Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 62 references

Emergent gravitational action from non-local $T\bar T$-like deformations

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Conformal field theories contain a universal sector, fixed by the central charge $C_T$, that determines finite, scheme-independent contributions to the gravitational action induced by non-local $T\bar T$-like deformations.

desk verdict Solid free-field and trace-anomaly sections, but the headline universal C_T sector is incomplete by the paper's own admission. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05913 v1 pith:WVDZKV7R submitted 2026-08-06 hep-th gr-qc

Yun-Ze Li , Bo-Rui Li , Yu-Xiao Liu , Song He This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc MSC 81T2081T4083C45 PACS 04.60.-m11.10.-z11.25.Hf
keywords T-bar-Tdeformationinducedgravityeffectiveactionstress-tensortwo-pointfunctioncentralchargeWeylanomalyheat-kernelexpansionemergent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that when a quantum field theory is deformed by a non-local stress-tensor (a $T\bar T$-like) insertion, the first-order change in its gravitational effective action contains a sector universal to all conformal field theories. In free-field examples, a Dirac fermion, massive Maxwell theory, and Yang-Mills theory at one loop, the induced geometric coefficients remain model dependent, so universality is not automatic. The decisive input is conformal symmetry: the leading separated-point stress-tensor two-point function is fixed up to the central charge $C_T$, and after dimensional regularization and renormalization the scheme-independent pieces organize into a finite set of curvature invariants. If the argument is right, universal conformal data determine calculable parts of emergent gravity, with the Weyl anomaly playing the analogous role for trace-trace deformations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the heat-kernel expansion for the two minimal operators in play: the seed theory's one-loop operator and the $M$-th order operator defining the non-local kernel, whose Green's function is written as a Mellin transform of an off-diagonal heat kernel. The universal input is the conformally fixed stress-tensor two-point function, fixed up to $C_T$; the scheme-independent output is isolated by dimensional regularization and minimal subtraction, retaining only the terms of order $\ln^2(\mu/\mu_0)$. Concretely, Eq. (103) exhibits the four-dimensional coefficient $U^{\rm SI}_3$ as $C_T$ times a finite list of curvature invariants, while Eq. (104) adds the terms generated by a massive kernel. For trace-trace deformations, the relevant contact term is obtained by varying the Weyl anomaly, and that anomaly data fixes the finite induced action once the kernel is specified.

What would settle it

Evaluate the integral in Eq. (71) for a concrete CFT on a compact manifold, for example a free scalar on $S^4$, using the full Green's function including the global remainder $G_{\rm global}$; if that remainder changes the coefficient of $\ln^2(\mu/\mu_0)$ or generates additional scheme-independent invariants, then Eqs. (103)-(104) are incomplete as stated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the order-$\lambda$ gravitational response to a non-local $T\bar T$-like deformation is, for conformal seed theories, governed by the central charge $C_T$ in its leading universal sector. The stress-tensor two-point function on a curved background has a leading singularity proportional to $C_T/(2\sigma)^d$ with a fixed tensor structure; inserting this into the deformation kernel and renormalizing the ultraviolet divergences leaves finite terms built from curvature invariants. In four dimensions the paper evaluates the scheme-independent coefficient $U^{\rm SI}_3$ explicitly as $C_T$ times an explicit linear combination of invariants including $\square R$, $R_{\mu\nu}\square R^{\mu\nu}$, $R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}\square R^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}$, and cubic curvature terms, with additional $R^2$, $R_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu}$, and $R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}R^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}$ and Einstein-Hilbert-type terms when the kernel carries a mass scale. In the trace channel the contact terms come from the Weyl anomaly, giving a finite induced action for a general class of minimal kernels. The intended upshot is a quantum effective-action realization of induced gravity in which universal conformal data produce calculable geometric response.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the smooth global remainder of the Green's function does not alter the scheme-independent curvature terms derived from the local heat-kernel part, even though the paper itself notes that this remainder contributes to the ultraviolet logarithmic divergences of the main integral and cannot be neglected there.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any CFT, regardless of its microscopic fields, gives the same first-order induced action in the $C_T$ sector; the only theory-dependent data entering that sector is the numerical value of $C_T$.
  • The surviving terms are scheme-independent: local counterterms and finite renormalizations cannot change the $\ln^2(\mu/\mu_0)$ coefficients, so Eqs. (103)-(104) are concrete, checkable predictions.
  • In the trace channel, knowledge of the Weyl anomaly coefficients is sufficient to determine the leading induced gravitational action for the class of minimal kernels considered.
  • For free seeds the construction turns one-loop determinants directly into induced gravitational couplings; the massive Proca example produces an induced Newton constant set by the mass scale, the deformation parameter, and $\ln^2(\mu/m)$.
  • A mass scale in the kernel is what activates two-derivative terms; without such a scale the four-dimensional induced action starts at fourth derivative order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension would be to compute the full $W^{(1)}$ for a free CFT on a compact space such as $S^4$, including the global remainder $G_{\rm global}$ that the paper leaves unevaluated; that calculation would show whether the $\ln^2$ coefficients in Eqs. (103)-(104) are truly complete or receive additional finite, scheme-independent pieces.
  • If the universality claim survives, the same $C_T$-proportional terms should appear in any other construction of the induced effective action from stress-tensor deformations, so an independent computation from a solvable CFT would be a strong cross-check.
  • The scheme-independence result resembles a low-energy theorem for emergent gravity: at leading order only conformal data matter, while model-dependent OPE data and counterterm conventions are confined to the discarded scheme-dependent part. At $O(\lambda^2)$ this clean separation is likely to break down, since $TTT$ and $TTO$ data enter.
  • The trace-channel analysis suggests that anomaly matching alone can fix induced geometric couplings, which could be tested by deforming a lattice-regularized CFT and measuring the response of its partition function to a metric perturbation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the gravitational effective action induced at first order by non-local T\bar T-like deformations of quantum field theories. The authors develop a heat-kernel framework to extract local geometric terms from stress-tensor two-point functions, apply it to free fermions, massive Maxwell theory, and second-order Yang-Mills theory, and then focus on conformal field theories, where conformal symmetry fixes the leading separated-point stress-tensor correlator up to the central charge C_T. The central claim is that, after regularization and renormalization, this CFT sector yields finite, scheme-independent contributions organized into a finite set of curvature invariants. The paper also analyzes trace-trace deformations, where the contact terms are determined by the Weyl anomaly, and derives a corresponding finite gravitational action for a class of minimal non-local kernels. The free-field examples are presented as mostly model-dependent, while the CFT sector and the trace sector are claimed to be universal.

