Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 49 references

Exceptional Lines and Excitation of (Nearly) Double-Pole Quasinormal Modes: A Semi-Analytic Study in the Nariai Black Hole

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Ringdown modes degrade along a whole curve, not just isolated points

desk verdict A clean analytic Nariai toy model for a QNM exceptional line, with a real gap: the EL is only established at leading order in h, and the paper uses h=0.1 without estimating corrections. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.00704 v2 pith:WRDZE2F7 submitted 2026-01-02 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th

Nao Nakamoto , Naritaka Oshita This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-th
keywords exceptionalpointslinequasinormalmodesdouble-poleNariailimitmassivescalarfieldblackholeringdownPöschl-Tellerpotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that, for a massive scalar field around a rotating black hole with a positive cosmological constant in the near-coincident-horizon (Nariai) limit, the prograde and retrograde quasinormal-mode frequencies coincide along a one-dimensional curve in the plane of black-hole spin and scalar-field mass—an exceptional line, not just isolated exceptional points. Using the exact solvability of the reduced radial equation, it derives closed-form excitation amplitudes showing that the double-pole degeneracy produces a transient linear-growth term t e^{-iωt} in the ringdown. It also shows that although individual mode amplitudes diverge at the degeneracy, their superposition remains finite, so the observable ringdown is stable. Two explicit conditions are derived under which the linear-growth term dominates the early part of the ringdown, and the paper argues these conditions apply to any system with nearly double-pole quasinormal modes. This matters because an exceptional line removes one axis of fine-tuning needed to observe double-pole excitation: the degeneracy can be reached by tuning one parameter while the other follows the line.

What carries the argument

The engine is the reduction of the massive-scalar radial equation, to order h^2 in the Nariai limit, to an exactly solvable scattering problem with the sech-squared (Pöschl-Teller) potential V0/cosh^2(κ_h r*). In this reduction the QNM frequencies take the closed form ω_n^{±}=mΩ_h+κ_h[±√(V0/κ_h^2 − 1/4) − i(n+1/2)], and the excitation factors are ratios of Gamma functions. Setting the square root to zero (β=−1/2) makes two Gamma functions diverge, which is the exceptional-point condition; the divergence is the double pole. The separation constant entering V0 is obtained from a continued-fraction solution of the angular equation, which is why the condition becomes a curve rather than a point

What would settle it

Compute the prograde and retrograde fundamental QNM frequencies from the full radial equation without the Nariai truncation at, say, a=0.5 and h=0.1, scanning μ across the predicted exceptional-line value μ≈0.17211. If the two complex frequencies do not cross on the imaginary axis, or if a closed loop around the predicted line does not swap the modes, the leading-order exceptional line is an artifact of the PT reduction. A simpler check is to evaluate δω from the full numerical frequencies and test whether the analytic condition δω << ω_G still holds at the same μ.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the quasinormal-mode degeneracy in this system is not an isolated accident: the equation ω_n^+ = ω_n^- for the monopole sector (k=j=m=0) is solvable for the scalar mass μ at each allowed spin a, so the exceptional points form a continuous set—an exceptional line—in the (a, μ) plane. At such a point, the two modes coalesce into a double pole, and the Green's function residue contains a term proportional to t e^{-iω_EP t}. The paper computes this residue analytically in the Nariai limit, verifies that excitation factors diverge while the reconstructed ringdown stays stable, and demonstrates the square-root branch-point structure by showing that a closed loop aroun

