Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 69 references

Dark Matter Freeze-In during Warm Inflation and the Seesaw Mechanism

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a single U(1)_{B−L} breaking scale can produce the observed dark matter abundance during warm inflation while keeping neutrino masses sub-eV through the inverse seesaw.

desk verdict A readable proof-of-principle connecting WIFI to B-L seesaw, but the warm inflationary background rests on an unspecified dissipative sector. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06778 v1 pith:WUBCOT5E submitted 2024-12-09 hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-th

Rayff de Souza , Jamerson G. Rodrigues , Clarissa Siqueira , Felipe B. M. dos Santos , Jailson Alcaniz This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.COhep-th PACS 95.35.+d98.80.Cq14.60.Pq12.60.Cn
keywords warminflationfreeze-indarkmatterproductioninverseseesawB-LgaugesymmetrysterileneutrinoZ'portalearlyuniversecosmology
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that one extension of the Standard Model can simultaneously explain inflation, the dark matter abundance, and the smallness of neutrino masses. It places the warm-inflation freeze-in (WIFI) mechanism in a U(1)_{B−L} gauge theory with an inverse seesaw, taking the field that breaks B−L as the inflaton and the lightest sterile fermion as dark matter. Matching the observed relic density fixes the cutoff of the DM–bath interaction at around $\Lambda \sim 10^{16}$ to $10^{17}$ GeV, and this cutoff is naturally the B−L breaking scale, which also sets the neutrino mass hierarchy. For 1 GeV and 1 TeV dark matter benchmarks and two dissipation laws, the active neutrinos come out sub-eV while the right-handed neutrinos are very heavy. A sympathetic reader would care because this makes WIFI a concrete, minimal particle-physics scenario rather than a generic mechanism.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective dark-matter–bath operator of mass dimension 6, whose cutoff $\Lambda$ is tied to the B−L breaking scale by $1/\Lambda^2 = Y^q_{B-L} Y^\chi_{B-L} g^2_{B-L}/m^2_{Z'} \propto 1/v_\phi^2$. During warm inflation the bath temperature stays roughly constant instead of falling as $1/a$, so the dark-matter yield is sourced by an integral over e-folds of $T^{2n+4}/(\Lambda^{2n} H)$ rather than by the standard adiabatic freeze-in expression; matching this yield to $\Omega_\chi h^2$ fixes $\Lambda$. The inverse seesaw mass matrix, extended with the term $\mu_N \propto v_\phi$, carries the neutrino side of the argument, making the active neutrino mass doubly suppressed by the same high scale. The two dissipation coefficients, linear $\Upsilon \propto T$ and cubic $\Upsilon \propto T^3/\phi^2$, provide the concrete warm-inflation backgrounds used for the benchmarks.

