REVIEW 1 cited by
Statistically Valid Information Bottleneck via Multiple Hypothesis Testing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The information bottleneck (IB) problem is a widely studied framework in machine learning for extracting compressed features that are informative for downstream tasks. However, current approaches to solving the IB problem rely on a heuristic tuning of hyperparameters, offering no guarantees that the learned features satisfy information-theoretic constraints. In this work, we introduce a statistically valid solution to this problem, referred to as IB via multiple hypothesis testing (IB-MHT), which ensures that the learned features meet the IB constraints with high probability, regardless of the size of the available dataset. The proposed methodology builds on Pareto testing and learn-then-test (LTT), and it wraps around existing IB solvers to provide statistical guarantees on the IB constraints. We demonstrate the performance of IB-MHT on classical and deterministic IB formulations, including experiments on distillation of language models. The results validate the effectiveness of IB-MHT in outperforming conventional methods in terms of statistical robustness and reliability.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Ensuring Reliability via Hyperparameter Selection: Review and Advances
The paper reviews methods that cast hyperparameter selection as multiple hypothesis testing to deliver formal risk guarantees.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.