Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 1 cited by

Integrable systems from Poisson reductions of generalized Hamiltonian torus actions

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that, under a product-form stabilizer condition, integrable systems with generalized torus symmetries descend through Poisson reduction to integrable systems carrying explicit generalized action variables.

desk verdict Solid general reduction theorem with real applications; the broadest moduli-space examples rest on delicate case-by-case isotropy checks that deserve referee scrutiny, but no flaw is apparent. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.12051 v3 pith:WVQEG7ET submitted 2025-07-16 math-ph hep-thmath.MPmath.SGnlin.SI

L. Feher , M. Fairon This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phhep-thmath.MPmath.SGnlin.SI MSC 37J3553D2053D1753D30
keywords integrablesystemsPoissonreductiongeneralizedHamiltoniantorusactionsquasi-Poissonmanifoldsmodulispacesofflatconnectionsaction-anglecoordinatesspinCalogero-Moser-SutherlandRuijsenaars-Schneiderduality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a general reduction theorem: if a master integrable system is generated by a proper, effective action of a generalized torus $\mathrm{U}(1)^{\ell_1}\times\mathbb{R}^{\ell_2}$ that commutes with a compact symmetry group, then the system descends to an integrable system on a dense open part of the Poisson quotient, with the same rank $\ell$ and with explicitly identified generalized action variables. The authors verify the required hypotheses in the three standard doubles of a compact Lie group---the cotangent bundle, the Heisenberg double, and the quasi-Poisson double---showing that the reduced spin Sutherland and Ruijsenaars-Schneider type systems are integrable on every symplectic leaf of a dense open subset, settling a previously open problem in one dual case. The same mechanism yields integrable systems with explicit action variables on moduli spaces of flat connections, treated through quasi-Poisson geometry. If the theorem is correct, integrability after reduction no longer requires a case-by-case search for constants of motion: a generalized torus action with the right stabilizer structure is enough.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is a generalized Hamiltonian torus action: a proper, effective Hamiltonian action of $G_2 = \mathrm{U}(1)^{\ell_1}\times\mathbb{R}^{\ell_2}$ generated by $\ell$ commuting invariant functions, allowed to live on a quasi-Poisson manifold where only the invariant functions form a Poisson algebra. The dimension count rests on the invariant-theory identity $\ell + \mathrm{ddim}(C^\infty(Y)^{G_2}) = \dim(Y)$ for proper actions. The decisive hypothesis is condition 4 of Scenario 2.11: on the principal isotropy type submanifold of the combined $G_1\times G_2$ action, every stabilizer factors as $G_y = G_{1,y}\times\{e_2\}$. This product form makes the reduced $G_2$-action free on $Y_0/G_1$ and fixes the functional-dimension equality in Lemma 2.13 that turns the count into genuine integrability. A companion theorem produces generalized action-angle and transversal coordinates in an invariant neighbourhood of any point with trivial $G_2$-isotropy.

