Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 60 references

For any asymptotically flat static spherically symmetric spacetime filled with a homogeneous non-magnetic plasma, the weak-field deflection angle of light is an explicit power series in M/b with coefficients fixed by the metric's asymptotic

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 04:50 UTC pith:WUUCUDNB

load-bearing objection Useful general-series result in a mature subfield; the unshown coefficient algebra makes the central formula unverifiable as printed, and the only numerical check exercises none of the higher-order metric dependences. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.22401 v1 pith:WUUCUDNB submitted 2026-07-24 gr-qc

Light deflection in general static and spherically symmetric spacetime with a homogeneous plasma

Guanming Li , Zhongze Li , Junji Jia This is my paper
classification gr-qc MSC 83C1083C2583C57
keywords gravitational lensinglight deflectionhomogeneous plasmastatic spherically symmetric spacetimeperturbative expansionReissner-NordströmHorndeski black holeGalileon black hole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes a general statement about gravitational lensing in a plasma: for every asymptotically flat, static, spherically symmetric spacetime, the weak-field deflection angle can be written as a power series in M/b whose coefficients are explicit polynomials in the metric's asymptotic expansion coefficients and in 1/n∞. When the plasma is dilute, the same result becomes a double series in M/b and ε², the squared ratio of the electron plasma frequency to the photon frequency. The leading plasma contribution is +2M ε²/b, which is positive for any positive mass, so the plasma always enhances deflection at leading order and makes lensed images appear larger than in vacuum. The paper applies the formula to Reissner-Nordström, charged Horndeski, and charged Galileon black holes, shows that truncated series match numerical integration closely over the tested range of impact parameters, and re-derives several earlier spacetime-specific results as special cases.

Core claim

The central discovery is a universal formula for light deflection in a homogeneous plasma: equations (38)-(39) express the deflection angle as Σ d_j/b^j, with d_j polynomials in the metric expansion coefficients {a_j, b_j} and 1/n∞, for any static spherically symmetric spacetime that is asymptotically flat. In the dilute-plasma limit the deflection becomes a dual series in M/b and ε², equation (40), and the first plasma coefficient d1,1 = -a1 = +2M is fixed by the ADM mass alone. The sign is the key result: because the coefficient is positive for every positive-mass spacetime, the plasma effect cannot cancel or reverse the gravitational bending at leading order; it always adds to it. The sam

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is a change of integration variable through the metric: r=1/x and u²(x)=A(1/x) n∞² b² + A(1/x) ε², which turns the angular-deflection integral into an integral with a √(1-u²) denominator. Because u²(x) is non-monotonic between the turning point and infinity, the integral is split into two branches around the minimum um, and the inverse functions x±(u²) are expanded using the generalized Lagrange inversion theorem. The metric functions are expanded as 1 + Σ a_j/r^j and 1 + Σ b_j/r^j, and all deflection coefficients are obtained by substituting these expansions into the Hamiltonian H = (gαβ pα pβ + ω_e²)/2 = 0.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the plasma is homogeneous, non-magnetic, pressureless, and at rest in the static spacetime, so that the photon's locally measured frequency is ω(r)=ω∞/√A(r); if the plasma moves or carries internal structure that breaks this relation, the series coefficients no longer apply.