Significance. If the central claim were established, the paper would provide a concrete realization of induced gravity in which universal conformal data determine calculable geometric terms, a result of genuine interest in the T\bar T deformation and induced gravity literature. The paper contains detailed heat-kernel computations, explicit formulas such as Eq. (103) and Eq. (122), and a systematic regularization and renormalization procedure. These are strengths worth acknowledging. However, the advertised universal-sector claim is not supported by the computation as presented, because the paper explicitly concedes that a contribution to the UV logarithmic divergences is omitted. The trace-trace analysis and the free-field examples may stand on their own, but the headline result of a universal C_T-fixed sector is the main reason to consider publication, and it is precisely this claim that is undermined.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, footnote 5; Eqs. (75)–(77); Eqs. (101)–(103)] The manuscript's footnote 5 states that the smooth remainder G_global of the Green's function 'does contribute to the UV divergences of the integral (71), due to the negative-power prefactor (2σ)^{-d}' and 'cannot be neglected when considering the UV logarithmic divergences that contribute to the effective gravitational action after renormalization.' Yet §3.2 and §3.3 compute only the G_local contribution, and the scheme-independent coefficients U_SI and V_SI in Eqs. (101)–(103) are derived exclusively from that part. No computation or bound for the G_global contribution is provided, and footnote 5 itself says it cannot be evaluated by the methods used in the paper. Because G_global depends on global spectral data and boundary conditions, its uncomputed contribution could affect precisely the ln μ and ln^2 μ terms that Eqs. (101)–(103) claim are scheme-independent. The abstract's statement that CFTs 'contain a universal sector fixed by the central charge C_T' is therefore not established; the derived coefficients are incomplete in a way that the manuscript itself acknowledges. This is a load-bearing gap, not a cosmetic one.
  2. [§3.1–3.2, Eq. (64)] The computation of the CFT contribution to W^{(1)} in Eq. (71) retains only the leading identity term of the stress-tensor OPE, Eq. (64), which is universal and fixed by C_T. However, the text notes in §3.1 that subleading singular terms O(σ^{-d+1}) are not universal and depend on further CFT data such as TTT and TTO OPE coefficients. The paper does not show that these subleading terms fail to contribute to the UV logarithmic divergences that are later identified as scheme-independent. Indeed, after multiplication by the off-diagonal heat-kernel expansion of the non-local kernel, subleading terms of the two-point function can in principle generate the same 1/ε and ln μ poles. Since the paper does not compute them or argue their absence, the claim that Eqs. (101)–(103) represent the complete universal C_T sector is not justified. The manuscript appears to acknowledge this by saying that a similar analysis can be carried out once the subleading terms are determined, but that acknowledgment does not rescue the central claim as stated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Footnote 5 and abstract/conclusion] The admission in footnote 5 that G_global contributes to the UV divergences and cannot be neglected should be prominently reflected in the abstract and conclusion, rather than appearing only in a footnote; the current text overstates the universality of the results.
  2. [§3.2, Eq. (83)] The decomposition of J_n^{(ε)} into barred quantities in Eq. (83) is not explained before use; define what the bar on J_n, J_n^{μρ}, and J_n^{μν,ρσ} denotes and how the decomposition is obtained.
  3. [References] The reference list contains duplicate entries: [6] and [7] are the same Adler paper, and [54] and [55] are also the same Zee paper; these should be merged or cross-referenced.
  4. [§3.3, Eq. (103)] The explicit form of U_SI^3 in Eq. (103) is computed only for the simplest kernel choice (I=J=δ and N=0); the claim that the result is universal across the class of non-local kernels is not demonstrated by this single example, and the general-kernel statement is only asserted.