What would settle it

Compute the full finite-temperature effective potential for an explicit dissipative sector realizing $\Upsilon \propto T$ or $\Upsilon \propto T^3/\phi^2$; if the induced thermal mass for the inflaton exceeds the Hubble scale during the roughly 50 to 60 e-folds, or if the sector forces an inflaton–dark matter coupling, the freeze-in calculation collapses. Observationally, a $Z'$ with $m_{Z'} < T$ would place a point inside the excluded region of the paper's Figure 4 and falsify the WIFI origin for that parameter choice.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated in the conclusions, is that the WIFI mechanism is feasible within a minimal extension of the Standard Model and that it provides a hierarchy of scales compatible with the seesaw mechanism. In the proposed model the B−L breaking scalar is the inflaton, the lightest sterile fermion is dark matter, and the $Z'$ gauge boson mediates a dimension-6 effective operator ($n=2$) that produces dark matter from the warm thermal bath. Matching the final yield to $\Omega_\chi h^2 \simeq 0.120$ fixes the cutoff at values between $7.6 \times 10^{15}$ GeV and $4.5 \times 10^{17}$ GeV for the benchmarks, with $\Lambda \sim v_\phi$. The same $v_\phi$ generates the new term $\mu_N = Y_N v_\phi/\sqrt{2}$ in the inverse seesaw matrix, so active neutrinos acquire sub-eV masses while the right-handed neutrinos become very heavy. The paper concludes that both the observed dark matter density and the small neutrino masses can originate from the spontaneous breaking of B−L during warm inflation.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that a dissipative microphysics exists which sustains the warm thermal bath without coupling the inflaton directly to the dark matter and without generating large thermal corrections to the inflaton potential; if no such sector can be added, the warm-inflation background and the derived dark matter yield do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The observed dark matter abundance fixes $\Lambda \sim v_\phi$ at $10^{16}$ to $10^{17}$ GeV for the benchmark points, so the B−L breaking scale is automatically very high even though the dark matter mass is only 1 GeV to 1 TeV.
  • Active neutrinos come out sub-eV, about $10^{-2}$ eV in the benchmarks, while right-handed neutrinos sit near $10^{14}$ to $10^{15}$ GeV, matching the seesaw expectation.
  • The dark matter relic density is fully produced before the onset of radiation domination, so the WIFI abundance does not depend on the standard reheating history.
  • Direct and indirect dark matter detection rates are strongly suppressed because the dark matter coupling to the bath is set by $\Lambda \sim v_\phi$, far above the weak scale.
  • The model tolerates a wide range of dark matter masses and B−L gauge couplings, with light dark matter requiring larger $g_{B-L}$ to stay above the $m_{Z'} > T$ validity bound.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If an explicit dissipative sector can be constructed without coupling the inflaton to the dark matter or generating large thermal corrections, the same B−L framework would predict a sharp correlation between $m_\chi$, $g_{B-L}$, and $m_{Z'}$ that future collider or direct-detection searches could test.
  • Because WIFI production happens during inflation, the usual freeze-in degeneracy between coupling and dark matter mass is broken; the model effectively predicts the cutoff scale from the relic abundance, which could be checked against independent determinations of the B−L scale from neutrino physics.
  • The authors leave the dissipative sector unspecified; spelling it out is the natural next step, and any concrete realization that produces $\Upsilon \propto T$ or $\Upsilon \propto T^3/\phi^2$ while preserving the WIFI assumptions would allow a first-principles check of the thermal corrections to the inflaton potential.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a concrete realization of "warm inflation freeze-in" (WIFI) by embedding the DM production mechanism of Ref. [28] into a U(1)_{B-L} extension of the SM with an inverse seesaw (ISS) neutrino sector. The B-L breaking scalar phi plays the role of the inflaton with a quartic potential, and the lightest sterile fermion chi is the DM candidate, produced by UV freeze-in through an effective dimension-6 operator mediated by the Z' gauge boson. Using linear (Upsilon ~ T) and cubic (Upsilon ~ T^3/phi^2) dissipation coefficients and weak-dissipative warm inflation with log Q_* = -2, the authors solve the background and Boltzmann equations, match the cutoff scale Lambda to the observed DM abundance for m_chi = 1 GeV and 1 TeV, compute masses in the scalar and neutrino sectors, and map the allowed (m_chi, m_Z') region for four values of g_{B-L}. They conclude that the WIFI mechanism is feasible in this framework while accommodating sub-eV neutrino masses.