What would settle it

Take a static spherically symmetric metric and numerically integrate the photon Hamiltonian with a homogeneous plasma whose four-velocity has a small nonzero radial or azimuthal component. If the computed deflection's leading plasma coefficient differs from +2M ε²/b, the effective-redshift assumption underlying equations (38)-(40) is falsified.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • In any positive-mass static spherically symmetric spacetime, a homogeneous plasma increases the photon deflection angle at leading order, so gravitational-lens image positions are systematically shifted outward relative to the vacuum prediction.
  • Because the plasma correction enters at order ε²/b while the pure-spacetime correction enters at order (M/b)², the plasma contribution dominates for sufficiently large impact parameters.
  • The charge of the spacetime and the plasma density compete: electric charge decreases the deflection at leading order, while the plasma increases it, so the net sign depends on Q²/M² versus ε².
  • The general formula reduces to the previously known deflection angles for vacuum, Schwarzschild, and Reissner-Nordström spacetimes when the plasma frequency or charge parameter is set to zero.
  • The paper's additivity expression combines mass, charge, spin, and plasma contributions into a single leading-order deflection formula for stationary axisymmetric spacetimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • I infer the method extends to plasma with slow bulk motion: the effective-redshift step would acquire a Doppler factor from the plasma four-velocity, so the coefficients become functions of that velocity, giving a testable frequency asymmetry in lensing.
  • I infer the polynomial dependence on the metric coefficients means any future SSS metric only requires substituting its {a_j,b_j} into the published series; no new integration or Lagrange inversion needs to be repeated.
  • I infer that the universal sign of the plasma correction suggests plasma density gradients, rather than the uniform part, are the most promising place to look for plasma effects that reverse or distort the deflection angle.
  • I infer that measuring the deflection of two frequencies from the same lens-source pair in a known plasma would directly isolate the coefficient d1,1 and test whether the effective-redshift relation holds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a perturbative method for the weak-field deflection angle of light in a general static, spherically symmetric (SSS) spacetime filled with a homogeneous, non-magnetic plasma. The derivation introduces a change of variables (22)-(23), splits the radial integral at the branch point of u^2(x) (25)-(26), and uses generalized Lagrange inversion (30) to express the deflection angle as a power series in 1/b, with coefficients that are polynomials in the metric's asymptotic expansion coefficients and 1/n_∞ (Eqs. (38)-(39)). A dual series in the plasma frequency ratio ε^2 is also derived (Eqs. (40)-(41)). The results are applied to Reissner-Nordström, charged Horndeski, and charged Galileon black holes, and to several additional spacetimes in the appendix. The RN series is compared with numerical integration and shown to be accurate to ~10^-12 at b/M=10^3 for the truncation order used.

