Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LLM-Based Community Surveys for Operational Decision Making in Interconnected Utility Infrastructures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.13577 v1 pith:WWXBUOCS submitted 2025-07-17 cs.SI

LLM-Based Community Surveys for Operational Decision Making in Interconnected Utility Infrastructures

classification cs.SI
keywords communitiesorderdisasterfunctionalitiesinfrastructurerepairacrossaddress
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We represent interdependent infrastructure systems and communities alike with a hetero-functional graph (HFG) that encodes the dependencies between functionalities. This graph naturally imposes a partial order of functionalities that can inform the sequence of repair decisions to be made during a disaster across affected communities. However, using such technical criteria alone provides limited guidance at the point where the functionalities directly impact the communities, since these can be repaired in any order without violating the system constraints. To address this gap and improve resilience, we integrate community preferences to refine this partial order from the HFG into a total order. Our strategy involves getting the communities' opinions on their preferred sequence for repair crews to address infrastructure issues, considering potential constraints on resources. Due to the delay and cost associated with real-world survey data, we utilize a Large Language Model (LLM) as a proxy survey tool. We use the LLM to craft distinct personas representing individuals, each with varied disaster experiences. We construct diverse disaster scenarios, and each simulated persona provides input on prioritizing infrastructure repair needs across various communities. Finally, we apply learning algorithms to generate a global order based on the aggregated responses from these LLM-generated personas.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LISTEN to Your Preferences: An LLM Framework for Multi-Objective Selection

    cs.CL 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LISTEN is an agentic LLM framework for multi-objective selection using natural language, with LISTEN-U refining a parametric utility function and LISTEN-T performing tournament-style batch selections, showing context-...

  2. LISTEN to Your Preferences: An LLM Framework for Multi-Objective Selection

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    LISTEN uses LLMs as zero-shot preference oracles, via iterative utility refinement (LISTEN-U) or tournament comparisons (LISTEN-T), to select preferred items from large multi-objective candidate sets.