  5. [§4.2, Eq. (119)] The discussion of the n=0,1,2 terms of the regularized heat kernel in the trace-trace sector is difficult to follow; the text should specify precisely which order of limits is used to arrive at Eq. (121), especially for the terms that are singular before dimensional regularization is applied.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the scheme-independent CFT-sector action is a direct contraction of the C_T-fixed stress-tensor two-point function with an explicitly given deformation kernel; self-citations supply the kernel but do not force the result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: W^(1) in Eq. (5) is defined as the contraction of the deformation kernel H with the seed stress-tensor two-point function. For the free-field examples, the two-point function's contact part is obtained by two metric variations of the known one-loop heat-kernel action using standard Seeley-DeWitt coefficients (refs. [27], [33]), and the kernel is given explicitly in Eqs. (30)-(31) or as a Laplace-type Green's function in Eq. (72). No parameter is fitted; the output coefficients are the same heat-kernel data contracted with the chosen kernel. For the conformal sector, the leading separated-point correlator is fixed by C_T through Eqs. (63)-(65), which is external conformal-field-theory input (Osborn-Petkou and Erdmenger-Osborn, refs. [26], [35]); substituting it into Eq. (71) and using the heat-kernel representation of the Green's function produces the U_n, V_m integrals, and the scheme-independent part is selected by the standard rule that only ln mu and ln^2 mu terms survive minimal subtraction, Eqs. (101)-(102). Eq. (103) is an evaluation of these coefficients using Vassilevich's a_3 heat-kernel coefficients; it is proportional to C_T because the input correlator is proportional to C_T, not because C_T was adjusted to match the output. The self-citations [24] and [25] supply the kernel choices and the earlier trace-trace setup, but the present computation does not cite a result whose content is the target action, and the kernel is explicitly exhibited in the paper. The main genuine gap is the one acknowledged in footnote 5: the smooth remainder G_global is stated to contribute to the UV divergences of Eq. (71) and is never computed, so the U_SI and V_SI coefficients may be incomplete. That is a completeness/correctness concern, not a circular reduction; the central claim is not equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The computation relies on standard heat-kernel technology and conformal data (C_T, Weyl anomaly coefficients). The only hand-chosen inputs are the deformation coupling and the kernel mass scale; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • lambda (deformation coupling)
    Input coupling of the non-local T-bar-T-like deformation in the flow equation (1); no data fit is performed.
  • m (kernel mass scale)
    In Sections 3.3 and 4.2 a mass term N(x)=m^2 is added to the Green's function kernel to make the induced action depend on low-order curvature terms; chosen by hand, not determined by the theory.
  • Seed theory mass scale
    Fermion mass m in Section 2.3.1 and Proca mass m in Section 2.3.2 are inputs of the seed theories; they set the physical scale of the induced terms.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Heat kernel asymptotic expansion for minimal differential operators
    Used throughout Section 2 to expand the Green's function and one-loop determinants (Eqs. (13), (19)).
  • standard math Mellin transform representation of Green's functions
    Used to express G and H as proper-time integrals (Eqs. (17), (73), (118)).
  • standard math Dimensional regularization and analytic continuation of scaleless integrals
    Used to evaluate radial integrals in Section 3.2 (Eqs. (94), (99)).
  • domain assumption The leading singularity of the CFT stress-tensor two-point function is universal
    Section 3.1: the (2sigma)^{-d} term is fixed by C_T; subleading terms are not universal.
  • domain assumption The manifold has no boundary
    Stated at the start of Section 2.1; boundary terms are discarded.
  • domain assumption The non-local kernel operator F is minimal
    Eq. (2): F is an M-th order minimal operator; the analysis does not cover non-minimal kernels.
  • domain assumption The deformation is treated to first order in lambda
    Eq. (5): only O(lambda) is computed; higher orders are left for future work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emergent gravitational action from non-local $T\bar T$-like deformations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WVDZKV7R