Significance. If correct, the general formula would be a useful reference result for gravitational lensing in plasma-filled SSS spacetimes, unifying and extending several case-by-case results in the literature. The derivation is principled and not fitted to numerical data; the independent numerical check for RN is a genuine strength. However, an internal inconsistency in the printed dual-series coefficient and the complete omission of the recurrence that generates the central series prevent acceptance of the general claim as stated. The approach is promising, but the manuscript needs substantial revision before the central results can be considered verified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (41f) vs Eq. (39c)] The dual-series coefficient d_{2,1} printed in Eq. (41f) is not consistent with a direct expansion of Eq. (39c). Since n_∞^2 = 1 - ε^2, one has 1/n_∞^2 = (1-ε^2)^{-1} = 1 + ε^2 + O(ε^4). Substituting this into Eq. (39c) yields the coefficient of ε^2/b^2 as π/4 (2a1^2 - 2a2 - a1 b1) = π/2 (a1^2 - a2 - a1 b1/2), not π/2 (a1^2 - a2 - a1 b1) as printed. The two expressions differ by π a1 b1 /4. For Schwarzschild (a1 = -2M, b1 = 2M), the correct value is 3πM^2, while Eq. (41f) gives 4πM^2; Eq. (47) of the same paper contains 3πM^2/b^2, confirming the error. The dual series therefore needs to be re-derived and corrected.
  2. [§III, Eqs. (30)-(35)] The central claim—Eqs. (38)-(39) give the deflection in any asymptotically flat SSS spacetime with a homogeneous plasma—rests on the coefficients x_j and h_j that are introduced in Eq. (30) and Eq. (35) but are never presented; the text states they are 'too lengthy' and gives no recurrence or code. The only numerical validation, Fig. 2, is for the RN metric, for which a3 = a4 = 0 and the b_j are fixed by A = 1/B; this does not exercise the dependence on a3, a4, b3, b4 that appears in Eqs. (39d)-(39e). Given that the directly derived dual-series coefficient in Eq. (41f) is wrong, the omitted algebra cannot be taken on faith. Please provide the recurrence (or an electronic supplement implementing it) and a numerical check for at least one spacetime with nonzero a3/a4, e.g., the charged Horndeski or the RGI Schwarzschild metric.
  3. [Eq. (57)] The combined 'additivity' formula in Eq. (57) is dimensionally inconsistent. In units G=c=1, the Kerr contribution to the deflection angle is 4 a M / b^2 (where the spin parameter a has dimension length), not 4 a M^2 / b^2 as printed. As written, the last term has dimensions of length and cannot be added to the dimensionless quantity 4M/b. The accompanying condition '|a| ≤ 1' is also dimensionally awkward unless interpreted as |a|/M ≤ 1. Please correct Eq. (57) and its surrounding text.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (9) and surrounding text] The notation for the plasma four-velocity is ambiguous: the printed expression appears to be v^t = sqrt(-g^tt), but this should be written explicitly as v^t = 1/sqrt(-g_tt) (or sqrt(-g^{tt})) to avoid confusion with the metric component.
  2. [Multiple places] The text contains repeated ligature typos such as 'coefficients', 'affine', and 'first'. These are presentation issues but should be cleaned up.
  3. [Eqs. (A2), (A4), (A7), (A10), (A15)] The notation O(ε^4, M^5/b^5) is potentially misleading; it means O(ε^4) + O(M^5/b^5), not a single mixed-order remainder. Consider using the explicit sum or clarifying the convention.
  4. [§IV (after Eq. (41))] The phrase 'Due to the space limit' is vague. If higher-order coefficients are available from the authors or from a supplement, state this explicitly; otherwise, the statement that 'it is very easy to obtain higher-order results' is not checkable by the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the series derivation is self-contained and checked against numerical integration.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation—Eqs. (38)-(39) for a general SSS spacetime and Eqs. (40)-(41) for the dilute-plasma dual series—does not reduce to its inputs by construction. The starting point is the standard Synge plasma Hamiltonian (5), the effective redshift relation omega(r)=omega_infty/A^{1/2} (11), and asymptotic metric expansions (29). The coefficients d_j are obtained by an explicit perturbative expansion around the turning point u_m, using the Lagrange-inversion form (30) and the definitions (23), (26)-(28). No coefficient is fit to a target deflection value; the final d_j are polynomial functions of the metric expansion coefficients {a_j,b_j} and n_infty stated in the abstract. The claim that plasma always enhances deflection at leading order follows from d_{1,1}=-a_1=2M with a_1=-2M for the ADM mass, which is a physically meaningful relation and not a restatement of the deflection. The numerical comparison in Fig. 2 is an independent check of the series against direct integration of Eq. (17) for the RN metric, and the vacuum limit n_infty->1 is checked against previously known results. The self-citations to Refs. [29-33] are method pedigree, not load-bearing: the perturbation procedure is re-derived in Sec. III with the needed expansions, and the cited works are not used as a black-box uniqueness or existence proof. The only substantive concern raised by the skeptic, an apparent inconsistency between Eq. (41f) and the epsilon^2 term obtained by expanding Eq. (39c), is a possible algebraic correctness issue, not circularity: it does not show that any output quantity was used as an input or that a fitted parameter was renamed as a prediction. Thus the paper exhibits no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No fundamentally new physical entities are introduced; the paper uses only standard plasma and GR ingredients. The main free/ad hoc inputs are the metric expansion coefficients (spacetime inputs) and the plasma frequency ratio epsilon; the assumption of homogeneity and the branch-point expansion of u^2(x) are the silent but load-bearing choices. The plasma Hamiltonian and the effective redshift relation are the true axioms on which the central series rests.

