Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 45 references

Single-Pass, Depth-Selective Reading for Multi-Aspect Sentiment Analysis

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-21 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read DABS performs multi-aspect sentiment analysis in a single Transformer pass by building a shared depth-ordered substrate that each aspect can selectively read from.

desk verdict DABS gets real compute savings for multi-aspect ATSA by selective depth readout after one pass, but the shared substrate may not adapt enough when aspects conflict. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.20998 v1 pith:WRKYIVIB submitted 2026-05-20 cs.CL cs.AI

Yan Xia , Zhuangzhuang Pan , Amirrudin Kamsin , Chee Seng Chan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords aspect-termsentimentanalysismulti-aspectsentencestransformerefficiencysingle-passinferencedepth-selectivereadingATSAbenchmarks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes DABS to address the efficiency-expressiveness tradeoff in aspect-term sentiment analysis for sentences with multiple aspects. Existing approaches either re-encode the sentence for every aspect or use fixed deep representations, both of which are costly or inflexible. DABS encodes the sentence once to create a reusable substrate ordered by Transformer depth. Each aspect then performs lightweight queries to select relevant tokens and abstraction levels from this shared resource. This separation allows competitive accuracy on standard benchmarks while cutting computation substantially when multiple aspects are present.

What carries the argument

The depth-ordered substrate created by a single forward pass through the Transformer, which serves as a queryable resource for aspect-specific selective reading of tokens and abstraction levels.

What would settle it

An experiment showing that aspect-specific selective readout from the single-pass substrate yields substantially lower accuracy than full per-aspect re-encoding on the same benchmarks.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

DABS is a single-pass inference framework that encodes each sentence once to construct a reusable, depth-ordered substrate. Each aspect then queries this shared representation to selectively read relevant tokens and abstraction levels without re-encoding the sentence. This decouples the shared sentence encoding from lightweight, aspect-conditioned readout.

Load-bearing premise

A single forward pass through the Transformer produces a reusable, depth-ordered substrate from which aspect-specific selective reading can recover the necessary token and abstraction information without material loss of expressiveness or accuracy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Competitive performance on four ATSA benchmarks while reducing end-to-end computation by up to 60% in multi-aspect settings.
  • Adaptive depth querying proves most beneficial for linguistically complex cases such as negation and contrast.
  • The framework maintains expressiveness by allowing each aspect to select its own relevant information from the shared substrate.
  • End-to-end computation is decoupled into one shared encoding and multiple lightweight readouts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This selective reading strategy could extend to other multi-query settings in NLP where several labels or questions apply to the same input text.
  • By reducing redundant computations, the method may lower energy use in deployed sentiment analysis systems processing many aspects.
  • Further exploration could test whether the depth-ordering property holds across different Transformer architectures or pre-training objectives.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes DABS, a single-pass inference framework for Aspect-Term Sentiment Analysis (ATSA) in multi-aspect sentences. A Transformer encodes the input sentence once to produce a reusable, depth-ordered substrate; each aspect then performs lightweight, aspect-conditioned selective reading over tokens and abstraction levels from this shared representation, avoiding per-aspect re-encoding. On four ATSA benchmarks the method reports competitive accuracy while reducing end-to-end computation by up to 60% when the number of aspects M ≥ 2, with additional gains noted for linguistically complex phenomena such as negation and contrast. Code is released publicly.