@misc{pith2026260805913,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emergent gravitational action from non-local $T\bar T$-like deformations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WVDZKV7R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05913}
}
abstract

We study the gravitational effective action induced, at first order in the deformation parameter, by non-local $T\bar T$-like deformations of quantum field theories. Using a heat-kernel formulation, we extract the local geometric terms generated by stress-tensor two-point functions, and apply the construction to free fermions, massive Maxwell theory, and second-order Yang-Mills theory. While the resulting coefficients are generally model dependent, conformal field theories contain a universal sector fixed by the central charge $C_T$. After regularization and renormalization, this sector yields finite, scheme-independent contributions organized into a finite set of curvature invariants. We further analyze trace-trace deformations, for which the relevant contact terms are determined by the Weyl anomaly, and derive the corresponding finite gravitational action for a general class of minimal non-local kernels. These results provide a quantum effective-action realization of induced gravity in which universal conformal data determine calculable contributions to the emergent geometric response.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov,Gauge Theory Correlators from Noncritical String Theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105–114, [hep-th/9802109]. 36

    arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 253–291, [hep-th/9802150]

    arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    A. D. Sakharov,Vacuum Quantum Fluctuations in Curved Space and the Theory of Gravitation,Sov. Phys. Dokl.12(1968) 1040–1041

    work page 1968

  5. [5]

    Visser,Sakharov’s induced gravity: A Modern perspective,Mod

    M. Visser,Sakharov’s induced gravity: A Modern perspective,Mod. Phys. Lett. A17(2002) 977–992, [gr-qc/0204062]

    arXiv 2002

  6. [7]

    S. L. Adler,Einstein gravity as a symmetry-breaking effect in quantum field theory,Rev. Mod. Phys.54(1982) 729–766

    work page 1982

  7. [9]

    Weinberg and E

    S. Weinberg and E. Witten,Limits on Massless Particles,Phys. Lett. B96 (1980) 59–62

    work page 1980

  8. [10]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory,hep-th/0401146

    arXiv

Show all 62 references
  1. [11]

    F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,On space of integrable quantum field theories,Nucl. Phys. B915(2017) 363–383, [1608.05499]

    2017 arXiv

  2. [12]

    Cavagli` a, S

    A. Cavagli` a, S. Negro, I. M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi and R. Tateo,T¯T-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories,JHEP10(2016) 112, [1608.05534]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [13]

    Dubovsky, V

    S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko and M. Mirbabayi,Asymptotic fragility, near AdS 2 holography andT T,JHEP09(2017) 136, [1706.06604]

    2017 arXiv

  4. [14]

    Dubovsky, V

    S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko and G. Hern´ andez-Chifflet,T Tpartition function from topological gravity,JHEP09(2018) 158, [1805.07386]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [15]

    Cardy,TheT Tdeformation of quantum field theory as random geometry, JHEP10(2018) 186, [1801.06895]

    J. Cardy,TheT Tdeformation of quantum field theory as random geometry, JHEP10(2018) 186, [1801.06895]. 37

    2018 arXiv

  6. [16]

    A. J. Tolley,T Tdeformations, massive gravity and non-critical strings,JHEP 06(2020) 050, [1911.06142]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [17]

    Taylor,T ¯Tdeformations in general dimensions,Adv

    M. Taylor,T ¯Tdeformations in general dimensions,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 27(2023) 37–63, [1805.10287]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [18]

    Bonelli, N

    G. Bonelli, N. Doroud and M. Zhu,T ¯T-deformations in closed form,JHEP 06(2018) 149, [1804.10967]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [19]

    Conti, J

    R. Conti, J. Romano and R. Tateo,Metric approach to aT T-like deformation in arbitrary dimensions,JHEP09(2022) 085, [2206.03415]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [20]