free parameters (2)
  • epsilon^2 = omega_e^2 / omega_infty^2
    The plasma frequency ratio is treated as an expansion parameter and given no physical value; it is a model parameter, standard for this type of calculation.
  • Metric expansion coefficients a_j, b_j
    These are inputs from the specific spacetime and are not fitted. For the RN example a1 = -2M, a2 = Q^2, etc. They are parameters of the background solution rather than ad hoc fitted constants.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The geometric-optics photon Hamiltonian in a plasma (Synge): H = 1/2[g^{alpha beta} p_alpha p_beta - (n^2 - 1)(p_gamma v^gamma)^2] = 0
    This is the physical foundation for photon propagation in plasma; it is standard in the plasma-lensing literature (Ref. 40) but is a physical modeling assumption, not a mathematical theorem.
  • domain assumption Homogeneous non-magnetic pressureless plasma at rest with the SSS geometry: v^i = 0, fixed electron density N
    Homogeneity makes n depend only on omega(r), and v^i = 0 gives the frequency shift omega(r) = omega_infty / A^{1/2}. This is the assumption that the whole result is restricted to.
  • domain assumption The metric is asymptotically flat (A, B -> 1) and admits expansion (29) (A(r) = 1 + sum a_j / r^j, B(r) = 1 + sum b_j / r^j, C(r) = r^2)
    The entire series method is built on the asymptotic expansion; non-asymptotically-flat spacetimes or metrics not of this form are outside the claimed domain. This is stated in Sec. II.
  • ad hoc to paper The existence and analyticity of the u_min branch point x_m with the generalized Lagrange inversion expansion (30)
    The paper asserts the existence of r_m and the branch structure (Fig. 1) but does not give a complete proof; it is justified by the series method and verified numerically in the examples.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 17676 in / 8751 out tokens · 80232 ms · 2026-08-01T04:50:05.531496+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Light deflection in general static and spherically symmetric spacetime with a homogeneous plasma." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WUUCUDNB

@misc{pith2026260722401,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Light deflection in general static and spherically symmetric spacetime with a homogeneous plasma},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WUUCUDNB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22401}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We developed in this work a perturbative technique to compute the deflection angle of light rays in general static and spherically symmetric spacetimes with a homogeneous non-magnetic plasma. The deflection angle is expressed as a power series of $M/b$ with $M$ and $b$ being the spacetime mass and the impact parameter of the ray. The series coefficients are polynomials of the asymptotic expansion coefficients of the metric functions and the reciprocal of the asymptotic refractive index. When the plasma is dilute, the deflection angle can also be expressed as a dual series of $M/b$ and the frequency ratio between the electron plasma frequency and the asymptotic photon frequency. The series result reveals that for general SSS spacetime, the plasma at the leading order always enhances the deflection angle and therefore increases the apparent angles of the gravitational lensing images. These series results of the deflection angle are then shown to have excellent agreement with those obtained using numerical integration. The general formula of the deflection angle is then applied to the Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m, charged Horndeski and charged Galileon spacetimes. The effect of the plasma and characteristic parameter of the spacetimes on the deflection angles in these spacetimes was briefly discussed. In the appendix, the deflection angles in previously attempted spacetimes are re-computed and compared with the literature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22401 by Guanming Li, Junji Jia, Zhongze Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Since this metric can be mapped from the RN metric (42) using Q → ( ˜Q2 + ˜P 2)e−γ, we can simply obtain the deflection in this spacetime by substituting the same mapping into Eq

    Deflection in the Einstein-Dyonic-ModMax BH spacetime The spacetime of Einstein-Dyonic-ModMax (EDM) BH framework is described by [ 49] A(r) = 1 B(r) = 1 − 2M r + ( ˜Q2 + ˜P 2)e−γ r2 , (A1) where eγ is a constant factor of Einstein-ModMax equa- tions in Weyl construction, ˜Q and ˜P are the electric and magnetic parts of the original charge Q. Since this me...

  2. [2]

    Therefore the deflection in this spacetime with a homogeneous plasma can also be obtained by substituting the same mapping into Eq

    Deflection in Schwarzschild-MOG BH spacetime The metric function of the Schwarzschild-MOG space- time is given by [ 51] A(r) = 1 B(r) = 1 − 2(1 + α)M r − α(1 + α)M 2 r2 , (A3) This metric can be obtained from the RN one by the map M → (1 + α)M , Q → −α(1 + α)M 2. Therefore the deflection in this spacetime with a homogeneous plasma can also be obtained by ...