Significance. If the framework can be completed, the paper offers an interesting unification of DM genesis, warm inflation, and neutrino mass generation, and it makes explicit quantitative predictions for the required cutoff scale Lambda in the range ~10^16 to 10^17 GeV. The paper is transparent about parameter fitting: the DM abundance fixes Lambda, and the neutrino-sector parameters are adjusted by hand. The main value is therefore as an existence proof in a well-motivated SM extension, provided the assumed dissipative microphysics can be supplied. The Boltzmann and seesaw calculations are standard, and the order-of-magnitude consistency checks (m_Z' > T, sub-eV m_nu) are useful and clearly presented.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.3] The central feasibility assertion in Sec. 5 rests on the warm-inflation backgrounds of Fig. 1, obtained with the linear or cubic dissipation coefficients, but the model specified by Eqs. (3.6)-(3.10) contains no fields that can generate these coefficients: the right-handed neutrinos and Z' are heavier than T, and sigma is weakly coupled. The text explicitly delegates the dissipative sector by stating that the authors stay agnostic about the inflaton interactions responsible for sustaining the thermal bath through dissipation. This is a load-bearing gap, because an explicit completion would introduce light fields coupled to phi, and those fields generically induce thermal corrections delta m_phi^2 ~ g_d^2 T^2 that could spoil the flatness of the very flat quartic potential (lambda_phi ~ 3 x 10^-15). The paper neither exhibits a parameter region where such corrections are small nor shows that the new fields avoid coupling to chi and v_phi. The claims in Sec. 5 should be made conditional on this completion, or the completion should be provided.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (3.13)] The statement that Coleman-Weinberg corrections are subleading because beta_lambda << 1 is not substantiated. Since the inflaton quartic coupling is extremely small, a cancellation of the beta-function is a nontrivial requirement, and no model content is specified to realize it. This assumption is needed for the tree-level potential V(phi) ~ lambda_phi phi^4 used in all background and perturbation calculations; without a quantitative check, the numerical inputs to Table 1 are not robust.
  3. [Sec. 4.2, Table 1] The benchmark values (Y_nu ~ 1, Y_M ~ 0.1, Y_N ~ 0.01-0.1, v_sigma = 10^6 GeV, lambda_2 = lambda_3 = 10^-8, and the tuned M_mu) are chosen by hand, and the correct relic density is enforced by fitting Lambda via Eq. (4.5). This is disclosed, but it means the paper does not derive the scale hierarchy; it demonstrates existence of a parameter point. The wording in Sec. 5 ('demonstrated... feasible') should be softened to reflect the fitted and assumed nature of these inputs.
  4. [Sec. 3.2] The DM candidate is identified with the lightest chi, but its cosmological stability is not demonstrated. Since <sigma> breaks the remnant (-1)^L symmetry and chi mixes with N through M = Y_M v_sigma / sqrt(2), there are potential decay channels; the paper should provide a lifetime estimate and show that the lightest chi is stable on cosmological timescales. Without this, the calculation of the relic density is insufficient to establish chi as the DM.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 4.1] In the sentence 'We will also set the vev of the sigma field to an intermediate energy scale, v_phi ~ 10^6 GeV', the symbol should be v_sigma, not v_phi.
  2. [Sec. 4.2] The notation 'v4/\sigma/M3\mu' is unclear; it should be written as v_sigma^4 / M_mu^3.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract contains 'aU (1)_{B-L}' with a missing space; it should read 'a U(1)_{B-L}'.
  4. [Sec. 2.1, Eq. (2.7)] The factor 3(T'/T + 1) in the left-hand side is not explained; a brief comment that this term represents non-adiabaticity of the bath would improve readability.
  5. [Fig. 2 caption] The symbol f used to denote the SM fermions is not defined in the text; please clarify this notation.
  6. [Fig. 3 caption] The phrase 'The Lambda scaled is matched' should read 'The Lambda scale is matched'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the DM abundance is an explicit observational input used to fix the cutoff scale Lambda, and the remaining benchmarks are transparent projections of that fit rather than hidden predictions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-consistent rather than circular. Section 2.1 explicitly states: 'Hence, we can fix Lambda by matching the equilibrium value of Y_chi given by the coupled background system to the yield needed to account for the observed DM abundance', and Section 4 repeats that 'the Lambda scaled is matched so that the final yield results in the observed DM abundance.' Thus the DM relic density is an input used to determine Lambda, not an output disguised as a prediction; the paper does not claim to predict Omega_chi h^2. The relation Lambda ~ v_phi in Eq. (4.5) is a model definition of the UV cutoff in terms of the B-L breaking scale, so Table 1 and Figure 4 are parameter determinations and projections of the relic-density fit, and the text is transparent about this matching. The seesaw sector is likewise a parameter-space demonstration: the inverse seesaw formula (Eqs. (3.3) and (4.4)) is evaluated with chosen Yukawas and vevs to show that sub-eV active neutrino masses can coexist with heavy right-handed neutrinos, rather than fitting a subset of data and re-predicting a closely related quantity. The warm-inflation background uses dissipation coefficients imported from [38,39] and the values log Q_star = -2 and lambda from [27]; although [27] has overlapping authorship, it is an externally falsifiable CMB constraint analysis independent of the present model, so it does not constitute load-bearing circular self-citation. The main weakness, noted in Sec. 3.3 ('we stay agnostic about the inflaton interactions responsible for sustaining the thermal bath through dissipation'), is a model-completeness gap: the dissipative sector is assumed rather than derived from the B-L Lagrangian. That is an unproven assumption and a correctness risk, but it is not a circular reduction because the paper does not claim to derive the warm-inflation background from its own particle content. Overall, the central feasibility claim is a conditional existence statement for a parameter point, which is self-consistent and not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 10 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper is a model-building exercise with many hand-chosen inputs. The DM abundance is matched by fixing Λ; neutrino masses are accommodated by choosing v_σ, Yukawas, and μ. The most consequential unproven input is the unspecified dissipative sector needed for warm inflation. None of these choices is independently derived.

