Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

A proposal for the role of higher spin fields in Conformal Cyclic Cosmology

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes that the non-unitary time evolution of cubic chiral higher spin gravity supplies the entropy-resetting mechanism that conformal cyclic cosmology needs between aeons.

desk verdict An honest, clearly-written essay proposing a new role for chiral higher spin theory in CCC, but the central helicity-migration mechanism is in direct tension with the cited S=1 result and no calculation is offered. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.06634 v1 pith:WYB7TLN6 submitted 2025-07-09 gr-qc hep-th

Anders K. H. Bengtsson This is my paper
classification gr-qchep-th
keywords higherspingaugefieldscubicchiralgravityconformalcycliccosmologyblackholeinformationparadoxnon-unitarytimeevolutionentropyresetlight-frontformulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a physical role for higher spin gauge fields: they are confined to extreme environments such as black holes, where they erase degrees of freedom. It argues that the cubic chiral higher spin gravity theory, the only known interacting four-dimensional higher spin theory with an action and propagating degrees of freedom, has a non-unitary Hamiltonian that can drive lower-helicity degrees of freedom into higher-helicity ones, and that these higher-helicity states then decouple from the world. In conformal cyclic cosmology this would be exactly the entropy-resetting process needed to join a high-entropy end of one aeon to a low-entropy beginning of the next. The paper presents the idea as a qualitative research program, not a completed calculation, and it points to the transition mechanism as the step that must be made precise.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the cubic chiral higher spin gravity theory in the light-front formulation: a theory containing one massless field for every integer spin, whose interactions are only cubic, and whose Hamiltonian is non-Hermitean because the complex-conjugate terms of each vertex are dropped. The vertices carry definite helicities, with coupling coefficients that grow or shrink according to the total helicity, so a vertex that sends a helicity-1 field into a helicity-$s$ pair has coupling $\alpha_g$, while the reverse process is suppressed by powers of $L_P/\alpha_g$. That helicity-dependent asymmetry is what the paper uses to argue for a one-way migration of degrees of freedom from low to high spin, and hence for a phase-space reduction that resets entropy.

What would settle it

A direct way to test the proposal is to compute the non-unitary evolution generated by the cubic chiral Hamiltonian on an on-shell low-spin initial state and ask whether any probability flows into higher-helicity sectors; if all transition rates vanish, not just S-matrix elements, then the claimed phase-space reduction cannot happen and the entropy-reset mechanism is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the non-unitary time evolution of the cubic chiral higher spin gravity theory can bridge the very large entropy gap between aeons in conformal cyclic cosmology. Inside black holes, so the proposal goes, lower-spin degrees of freedom are converted by the theory's cubic vertices into higher-spin degrees of freedom, and once converted they no longer interact with the outside world; the higher-spin part of phase space factors out, resetting entropy to a low value. The theory's trivial S-matrix is not an obstacle because the relevant process is non-unitary Hamiltonian evolution rather than on-shell scattering, and the reverse transitions from high helicity back to low helicity are suppressed by powers of the Planck length over the gauge coupling. This is advanced as a program for future work, with its own hard questions acknowledged.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the chiral cubic interactions actually transfer low-spin degrees of freedom into higher-spin ones inside black holes, even though the theory's own perturbative results say all on-shell scattering amplitudes vanish and the S-matrix is the identity; if the transfer rate is zero, the entropy-reset mechanism collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the proposal is correct, higher spin fields never appear in ordinary low-energy physics; their only physical habitat is the interior of black holes.
  • Black hole evaporation is information-losing, and the second law is preserved globally because the lost degrees of freedom are removed from the accessible phase space rather than radiated away.
  • The entropy reset between aeons in conformal cyclic cosmology becomes a concrete dynamical consequence rather than an imposed condition.
  • Entropy reduction during evaporation is gradual and driven by helicity migration, with higher-spin transitions suppressed by powers of the Planck length over the gauge coupling, so the effect is strongest near Planck-scale energies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension of the paper's logic is to truncate the theory to a few low spins and numerically integrate the non-unitary light-front Hamiltonian, checking whether probability genuinely accumulates in higher-helicity sectors; the paper gives the vertex patterns but no rates.
  • A conceptual gap the paper leaves open is how to define transition probabilities in a non-unitary theory whose S-matrix is the identity; until that is settled, the statement that degrees of freedom disappear remains heuristic.
  • If the mechanism holds, one would expect the late-time evaporation spectrum to show traces of a shrinking Hilbert space, for example a time-dependent reduction in the number of effectively available final states during black hole evaporation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a qualitative research program in which the cubic chiral higher spin gravity theory (the Ponomarev-Skvortsov/Metsaev light-front theory) plays a physical role inside black holes, providing the entropy reset required by Penrose's Conformal Cyclic Cosmology. The core idea is that lower-helicity degrees of freedom transition into higher-helicity degrees of freedom via the cubic interactions, and that these higher-helicity states are then effectively removed from phase space, so that entropy decreases during black hole evaporation. The paper reviews the history of higher spin gauge theory, collects the known properties of the cubic chiral theory (including the vanishing of all on-shell amplitudes and a trivial S-matrix), describes the entropy problem in CCC, and discusses how the non-unitary evolution might implement the reset. Section 9 explicitly states that no technical calculations are provided.