  3. [3]

    Expanding this asymptotically, the asymptotic coefficients are found to be a1 = −2M, a 2 = − a2 2 , a3 = 0, a 4 = − a4 8 ,

    Deflection in Kazakov–Solodukhin BH spacetime The spacetime of Kazakov–Solodukhin BH is described by [ 52] A(r) = 1 B(r) = √ r2 − a2 r − 2M r , (A5) where r ≥ a = 4 √κ with κ being the dimensional grav- itational constant. Expanding this asymptotically, the asymptotic coefficients are found to be a1 = −2M, a 2 = − a2 2 , a3 = 0, a 4 = − a4 8 , . . . (A6a) ...

  4. [4]

    The classical Schwarzschild limit is recovered by setting Ω = 0

    Deflection in renormalization group improved Schwarzschild BH spacetime The spacetime of the renormalization group improved Schwarzschild BH is described by [ 53] A(r) = 1 B(r) = 1 − 2M r 1 + ΩM 2 r2 + ΩγM 3 r3 −1 , (A8) where the parameter Ω is a measure of the quantum grav- ity effects. The classical Schwarzschild limit is recovered by setting Ω = 0 . 1...

  5. [5]

    In the Nd → 0 limit, this reduces to the metric of the RN BH spacetime

    Deflection in BH spacetime in Rastall theory The metric functions of a known BH solution in Rastall theory take the following form [ 54] A(r) = 1 B(r) = 1 − 2M r + Q2 r2 − Nd r(1−6kλ)/(1−3kλ) , (A11) where k and λ are geometric parameters of the Rastall theory, while the integration constant Nd is characteristic of the surrounding field. In the Nd → 0 lim...

  6. [6]

    Accioly and S

    A. Accioly and S. Ragusa. Gravitational deflection of massive particles in classical and semiclassical general relativity. Class. Quant. Grav., 19:5429–5434, 2002. [Er- ratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 20, 4963–4964 (2003)]

    2002

  7. [7]

    Photon mass and gravitational deflection

    Antonio Accioly and Ricardo Paszko. Photon mass and gravitational deflection. Phys. Rev. D, 69:107501, 2004

    2004

  8. [8]

    F. W. Dyson, A. S. Eddington, and C. Davidson. A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun’s GravitationalField, fromObservationsMadeattheTotal Eclipse of May 29, 1919. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 220:291–333, 1920

    1919

  9. [9]

    Bhadra, K

    A. Bhadra, K. Sarkar, and K. K. Nandi. Testing gravity at the second post-Newtonian level through gravitational deflection of massive particles. Phys. Rev. D, 75:123004, 2007

    2007

  10. [10]

    Unboundmotionofmassiveparticlesin the Schwarzschild metric: Analytical description in case of strong deflection

    OlegYu.Tsupko. Unboundmotionofmassiveparticlesin the Schwarzschild metric: Analytical description in case of strong deflection. Phys. Rev. D, 89(8):084075, 2014

    2014

  11. [11]

    Gravitational deflection of light and massive particles by a moving Kerr–Newman black hole

    Guansheng He and Wenbin Lin. Gravitational deflection of light and massive particles by a moving Kerr–Newman black hole. Class. Quant. Grav., 33(9):095007, 2016. [Ad- dendum: Class.Quant.Grav. 34, 029401 (2017)]

    2016

  12. [12]

    Analytical derivation of second-order deflection in the equatorial plane of a radially moving Kerr–Newman black hole

    Guansheng He and Wenbin Lin. Analytical derivation of second-order deflection in the equatorial plane of a radially moving Kerr–Newman black hole. Class. Quant. Grav., 34(10):105006, 2017. 12

    2017

  13. [13]

    John S. Mathis. The warm ionized medium in the milky way and other galaxies. Astrophys. J., 544:347, 2000

    2000

  14. [14]

    Shocks and cold fronts in galaxy clusters

    Maxim Markevitch and Alexey Vikhlinin. Shocks and cold fronts in galaxy clusters. Phys. Rept., 443:1–53, 2007

    2007

  15. [15]