free parameters (10)
  • Λ (effective cutoff of DM-bath operator) = 7.6e15 to 4.5e17 GeV depending on scenario
    Fixed by matching the integrated WIFI yield to Ωχ h^2 ≈ 0.12 (Sec. 4, Fig. 3).
  • v_ϕ (inflaton/B-L breaking vev) = 1.1e16 to 6.4e17 GeV
    Set by Λ through Eq. (4.5); controls Z' and right-handed neutrino masses.
  • v_σ (vev of σ field) = 1e6 GeV
    Chosen by hand to satisfy the WIFI hierarchy m_χ < T < Λ and to give sterile masses M ~ Y_M v_σ.
  • λ_ϕ (inflaton quartic coupling) = 3.3e-15 (linear), 2.7e-14 (cubic)
    Fixed by matching the CMB scalar amplitude Δ_R^2 ≈ 2.1e-9, using constraints from [27].
  • Y_ν, Y_M, Y_N (neutrino Yukawa couplings) = Y_ν=1, Y_M=0.1, Y_N=1e-2 (linear) or 1e-1 (cubic)
    Chosen to produce acceptable right-handed and active neutrino masses while keeping couplings natural.
  • μ = v_σ^4 / M_μ^3 = 1 GeV or 1 TeV
    Chosen to set the lightest χ mass to the desired DM mass.
  • λ_h, λ_σ, λ_1, λ_2, λ_3 = λ_h=λ_σ=λ_1~1e-1, λ_2=λ_3~1e-8
    Chosen to satisfy vacuum stability conditions and suppress thermal corrections to the inflaton potential.
  • m_nh (non-Hermitian scalar mass parameter) = varied in [1e-10, 1e10] GeV
    Free parameter that controls the heavy pseudo-scalar mass; no data constraint applied.
  • g_B-L (B-L gauge coupling) = scanned over 1e-3 to 1
    Scanned to explore the Z' mass parameter space; not fitted to data.
  • Q* (dissipation parameter at horizon crossing) = log Q* = -2
    Taken from the 1σ range of the Bayesian analysis in [27], not derived in this paper.
assumptions (9)
  • domain assumption Warm inflation background equations (2.1)-(2.3) with dissipation coefficient Υ and rapid thermalization T > H hold for the model.
    Standard warm inflation framework imported from [15,16,32]; assumed to apply without a microphysical derivation here.
  • domain assumption The DM-bath coupling is described by a dimension-6 effective operator with production rate T^(2n+4)/Λ^(2n), valid for T < Λ.
    UV freeze-in formalism from [5]; used to set Eq. (2.5) and the n=2 source term.
  • ad hoc to paper Linear and cubic dissipation coefficients can be realized by an unspecified microphysical sector without spoiling the inflaton potential or DM isolation.
    The authors explicitly stay agnostic about the dissipative sector (Sec. 3.3), making this the key unproven ingredient.
  • ad hoc to paper Coleman-Weinberg corrections to the inflaton potential are subleading, i.e., β_λ << 1 due to cancellations.
    Assumed in Sec. 3.3 to justify using the tree-level quartic potential during WI.
  • domain assumption The B-L symmetry is broken during warm inflation (v_ϕ ~ Λ > T), while (−1)^L and electroweak symmetries are restored until later.
    Based on the small thermal minimum shift estimate Eq. (3.14); not computed from the full thermal potential.
  • domain assumption Inverse seesaw hierarchy μ << m_D << M, with m_χ < T < Λ, is realized by choosing v_σ, Yukawas, and μ appropriately.
    Standard ISS diagonalization from [47-51]; the hierarchy is imposed by parameter choice, not derived.
  • ad hoc to paper Anomaly cancellation from three additional B-L charged sterile fermions can be ignored via an imposed parity symmetry.
    Footnote 4, Sec. 3.2 states the extra fields are ignored by a parity symmetry.
  • domain assumption g⋆(T) is constant during the relevant evolution.
    Footnote 2 assumes dg⋆/dT = 0 for the Boltzmann equation.
  • domain assumption No significant entropy production after the end of warm inflation dilutes the DM yield.
    The final Y_χ is taken as constant after reheating; no additional entropy injection is considered.
invented entities (1)
  • Unspecified dissipative sector (fields responsible for Υ)
    purpose: Provides the assumed linear or cubic dissipation coefficients that sustain warm inflation and the thermal bath.
    Introduced by reference to generic warm inflation models ([25,38,39]); no concrete fields, couplings, or masses are specified, and no independent observable is predicted.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dark Matter Freeze-In during Warm Inflation and the Seesaw Mechanism." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WUBCOT5E