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the leading-order Nariai reduction—replacing the radial potential by V0/cosh^2(κ_h r*) at order h^2—preserves the exact degeneracy structure; if O(h^2) corrections in the full radial equation lift the double pole, the exceptional line exists only exactly at h=0 rather than for the near-Nariai configurations with h=0.1 used in the figures.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A continuous exceptional line in the (spin, mass) plane means double-pole quasinormal modes can be reached with one less fine-tuning step: tune one parameter and the other is determined by the line.
  • Near the line, individual excitation factors diverge but the superposed ringdown amplitude stays finite; the observable signature is a transient linear growth rather than an instability.
  • The conditions δω << ω_G and q ≳ 1 give a testable, parameter-independent criterion for when the t e^{-iω t} term dominates the early ringdown in any system with nearly double-pole modes.
  • Encircling the exceptional line in complex mass space swaps prograde and retrograde modes, giving a topological signature of the square-root branch point that could be searched for in mode-tracking studies.
  • The same exceptional-line structure appears in five-dimensional rotating black holes, extending the result beyond four spacetime dimensions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the leading-order degeneracy survives finite-h corrections, then for a near-Nariai black hole the exceptional line is a genuine one-dimensional locus in physical parameter space; a direct numerical scan of the full radial equation at h=0.1 would settle this, since the paper only analyses the leading-order PT reduction.
  • The analytic conditions should transfer to tabletop non-Hermitian experiments (e.g., coupled-resonator or optical systems) where sech-squared potentials and exceptional points are engineered, providing an analogue test of black-hole ringdown stability.
  • The reduction's dependence on the monopole sector suggests the exceptional line may be special to k=j=m=0; a natural extension is to ask whether higher-ℓ or gravitational perturbations acquire similar lines in other effective potentials, since the paper finds none in the investigated parameter range.
  • The quantity q could be measured in time-domain ringdown fitting with a linear-growth template and compared with the analytic values tabulated in the paper, validating whether the dominance condition holds in a full numerical evolution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies massive scalar-field quasinormal modes (QNMs) of Myers-Perry-de Sitter black holes in the Nariai limit. It reduces the radial perturbation equation to a Pöschl-Teller (PT) equation at leading order in h = r_c - r_h, obtains closed-form QNM frequencies and excitation factors, and shows that for k=j=m=0 the prograde and retrograde modes coalesce when V0/κ_h^2 = 1/4. The paper interprets the resulting locus in the (a, μ) parameter space as an exceptional line (EL), computes the double-pole residue in the Green's function, and identifies the resulting t e^{-iω t} transient linear growth. It also derives conditions (66) and (71) for this linear growth to dominate the early ringdown, demonstrates destructive excitation and ringdown stability near the EP, and extends the analysis to d=5.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides one of the few analytically controlled examples of an exceptional line in black-hole QNM spectra, with explicit excitation factors, a closed-form Green's function, and a concrete prediction for a linear-growth term in the ringdown. The derivation of the double-pole residue and the general conditions for linear-growth dominance are valuable and go beyond existing numerical studies. The use of the exactly solvable PT potential and gamma-function expressions is a clear strength. The main limitation is that the EL and the associated quantitative predictions are established only in the leading-order Nariai reduction; the validity at the finite value h=0.1 used in the figures is not controlled.