What would settle it

Exhibit a compact Poisson or quasi-Poisson $G_1$-manifold with a commuting proper action of $G_2 = \mathrm{U}(1)^{\ell_1}\times\mathbb{R}^{\ell_2}$ whose other hypotheses hold, and a point in the principal isotropy locus whose stabilizer contains an element $(e_1,t)$ with $t\neq e_2$; at such a point the equality $\mathrm{ddim}(\mathcal F^{G_1}_*) = \dim(M_*/G_1)-\ell$ would fail, so Theorem 2.14 would not apply to that example.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 2.14. Under the conditions of Scenario 2.11, the Abelian Poisson algebra $\mathcal H$ descends to an integrable system of rank $\ell$ on $M_*^{\mathrm{red}} = M_*/G_1$, the principal-isotropy-type component of the Poisson quotient. On the dense open submanifolds $Y_0/G_1$ and $Y_0^{1}/G_1$, the functions $H_1,\ldots,H_\ell$ descend to generalized action variables; the induced $G_2$-action is free on $Y_0/G_1$; and the resulting system restricts to an integrable system on every symplectic leaf of these subsets. The paper realizes the scenario for reductions of $T^*K$, the Heisenberg double of $K$, the fused double $D(K)$, and moduli spaces of flat connections, in each case producing generalized action variables where earlier results only established integrability on generic symplectic leaves.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that on the principal-isotropy part of the combined action, every stabilizer is exactly the product of its $G_1$-part with the identity of the generalized torus; if that product form fails, the dimension count that produces the correct number of integrals breaks down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every realization of Scenario 2.11 gives an integrable system of rank $\ell$ on $M_*/G_1$, with $H_1,\ldots,H_\ell$ serving as generalized action variables on $Y_0/G_1$ and $Y_0^{1}/G_1$, and with integrability on every symplectic leaf of those subsets.
  • The reductions of the master systems on $T^*K$ and on the Heisenberg double are integrable in this stronger leaf-by-leaf sense; in particular, the dual Ruijsenaars-type system whose integrability was previously incomplete is now covered.
  • The quasi-Poisson reductions of $D(K)$ yield integrable systems with explicit action variables on moduli spaces of flat connections for the sphere with four holes, the torus with one hole, and the genus-two surface with one hole.
  • The general family over $M_{m,n}$ produces integrable systems of rank $(p+b_p+q)\ell$ on moduli spaces for arbitrary genus and number of holes whenever the interval and commutator data satisfy Assumption B.1.
  • In these systems the constants of motion are explicit invariants of the reduced free $G_2$-action, and generalized action-angle coordinates exist around points with trivial $G_2$-isotropy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A boundary test the authors leave implicit is whether the product-form stabilizer condition can fail for the extended Hamiltonian families mentioned in Remark 5.23 and Appendix B.2; checking one such family by direct stabilizer computation would map out the method's limits.
  • Because compactness of $G_1$ is not essential and only properness of the combined action is used, a concrete extension would be to run Scenario 2.11 with a non-compact symmetry group in Toda-type reductions.
  • Since the action variables are smooth only on a dense open set, the reduced systems likely admit singular extensions to non-principal strata, and describing the behaviour there is a natural continuation.
  • The permutation construction in Appendix B.3 produces systems not covered by the main family, and testing whether those systems are genuinely inequivalent would be a concrete next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a general mechanism for proving that integrable systems descend through Poisson reduction. Starting from a (quasi-)Poisson manifold M with a symmetry group G1 and an Abelian Poisson algebra H of G1-invariant Hamiltonians, the authors formulate Scenario 2.11: on a dense open G1-invariant submanifold Y there exist functions H1,...,Hℓ whose Hamiltonian flows generate a proper effective action of a generalized torus G2 = U(1)^{ℓ1} × R^{ℓ2}, whose differentials span the differentials of H, and for which the principal isotropy of the combined G1×G2 action has the product form Gy = (G1)_y × {e2}. Under these hypotheses, Theorem 2.14 asserts that H descends to a degenerate integrable system of rank ℓ on the principal stratum M_*/G1, with generalized action variables on the dense open subsets Y0/G1 and Y^1_0/G1, and to integrable systems on every symplectic leaf of those open subsets. The paper then applies this abstract result to reductions of the cotangent bundle T*K, the Heisenberg double of a compact simple Lie group K, the internally fused quasi-Poisson double D(K), and quasi-Poisson models of moduli spaces of flat connections. The applications include explicit torus actions, momentum maps, generalized action variables, and the treatment of arbitrary genus with several boundary components in Proposition B.6.

Significance. If the results stand, this is a substantial and unifying contribution to the Poisson-reduction approach to integrable systems. It strengthens earlier work by Fehér and collaborators by proving integrability on every symplectic leaf of dense open subsets of the reduced spaces and, more importantly, by explicitly identifying generalized action variables; in particular it resolves an open problem from [23] for the Heisenberg double and gives a uniform treatment of systems on moduli spaces of flat connections. The paper is careful to separate the conditional general theorem from the case-by-case verification of its hypotheses, and the often delicate product-form isotropy condition is checked in the examples, including the induction over genus in Lemma B.5. I examined the stress-test concern about that induction: the constructed points do lie in the required open sets, the Coxeter-element fixed-point statements are standard and properly cited, and each subcase uses only the induction hypothesis on lower-genus factors; I found no gap or circularity.