Significance. If the proposal were correct, it would give a concrete physical role to higher spin fields, resolve the black hole information paradox in a way compatible with the early Hawking picture, and supply the missing entropy reset in CCC. The paper is valuable in clearly posing a new question and in honestly displaying the known results and tensions of the cubic chiral theory, including the vanishing amplitudes and trivial S-matrix of refs. [58,61,62]. However, the significance is entirely conditional: the central mechanism of lower-to-higher helicity migration is asserted rather than derived, and it appears to be in direct tension with the very quantum results the paper cites. As it stands, the proposal does not provide a working mechanism, only a speculative research direction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 8 vs. Section 4] The central entropy-reset mechanism is not supported by the paper's own cited results. Section 4 reports that refs. [58,61,62] prove all on-shell tree amplitudes of the cubic chiral theory vanish and the S-matrix is the identity. Section 8 nevertheless asserts that 'the lower spin degrees of freedom transitions into higher spin degrees of freedom via the cubic interactions,' adding that 'the S-matrix however being trivial, these do not subsequently scatter, although there may be transitions according to the cubic interactions.' On-shell transition amplitudes are exactly the matrix elements of the S-matrix; a trivial S-matrix means zero transition probability in every channel. The paper acknowledges the apparent paradox ('How can the S-matrix be a unit matrix ... and the underlying theory be non-unitary?') but provides no calculation or alternative definition of 'transition' that would evade the vanishing amplitudes. Section 9 concedes that no technical calculations support the proposal. Without a concrete mechanism — e.g., a demonstration that non-unitary evolution produces non-zero on-shell transition probabilities from the cubic Hamiltonian, or an explicit statement that the effect is pure norm decay rather than scattering — the central claim that helicity migrates from lower to higher spin is unsupported and, on the cited results, appears to be exactly zero.
  2. [Section 8, inside/outside black holes] The applicability of the flat-space cubic chiral theory to black hole interiors is an unresolved, load-bearing assumption. The paper notes that the theory is derived in Minkowski (or constant curvature) space and asks 'How can it be relevant inside black holes?' The answer given — 'inside black holes, space-time may be simple' and 'some serious rethinking is needed' — is not an argument. No concrete model of the interior geometry, no estimate of curvature scales, and no description of the inside/outside transformation is provided. Without this, the proposal cannot even state in what regime the cubic chiral Hamiltonian governs the dynamics, nor why the S-matrix triviality computed in flat space would be bypassed by interior boundary conditions. This is not a minor technicality; it is the physical setting in which the entropy reset is supposed to occur.
  3. [Section 8, Eq. (7) and the coupling suppression argument] The heuristic derivation of a 'gradual migration' of helicity uses the coupling parameter αg(l_p/αg)^{λ123−1} displayed after Eq. (6) and the discussion of vertices such as λ1=1, λ2=s, λ3=−s. The comparison of forward and backward transition rates is purely dimensional and assumes that the cubic vertices actually produce on-shell transitions. In light of the trivial S-matrix established in Section 4, the coupling strength is irrelevant: if all on-shell amplitudes vanish, there are no transitions to be suppressed or enhanced. The paper does not address this logical gap; it merely asserts that the cubic interactions 'lend support' to the migration hypothesis. A calculation (even a schematic one) showing that the non-unitary Hamiltonian generates non-zero probabilities for these processes is required before the coupling hierarchy can carry the claimed entropy-reducing effect.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains several typos and grammatical errors, for example 'dicuss' in the introduction, 'succes' in Section 3, 'Her-mitean' in Section 4, 'and och' in the footnote of Section 4, and 'it would take us to far afield' in Section 3. These should be corrected.