major comments (2)
  1. [§II C, Eq. (18); §III C, Figs. 3–7] Equation (18) is obtained from the full radial equation (11) by retaining only the O(h^2) term of Δ_r and discarding the terms involving Δ_r Δ'_r in the square bracket. After the prefactor Δ_r/(r^2+a^2)^2, those discarded terms are O(h^3), so they correct V0/κ_h^2 at O(h). The EP condition V0/κ_h^2 = 1/4 and the EL in Fig. 7 are computed from this leading-order V0, while the figures take h=0.1. No estimate is given for the O(h) shift of the EP, nor is it shown that the degeneracy survives (rather than becoming an avoided crossing) in the full equation. The strict h→0 limit is safe, but the near-Nariai claims and the quantitative predictions at h=0.1 are not established. Please either restrict the claims to h→0, or supplement with a next-order computation or a numerical solution of the full Eq. (11) for representative points on the EL.
  2. [§IV, Eqs. (66)–(72); Table II] The conditions for dominant linear growth are derived from a local two-mode expansion and use the identification ω_G = κ_h for the characteristic variation scale of A_out/A_in. For a ≠ 0, the angular eigenvalue A_kjm(ω) depends on ω through the continued fraction (34), which introduces an additional frequency scale; the identification ω_G = κ_h is not automatic in the spinning case. The numerical verification of the conditions in Table II and Fig. 11 is restricted to a=0. The paper should either state explicitly that the quantitative verification applies only to the non-spinning case, or compute q and δω/ω_G for representative spinning EL points to support the claim that the conditions apply to the a>0 EL.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] Typographical spacing: "rc−r h→ 0" should be "r_c - r_h → 0".
  2. [§V and Fig. 12] There is an inconsistency in the value of μ for case (a): Table II lists μ = 1/6 + 10^{-6}, while the text and Fig. 12 caption state μ = 1/6 + 10^{-10}. Please correct the discrepancy.
  3. [Table I caption] Typo: "ferquencies" should be "frequencies".
  4. [Eq. (62)] For d=4, the separation constant is written as A_kjm = (2k+m)(2k+m+1). It would be clearer to note explicitly that j=0 in four dimensions, since the general formula (36) includes j.
  5. [Fig. 7 caption] The caption says the EL exists "without the need for fine-tuning"; this is overstated in view of the Nariai-limit fine-tuning that the paper acknowledges in Sec. V. Consider qualifying the caption.
  6. [§III B, Eq. (57)] The sign convention for h_E in Eq. (57) differs from Eq. (47) by an overall factor of -i. This is harmless for |h_E|, but the convention should be stated to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the EL and double-pole excitation conditions are solved analytically from the Nariai-limit PT reduction, not fitted or imported from self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central chain is self-contained: the MP-dS metric and Klein-Gordon equation are reduced in the Nariai limit to the PT radial equation (18), whose Green's function and QNM frequencies are obtained in closed form (36)-(38). The EP/EL condition is the algebraic condition sqrt(V0/kappa_h^2 - 1/4)=0, and the EL in the (a, mu) plane follows by solving V0/kappa_h^2 = 1/4 together with the angular eigenvalue condition, not by fitting to the phenomenon. The excitation factors, divergences at the EP, and the t e^{-i omega t} linear-growth term are derived from residues of the analytic Green's function, and the stability/ringdown behavior is demonstrated by explicit reconstruction in Figs. 4-5. The self-citations [22,23,27] are used for context and interpretation (excitation factors, destructive interference, ringdown stability), but the corresponding statements are rederived in the PT model (e.g., Eqs. (49)-(52)) or are independent standard results; the conclusions do not reduce to those papers. The main caveat is the leading-order Nariai/h truncation in Eq. (18), with higher-order terms in Eq. (11) not estimated for the h=0.1 figures; this is a modeling/approximation limitation that could shift or split the leading-order EP, but it is not circularity in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central existence claim introduces no fit parameters: μ and a are physical parameters, and the EP curve μ_EP(a) is solved from the analytic condition V0/κ_h^2=1/4 (plus the numerical angular eigenvalue). h=0.1 is an illustrative value for plots. No new particles/forces/entities are introduced. The main external postulates are the leading-order Nariai reduction and the standard PT/Heun technology, listed as axioms.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Leading-order Nariai reduction: the full radial Eq. (11) is approximated by the PT equation (18) with V0/cosh^2(κ_h r*), dropping O(h^2) and higher terms.
    Everything analytic (QNM formula Eq. (38), EP condition) follows from this replacement; finite-h corrections are not estimated.
  • standard math Exact scattering solution for PT potential: hypergeometric representation of in/out modes and reflection amplitudes (36) from Refs [2, 40].
    Standard result; used to build the Green's function and excitation factors.
  • domain assumption The angular eigenvalue A_kjm is obtained by solving the three-term continued fraction (34) from the Heun equation (21); for a≠0 this is numerical.
    EL curve for a>0 depends on this; no error bounds are stated.
  • domain assumption For m=0 (axisymmetric scalar), the separation constants satisfy A^-_n = (A^+_n)^* and are real, so the EP condition reduces to V0/κ_h^2 = 1/4.
    Used in Appendix B to justify setting β=-1/2; assumed valid for the modes explored.
  • standard math QNM boundary condition A_in(ω)=0 selects a discrete complex spectrum; the Green's function poles are simple zeros except at the EP.
    Standard definition of QNMs; used throughout Sec. III.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exceptional Lines and Excitation of (Nearly) Double-Pole Quasinormal Modes: A Semi-Analytic Study in the Nariai Black Hole." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WRDZE2F7

@misc{pith2026260100704,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exceptional Lines and Excitation of (Nearly) Double-Pole Quasinormal Modes: A Semi-Analytic Study in the Nariai Black Hole},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WRDZE2F7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.00704}
}
abstract