minor comments (5)
  1. [§B.1.1, Lemma B.3, Case 2] In the description of the torus action after (B.11), the factors from ŽI = {1} are said to change B by B(τ) = T′BT′^{-1}, but they also act on A by A(τ) = T′AT′^{-1}; the proof does not use this extra relation, but the action formula as written is incomplete, and the same omission recurs implicitly in the analogous subcases of Lemmas B.4 and B.5.
  2. [§2.2, Eq. (2.22)] The displayed equality ddim(H) + ddim(F^{G1}) = dim(M_*/G1) is introduced as something that “should be useful” and is said to “basically follow” from the same arguments as (2.20); as written this is an unproved assertion. Since it is not needed for the main theorem, please mark it explicitly as a remark or provide the short proof.
  3. [§B.1.1, Lemma B.5, Case 2] The swap argument in Case 2 is terse: the reader must reindex the factors (A_2,...,A_m) to apply the induction hypothesis and then handle the inert (A_1,B_1) factor. Spelling out this subcase in a few lines would substantially improve readability of the load-bearing induction.
  4. [§5.5 and Proposition B.6] The general action of ŽT on Y(I,ŽI,J) is described only by reference to earlier examples and Lemma 5.25; since the isotropy lemmas use the action explicitly, an explicit display of the action on all components of Mm,n would remove ambiguity.
  5. [§4, Proposition 4.3] The proof of the Heisenberg double statement repeatedly refers to [23,25] for omitted verifications; this is acceptable, but a sentence indicating which specific lemmas of those papers cover each step would help the reader check the product-form isotropy condition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular step found: Theorem 2.14 is an explicitly conditional theorem proved in-text, with Scenario 2.11's product-isotropy condition verified case-by-case via external Lie-theoretic facts; the score of 2 reflects only minor, non-load-bearing self-citation usage.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, I find no step in which a conclusion is equivalent to its input by construction. Theorem 2.14 is openly conditional on Scenario 2.11, and its proof is a transparent rank count: condition 4 (principal isotropy Gy = G1_y × {e2}) enters through Lemma 2.2 to make the reduced G2-action free on Y0/G1, and Lemma 2.13 then derives ddim(H∗) + ddim(F_∗^{G1}) = dim(M_∗/G1) using the external invariant-theory count (1.1) for proper actions; none of these steps assumes the theorem's conclusion. If condition 4 fails, the theorem simply does not apply, and the paper says so explicitly (Remark 5.23 and Appendix B.2 leave such cases open). The examples in Sections 3-5 verify Scenario 2.11 case by case with genuinely external mathematics: Kostant's maximal tori in apposition [44, 51], the Coxeter fixed-point theorem [16], properness arguments, and [2, Thm. 7.2] for the connectedness of momentum-map fibers. The only self-citation is the borrowing of Heisenberg-double verification steps from [23, 25] in Section 4, but those papers do not contain the target result: Remark 4.4 states that no action variables appeared in [23, 25] and that integrability of the dual system based on H̃ had not been completed previously, so those citations are real, parameter-free evidence rather than assumptions of the conclusion. I note that the clause 'possess generalized action variables' in Theorem 2.14 largely restates conditions 2-3 of Scenario 2.11, but the paper itself flags this identification after Proposition 2.12, and the substantive claim of rank-ℓ integrability on the quotient requires the independent derivation just described. The skeptic's concern about Lemma B.5's induction is a correctness risk about verifying condition 4 in a delicate check, not a circularity: failing that check would invalidate the application of the theorem to that example class, exactly how the paper frames the remaining open cases. Verdict: no significant circularity; the residual score of 2 records only self-citation usage that is not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on two kinds of input. First, standard results from the theory of proper actions, Poisson action-angle theory, and quasi-Poisson geometry, all cited to the referenced literature. Second, the paper's own sufficient conditions (Assumption 2.5 and Scenario 2.11), verified in each example family. The most delicate homemade assumption is the product-form principal isotropy condition, verified via Coxeter elements and maximal tori in apposition. No free parameters are fitted anywhere: the constructions are parameter-free and the normalization constant in the Killing form (3.1) is a convention. The reliance on the authors' prior papers [23, 25] for some example verifications is the main external dependency.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math For a proper action of G = U(1)^l1 x R^l2 with l = l1 + l2 > 0, invariant theory gives l + ddim(C^inf(Y)^G) = dim(Y) (equation 1.1).
    This equality is the engine of the paper: it converts a proper effective generalized torus action into an integrable system. The paper cites it to invariant theory for proper actions rather than proving it, and it is used throughout Section 2.
  • standard math Existence of generalized action-angle coordinates for proper effective Hamiltonian actions of U(1)^l1 x R^l2 on Poisson manifolds, from Laurent-Gengoux-Miranda-Vanhaecke [45, Thm. 3.6 and Thm. 2.1].
    Theorem 2.15 and Corollary 2.17 rely on the Poisson version of the Caratheodory-Jacobi-Lie theorem; the paper extends it to its generalized torus setting via a change of coordinates that is proven in the text.
  • ad hoc to paper Product-form principal isotropy: on the principal isotropy type submanifold Y0 of the G1 x G2 action, Gy = (G1)_y x {e2} (Assumption 2.5(c), Scenario 2.11 condition 4).
    This is the paper's own sufficient condition, not a standard result. It is load-bearing: it makes the reduced G2-action free on Y0/G1 and fixes the functional dimensions in Lemma 2.13 and Theorem 2.14. It is verified example-by-example in Sections 3-5.
  • domain assumption Fibers of the group-valued momentum map of connected quasi-Hamiltonian K-spaces are connected (Alekseev-Malkin-Meinrenken [2, Thm. 7.2]).
    Used in Appendix A (Lemma A.1) to prove that Phi^{-1}(Kreg) is dense and connected in the internally fused double D(K), which then feeds into the connectedness of the open submanifolds Y(I,bI,J) used in Section 5 and Appendix B.
  • standard math The fixed point set of a Coxeter element acting on a maximal torus T of a compact simple Lie group K is the center Z(K), and Kostant's maximal torus in apposition intersects T in Z(K) ([16, 44, 51]).
    Used repeatedly (Lemmas 3.8, 3.9, 5.18, 5.21, B.2-B.5) to exhibit points whose G1 x G2 isotropy is exactly Z(K) x {e}, thereby proving the product-form principal isotropy condition.
  • domain assumption The quasi-Poisson calculus of Alekseev-Kosmann-Schwarzbach-Meinrenken [1] and Alekseev-Malkin-Meinrenken [2]: fusion procedure, group-valued momentum maps, reduction to moduli spaces of flat connections, and the result that C^inf(Y)^K is a Poisson algebra on quasi-Poisson K-manifolds.
    Section 5 and Appendix B are built entirely inside this framework. The paper cites [1, 2] directly instead of re-deriving the fusion bivectors and reduction statements.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Integrable systems from Poisson reductions of generalized Hamiltonian torus actions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WVQEG7ET