Significance. If the central premise holds—that a fixed depth-ordered substrate from one forward pass supplies sufficient information for aspect-specific readout without material loss of expressiveness—the work offers a practical route to lowering inference cost in multi-aspect settings. The public code release supports reproducibility and allows direct verification of the claimed speed-ups. The approach is most relevant to efficiency-critical deployments where multiple aspects must be scored from the same sentence.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2 (Selective Reading Module): the description states that the readout uses lightweight attention or gating over the fixed substrate, yet provides no mechanism for aspect-specific re-contextualization of tokens. When aspects induce opposing polarities (e.g., “great battery but poor screen”), the same token representations must be re-weighted differently per aspect; it is unclear whether the fixed activations plus lightweight readout can perform this adaptation without the re-encoding performed by the baselines.
  2. [§4.3] §4.3 (Experimental Results, Table 2): the 60% end-to-end reduction is reported relative to re-encoding baselines, but the table does not list per-baseline FLOPs or wall-clock times, nor does it report statistical significance (e.g., paired t-tests or bootstrap intervals) across the four benchmarks. Without these, it is difficult to judge whether the efficiency gain is robust or sensitive to post-hoc implementation choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / §1] The abstract and §1 refer to “four ATSA benchmarks” without naming them; the introduction or experimental setup should explicitly list the datasets (e.g., SemEval-2014 Task 4, etc.) for immediate clarity.
  2. [§3.1] Notation for the depth-ordered substrate (e.g., the tensor H_d in Eq. (3)) is introduced without an accompanying diagram; a small schematic showing how depth indices map to layers would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive comments on our work. We address each of the major comments below and outline the revisions we plan to make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Selective Reading Module): the description states that the readout uses lightweight attention or gating over the fixed substrate, yet provides no mechanism for aspect-specific re-contextualization of tokens. When aspects induce opposing polarities (e.g., “great battery but poor screen”), the same token representations must be re-weighted differently per aspect; it is unclear whether the fixed activations plus lightweight readout can perform this adaptation without the re-encoding performed by the baselines.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the need for clearer explanation of aspect-specific adaptation. In the DABS framework, the Selective Reading Module conditions the lightweight attention and gating operations directly on aspect-specific embeddings. This allows the model to dynamically re-weight both individual tokens and different abstraction levels from the shared depth-ordered substrate in an aspect-dependent manner. For instance, in sentences with opposing polarities, the aspect query can emphasize positive or negative cues accordingly. Our analyses on complex linguistic phenomena demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. To address the concern, we will revise §3.2 to include more explicit description of the conditioning mechanism, along with an illustrative example. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.3] §4.3 (Experimental Results, Table 2): the 60% end-to-end reduction is reported relative to re-encoding baselines, but the table does not list per-baseline FLOPs or wall-clock times, nor does it report statistical significance (e.g., paired t-tests or bootstrap intervals) across the four benchmarks. Without these, it is difficult to judge whether the efficiency gain is robust or sensitive to post-hoc implementation choices.

    Authors: We agree that including detailed efficiency metrics and statistical analysis would enhance the presentation of results. We will update Table 2 to report FLOPs and wall-clock times for each baseline method. Furthermore, we will add statistical significance tests, such as paired t-tests or bootstrap intervals, computed across the four benchmarks to confirm the robustness of the reported speed-ups. These additions will be included in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: architectural proposal validated by end-to-end empirical measurements

full rationale

The paper introduces DABS as a new single-pass Transformer framework that encodes the sentence once into a depth-ordered substrate and then performs lightweight aspect-conditioned selective readout. All reported gains (up to 60% computation reduction for M >= 2) are obtained from direct experimental timing and accuracy measurements on four ATSA benchmarks rather than from any fitted parameter that is subsequently renamed as a prediction. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are shown to reduce to their own inputs by construction, and the central premise is not justified solely by self-citation. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained and independent of the target results.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that Transformer layer outputs form an ordered, queryable substrate whose selective use preserves task performance; no free parameters or invented physical entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Transformer depth provides a reusable, ordered set of representations that can be selectively read without re-encoding the sentence.
    Invoked when the paper states that each aspect queries the shared representation to read relevant tokens and abstraction levels.
invented entities (1)
  • depth-ordered substrate
    purpose: Reusable representation constructed from a single forward pass for aspect-conditioned readout.
    New conceptual object introduced to decouple sentence encoding from per-aspect processing.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Single-Pass, Depth-Selective Reading for Multi-Aspect Sentiment Analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WRKYIVIB

@misc{pith2026260520998,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Single-Pass, Depth-Selective Reading for Multi-Aspect Sentiment Analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WRKYIVIB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.20998}
}
read the original abstract

Aspect-Term Sentiment Analysis (ATSA) in multi-aspect sentences faces a fundamental tradeoff between efficiency and expressiveness. Existing models either re-encode the sentence for each aspect or rely on static use of deep representations, leading to redundant computation and limited adaptivity. We argue that Transformer depth is a costly, queryable resource, and propose DABS, a single-pass inference framework that encodes each sentence once to construct a reusable, depth-ordered substrate. Each aspect then queries this shared representation to selectively read relevant tokens and abstraction levels, without re-encoding. This decouples shared sentence encoding from lightweight, aspect-conditioned readout. Experiments on four ATSA benchmarks show that DABS achieves competitive performance while reducing end-to-end computation by up to 60% in multi-aspect settings (M >= 2). Further analyses indicate that adaptive depth querying is most beneficial for linguistically complex cases such as negation and contrast. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/panzhzh/acl-dabs