We show that quasinormal modes (QNMs) of a massive scalar field in Kerr-de Sitter and Myers-Perry black holes exhibit an exceptional line (EL), which is a continuous set of exceptional points (EPs) in parameter space, at which two QNM frequencies and their associated solutions coincide. We find that the EL appears in the parameter space spanned by the scalar mass and the black hole spin parameter, and also in the Nariai limit, i.e., $r_{\rm c} - r_{\rm h} \to 0$, where $r_{\rm c}$ and $r_{\rm h}$ denote the radii of the cosmological and black hole horizons, respectively. We analytically study the amplitudes or excitation factors of QNMs near the EL. Such an analytic treatment becomes possible since, in the Nariai limit, the perturbation equation reduces to a wave equation with the P\"{o}schl-Teller (PT) potential. We discuss the destructive excitation of QNMs and the stability of the ringdown near and at the EL. The transient linear growth of QNMs -- a characteristic excitation pattern near an EP or EL -- together with the conditions under which this linear growth dominates the early ringdown, is also studied analytically. Our conditions apply to a broad class of systems that involve the excitation of (nearly) double-pole QNMs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.00704 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Schematic picture of BH parameter trajectories [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Phase space of the MP-dS BH with a single rotation and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Transient linear growth at the EP. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The exceptional line (EL) in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Trajectories of QNMs associated with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: The fundamental prograde and retrograde [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: The exceptional line (EL) in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 37 linked inside Pith

  1. [30]

    Panosso Macedo, T

    R. Panosso Macedo, T. Katagiri, K.-i. Kubota, and H. Motohashi, (2025), arXiv:2512.02110 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058

    arXiv 1999

  3. [2]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2009

  4. [3]

    Bertiet al., (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    E. Bertiet al., (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  5. [4]

    Nollert, Phys

    H.-P. Nollert, Phys. Rev. D53, 4397 (1996), arXiv:gr- qc/9602032

    arXiv 1996

  6. [5]

    Barausse, V

    E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D89, 104059 (2014), arXiv:1404.7149 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2014

  7. [6]

    J. L. Jaramillo, R. Panosso Macedo, and L. Al Sheikh, Phys. Rev. X11, 031003 (2021), arXiv:2004.06434 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [7]

    J. L. Jaramillo, R. Panosso Macedo, and L. A. Sheikh, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 211102 (2022), arXiv:2105.03451 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

Show all 49 references
  1. [8]

    M. H.-Y. Cheung, K. Destounis, R. P. Macedo, E. Berti, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 111103 (2022), arXiv:2111.05415 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, M. H.-Y. Cheung, F. Di Filippo, F. Duque, P. Martens, and S. Mukohyama, Phys. Rev. D106, 084011 (2022), arXiv:2205.08547 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [10]

    O. J. C. Dias, M. Godazgar, J. E. Santos, G. Carullo, W. Del Pozzo, and D. Laghi, Phys. Rev. D105, 084044 (2022), arXiv:2109.13949 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Davey, O

    A. Davey, O. J. C. Dias, P. Rodgers, and J. E. Santos, JHEP07, 086 (2022), arXiv:2203.13830 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [12]

    O. J. C. Dias, M. Godazgar, and J. E. Santos, JHEP07, 076 (2022), arXiv:2205.13072 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Davey, O

    A. Davey, O. J. C. Dias, and J. E. Santos, JHEP12, 101 (2023), arXiv:2305.11216 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [14]

    J. P. Cavalcante, M. Richartz, and B. C. da Cunha, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 261401 (2024), arXiv:2407.20850 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [15]

    E. W. Leaver, Phys. Rev. D34, 384 (1986)

    1986

  9. [16]

    Sun and R

    Y. Sun and R. H. Price, Phys. Rev. D38, 1040 (1988)

    1988

  10. [17]

    Andersson, Phys

    N. Andersson, Phys. Rev. D51, 353 (1995). 16

    1995

  11. [18]

    Glampedakis and N

    K. Glampedakis and N. Andersson, Phys. Rev. D64, 104021 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0103054

    2001 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Glampedakis and N

    K. Glampedakis and N. Andersson, Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 3441 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0304030

