck, and master equation approaches to quantum dissipative systems. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2006, 75 (8), 082001

  61. [69]

    Xu, R.-X.; Cui, P.; Li, X.-Q.; Mo, Y .; Y an, Y ., Exact quantum master equation via the calculus on path integrals. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122 (4), 041103

  62. [70]

    P.; Zheng, R

    Chen, L. P.; Zheng, R. H.; Shi, Q.; Y an, Y . J., Optical Line Shapes of Molecular Aggregates: Hierarchical Equations of Motion Method. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131 (9), 27 094502

  63. [71]

    E., Projector Augmented-Wave Method

    Blochl, P. E., Projector Augmented-Wave Method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50 (24), 17953-17979

  64. [72]

    Kresse, G.; Joubert, D., From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59 (3), 1758-1775

  65. [73]

    Kang, J.; Tongay , S.; Zhou, J.; Li, J.; Wu, J., Band offsets and heterostructures of two-dimensional semiconductors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102 (1), 012111

  66. [74]

    M.; Cho, K., Band alignment of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides: Application in tunnel field effect transistors

    Gong, C.; Zhang, H.; Wang, W.; Colombo, L.; Wallace, R. M.; Cho, K., Band alignment of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides: Application in tunnel field effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103 (5), 053513

  67. [75]

    V ., Electronic structures and optical properties of realistic transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures from first principles

    Komsa, H.-P.; Krasheninnikov , A. V ., Electronic structures and optical properties of realistic transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88 (8), 085318

  68. [76]

    Kośmider, K.; Fernández-Rossier, J., Electronic properties of the MoS${}_{2}$ - WS${}_{2}$ heterojunction. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87 (7), 075451

  69. [77]

    S.; Eda, G.; Li, L

    Chhowalla, M.; Shin, H. S.; Eda, G.; Li, L. J.; Loh, K. P.; Zhang, H., The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition meta l dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5 (4), 263-275

  70. [78]

    F.; Lee, C.; Hone, J.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T

    Mak, K. F.; Lee, C.; Hone, J.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T. F., Atomically Thin ${\mathrm{MoS}}_{2}$: A New Direct-Gap Semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105 (13), 136805

  71. [79]

    Y .; da Jorna da, F

    Qiu, D. Y .; da Jorna da, F. H.; Louie, S. G., Optical Spectrum of ${\mathrm{MoS}}_{2}$: Many-Body Effects and Diversity of Exciton States. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111 (21), 216805

  72. [80]

    L.; Krivosheeva, A.; Shaposhnikov , V .; Borisenko, V .; Gusakov , V .; Tay , B

    Gusakova, J.; Wang, X.; Shiau, L. L.; Krivosheeva, A.; Shaposhnikov , V .; Borisenko, V .; Gusakov , V .; Tay , B. K., Electronic Properties of Bulk and Monolayer TMDs: Theoretical Study Within DFT Framework (GVJ -2e Method). Phys. Status Solidi A 2017, 214 (12), 1700218

  73. [81]

    Terrones, H.; López-Urías, F.; Terrones, M., Novel hetero-layered materials wit h tunable direct band gaps by sandwiching different metal disulfides and diselenides. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3 (3), 1549

  74. [82]

    H., Exciton band structure of monolayer ${\mathrm{MoS}}_{2}$

    Wu, F.; Qu, F.; MacDonald, A. H., Exciton band structure of monolayer ${\mathrm{MoS}}_{2}$. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91 (7), 075310

  75. [83]

    R.; Zhang, K.; Glazov , M.; Urbaszek, B.; Amand, T.; Ji, Z

    Zhu, C. R.; Zhang, K.; Glazov , M.; Urbaszek, B.; Amand, T.; Ji, Z. W.; Liu, B. L.; Marie, X., Exciton valley dynamics probed by Kerr rotation in ${\mathrm{WSe}}_{2}$ monolayers. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 90 (16), 161302

  76. [84]

    Dal Conte, S.; Bottegoni, F.; Pogna, E. A. A.; De Fazio, D.; Ambrogio, S.; Bargigia, I.; D'Andrea, C.; Lombardo, A.; Bruna, M.; Ciccacci, F.; Ferrari, A. C.; Cerullo, G.; Finazzi, M., Ultrafast valley relaxation dynamics in monolayer ${\mathrm{MoS}}_{2}$ probed by nonequilibri...

  77. [85]

    G.; Kim, K

    Mai, C.; Barrette, A.; Y u, Y .; Semenov , Y . G.; Kim, K. W.; Cao, L.; Gundogdu, K., 28 Many-Body Effects in V alleytronics: Direct Measurement of V alley Lifetimes in Single-Layer MoS2. Nano Lett. 2014, 14 (1), 202-206

  78. [86]

    G.; Barrette, A.; Y u, Y .; Jin, Z.; Cao, L.; Kim, K

    Mai, C.; Semenov , Y . G.; Barrette, A.; Y u, Y .; Jin, Z.; Cao, L.; Kim, K. W.; Gundogdu, K., Exciton valley relaxation in a single layer of ${\mathrm{WS}}_{2}$ measured by ultrafast spectroscopy . Phys. Rev. B 2014, 90 (4), 041414

  79. [87]

    Kubas, A.; Hoffmann, F.; Heck, A.; Oberhofer, H.; Elstner, M.; Blumberger, J., Electronic couplings for molecular charge transfer: Benchmarking CDFT, FODFT, and FODFTB against high-level ab initio calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140 (10), 104105

  80. [88]

    Stock, G.; Thoss, M., Classical Description of Nonadiabatic Quantum Dynamics. Adv. Chem. Phys. 2005, 131, 243-375

  81. [89]

    B.; Sun, X.; Miller, W

    Wang, H. B.; Sun, X.; Miller, W. H., Semiclassical approximations for the calculation of thermal rate constants for chemical reactions in complex molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108 (23), 9726-9736

  82. [90]

    Kim, H.; Nassimi, A.; Kapral, R., Quantum -classical Liouville dynamics in the mapping basis. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129 (8), 084102

  83. [91]

    Stroppa, A.; Kresse, G., The shortcomings of semi -local and hybrid functionals: what we can learn from surface science studies. New J. Phys. 2008, 10 (6), 063020

  84. [92]

    Kresse, G.; Hafner, J., Ab-Initio Molecular-Dynamics for Open -Shell Transitio n- Metals. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 48 (17), 13115-13118

  85. [93]

    Kresse, G.; Hafner, J., Ab -Initio Molecular-Dynamics Simulation of the Liquid - Metal Amorphous-Semiconductor Transition in Germanium. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49 (20), 14251-14269

  86. [94]

    Grimme, S., Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long- range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27 (15), 1787-1799

  87. [95]

    L.; Luo, Y ., Simulation of inelastic electronic tunneling spectra of adsorbates from first principles

    Ren, H.; Y ang, J. L.; Luo, Y ., Simulation of inelastic electronic tunneling spectra of adsorbates from first principles. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130 (13), 134707

  88. [96]

    The Pietas Code, see https://github.com/renh/pietas; 2017

    Ren, H. The Pietas Code, see https://github.com/renh/pietas; 2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.