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20998 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the proposed DABS framework. DORA constructs a shared depth substrate via a single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Single-pass reuse under multi-aspect inference ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Depth allocation under negation. Aggregated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Learned representations and selection behavior. (a) t-SNE of instance embeddings by gold label. (b) Case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L ay A lign: Enhancing Multilingual Reasoning in Large Language Models via Layer-Wise Adaptive Fusion and Alignment Strategy

    Ruan, Zhiwen and Li, Yixia and Zhu, He and Wang, Longyue and Luo, Weihua and Zhang, Kaifu and Chen, Yun and Chen, Guanhua. L ay A lign: Enhancing Multilingual Reasoning in Large Language Models via Layer-Wise Adaptive Fusion and Alignment Strategy. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2025. 2025. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.81

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.81 2025

  2. [2]

    PASTEL : Polarity-Aware Sentiment Triplet Extraction with LLM -as-a-Judge

    Bodke, Aaditya and Kohli, Avinoor Singh and Pardeshi, Hemant Subhash and Bhosale, Prathamesh. PASTEL : Polarity-Aware Sentiment Triplet Extraction with LLM -as-a-Judge. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025. 2025. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1309

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1309 2025

  3. [3]

    Simmering and Paavo Huoviala , title =

    Paul F. Simmering and Paavo Huoviala , title =. CoRR , volume =. 2023 , url =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2310.18025 , eprinttype =. 2310.18025 , timestamp =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.18025 2023

  4. [4]

    and Wen, Lijie

    Fukun Ma and Xuming Hu and Aiwei Liu and Yawen Yang and Shuang Li and Philip S. Yu and Lijie Wen , editor =. AMR-based Network for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis , booktitle =. 2023 , url =. doi:10.18653/V1/2023.ACL-LONG.19 , timestamp =

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.19 2023

  5. [5]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume =

    TextGT: A Double-View Graph Transformer on Text for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis , author =. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume =

    You Only Read Once: Constituency-Oriented Relational Graph Convolutional Network for Multi-Aspect Multi-Sentiment Classification , author =. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Song Jin and Qing He and Yuji Wang and Nisuo Du and Wenjing Lei , title =. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. , volume =. 2025 , url =. doi:10.1016/J.ENGAPPAI.2025.111654 , timestamp =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111654 2025

  8. [8]

    Expert Syst

    Nils Constantin Hellwig and Jakob Fehle and Christian Wolff , title =. Expert Syst. Appl. , volume =. 2025 , url =. doi:10.1016/J.ESWA.2024.125514 , timestamp =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125514 2025

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Siyu Zhang and Hongfang Gong and Lina She , title =. Knowl. Based Syst. , volume =. 2023 , url =. doi:10.1016/J.KNOSYS.2023.110662 , timestamp =

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    Exploring Graph Pre-training for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis

    Bao, Xiaoyi and Wang, Zhongqing and Zhou, Guodong. Exploring Graph Pre-training for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023. 2023. doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.234

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    Zero-Shot Cross-Domain Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis via Domain-Contextualized Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

    Shen, Chuming and Wei, Wei and Wang, Dong and Wang, Zhong-Hao. Zero-Shot Cross-Domain Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis via Domain-Contextualized Chain-of-Thought Reasoning. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025. 2025. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.finding...

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    I nstruct ABSA : Instruction Learning for Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis

    Scaria, Kevin and Gupta, Himanshu and Goyal, Siddharth and Sawant, Saurabh and Mishra, Swaroop and Baral, Chitta. I nstruct ABSA : Instruction Learning for Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for ...

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    CONTRASTE : Supervised Contrastive Pre-training With Aspect-based Prompts For Aspect Sentiment Triplet Extraction

    Mukherjee, Rajdeep and Kannen, Nithish and Pandey, Saurabh and Goyal, Pawan. CONTRASTE : Supervised Contrastive Pre-training With Aspect-based Prompts For Aspect Sentiment Triplet Extraction. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023. 2023. doi:10.1...