@misc{pith2026241206778,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dark Matter Freeze-In during Warm Inflation and the Seesaw Mechanism},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WUBCOT5E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06778}
}
abstract

A compelling way to address the inflationary period is via the warm inflation scenario, where the interaction of the inflaton field with other degrees of freedom affects its dynamics in such a way that slow-roll inflation is maintained by dissipative effects in a thermal bath. In this context, if a dark matter particle is coupled to the bath due to non-renormalizable interactions, the observed dark matter abundance may be produced during warm inflation via ultra-violet freeze-in. In this work, we propose applying this scenario in the framework of a $U(1)_{B-L}$ gauge extension of the Standard Model of Particle Physics, where we also employ the seesaw mechanism for generating neutrino masses.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    Freese, G

    K. Freese, G. Montefalcone, and B. Shams Es Haghi,Dark Matter Production during Warm Inflation via Freeze-In, Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024), no. 21 211001, [arXiv:2401.17371]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279–390, [hep-ph/0404175]

    arXiv 2005

  3. [2]

    Aalbers et al.,First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys

    LZ Collaboration, J. Aalbers et al.,First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023), no. 4 041002, [arXiv:2207.03764]

    arXiv 2023

  4. [3]

    Aprile et al.,First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment, Phys

    XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al.,First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023), no. 4 041003, [arXiv:2303.14729]. – 16 –

    arXiv 2023

  5. [4]

    Gondolo and G

    P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini,Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 145–179

    1991

  6. [5]

    Elahi, C

    F. Elahi, C. Kolda, and J. Unwin,UltraViolet Freeze-in, JHEP 03 (2015) 048, [arXiv:1410.6157]

    arXiv 2015

  7. [6]

    L. J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell, and S. M. West,Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter, JHEP 03 (2010) 080, [arXiv:0911.1120]

    arXiv 2010

  8. [7]

    A. H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 347–356

    work page 1981

Show all 69 references
  1. [8]

    A. A. Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity, Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99–102

    1980

  2. [9]

    A. D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems, Phys. Lett. B108 (1982) 389–393

    1982

  3. [10]

    Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A6, [arXiv:1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Akrami et al.,Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami et al.,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A10, [arXiv:1807.06211]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin,Cosmic Inflation at the crossroads, JCAP 07 (2024) 087, [arXiv:2404.10647]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [13]

    BICEP , KeckCollaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al.,Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021), no. 15 151301, [arXiv:2110.00483]

    2021

  7. [14]

    Tristram et al.,Improved limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio using BICEP and Planck data, Phys

    M. Tristram et al.,Improved limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio using BICEP and Planck data, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022), no. 8 083524, [arXiv:2112.07961]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Berera,Warm inflation, Phys