  2. [Section 2] The acronym CCC is used without expansion at first occurrence; spell out 'Conformal Cyclic Cosmology' at the beginning of Section 2.
  3. [Section 8] The coupling coefficient formula (6) is attributed to Metsaev in the text, but the displayed equation number for the alpha-gamma coupling in Section 8 is not labelled; consider numbering it explicitly so that cross-referencing is easier.
  4. [References] Some references are incomplete or informal, e.g., ref. [71] lacks the journal or preprint identifier in the citation style used elsewhere, and ref. [91] is a 2024 arXiv preprint with an unusual year in the running text. Please standardize.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the proposal is an interpretive application of an externally established theory, not a derivation that reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper makes no derivation that is forced by its own definitions or by a self-citation chain. The load-bearing theory, the cubic chiral higher spin gravity theory, is taken from independent external work: the 2016 light-front construction of Ponomarev and Skvortsov [53], the Metsaev coupling coefficients [51,52], and the quantum results of Skvortsov, Tran, and Tsulaia [58,61,62]. The author's own earlier papers [7,8] are used for historical background and for the original derivation of cubic vertices, but the specific properties on which the proposal relies, the non-unitary Hamiltonian, the coupling formula (6), and the trivial S-matrix, are not imported from a self-citation. The proposal explicitly identifies an open problem rather than pretending to derive it: the tension between a trivial S-matrix and non-unitary evolution is stated as an apparent paradox and left unresolved. Sections 8 and 9 concede that the transition mechanism is qualitative and that no technical calculations support the proposal. The entropy reset is thus unsupported and potentially inconsistent with the cited trivial S-matrix, but unsupportedness is a correctness risk, not circularity. There are no fitted parameters called predictions and no equations that reduce to their own inputs by construction. The self-citations in the historical sections are background only and do not carry the central claim, so the paper receives a 0 circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on two external pillars (the cubic chiral theory and CCC) plus three ad hoc assumptions introduced to make the mechanism work. No free parameters are fitted and no new entities are postulated. The coupling estimates in Eq. (7) reuse the Metsaev couplings with a gauge coupling constant alpha_g as an input.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The cubic chiral higher spin theory is a consistent quantum field theory with non-unitary Hamiltonian and trivial S-matrix.
    Invoked throughout Sections 4, 6, and 8; the proposal assumes the existence and quantum properties established in cited refs [53], [58], [61], [62].
  • domain assumption Penrose's Conformal Cyclic Cosmology is viable and requires an entropy reset across aeons.
    Section 5: the author states 'instead assuming that the theory is a viable cosmological theory' and builds the proposal on CCC's entropy gap.
  • ad hoc to paper Inside black holes spacetime is simple enough for the flat-space light-front cubic chiral theory to apply.
    Section 8: 'Yes, inside black holes, space-time may be simple.' The author flags this as a serious unresolved problem.
  • ad hoc to paper Higher spin interactions effectively stop at the cubic chiral theory; no unitary completion exists or is relevant.
    Section 7: 'I will assume that higher spin effectively stops with the cubic chiral theory adapted to black hole physics.'
  • ad hoc to paper The cubic interactions can transfer lower-helicity to higher-helicity degrees of freedom even though all on-shell amplitudes vanish.
    Section 8 asserts 'there may be transitions according to the cubic interactions' after citing the S-matrix equals 1 in Section 4; no mechanism is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A proposal for the role of higher spin fields in Conformal Cyclic Cosmology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WYB7TLN6