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    M v P : Multi-view Prompting Improves Aspect Sentiment Tuple Prediction

    Gou, Zhibin and Guo, Qingyan and Yang, Yujiu. M v P : Multi-view Prompting Improves Aspect Sentiment Tuple Prediction. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023. doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.240

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    Instruction Tuning with Retrieval-based Examples Ranking for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis

    Zheng, Guangmin and Wang, Jin and Yu, Liang-Chih and Zhang, Xuejie. Instruction Tuning with Retrieval-based Examples Ranking for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024. 2024. doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.284

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    i ACOS : Advancing Implicit Sentiment Extraction with Informative and Adaptive Negative Examples

    Xu, Xiancai and Zhang, Jia-Dong and Xiong, Lei and Liu, Zhishang. i ACOS : Advancing Implicit Sentiment Extraction with Informative and Adaptive Negative Examples. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics...

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    Aspect-to-Scope Oriented Multi-view Contrastive Learning for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis

    Chai, Heyan and Yao, Ziyi and Tang, Siyu and Wang, Ye and Nie, Liqiang and Fang, Binxing and Liao, Qing. Aspect-to-Scope Oriented Multi-view Contrastive Learning for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023. 2023. d...

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Pinpointing Diffusion Grid Noise to Enhance Aspect Sentiment Quad Prediction

    Zhu, Linan and Chen, Xiangfan and Guo, Xiaolei and Zhang, Chenwei and Zhu, Zhechao and Zhou, Zehai and Kong, Xiangjie. Pinpointing Diffusion Grid Noise to Enhance Aspect Sentiment Quad Prediction. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024. 2024. doi:1...

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    Investigating the Saliency of Sentiment Expressions in Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis

    Wagner, Joachim and Foster, Jennifer. Investigating the Saliency of Sentiment Expressions in Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023. 2023. doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.807

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    It is Simple Sometimes: A Study On Improving Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis Performance

    Cabello, Laura and Akujuobi, Uchenna. It is Simple Sometimes: A Study On Improving Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis Performance. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024. 2024. doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.394

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    Make Compound Sentences Simple to Analyze: Learning to Split Sentences for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis

    Seo, Yongsik and Song, Sungwon and Heo, Ryang and Kim, Jieyong and Lee, Dongha. Make Compound Sentences Simple to Analyze: Learning to Split Sentences for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024. 2024. doi:10.18653...

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    Span-level Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis via Table Filling

    Zhang, Mao and Zhu, Yongxin and Liu, Zhen and Bao, Zhimin and Wu, Yunfei and Sun, Xing and Xu, Linli. Span-level Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis via Table Filling. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). ...

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    DAGCN : Distance-based and Aspect-oriented Graph Convolutional Network for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis

    Wang, Zhihao and Zhang, Bo and Yang, Ru and Guo, Chang and Li, Maozhen. DAGCN : Distance-based and Aspect-oriented Graph Convolutional Network for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024. 2024. doi:10.18653/v1/2024...

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    L ayer S kip: Enabling Early Exit Inference and Self-Speculative Decoding

    Elhoushi, Mostafa and Shrivastava, Akshat and Liskovich, Diana and Hosmer, Basil and Wasti, Bram and Lai, Liangzhen and Mahmoud, Anas and Acun, Bilge and Agarwal, Saurabh and Roman, Ahmed and Aly, Ahmed and Chen, Beidi and Wu, Carole-Jean. L ayer S kip: Enabling Early Exit Inf...

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    Fast and Robust Early-Exiting Framework for Autoregressive Language Models with Synchronized Parallel Decoding

    Bae, Sangmin and Ko, Jongwoo and Song, Hwanjun and Yun, Se-Young. Fast and Robust Early-Exiting Framework for Autoregressive Language Models with Synchronized Parallel Decoding. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023. doi:1...

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    The Impact of Depth on Compositional Generalization in Transformer Language Models

    Petty, Jackson and Steenkiste, Sjoerd and Dasgupta, Ishita and Sha, Fei and Garrette, Dan and Linzen, Tal. The Impact of Depth on Compositional Generalization in Transformer Language Models. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association fo...

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    Opinion Tree Parsing for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis

    Bao, Xiaoyi and Jiang, Xiaotong and Wang, Zhongqing and Zhang, Yue and Zhou, Guodong. Opinion Tree Parsing for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023. 2023. doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.505

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    Boosting Large Language Models with Continual Learning for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis

    Ding, Xuanwen and Zhou, Jie and Dou, Liang and Chen, Qin and Wu, Yuanbin and Chen, Arlene and He, Liang. Boosting Large Language Models with Continual Learning for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024. 2024. doi...

    2024 doi

  21. [29]

    Efficient Hybrid Generation Framework for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis

    Lv, Haoran and Liu, Junyi and Wang, Henan and Wang, Yaoming and Luo, Jixiang and Liu, Yaxiao. Efficient Hybrid Generation Framework for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis. Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics....