@misc{pith2026250712051,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Integrable systems from Poisson reductions of generalized Hamiltonian torus actions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WVQEG7ET}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.12051}
}
abstract

We develop a set of sufficient conditions for guaranteeing that an integrable system with a symmetry group $K$ on a manifold $M$ descends to an integrable system on a dense open subset of the quotient Poisson space $M/K$. The higher dimensional phase space $M$ carries a bivector $P_M$ yielding a bracket on $C^\infty(M)$ such that $C^\infty(M)^K$ is a Poisson algebra. The unreduced system on $M$ is supposed to possess `action variables' that generate a proper, effective action of a group of the form $\mathrm{U}(1)^{\ell_1} \times \mathbb{R}^{\ell_2}$ and descend to action variables of the reduced system. In view of the form of the group and since $P_M$ could be a quasi-Poisson bivector, we say that we work with a generalized Hamiltonian torus action. The reduced systems are in general superintegrable owing to the large set of invariants of the proper Hamiltonian action of $\mathrm{U}(1)^{\ell_1} \times \mathbb{R}^{\ell_2}$. We present several examples and apply our construction for solving open problems regarding the integrability of systems obtained previously by reductions of master systems on doubles of compact Lie groups: the cotangent bundle, the Heisenberg double and the quasi-Poisson double. Furthermore, we offer numerous applications to integrable systems living on moduli spaces of flat connections, using the quasi-Poisson approach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.12051 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A system of curves on Σ2,4 where the red, blue and green curves (α1, [α2, β2] and γ[2,3]) induce, respectively, the 3 types of functions (5.76), (5.77) and (5.80) for I = {1}, Ib= {2} and J = {[2, 3]} on M2,3. 42 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. A system of curves on Σ2,4 where the red, blue and green curves (α1, [α2, β2] and γ[2,3]) induce, respectively, the 3 types of functions (5.76), (5.77) and (5.80) for I = {1}, Ib= {2} and J = {[2, 3]} on M2,3. c on Σm,n+1, we can consider a representative Γc ∈ π(Σm,n+1) of the corresponding conjugacy class in the fundamental group, and then look at all the K-invariant elements it generates in C∞(Mm,n) ≃ C∞(Φ−1 m,n+1… view at source ↗

Review history (3 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Collective superintegrable systems from the Guillemin--Sternberg torus action

    math-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Collective Hamiltonians of any Hamiltonian action of a compact semisimple Lie group form a superintegrable system, with action variables given by the Guillemin-Sternberg torus momentum map.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [23]

    Feh´ er,Poisson reductions of master integrable systems on doubles of compact Lie groups

    L. Feh´ er,Poisson reductions of master integrable systems on doubles of compact Lie groups . Ann. Henri Poincar´ e24 (2023) 1823-1876; arXiv:2208.03728

