REVIEW 5 cited by
Watermarking Text Generated by Black-Box Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
LLMs now exhibit human-like skills in various fields, leading to worries about misuse. Thus, detecting generated text is crucial. However, passive detection methods are stuck in domain specificity and limited adversarial robustness. To achieve reliable detection, a watermark-based method was proposed for white-box LLMs, allowing them to embed watermarks during text generation. The method involves randomly dividing the model vocabulary to obtain a special list and adjusting the probability distribution to promote the selection of words in the list. A detection algorithm aware of the list can identify the watermarked text. However, this method is not applicable in many real-world scenarios where only black-box language models are available. For instance, third-parties that develop API-based vertical applications cannot watermark text themselves because API providers only supply generated text and withhold probability distributions to shield their commercial interests. To allow third-parties to autonomously inject watermarks into generated text, we develop a watermarking framework for black-box language model usage scenarios. Specifically, we first define a binary encoding function to compute a random binary encoding corresponding to a word. The encodings computed for non-watermarked text conform to a Bernoulli distribution, wherein the probability of a word representing bit-1 being approximately 0.5. To inject a watermark, we alter the distribution by selectively replacing words representing bit-0 with context-based synonyms that represent bit-1. A statistical test is then used to identify the watermark. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on both Chinese and English datasets. Furthermore, results under re-translation, polishing, word deletion, and synonym substitution attacks reveal that it is arduous to remove the watermark without compromising the original semantics.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Selective Disclosure Watermarking for Large Language Models
HeRo recursively partitions the LLM vocabulary into a hierarchy, embedding multi-bit payloads across layers so that verifiers with different keys recover only their authorized portion while preserving the original sam...
-
Can Watermarking Techniques Help Prevent LLM Model Stealing?
Softplus-then-perturb with embedding-seeded Gaussian noise defeats PCA/averaging/RPCA dimension-extraction attacks on Mistral-7B and GPT-2 with only modest quality loss.
-
Observation-Level Watermarking and Detection for Tabular Data
STAMP embeds Laplace keys via refined empirical CDFs so watermarked tabular rows keep the original law asymptotically and remain detectable from a single observation.
-
SSTMark: Robust Training-Free Semantic-Level Speech Watermarking
SSTMark embeds a watermark in AI speech by rewriting its transcript and resynthesizing it, achieving strong average robustness to audio distortions but at the cost of altering the spoken content.
-
FPEdit: Robust LLM Fingerprinting through Localized Parameter Editing
FPEdit uses knowledge editing with a promote-suppress objective to embed robust, stealthy natural-language fingerprints into LLMs, achieving 94 to 100 percent retention after fine-tuning while preserving benchmark per...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.