    A. Berera,Warm inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.75 (1995) 3218–3221, [astro-ph/9509049]

    1995 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Berera, I

    A. Berera, I. G. Moss, and R. O. Ramos,Warm Inflation and its Microphysical Basis, Rept. Prog. Phys.72 (2009) 026901, [arXiv:0808.1855]

    2009 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Bastero-Gil and A

    M. Bastero-Gil and A. Berera,Warm inflation model building, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24 (2009) 2207–2240, [arXiv:0902.0521]

    2009 arXiv

  11. [18]

    R. Arya, A. Dasgupta, G. Goswami, J. Prasad, and R. Rangarajan,Revisiting CMB constraints on warm inflation, JCAP 02 (2018) 043, [arXiv:1710.11109]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Bastero-Gil, S

    M. Bastero-Gil, S. Bhattacharya, K. Dutta, and M. R. Gangopadhyay,Constraining Warm Inflation with CMB data, JCAP 02 (2018) 054, [arXiv:1710.10008]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Arya and R

    R. Arya and R. Rangarajan,Study of warm inflationary models and their parameter estimation from CMB, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D29 (2020), no. 08 2050055, [arXiv:1812.03107]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [21]

    K. V. Berghaus, P. W. Graham, and D. E. Kaplan,Minimal Warm Inflation, JCAP 03 (2020) 034, [arXiv:1910.07525]. [Erratum: JCAP 10, E02 (2023)]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Das and R

    S. Das and R. O. Ramos,Runaway potentials in warm inflation satisfying the swampland conjectures, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020), no. 10 103522, [arXiv:2007.15268]. – 17 –

    2020 arXiv

  16. [23]

    F. B. M. d. Santos, R. Silva, S. S. da Costa, M. Benetti, and J. S. Alcaniz,Warm β-exponential inflation and the swampland conjectures, Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023), no. 2 178, [arXiv:2209.06153]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Montefalcone, V

    G. Montefalcone, V. Aragam, L. Visinelli, and K. Freese,Observational constraints on warm natural inflation, JCAP 03 (2023) 002, [arXiv:2212.04482]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Berera,The Warm Inflation Story, Universe 9 (2023), no

    A. Berera,The Warm Inflation Story, Universe 9 (2023), no. 6 272, [arXiv:2305.10879]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Benetti, L

    M. Benetti, L. L. Graef, and J. S. Alcaniz,The H0 and σ8 tensions and the scale invariant spectrum, JCAP 07 (2018) 066, [arXiv:1712.00677]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [27]

    F. B. M. d. Santos, R. de Souza, and J. S. Alcaniz,A comparative analysis of dissipation coefficients in warm inflation, JCAP 10 (2024) 071, [arXiv:2407.18891]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Buchmuller, C

    W. Buchmuller, C. Greub, and P. Minkowski,Neutrino masses, neutral vector bosons and the scale of B-L breaking, Phys. Lett. B267 (1991) 395–399

    1991

  22. [30]

    S. F. King and T. Yanagida,Testing the see-saw mechanism at collider energies, Prog. Theor. Phys. 114 (2006) 1035–1043, [hep-ph/0411030]

    2006 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Basso, A

    L. Basso, A. Belyaev, S. Moretti, and C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous,Phenomenology of the minimal B-L extension of the Standard model: Z’ and neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 055030, [arXiv:0812.4313]

    2009 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Bastero-Gil, A

    M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, and R. O. Ramos,Dissipation coefficients from scalar and fermion quantum field interactions, JCAP 09 (2011) 033, [arXiv:1008.1929]

    2011 arXiv

  25. [33]

    L. M. H. Hall, I. G. Moss, and A. Berera,Scalar perturbation spectra from warm inflation, Phys. Rev. D69 (2003) 083525, [astro-ph/0305015]

    2003 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Graham and I

    C. Graham and I. G. Moss,Density fluctuations from warm inflation, JCAP 07 (2009) 013, [arXiv:0905.3500]

    2009 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Bastero-Gil, A

    M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, and R. O. Ramos,Shear viscous effects on the primordial power spectrum from warm inflation, JCAP 07 (2011) 030, [arXiv:1106.0701]