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    Alekseev, Y

    A. Alekseev, Y. Kosmann-Schwarzbach and E. Meinrenken, Quasi-Poisson manifolds . Canad. J. Math. 54 (2002) 3-29; arXiv:math/0006168

    arXiv 2002

  3. [2]

    Alekseev, A

    A. Alekseev, A. Malkin and E. Meinrenken, Lie group valued moment maps . J. Differential Geom. 48 (1998) 445-495; arXiv:dg-ga/9707021

    arXiv 1998

  4. [3]

    Arthamonov and N

    S. Arthamonov and N. Reshetikhin, Superintegrable systems on moduli spaces of flat con- nections. Commun. Math. Phys. 386 (2021) 1337-1381; arXiv:1909.08682

    arXiv 2021

  5. [4]

    Arutyunov, Elements of Classical and Quantum Integrable Systems

    G. Arutyunov, Elements of Classical and Quantum Integrable Systems. Springer, 2019

    2019

  6. [5]

    Arutyunov and E

    G. Arutyunov and E. Olivucci, Hyperbolic spin Ruijsenaars–Schneider model from Poisson reduction. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 309 (2020) 31-45; arXiv:1906.02619

    arXiv 2020

  7. [6]

    Birman and C

    J.S. Birman and C. Series, An algorithm for simple curves on surfaces . J. London Math. Soc. (2), 29 (1984) 331-342

    1984

  8. [7]

    Blasco, I

    A. Blasco, I. Gutierrez-Sagredo and F.J. Herranz, Higher-order superintegrable momentum- dependent Hamiltonians on curved spaces from the classical Zernike system . Nonlinearity 36 (2023) 1143-1167; arXiv:2206.12717

    arXiv 2023

Show all 75 references
  1. [8]

    Bolsinov and B

    A.V. Bolsinov and B. Jovanovi´ c,Noncommutative integrability, moment map and geodesic flows. Ann. Glob. Anal. and Geom. 23 (2003) 305-322; arXiv:math-ph/0109031

    2003 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Caudrelier, D

    V. Caudrelier, D. Harland, A.A. Singh and B. Vicedo, The 3d mixed BF Lagrangian 1-form: a variational formulation of Hitchin ’s integrable system. Commun. Math. Phys. 407 (2026) article no. 40; arXiv:2509.05127

    2026

  3. [10]

    Chalykh and M

    O. Chalykh and M. Fairon, On the Hamiltonian formulation of the trigonometric spin Ruijsenaars–Schneider system. Lett. Math. Phys. 110 (2020) 2893-2940; arXiv:1811.08727

    2020 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Chalykh and B

    O. Chalykh and B. Ryan, DAHAs of Type C∨Cn and character varieties . Preprint; arXiv:2410.23456

    arXiv

  5. [12]

    Z. Chen, K. Jiang, N. Reshetikhin and H. Xiao, Superintegrability of the reduced stratified symplectic space. In preparation

  6. [13]

    Dragovi´ c, B

    V. Dragovi´ c, B. Gaji´ c and B. Jovanovi´ c,Integrability of homogeneous exact magnetic flows on spheres. Regul. Chaot. Dyn. 30 (2025) 582-597; arXiv:2504.20515

    2025 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Dubrovin, A.T

    B.A. Dubrovin, A.T. Fomenko and S.P. Novikov, Modern Geometry–Methods and Appli- cations. Part II. The Geometry and Topology of Manifolds. Springer, 1985

    1985

  8. [15]

    Duistermaat and J.A.C

    J.J. Duistermaat and J.A.C. Kolk, Lie Groups. Universitext. Springer, 2000 43

    2000

  9. [16]

    Dwyer and C.W

    W.G. Dwyer and C.W. Wilkerson, Centers and Coxeter elements . pp. 53–75 in: Homotopy methods in algebraic topology. Contemp. Math., Vol. 271, Amer. Math. Soc., 2001

    2001

  10. [17]

    Fairon, Integrable systems on multiplicative quiver varieties from cyclic quivers

    M. Fairon, Integrable systems on multiplicative quiver varieties from cyclic quivers . J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 58 (2025) Article ID 045202; arXiv:2108.02496

    2025

  11. [18]

    Fairon and L

    M. Fairon and L. Feh´ er,Integrable multi-Hamiltonian systems from reduction of an extended quasi-Poisson double of U(n). Ann. Henri Poincar´ e24 (2023) 3461-3529; arXiv:2302.14392