    Hand- book of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics

    Cosimo Bambi and Andrea Santangelo, editors. Hand- book of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics. Springer, 2024

    2024

  16. [16]

    The Evolution of the Intergalac- tic Medium

    Matthew McQuinn. The Evolution of the Intergalac- tic Medium. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 54:313–362, 2016

    2016

  17. [17]

    Effect of the dilaton field and plasma medium on deflection angle by black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton-axion theory

    Wajiha Javed, Rimsha Babar, and Alï Övgün. Effect of the dilaton field and plasma medium on deflection angle by black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton-axion theory. Phys. Rev. D, 100(10):104032, 2019

    2019

  18. [18]

    Weakdeflec- tion angle of Kazakov–Solodukhin black hole in plasma medium using Gauss–Bonnet theorem and its greybody bonding

    WajihaJaved, IqraHussain, andAliÖvgün. Weakdeflec- tion angle of Kazakov–Solodukhin black hole in plasma medium using Gauss–Bonnet theorem and its greybody bonding. Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 137(1):148, 2022

    2022

  19. [19]

    Exploring plasma and dark matter on photon deflection by Reissner–Nordström black hole with scalar hair and its shadow

    Riasat Ali, Xia Tiecheng, Muhammad Awais, and Rimsha Babar. Exploring plasma and dark matter on photon deflection by Reissner–Nordström black hole with scalar hair and its shadow. Annals Phys., 482:170201, 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    Frequency-dependent effects of gravita- tional lensing within plasma

    Adam Rogers. Frequency-dependent effects of gravita- tional lensing within plasma. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 451(1):17–25, 2015

    2015

  21. [21]

    Ray Optics, Fermat’s Principle, and Applications to General Relativity

    Volker Perlick, editor. Ray Optics, Fermat’s Principle, and Applications to General Relativity. Springer, 2000

    2000

  22. [22]

    G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan and O. Yu. Tsupko. Gravita- tional radiospectrometer. Grav. Cosmol., 15:20–27, 2009

    2009

  23. [23]

    G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan and O. Yu. Tsupko. Gravita- tional lensing in a non-uniform plasma. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 404:1790–1800, 2010

    2010

  24. [24]

    V. S. Morozova, B. J. Ahmedov, and A. A. Tursunov. Gravitational lensing by a rotating massive object in a plasma. Astrophys. Space Sci., 346(2):513–520, 2013

    2013

  25. [25]

    Weak gravitational lensing Schwarzschild-MOG black hole in plasma

    Farruh Atamurotov, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, and Javlon Rayimbaev. Weak gravitational lensing Schwarzschild-MOG black hole in plasma. Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(2):118, 2021

    2021

  26. [26]

    Study of the Deflection Angle and Shadow of Black Hole Solutions in Non-Plasma and Plasma Mediums Under the Effect of Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet Gravity

    Riasat Ali, Muhammad Awais, and Asif Mahmood. Study of the Deflection Angle and Shadow of Black Hole Solutions in Non-Plasma and Plasma Mediums Under the Effect of Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet Gravity. Annalen Phys., 535(9):2300236, 2023

    2023

  27. [27]

    Shadow and weak gravitational lensing of RN-like BH in plasma

    Asalkhon Alimova, Ziyodulla Turakhonov, Farruh Ata- murotov, and Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov. Shadow and weak gravitational lensing of RN-like BH in plasma. Phys. Dark Univ., 47:101749, 2025

    2025

  28. [28]

    Tsupko and Gennady S

    Oleg Yu. Tsupko and Gennady S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan. Gravitational lensing in plasma: Relativistic images at homogeneousplasma. Phys.Rev.D,87(12):124009, 2013

    2013

  29. [29]

    Opti- cal properties of black hole in the presence of plasma: shadow

    Farruh Atamurotov and Bobomurat Ahmedov. Opti- cal properties of black hole in the presence of plasma: shadow. Phys. Rev. D, 92:084005, 2015

    2015

  30. [30]

    Tsupko, and Gennady S

    Volker Perlick, Oleg Yu. Tsupko, and Gennady S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan. Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a spherically symmetric black hole. Phys. Rev. D, 92(10):104031, 2015