@misc{pith2026250706634,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A proposal for the role of higher spin fields in Conformal Cyclic Cosmology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WYB7TLN6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.06634}
}
read the original abstract

This paper proposes a research program into how the special properties of the cubic chiral higher spin gravity theory may play a role in conformal cyclic cosmology and black hole physics, in particular for the black hole information paradox. The paper is qualitative, raising a number of questions and connections, that may be interesting to pursue in more detail. The proposal is based on a new -- at least not so commonly expressed -- view on the presumptive role of higher spin gauge fields in fundamental physics. In short, it is proposed that the non-unitary time evolution of the cubic chiral higher spin gravity theory is precisely what is needed for bridging the very large entropy gap between aeons in Roger Penrose's cosmological theory CCC.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On symmetry breaking in the self-dual higher-spin theory

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the self-dual higher-spin theory, a scalar vacuum that breaks AdS symmetry to 3D Poincaré makes all higher-spin gauge fields decouple except spin one, and makes higher-spin currents non-conserved except the spin-on...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S. W. Hawking. Particle creation by black holes. Commun. Math. Phys., 43:199–220, 1975

    1975

  2. [2]

    S. W. Hawking. Information loss in black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 72:084013, 2005

    2005

  3. [3]

    R. Penrose. The Road to Reality. Jonathan Cape, 2004

    2004

  4. [4]

    Majorana

    E. Majorana. Teoria relativistica di particelle con momento intrinseco arbitrario. Nuovo Cimento, 9:335–344, 1932

    1932

  5. [5]

    P. A. M. Dirac. Relativistic wave equations. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 155:447– 459, 1936

    1936

  6. [6]

    Fronsdal

    C. Fronsdal. Massless fields with integer spin. Phys. Rev. D, 18:3624– 3629, 1978

    1978

  7. [7]

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson, and L. Brink. Cubic interaction terms for arbitrary spin. Nucl. Phys. B, 227:31–40, 1983

    1983

  8. [8]

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson, and N. Linden. Interacting higher- spin gauge fields on the light front. Class. Quant. Grav., 4:1333–1345, 1987

    1987

Show all 93 references
  1. [9]

    F. A. Berends, G. J. H. Burgers, and H. van Dam. On spin three self interactions. Z. Phys. C, 24:247–254, 1984

    1984

  2. [10]

    F. A. Berends, G. J. H. Burgers, and H. van Dam. On the theoreti- cal problems in constructing interactions involving higher-spin massless particles. Nucl. Phys. B, 260:295–322, 1985

    1985

  3. [11]

    E. S. Fradkin and M. A. Vasiliev. On the gravitational interaction of massless higher spin fields. Phys. Lett. B, 189:89–95, 1987

    1987

  4. [12]

    E. S. Fradkin and M. A. Vasiliev. Cubic interaction in extended theories of massless higher spin fields. Nucl. Phys. B, 291:141–171, 1987

    1987

  5. [13]

    Higher Spin Field Theoy, Vol

    Anders Bengtsson. Higher Spin Field Theoy, Vol. 1: Free Theory. De Gruyter, 2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    Higher Spin Field Theoy, Vol

    Anders Bengtsson. Higher Spin Field Theoy, Vol. 2: Interactions. De Gruyter, 2023