    2023 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Fairon, L

    M. Fairon, L. Feh´ er and I. Marshall, Trigonometric real form of the spin RS model of Krichever and Zabrodin . Ann. Henri Poincar´ e22 (2021) 615-675; arXiv:2007.08388

    2021 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Farb and D

    B. Farb and D. Margalit, A Primer on Mapping Class Groups. Princeton University Press, 2012

    2012

  14. [21]

    Fass` o,Superintegrable Hamiltonian systems: Geometry and perturbations

    F. Fass` o,Superintegrable Hamiltonian systems: Geometry and perturbations . Acta Appl. Math. 87 (2005) 93-121

    2005

  15. [22]

    Feh´ er,An application of the reduction method to Sutherland type many-body systems

    L. Feh´ er,An application of the reduction method to Sutherland type many-body systems . pp. 109-117 in: P. Kielanowski (ed.) et al., Geometric Methods in Physics XXXI. Birkh¨ auser, 2013; arXiv:1308.6708

    2013 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Feh´ er, Notes on the degenerate integrability of reduced systems obtained from the master systems of free motion on cotangent bundles of compact Lie groups

    L. Feh´ er, Notes on the degenerate integrability of reduced systems obtained from the master systems of free motion on cotangent bundles of compact Lie groups . pp. 309-330 in: P. Kielanowski (ed.) et al., Geometric Methods in Physics XL. Birkh¨ auser, 2024; arXiv:2309.16245

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Feh´ er,Poisson-Lie analogues of spin Sutherland models revisited

    L. Feh´ er,Poisson-Lie analogues of spin Sutherland models revisited . J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57 (2024) Article ID 205202; arXiv:2402.02990

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Feh´ er,On the maximal superintegrability of strongly isochronous Hamiltonians

    L. Feh´ er,On the maximal superintegrability of strongly isochronous Hamiltonians . J. Geom. Phys. 209 (2025) Article ID 105409; arXiv:2409.19349

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Feh´ er and V

    L. Feh´ er and V. Ayadi,Trigonometric Sutherland systems and their Ruijsenaars duals from symplectic reduction. J. Math. Phys. 51 (2010) Article ID 103511; arXiv:1005.4531

    2010 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Feh´ er and C

    L. Feh´ er and C. Klimˇ c ´ ık,Poisson–Lie interpretation of trigonometric Ruijsenaars duality . Commun. Math. Phys. 301 (2011) 55-104; arXiv:0906.4198

    2011 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Feh´ er and C

    L. Feh´ er and C. Klimˇ c ´ ık,Self-duality of the compactified Ruijsenaars–Schneider system from quasi-Hamiltonian reduction. Nucl. Phys. B 860 (2012) 464-515; arXiv:1101.1759

    2012 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Feh´ er and T.J

    L. Feh´ er and T.J. Kluck, New compact forms of the trigonometric Ruijsenaars-Schneider system. Nucl. Phys. B 882 (2014) 97-127; arXiv:1312.0400

    2014 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Feh´ er and B.G

    L. Feh´ er and B.G. Pusztai, Generalized spin Sutherland systems revisited . Nucl. Phys. B 893 (2015) 236-256; arXiv:1501.03085

    2015 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Sardanashvily, Noncommutative integrability on noncompact invariant manifolds

    E Fiorani and G. Sardanashvily, Noncommutative integrability on noncompact invariant manifolds. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 39 (2006) 14035-14042; arXiv:math/0604104

    2006 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Fock and A

    V. Fock and A. Rosly, Poisson structure on moduli of flat connections on Riemann surfaces and the r-matrix. pp. 67–86 in: Moscow Seminar in Mathematical Physics. Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, Vol. 191, Amer. Math. Soc., 1999; arXiv:math/9802054

    1999 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Fordy and Q

    A.P. Fordy and Q. Huang,Integrable and superintegrable extensions of the rational Calogero- Moser model in three dimensions . J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 55 (2022), Paper No. 225203; arXiv:2111.15659

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Gotˆ o,A theorem on compact semi-simple groups

    M. Gotˆ o,A theorem on compact semi-simple groups . J. Math. Soc. Japan 1 (1949) 270-272

    1949

  28. [36]

    Guillemin and S

    V. Guillemin and S. Sternberg, The Gelfand-Cetlin system and quantization of complex flag manifolds. J. Funct. Anal. 52 (1983) 106-128

    1983

  29. [37]

    Hoque and L

    M.F. Hoque and L. ˇSnobl, Family of nonstandard integrable and superintegrable classical Hamiltonian systems in non-vanishing magnetic fields . J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56 (2023) Article ID 165203; arXiv:2212.05338