    2015

  31. [31]

    Quantum effects on the black hole shadow and deflec- tion angle in the presence of plasma*

    Farruh Atamurotov, Mubasher Jamil, and Kimet Jusufi. Quantum effects on the black hole shadow and deflec- tion angle in the presence of plasma*. Chin. Phys. C, 47(3):035106, 2023

    2023

  32. [32]

    Effects of plasma on gravitational lensing

    Xinzhong Er and Shude Mao. Effects of plasma on gravitational lensing. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 437(3):2180–2186, 2014

    2014

  33. [33]

    The effects of plasma on the magnification and time delay of strongly lensed fast radio bursts

    Xinzhong Er and Shude Mao. The effects of plasma on the magnification and time delay of strongly lensed fast radio bursts. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 516(2):2218– 2222, 2022

    2022

  34. [34]

    Perturbative deflection an- gle, gravitational lensing in the strong field limit and the black hole shadow

    Junji Jia and Ke Huang. Perturbative deflection an- gle, gravitational lensing in the strong field limit and the black hole shadow. Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(3):242, 2021

    2021

  35. [35]

    Perturbative deflection angle for signal with finite distance and general velocities

    Ke Huang and Junji Jia. Perturbative deflection angle for signal with finite distance and general velocities. JCAP, 08:016, 2020

    2020

  36. [36]

    The perturbative approach for the weak de- flection angle

    Junji Jia. The perturbative approach for the weak de- flection angle. Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(3):242, 2020

    2020

  37. [37]

    Pertur- bative deflection angles of timelike rays

    Yujie Duan, Weiyu Hu, Ke Huang, and Junji Jia. Pertur- bative deflection angles of timelike rays. Class. Quant. Grav., 37(14):145004, 2020

    2020

  38. [38]

    From matter density to deflection angle and gravitational lensing using a perturbative method

    Peiran Liu, Xiaotian Zhang, and Junji Jia. From matter density to deflection angle and gravitational lensing using a perturbative method. Phys. Dark Univ., 50:102095, 2025

    2025

  39. [39]

    Deflection angle with electromagnetic interaction and gravitational- electromagnetic dual lensing

    Xiaoge Xu, Tingyuan Jiang, and Junji Jia. Deflection angle with electromagnetic interaction and gravitational- electromagnetic dual lensing. JCAP, 08:022, 2021

    2021

  40. [40]

    Effect of electric interaction on the deflection and gravita- tional lensing in the strong field limit

    Shangjie Zhou, Muchun Chen, and Junji Jia. Effect of electric interaction on the deflection and gravita- tional lensing in the strong field limit. Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(9):883, 2023

    2023

  41. [41]

    Deflection and gravitational lensing with finite distance effect in the strong deflection limit in stationary and axisymmetric spacetimes

    Yujie Duan, Siyan Lin, and Junji Jia. Deflection and gravitational lensing with finite distance effect in the strong deflection limit in stationary and axisymmetric spacetimes. JCAP, 07:036, 2023

    2023

  42. [42]

    Constraining the spacetime spin using time delay in stationary axisymmetric space- times

    Haotian Liu and Junji Jia. Constraining the spacetime spin using time delay in stationary axisymmetric space- times. Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(10):932, 2020

    2020

  43. [43]

    Universal time delay in static spherically symmetric spacetimes for null and timelike signals

    Haotian Liu and Junji Jia. Universal time delay in static spherically symmetric spacetimes for null and timelike signals. Chin. Phys. C, 45(8):083102, 2021

    2021

  44. [44]

    Time delay in the strong field limit for null and timelike signals and its simple interpretation

    Haotian Liu and Junji Jia. Time delay in the strong field limit for null and timelike signals and its simple interpretation. Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(10):894, 2021

    2021

  45. [45]

    J. L. Synge, editor. Relativity: The General Theory. North-Holland Publishing Company, 1960

    1960

  46. [46]

    Deflection and gravitational lensing of null and timelike signals in the Kiselev black hole spacetime in the weak field limit