    2023

  7. [15]

    Fierz and W

    M. Fierz and W. Pauli. On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 173:211– 232, 1939. 19

    1939

  8. [16]

    R. R. Metsaev. Cubic interaction vertices for higher spin fields, 1997. hep-th/9705048

    1997 arXiv

  9. [17]

    R. R. Metsaev. Generating function for cubic interaction vertices of higher spin fields in any dimension. Modern Physics Letters A, 8(25):2413–2426, 1993

    1993

  10. [18]

    Bengtsson, M

    I. Bengtsson, M. Cederwall, and O. Lindgren. Light-cone actions for gravity and higher spins. 1983. G¨ oteborg preprint 83-55

    1983

  11. [19]

    S. Ananth. The quintic interaction vertex in light-cone gravity. Phys. Lett., B664:219–223, 2008. arXiv:0803.1494

    2008 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Ouvry and J

    S. Ouvry and J. Stern. Gauge fields of any spin and symmetry. Phys. Lett. B, 177:335–340, 1986

    1986

  13. [21]

    A. K. H. Bengtsson. A unified action for higher spin gauge bosons from covariant string theory. Phys. Lett. B, 182:321–325, 1986

    1986

  14. [22]

    A. K. H. Bengtsson. BRST approach to interacting higher-spin gauge fields. Class. Quant. Grav., 5:437–451, 1988

    1988

  15. [23]

    Manvelyan, Karapet Mkrtchyan, and Werner R¨ uhl

    R. Manvelyan, Karapet Mkrtchyan, and Werner R¨ uhl. Off-shell con- struction of some trilinear higher spin gauge field interactions. Nucl. Phys. B, 826:1–17, 2010. arXiv:0903.0243

    2010 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Manvelyan, Karapet Mkrtchyan, and Werner R¨ uhl

    R. Manvelyan, Karapet Mkrtchyan, and Werner R¨ uhl. General trilinear interaction for arbitrary even higher spin gauge fields. Nucl. Phys. B, 836:204–221, 2010. arXiv:1003.2877

    2010 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Manvelyan, Karapet Mkrtchyan, and Werner R¨ uhl

    R. Manvelyan, Karapet Mkrtchyan, and Werner R¨ uhl. Direct con- struction of a cubic selfinteraction for higher spin fields. Nucl. Phys. B, 844:348, 2011. arXiv:1002.1358

    2011 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Manvelyan, Karapet Mkrtchyan, and Werner R¨ uhl

    R. Manvelyan, Karapet Mkrtchyan, and Werner R¨ uhl. A generating function for the cubic interactions for higher spin fields. Phys. Lett. B, 696:410, 2011. arXiv:1009.1054

    2011 arXiv

  19. [27]

    A. K. H. Bengtsson and I. Bengtsson. Massless higher-spin fields revis- ited. Class. Quant. Grav., 3:927–936, 1986

    1986

  20. [28]

    A. K. H. Bengtsson. Gauge invariance for spin-3 fields. Phys. Rev. D, 32:2031–2036, 1985

    1985

  21. [29]

    Barnich and M

    G. Barnich and M. Henneaux. Consistent couplings between fields with a gauge freedom and deformations of the master equation. Phys. Lett. B, 311:123–129, 1993. arXiv:hep-th/9304057. 20

    1993 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Bekaert and N

    X. Bekaert and N. Boulanger. Gauge invariants and Killing ten- sors in higher-spin gauge theories. Nucl. Phys. B, 772:225–248, 2005. arXiv:hep-th/0505068

    2005 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Bekaert, N

    X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger, S. Cnockaert, and S Leclercq. On Killing tensors and cubic vertices in higher-spin gauge theories. Fortsch. Phys., 54:282, 2006. arXiv:hep-th/0602092

    2006 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Bekaert, N

    X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger, and S. Leclercq. Strong obstruction of the Berends-Burgers-van Dam spin-3 vertex. Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and Theoretical, 43(18):185401, 2010. arXiv:1002.0289