    2011 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Benetti and R

    M. Benetti and R. O. Ramos,Warm inflation dissipative effects: predictions and constraints from the Planck data, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017), no. 2 023517, [arXiv:1610.08758]

    2017 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Kumar and S

    U. Kumar and S. Das,A generalized method of constraining Warm Inflation with CMB data, JCAP 10 (2024) 058, [arXiv:2407.06032]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Bastero-Gil, A

    M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R. O. Ramos, and J. G. Rosa,Warm Little Inflaton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016), no. 15 151301, [arXiv:1604.08838]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Bastero-Gil, A

    M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R. O. Ramos, and J. G. Rosa,General dissipation coefficient in low-temperature warm inflation, JCAP 01 (2013) 016, [arXiv:1207.0445]

    2013 arXiv

  32. [40]

    E. W. Kolb,The Early Universe, vol. 69. Taylor and Francis, 5, 2019

    2019

  33. [41]

    Navas et al.,Review of particle physics, Phys

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, S. Navas et al.,Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 3 030001

    2024

  34. [42]

    Minkowski,µ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of109 Muon Decays?, Phys

    P. Minkowski,µ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of109 Muon Decays?, Phys. Lett. 67B (1977) 421–428. – 18 –

    1977

  35. [43]

    Yanagida,Horizontal Symmetry and Masses of Neutrinos, Conf

    T. Yanagida,Horizontal Symmetry and Masses of Neutrinos, Conf. Proc.C7902131 (1979) 95–99

    1979

  36. [44]

    Gell-Mann, P

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky,Complex Spinors and Unified Theories, Conf. Proc. C790927 (1979) 315–321, [arXiv:1306.4669]

    1979 arXiv

  37. [45]

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Violation, Phys. Rev. Lett.44 (1980) 912. [,231(1979)]

    1980

  38. [46]

    Schechter and J

    J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle,Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories, Phys. Rev. D22 (1980) 2227

    1980

  39. [47]

    R. N. Mohapatra,Mechanism for Understanding Small Neutrino Mass in Superstring Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.56 (1986) 561–563

    1986

  40. [48]

    R. N. Mohapatra and J. W. F. Valle,Neutrino Mass and Baryon Number Nonconservation in Superstring Models, Phys. Rev. D34 (1986) 1642

    1986

  41. [49]

    Schechter and J

    J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle,Neutrino Decay and Spontaneous Violation of Lepton Number, Phys. Rev. D25 (1982) 774

    1982

  42. [50]

    Hettmansperger, M

    H. Hettmansperger, M. Lindner, and W. Rodejohann,Phenomenological Consequences of sub-leading Terms in See-Saw Formulas, JHEP 04 (2011) 123, [arXiv:1102.3432]

    2011 arXiv

  43. [51]

    A. G. Dias, C. A. de S. Pires, P. S. Rodrigues da Silva, and A. Sampieri,A Simple Realization of the Inverse Seesaw Mechanism, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 035007, [arXiv:1206.2590]

    2012 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Khalil,TeV-scale gauged B-L symmetry with inverse seesaw mechanism, Phys

    S. Khalil,TeV-scale gauged B-L symmetry with inverse seesaw mechanism, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 077702, [arXiv:1004.0013]

    2010 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Ma,Radiative inverse seesaw mechanism for nonzero neutrino mass, Phys

    E. Ma,Radiative inverse seesaw mechanism for nonzero neutrino mass, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 013013, [arXiv:0904.4450]

    2009 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Sher,Electroweak Higgs Potentials and Vacuum Stability, Phys

    M. Sher,Electroweak Higgs Potentials and Vacuum Stability, Phys. Rept. 179 (1989) 273–418

    1989

  47. [55]

    J. M. Cline and P.-A. Lemieux,Electroweak phase transition in two Higgs doublet models, Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 3873–3881, [hep-ph/9609240]

    1997 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Liu,The first results of PandaX-4T, Int

    PandaX Collaboration, J. Liu,The first results of PandaX-4T, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D31 (2022), no. 05 2230007