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Jovanovi´ c, Symmetries and integrability

    B. Jovanovi´ c, Symmetries and integrability . Publ. Institut Math. 49 (2008) 1-36; arXiv:0812.4398

    2008 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Kazhdan, B

    D. Kazhdan, B. Kostant and S. Sternberg, Hamiltonian group actions and dynamical sys- tems of Calogero type . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 31 (1978) 481-507 44

    1978

  32. [40]

    Kharchev, A

    S. Kharchev, A. Levin, M. Olshanetsky and A. Zotov, Quasi-compact Higgs bundles and Calogero–Sutherland systems with two types spins . J. Math. Phys. 59 (2018) Article ID 103509; arXiv:1712.08851

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Klimˇ c ´ ık,On moment maps associated to a twisted Heisenberg double

    C. Klimˇ c ´ ık,On moment maps associated to a twisted Heisenberg double . Rev. Math. Phys. 18 (2006) 781-821; arXiv:math-ph/0602048

    2006 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction

    A.W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction. Birkh¨ auser, 1996

    1996

  35. [43]

    Korogodski and Y.S

    L.I. Korogodski and Y.S. Soibelman, Algebras of Functions on Quantum Groups: Part I. American Mathematical Society, 1998

    1998

  36. [44]

    Kostant, The principal three-dimensional subgroup and the Betti numbers of a complex simple Lie group

    B. Kostant, The principal three-dimensional subgroup and the Betti numbers of a complex simple Lie group . Amer. J. Math. 81 (1959) 973–1032

    1959

  37. [45]

    Laurent-Gengoux, E

    C. Laurent-Gengoux, E. Miranda and P. Vanhaecke, Action-angle coordinates for in- tegrable systems on Poisson manifolds . Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2011, 1839-1869; arXiv:0805.1679

    2011 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Le Blanc, Quasi-Poisson structures and integrable systems related to the moduli space of flat connections on a punctured Riemann sphere

    A. Le Blanc, Quasi-Poisson structures and integrable systems related to the moduli space of flat connections on a punctured Riemann sphere . J. Geom. Phys. 57 (2007) 1631-1652

    2007

  39. [47]

    Liashyk, G

    A. Liashyk, G. Ma, N. Reshetikhin and I. Sechin, Low-dimensional tori in Calogero-Moser- Sutherland systems . Lett. Math. Phys. 116 (2026) article no. 44; arXiv:2506.16610

    2026

  40. [48]

    Lu, Momentum mappings and reduction of Poisson actions

    J.-H. Lu, Momentum mappings and reduction of Poisson actions. pp. 209-226 in: Symplectic Geometry, Groupoids, and Integrable Systems. Springer, 1991

    1991

  41. [49]

    Marquette, D

    I. Marquette, D. McLeod, S. Scapucci and A. Vollmer, On Haantjes tensors for second-order superintegrable systems. pp.269-286 in: D.R. Wood (ed.) at al, 2024 MATRIX Annals, Part I, Springer, 2026; arXiv:2412.13007

    2024

  42. [50]

    Marsden, G

    J. Marsden, G. Misio lek, J.-P. Ortega, M. Perlmutter and T.S. Ratiu, Hamiltonian Reduc- tion by Stages. Springer, 2007

    2007

  43. [51]

    Meinrenken, Verlinde formulas for nonsimply connected groups

    E. Meinrenken, Verlinde formulas for nonsimply connected groups. pp. 381-417 in: V.G. Kac (ed.) et al., Lie groups, geometry, and representation theory. Birkh¨ auser, 2018; arXiv:1706.04045

    2018 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Michor, Topics in Differential Geometry

    P.W. Michor, Topics in Differential Geometry. Amer. Math. Soc., 2008

    2008

  45. [53]

    Miller Jr, S

    W. Miller Jr, S. Post and P. Winternitz, Classical and quantum superintegrability with applications. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46 (2013) Article ID 423001; arXiv:1309.2694

    2013 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Mischenko and A.T

    A.S. Mischenko and A.T. Fomenko, Generalized Liouville method for integrating Hamilton- ian systems . Funct. Anal. Appl. 12 (1978) 113-125

    1978

  47. [55]

    Nekhoroshev, Action-angle variables and their generalizations

    N.N. Nekhoroshev, Action-angle variables and their generalizations . Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 26 (1972) 180-197

    1972

  48. [56]

    Onishchik and E.B

    A.L. Onishchik and E.B. Vinberg, Lie Groups and Algebraic Groups. Springer, 1990

    1990

  49. [57]