    Babaei-Aghbolagh, K

    H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, K. Babaei Velni, D. Mahdavian Yekta and H. Mohammadzadeh,MarginalT ¯T-Like Deformation and ModMax Theories in Two Dimensions,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 086022, [2206.12677]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [21]

    Ferko, A

    C. Ferko, A. Sfondrini, L. Smith and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Root-T ¯T Deformations in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett. 129(2022) 201604, [2206.10515]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [22]

    Morone, S

    T. Morone, S. Negro and R. Tateo,Gravity andT ¯Tflows in higher dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B1005(2024) 116605, [2401.16400]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [23]

    Babaei-Aghbolagh, S

    H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, S. He, T. Morone, H. Ouyang and R. Tateo,Geometric Formulation of Generalized Root-TT¯Deformations,Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024) 111602, [2405.03465]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [24]

    Y.-Z. Li, Y. Xie and S. He,Geometric realization of stress-tensor deformed field theory,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) L081901, [2508.15461]

    2026 arXiv

  15. [25]

    Xie, Y.-Z

    Y. Xie, Y.-Z. Li, L. Xu and S. He,Gravitational formulation of stress-tensor deformed field theories,2603.08481

  16. [26]

    Osborn and A

    H. Osborn and A. Petkou,Implications of conformal invariance in field theories for general dimensions,Annals of Physics231(1994) 311–362. 38

    1994

  17. [27]

    A. O. Barvinsky and G. A. Vilkovisky,The Generalized Schwinger-Dewitt Technique in Gauge Theories and Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rept.119(1985) 1–74

    1985

  18. [28]

    A. O. Barvinsky and W. Wachowski,Heat kernel expansion for higher order minimal and nonminimal operators,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 065013, [2112.03062]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [29]

    J. S. Schwinger,On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,Phys. Rev.82 (1951) 664–679

    1951

  20. [30]

    B. S. DeWitt,Dynamical theory of groups and fields. Gordon and Breach, 1965

    1965

  21. [31]

    Lichnerowicz,Spineurs harmoniques,C

    A. Lichnerowicz,Spineurs harmoniques,C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris257(1963) 7–9

    1963

  22. [32]

    H. B. Lawson and M.-L. Michelsohn,Spin Geometry. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1989

    1989

  23. [33]

    D. V. Vassilevich,Heat kernel expansion: User’s manual,Phys. Rept.388 (2003) 279–360, [hep-th/0306138]

    2003 arXiv

  24. [34]

    Osborn and A

    H. Osborn and A. C. Petkou,Implications of conformal invariance in field theories for general dimensions,Annals Phys.231(1994) 311–362, [hep-th/9307010]

    1994 arXiv

  25. [35]

    Erdmenger and H

    J. Erdmenger and H. Osborn,Conserved currents and the energy momentum tensor in conformally invariant theories for general dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B 483(1997) 431–474, [hep-th/9605009]

    1997 arXiv

  26. [36]

    Hollands,The operator product expansion for perturbative quantum field theory in curved spacetime,Commun

    S. Hollands,The operator product expansion for perturbative quantum field theory in curved spacetime,Commun. Math. Phys.273(2007) 1–36, [gr-qc/0605072]. 39

    2007 arXiv

  27. [37]

    Bzowski, P

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Renormalised 3-point functions of stress tensors and conserved currents in cft,JHEP11(2018) 153, [1711.09105]

    2018 arXiv

  28. [38]

    M. J. Radzikowski,Micro-local approach to the Hadamard condition in quantum field theory on curved space-time,Commun. Math. Phys.179(1996) 529–553

    1996

  29. [39]

    Sahlmann and R

    H. Sahlmann and R. Verch,Microlocal spectrum condition and Hadamard form for vector valued quantum fields in curved space-time,Rev. Math. Phys. 13(2001) 1203–1246, [math-ph/0008029]

    2001 arXiv

  30. [40]

    Hollands and R

    S. Hollands and R. M. Wald,Existence of local covariant time ordered products of quantum fields in curved space-time,Commun. Math. Phys.231 (2002) 309–345, [gr-qc/0111108]

    2002 arXiv

  31. [41]

    Moretti,Comments on the stress energy tensor operator in curved space-time,Commun

    V. Moretti,Comments on the stress energy tensor operator in curved space-time,Commun. Math. Phys.232(2003) 189–221, [gr-qc/0109048]

    2003 arXiv

  32. [42]

    Decanini and A

    Y. Decanini and A. Folacci,Hadamard renormalization of the stress-energy tensor for a quantized scalar field in a general spacetime of arbitrary dimension,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 044025, [gr-qc/0512118]