    2003 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Berti and V

    E. Berti and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D74, 104020 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0605118

    2006 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Zhang, E

    Z. Zhang, E. Berti, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D88, 044018 (2013), arXiv:1305.4306 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Oshita, Phys

    N. Oshita, Phys. Rev. D104, 124032 (2021), arXiv:2109.09757 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Oshita and V

    N. Oshita and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D111, 104043 (2025), arXiv:2407.02563 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  17. [24]

    R. K. L. Lo, L. Sabani, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D 111, 124002 (2025), arXiv:2504.00084 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Della Rocca, L

    M. Della Rocca, L. Pezzella, E. Berti, L. Gualtieri, and A. Maselli, (2025), arXiv:2512.07959 [gr-qc]

    2025

  19. [26]

    hysteresis

    and diverge at the degeneracy of two modes. Never- theless, time-domain ringdown waveforms are insensitive or stable with respect to pseudospectral effects [4–7, 9] FIG. 1: Schematic picture of BH parameter trajectories (black arrows) in a relevant parameter space spanned by, ...

    2026 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Motohashi, Phys

    H. Motohashi, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 141401 (2025), arXiv:2407.15191 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Oshita, E

    N. Oshita, E. Berti, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 031401 (2025), arXiv:2503.21276 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Y. Yang, E. Berti, and N. Franchini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 201401 (2025), arXiv:2504.06072 [gr-qc]

    2025

  23. [31]

    Cao, M.-F

    L.-M. Cao, M.-F. Ji, L.-B. Wu, and Y.-S. Zhou, (2025), arXiv:2511.17067 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Nariai, The Science Reports of the Tôhoku University Series I,34, 160 (1950)

    H. Nariai, The Science Reports of the Tôhoku University Series I,34, 160 (1950)

    1950

  25. [33]

    Pöschl and E

    G. Pöschl and E. Teller, Zeitschrift für Physik83, 143 (1933)

    1933

  26. [34]

    Shu and Y.-G

    F.-W. Shu and Y.-G. Shen, Phys. Rev. D70, 084046 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0410108

    2004 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Cardoso and J

    V. Cardoso and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. D67, 084020 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0301078

    2003 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Ponglertsakul and B

    S. Ponglertsakul and B. Gwak, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 1023 (2020), arXiv:2007.16108 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Kodama, R

    H. Kodama, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D79, 044003 (2009), arXiv:0812.0445 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Boonserm, A

    P. Boonserm, A. Chatrabhuti, T. Ngampitipan, and M. Visser, J. Math. Phys.55, 112502 (2014), arXiv:1405.5678 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Cornell, H

    A. Cornell, H. T. Cho, J. Doukas, and W. Naylor, in 19th Workshop on General Relativity and Gravitation in Japan(2009)

    2009

  32. [40]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and M. Casals, Phys. Rev. D73, 024013 (2006), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 73, 109902 (2006)], arXiv:gr-qc/0511111

    2006 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Ferrari and B

    V. Ferrari and B. Mashhoon, Phys. Rev. D30, 295 (1984)

    1984

  34. [42]

    H. T. Cho, A. S. Cornell, J. Doukas, and W. Naylor, Phys. Rev. D80, 064022 (2009), arXiv:0904.1867 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Suzuki, E

    H. Suzuki, E. Takasugi, and H. Umetsu, Prog. Theor. Phys.100, 491 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9805064

    1998 arXiv

  36. [44]

    E. W. Leaver, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A402, 285 (1985)

    1985

  37. [45]

    Kuntz, (2025), arXiv:2510.17954 [gr-qc]

    A. Kuntz, (2025), arXiv:2510.17954 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Casals, S

    M. Casals, S. R. Dolan, A. C. Ottewill, and B. Wardell, Phys. Rev. D79, 124043 (2009), arXiv:0903.0395 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun,Handbook of Mathemat- ical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables(Dover, New York, 1972)

    1972

  40. [48]

    W. D. Heiss, J. Phys. A45, 444016 (2012), arXiv:1210.7536 [quant-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  41. [49]

    J. P. Cavalcante, M. Richartz, and B. C. da Cunha, Phys. Rev. D110, 124064 (2024), arXiv:2408.13964 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.