    Ortega and T

    J.-P. Ortega and T. Ratiu, Momentum Maps and Hamiltonian Reduction. Birkh¨ auser, 2004

    2004

  50. [58]

    Perelomov, Integrable Systems of Classical Mechanics and Lie Algebras

    A.A. Perelomov, Integrable Systems of Classical Mechanics and Lie Algebras. Birkh¨ auser, 1990

    1990

  51. [59]

    Ragnisco and F

    O. Ragnisco and F. Zullo, The N-species integrable Volterra system as a maximally su- perintegrable Hamiltonian system . Open Comm. Nonlin. Math. Phys. 5 (2025) 36–56; arXiv:2505.09487

    2025 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Reshetikhin, Degenerate integrability of spin Calogero–Moser systems and the duality with the spin Ruijsenaars systems

    N. Reshetikhin, Degenerate integrability of spin Calogero–Moser systems and the duality with the spin Ruijsenaars systems . Lett. Math. Phys. 63 (2003) 55-71; arXiv:math/0202245

    2003 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Reshetikhin, Degenerately integrable systems

    N. Reshetikhin, Degenerately integrable systems . J. Math. Sci. 213 (2016) 769-785; arXiv:1509.00730

    2016 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Reshetikhin, Spin Calogero–Moser models on symmetric spaces

    N. Reshetikhin, Spin Calogero–Moser models on symmetric spaces. pp. 377-402 in: Integra- bility, Quantization, and Geometry. I. Integrable Systems. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. 103.1, Amer. Math. Soc., 2021; arXiv:1903.03685

    2021 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Reshetikhin, Periodic and open classical spin Calogero-Moser chains

    N. Reshetikhin, Periodic and open classical spin Calogero-Moser chains . pp.263-297 in: Surv. Differ. Geom. 26, International Press, 2024; arXiv:2302.14281

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Reshetikhin and G

    N. Reshetikhin and G. Schrader, Superintegrability of generalized Toda models on symmetric spaces. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2021, 12993-13010; arXiv:1802.00356

    2021 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Reshetikhin and M.A

    N. Reshetikhin and M.A. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Quantum R-matrices and factorization problems. J. Geom. Phys. 5 (1988) 533-550 45

    1988

  58. [66]

    Ruijsenaars, Action-angle maps and scattering theory for some finite-dimensional inte- grable systems

    S. Ruijsenaars, Action-angle maps and scattering theory for some finite-dimensional inte- grable systems. III. Sutherland type systems and their duals . Publ. RIMS 31 (1995) 247-353

    1995

  59. [67]

    Samelson, Notes on Lie Algebras

    H. Samelson, Notes on Lie Algebras. Springer, 1990

    1990

  60. [68]

    Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Dressing transformations and Poisson group actions

    M.A. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Dressing transformations and Poisson group actions . Publ. RIMS 21 (1985) 1237-1260

    1985

  61. [69]

    Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Integrable systems: an r-matrix approach

    M.A. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Integrable systems: an r-matrix approach . Kyoto preprint RIMS-1650, 2008; kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/preprint/file/RIMS1650.pdf

    2008

  62. [70]

    Sjamaar and E

    R. Sjamaar and E. Lerman, Stratified symplectic spaces and reduction . Ann. of Math. 134 (1991) 375-422

    1991

  63. [71]

    Tempesta (ed.) et al., Superintegrability in Classical and Quantum Systems

    P. Tempesta (ed.) et al., Superintegrability in Classical and Quantum Systems. CRM Pro- ceedings and Lecture Notes, Vol. 37, 2004

    2004

  64. [72]

    Tsiganov, Rotations and integrability

    A.V. Tsiganov, Rotations and integrability . Regul. Chaotic Dyn. 29 (2024) 913–930; arXiv:2305.12370

    2024 arXiv

  65. [73]

    van Diejen, Commuting difference operators with polynomial eigenfunctions

    J.F. van Diejen, Commuting difference operators with polynomial eigenfunctions. Compos. Math. 95 (1995) 183–233

    1995

  66. [74]

    Vollmer, Torsion-free connections of second-order maximally superintegrable systems

    A. Vollmer, Torsion-free connections of second-order maximally superintegrable systems . Bull. London Math. Soc. 57 (2025) 565-581; arXiv:2403.08509

    2025 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Zung, Torus actions and integrable systems

    N.T. Zung, Torus actions and integrable systems. pp. 289-328 in: Topological Methods in the Theory of Integrable Systems. Camb. Sci. Publ., 2006; arXiv:math/0407455 46

    2006 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.