    2008 arXiv

  33. [43]

    C. J. Fewster and R. Verch,The Necessity of the Hadamard Condition,Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 235027, [1307.5242]

    2013 arXiv

  34. [44]

    Moretti,On the global Hadamard parametrix in QFT and the signed squared geodesic distance defined in domains larger than convex normal neighbourhoods,Lett

    V. Moretti,On the global Hadamard parametrix in QFT and the signed squared geodesic distance defined in domains larger than convex normal neighbourhoods,Lett. Math. Phys.111(2021) 130, [2107.04903]

    2021 arXiv

  35. [45]

    B. S. Kay and R. M. Wald,Theorems on the Uniqueness and Thermal Properties of Stationary, Nonsingular, Quasifree States on Space-Times with a Bifurcate Killing Horizon,Phys. Rept.207(1991) 49–136

    1991

  36. [46]

    B. S. DeWitt and R. W. Brehme,Radiation damping in a gravitational field, Annals Phys.9(1960) 220–259. 40

    1960

  37. [47]

    Garabedian,Partial Differential Equations

    P. Garabedian,Partial Differential Equations. A Blaisdell book in the pure and applied sciences. Wiley, 1964

    1964

  38. [48]

    Poisson, A

    E. Poisson, A. Pound and I. Vega,The Motion of point particles in curved spacetime,Living Rev. Rel.14(2011) 7, [1102.0529]

    2011 arXiv

  39. [49]

    Brewin,Riemann Normal Coordinate expansions using Cadabra,Class

    L. Brewin,Riemann Normal Coordinate expansions using Cadabra,Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 175017, [0903.2087]

    2009 arXiv

  40. [50]

    Abreu, R

    S. Abreu, R. Britto and C. Duhr,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 3: Mathematical structures in Feynman integrals,J. Phys. A55(2022) 443004, [2203.13014]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [51]

    B. K. El-Menoufi,Quantum gravity of Kerr-Schild spacetimes and the logarithmic correction to Schwarzschild black hole entropy,JHEP05(2016) 035, [1511.08816]

    2016 arXiv

  42. [52]

    M. D. Schwartz,Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press, 3, 2014, 10.1017/9781139540940

    2014 doi

  43. [53]

    Le Doussal and L

    P. Le Doussal and L. Radzihovsky,Anomalous elasticity, fluctuations and disorder in elastic membranes,Annals of Physics392(2018) 340–410

    2018

  44. [54]

    S. L. Adler,A formula for the induced gravitational constant,Phys. Lett. B 95(1980) 241–242

    1980

  45. [55]

    Zee,Spontaneously generated gravity,Phys

    A. Zee,Spontaneously generated gravity,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 858

    1981

  46. [56]

    Zee,Calculation of newton ’s gravitational constant in infrared-stable yang-mills theories,Phys

    A. Zee,Calculation of newton ’s gravitational constant in infrared-stable yang-mills theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 295

    1982

  47. [57]

    L. S. Brown and A. Zee,Response to gravitational probes and induced newton ’s constant,J. Math. Phys.24(1983) 1821–1823

    1983

  48. [58]

    Bonora, P

    L. Bonora, P. Cotta-Ramusino and C. Reina,Conformal Anomaly and Cohomology,Phys. Lett. B126(1983) 305–308. 41

    1983

  49. [59]

    Bonora, P

    L. Bonora, P. Pasti and M. Bregola,WEYL COCYCLES,Class. Quant. Grav. 3(1986) 635

    1986

  50. [60]

    Deser and A

    S. Deser and A. Schwimmer,Geometric classification of conformal anomalies in arbitrary dimensions,Phys. Lett. B309(1993) 279–284, [hep-th/9302047]

    1993 arXiv

  51. [61]

    M. J. Duff,Twenty years of the Weyl anomaly,Class. Quant. Grav.11(1994) 1387–1404, [hep-th/9308075]

    1994 arXiv

  52. [62]

    Henningson and K

    M. Henningson and K. Skenderis,The Holographic Weyl anomaly,JHEP07 (1998) 023, [hep-th/9806087]

    1998 arXiv

  53. [63]

    Hartman and G

    T. Hartman and G. Mathys,Averaged null energy and the renormalization group,JHEP12(2023) 139, [2309.14409]

    2023 arXiv

  54. [64]

    Hartman and G

    T. Hartman and G. Mathys,Null energy constraints on two-dimensional RG flows,JHEP01(2024) 102, [2310.15217]. 42

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.