    2010 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Bekaert, N

    X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger, and S. Cnockaert. Spin three gauge theory revisited. JHEP, 0601:052, 2006. arXiv:hep-th/0508048

    2006 arXiv

  26. [34]

    V. E. Didenko and E. D. Skvortsov. Elements of Vasiliev theory. 2014. arXiv:1401.2975

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Iazeolla X

    C. Iazeolla X. Bekaert, S. Cnockaert and M. A. Vasiliev. Nonlinear higher spin theories in various dimensions. In G. Bonelli R. Argu- rio, G. Barnich and M. Grigoriev, editors, First Solvay Workshop on Higher-Spin Gauge Theories, pages 132–197. Universit´ e Libre de Brux- elle...

    2004 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Maldacena and A

    J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov. Constraining conformal field theories with a slightly broken higher spin symmetry. Class. Quant. Grav., 30:104003, 2013. arXiv:1204.3882

    2013 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Giombi and X

    S. Giombi and X. Yin. Higher spin gauge theory and holography: the three-point functions. JHEP, 2010(9), 2010. arXiv:0912.3462 (hep-th)

    2010 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Boulanger, P

    N. Boulanger, P. Kessel, E. Skvortsov, and M. Taronnal. Higher spin interactions in four dimensions: Vasiliev vs. fronsdal. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 49:095402, 2016. arXiv:1508.04139

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Roiban and A

    R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin. On four-point interactions in massless higher spin theory in flat space. JHEP, 04:139, 2017. arXiv:1701.05773

    2017 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Ponomarev

    D. Ponomarev. Chiral higher-spin theory and self-duality. JHEP, 12:141, 2017. arXiv:1710.00270

    2017 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Boulanger, D

    N. Boulanger, D. Ponomarev, E. D. Skvortsov, and M. Taronna. On the uniqueness of higher-spin symmetries in AdS and CFT. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 28:1350162, 2013. arXiv:1305.5180

    2013 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Sleight and M

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna. Higher-spin gage theories and bulk locality. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:171604, 2018. arXiv:1704.07859. 21

    2018 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Weinberg

    S. Weinberg. Photons and gravitons in perturbation theory: Derivation of charge conservation and equality of gravitational and inertial mass. Phys. Rev., 135:B1049–B1056, 1964

    1964

  36. [44]

    Coleman and J

    S. Coleman and J. Mandula. All possible symmetries of the S matrix. Phys. Rev., 159:1251–1256, 1967

    1967

  37. [45]

    Aragone and S

    C. Aragone and S. Deser. Constraints on gravitationally coupled tensor fields. Nuovo Cimento, 3A:709, 1971

    1971

  38. [46]

    Aragone and S

    C. Aragone and S. Deser. Consistency problems of hypergravity. Phys. Lett. B, 86:161–163, 1979

    1979

  39. [47]

    Aragone and S

    C. Aragone and S. Deser. Consistency problems of spin-2-gravity cou- pling. Nuovo Cimento, 57B:33, 1980

    1980

  40. [48]

    Bekaert, N

    X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger, and P. Sundell. How higher-spin gravity surpasses the spin two barrier: No-go theorems versus yes-go examples. Rev. Mod. Phys., 84:987–1009, 2012. arXiv:1007.0435

    2012 arXiv

  41. [49]

    P. A. M. Dirac. Forms of relativistic dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys., 21:392–399, 1949

    1949

  42. [50]

    A. K. H. Bengtsson. A Riccati type PDE for light-front higher helicity vertices. JHEP, September 2014:105(9), 2014. arXiv:1403.7345v2

    2014 arXiv

  43. [51]

    R. R. Metsaev. Poincar´ e invariant dynamics of massless higher spins: Fourth order analysis on mass shell. Mod. Phys. Lett., A6:359–367, 1991