    Haotian Liu, Jinning Liang, and Junji Jia. Deflection and gravitational lensing of null and timelike signals in the Kiselev black hole spacetime in the weak field limit. Class. Quant. Grav., 39(19):195013, 2022

    2022

  47. [47]

    Light deflection by squashed Kaluza- Klein black holes in a plasma medium

    Ken Matsuno. Light deflection by squashed Kaluza- Klein black holes in a plasma medium. Phys. Rev. D, 103(4):044008, 2021

    2021

  48. [48]

    Weak lensing in a plasma medium and gravitational deflection of mas- sive particles using the Gauss-Bonnet theorem

    Gabriel Crisnejo and Emanuel Gallo. Weak lensing in a plasma medium and gravitational deflection of mas- sive particles using the Gauss-Bonnet theorem. A unified treatment. Phys. Rev. D, 97(12):124016, 2018

    2018

  49. [49]

    GINZBURG, editor

    V.L. GINZBURG, editor. The Propagation of Elec- tromagnetic Waves in Plasmas, International Series of Monographs in Electromagnetic Waves. Oxford, Perga- mon, 1970

    1970

  50. [50]

    Lü, and C

    Xing-Hui Feng, Hai-Shan Liu, H. Lü, and C. N. Pope. Thermodynamics of Charged Black Holes in Einstein- Horndeski-Maxwell Theory. Phys. Rev. D, 93(4):044030, 2016

    2016

  51. [51]

    Weak and 13 strong deflection gravitational lensings by a charged Horndeski black hole

    Cheng-Yi Wang, Yu-Fu Shen, and Yi Xie. Weak and 13 strong deflection gravitational lensings by a charged Horndeski black hole. JCAP, 04:022, 2019

    2019

  52. [52]

    Gravitationallensingofmas- sive particles in Reissner-Nordström spacetime

    XiankaiPangandJunjiJia. Gravitationallensingofmas- sive particles in Reissner-Nordström spacetime. Class. Quant. Grav., 36(6):065012, 2019

    2019

  53. [53]

    Charged Galileon black holes

    Eugeny Babichev, Christos Charmousis, and Mokhtar Hassaine. Charged Galileon black holes. JCAP, 05:031, 2015

    2015

  54. [54]

    Exactmultiblack hole spacetimes in Einstein-ModMax theory

    AnaBokulićandCarlosA.R.Herdeiro. Exactmultiblack hole spacetimes in Einstein-ModMax theory. Phys. Rev. D, 111(6):064046, 2025

    2025

  55. [55]

    Ther- mal and Optical Signatures of Einstein-Dyonic ModMax Black Holes with GUP and Plasma Modifications

    Erdem Sucu, Suat Dengiz, and İzzet Sakallı. Ther- mal and Optical Signatures of Einstein-Dyonic ModMax Black Holes with GUP and Plasma Modifications. Nucl. Phys. B, 1026:117441, 2026

    2026

  56. [56]

    J. W. Moffat. Black Holes in Modified Gravity (MOG). Eur. Phys. J. C, 75(4):175, 2015

    2015

  57. [57]

    D. I. Kazakov and S. N. Solodukhin. On Quantum de- formation of the Schwarzschild solution. Nucl. Phys. B, 429:153–176, 1994

    1994

  58. [58]

    Renormalization group improved black hole space-times

    Alfio Bonanno and Martin Reuter. Renormalization group improved black hole space-times. Phys. Rev. D, 62:043008, 2000

    2000

  59. [59]

    Heydarzade and F

    Y. Heydarzade and F. Darabi. Black Hole Solutions Sur- rounded by Perfect Fluid in Rastall Theory. Phys. Lett. B, 771:365–373, 2017

    2017

  60. [60]

    Exploring Light Deflection and Black Hole Shadows in Rastall Theory with Plasma Effects

    Riasat Ali, Xia Tiecheng, Rimsha Babar, and Ali Övgün. Exploring Light Deflection and Black Hole Shadows in Rastall Theory with Plasma Effects. Int. J. Theor. Phys., 64(3):75, 2025

    2025