    2022

  49. [57]

    Aalbers et al.,First Constraints on WIMP-Nucleon Effective Field Theory Couplings in an Extended Energy Region From LUX-ZEPLIN, arXiv:2312.02030

    LZ Collaboration, J. Aalbers et al.,First Constraints on WIMP-Nucleon Effective Field Theory Couplings in an Extended Energy Region From LUX-ZEPLIN, arXiv:2312.02030

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Aprile et al.,The XENONnT Dark Matter Experiment, arXiv:2402.10446

    XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al.,The XENONnT Dark Matter Experiment, arXiv:2402.10446

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    Albert et al.,Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation in Recently Discovered Milky Way Satellites with Fermi-LAT, Astrophys

    F ermi-LA T, DESCollaboration, A. Albert et al.,Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation in Recently Discovered Milky Way Satellites with Fermi-LAT, Astrophys. J. 834 (2017), no. 2 110, [arXiv:1611.03184]

    2017 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Archambault et al.,Dark Matter Constraints from a Joint Analysis of Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy Observations with VERITAS, Phys

    VERIT ASCollaboration, S. Archambault et al.,Dark Matter Constraints from a Joint Analysis of Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy Observations with VERITAS, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017), no. 8 082001, [arXiv:1703.04937]

    2017 arXiv

  53. [61]

    CT A ConsortiumCollaboration, B. S. Acharya et al.,Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array. WSP, 11, 2018. – 19 –

    2018

  54. [62]

    Acharyya et al.,Sensitivity of the Cherenkov Telescope Array to a dark matter signal from the Galactic centre, JCAP 01 (2021) 057, [arXiv:2007.16129]

    CT ACollaboration, A. Acharyya et al.,Sensitivity of the Cherenkov Telescope Array to a dark matter signal from the Galactic centre, JCAP 01 (2021) 057, [arXiv:2007.16129]

    2021 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Viana, H

    A. Viana, H. Schoorlemmer, A. Albert, V. de Souza, J. P. Harding, and J. Hinton,Searching for Dark Matter in the Galactic Halo with a Wide Field of View TeV Gamma-ray Observatory in the Southern Hemisphere, JCAP 12 (2019) 061, [arXiv:1906.03353]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [64]

    MAGIC Collaboration, V. A. Acciari et al.,Combined searches for dark matter in dwarf spheroidal galaxies observed with the MAGIC telescopes, including new data from Coma Berenices and Draco, Phys. Dark Univ.35 (2022) 100912, [arXiv:2111.15009]

    2022

  57. [65]

    Cao et al.,Constraints on Heavy Decaying Dark Matter from 570 Days of LHAASO Observations, Phys

    LHAASO Collaboration, Z. Cao et al.,Constraints on Heavy Decaying Dark Matter from 570 Days of LHAASO Observations, Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022), no. 26 261103, [arXiv:2210.15989]

    2022

  58. [66]

    Collaboration, H

    H.E.S.S. Collaboration, H. Abdalla et al.,Search for Dark Matter Annihilation Signals in the H.E.S.S. Inner Galaxy Survey, Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022), no. 11 111101, [arXiv:2207.10471]

    2022

  59. [67]

    Calore, M

    F. Calore, M. Cirelli, L. Derome, Y. Genolini, D. Maurin, P. Salati, and P. D. Serpico, AMS-02 antiprotons and dark matter: Trimmed hints and robust bounds, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022), no. 5 163, [arXiv:2202.03076]

    2022 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Albert et al.,An optimized search for dark matter in the galactic halo with HAWC, JCAP 12 (2023) 038, [arXiv:2305.09861]

    HA WCCollaboration, A. Albert et al.,An optimized search for dark matter in the galactic halo with HAWC, JCAP 12 (2023) 038, [arXiv:2305.09861]

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Abbasi et al.,Search for neutrino lines from dark matter annihilation and decay with IceCube, Phys

    IceCube Collaboration, R. Abbasi et al.,Search for neutrino lines from dark matter annihilation and decay with IceCube, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023), no. 10 102004, [arXiv:2303.13663]. – 20 –

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.