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    2023 , url =

    Qihuang Zhong and Liang Ding and Juhua Liu and Bo Du and Hua Jin and Dacheng Tao , title =. 2023 , url =. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2023.3250499 , timestamp =

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    Expert Syst

    Hongtao Liu and Xin Li and Wanying Lu and Kefei Cheng and Xueyan Liu , title =. Expert Syst. Appl. , volume =. 2024 , url =. doi:10.1016/J.ESWA.2024.123981 , timestamp =

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    Ao Feng and Jiazhi Cai and Zhengjie Gao and Xiaojie Li , title =. J. Big Data , volume =. 2023 , url =. doi:10.1186/S40537-023-00856-8 , timestamp =

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    Xuefeng Shi and Min Hu and Fuji Ren and Piao Shi and Satoshi Nakagawa , title =. Appl. Intell. , volume =. 2024 , url =. doi:10.1007/S10489-024-05492-0 , timestamp =

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    ZhongQuan Jian and Jiajian Li and Qingqiang Wu and Junfeng Yao , title =. Inf. Process. Manag. , volume =. 2024 , url =. doi:10.1016/J.IPM.2023.103539 , timestamp =

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    Bo He and Ruoyu Zhao and Dali Tang , title =. Knowl. Based Syst. , volume =. 2025 , url =. doi:10.1016/J.KNOSYS.2024.112782 , timestamp =

    2025 doi

  28. [36]

    Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis with Syntax-Opinion-Sentiment Reasoning Chain

    Fan, Rui and Li, Shu and He, Tingting and Liu, Yu. Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis with Syntax-Opinion-Sentiment Reasoning Chain. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2025

    2025

  29. [37]

    2025 , issue_date =

    Sun, Xin and Mi, Yongqing and Li, Hongao , title =. 2025 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3721844 , journal =

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis with Explicit Sentiment Augmentations , booktitle =

    Jihong Ouyang and Zhiyao Yang and Silong Liang and Bing Wang and Yimeng Wang and Ximing Li , editor =. Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis with Explicit Sentiment Augmentations , booktitle =. 2024 , url =. doi:10.1609/AAAI.V38I17.29849 , timestamp =

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    Yanyan Wang and Qun Chen and Murtadha H. M. Ahmed and Zhaoqiang Chen and Jing Su and Wei Pan and Zhanhuai Li , title =. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics , volume =. 2023 , url =. doi:10.1162/TACL\_A\_00571 , timestamp =

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    SemEval-2014 Task 4: Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis , booktitle =

    Maria Pontiki and Dimitris Galanis and John Pavlopoulos and Harris Papageorgiou and Ion Androutsopoulos and Suresh Manandhar , editor =. SemEval-2014 Task 4: Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis , booktitle =. 2014 , url =. doi:10.3115/V1/S14-2004 , timestamp =

    2014 doi

  33. [41]

    SemEval-2015 Task 12: Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis , booktitle =

    Maria Pontiki and Dimitris Galanis and Haris Papageorgiou and Suresh Manandhar and Ion Androutsopoulos , editor =. SemEval-2015 Task 12: Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis , booktitle =. 2015 , url =. doi:10.18653/V1/S15-2082 , timestamp =

    2015 doi

  34. [42]

    S em E val-2016 Task 5: Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis

    Pontiki, Maria and Galanis, Dimitris and Papageorgiou, Haris and Androutsopoulos, Ion and Manandhar, Suresh and AL-Smadi, Mohammad and Al-Ayyoub, Mahmoud and Zhao, Yanyan and Qin, Bing and De Clercq, Orph. S em E val-2016 Task 5: Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis. Proceedings of...

    2016 doi

  35. [43]

    Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies,

    Jacob Devlin and Ming. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies,. 2019 , url =. doi:10.18653/V1/N19-1423 , timestamp =

    2019 doi

  36. [44]

    CoRR , volume =

    Yinhan Liu and Myle Ott and Naman Goyal and Jingfei Du and Mandar Joshi and Danqi Chen and Omer Levy and Mike Lewis and Luke Zettlemoyer and Veselin Stoyanov , title =. CoRR , volume =. 2019 , url =. 1907.11692 , timestamp =

    2019 arXiv

  37. [45]

    The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations,

    Pengcheng He and Jianfeng Gao and Weizhu Chen , title =. The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations,. 2023 , url =

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed May 21, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.