    1991

  44. [52]

    R. R. Metsaev. S-matrix approach to massless higher spins theory: II. the case of internal symmetry. Mod. Phys. Lett., A6:2411–2421, 1991

    1991

  45. [53]

    Ponomarev and E

    D. Ponomarev and E. Skvortsov. Light-front higher-spin theories in flat space. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 50:095401, 09 2016. arXiv:1609.04655

    2016 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Krasnov, E

    K. Krasnov, E. Skvortsov, and T. Tran. Actions for self-dual higher spin gravities. JHEP, 08:076, 2021. arXiv:2105.12782

    2021 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Skvortsov and R

    E. Skvortsov and R. Van Dongen. Minimal model of field theo- ries: Chiral higher spin gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 106:045006, 2022. arXiv:2204.10285

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Sharapov, E

    A. Sharapov, E. Skvortsov, A. Sukhanov, and R. Van Dongen. Min- imal model of chiral higher spin gravity. JHEP, 09:134, 2022. arXiv:2205.07794. 22

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Penrose and W

    R. Penrose and W. Rindler. Spinors and space-time, volume 1. Cam- bridge Univ. Press, 1984

    1984

  50. [58]

    Skvortsov, T

    E. Skvortsov, T. Tran, and M. Tsulaia. Quantum chiral higher spin gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:031601, 2018. arXiv:1805.00048

    2018 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Giombi and I.R

    S. Giombi and I.R. Klebanov. One loop tests of higher spin AdS/CFT. JHEP, 12, 2013. arXiv:1308.2337

    2013 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Beccaria and A

    M. Beccaria and A. A. Tseytlin. On higher partition functions. J. Phys. A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 48, 2015. arXiv:1503.08143

    2015 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Skvortsov, T

    E. Skvortsov, T. Tran, and M. Tsulaia. More on quantum chiral higher spin gravity. Phys. Rev. D, 101:106001, 2020. arXiv:2002.08487

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Skvortsov and T

    E. Skvortsov and T. Tran. One-loop finiteness of chiral higher spin gravity. JHEP, 07:021, 2020. arXiv:2004.10797

    2020 arXiv

  55. [63]

    R. Penrose. Before the big bang: An outrageous new perspective and its implications for particle physics. Proceedings of EPAC 2006, Edinburgh, pages 2759–2763, 2006

    2006

  56. [64]

    R. Penrose. What Came Before the Big Bang? Cycles of Time. Vintage Books, London, 2010

    2010

  57. [65]

    R. Penrose. On the gravitization of quantum mechanics 2: Conformal cyclic cosmology. Found. Phys., 44:873–890, 2014

    2014

  58. [66]

    Eckstein

    M. Eckstein. Conformal cyclic cosmology, gravitational entropy and quantum information. General Relativity and Gravitation, 55(2):26, 2023

    2023

  59. [67]

    P. Tod. Some questions about conformal cyclic cosmology. 2022. arXiv:2202.10864

    2022 arXiv

  60. [68]

    T. Paul. Conformal Methods in General Relativity with application to Conformal Cyclic Cosmology: A minicourse given at the IXth IMLG Warsaw 2018. 2021. arXiv:2102.02701

    2018 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Bodnia, K

    E. Bodnia, K. Colburn V. Isenbaev, J. Swearngin, and D. Bouwmeester. The quest for CMB signatures of conformal cyclic cosmology. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2024(05):009, 2024

    2024

  62. [70]

    K. A. Meissner and Roger Penrose. The physics of conformal cyclic cosmology. 2025. arXiv:2503.24263 (gr-qc)

    2025 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Boyle, K

    L. Boyle, K. Finn, and N. Turok. The big bang, CPT, and neutrino dark matter. Annals of Physics, 438:168767, 2022. arXiv:1803.08930. 23

    2022 arXiv

  64. [72]

    C. Kittel. Thermal Physics. John Wiley & Sons, 1969

    1969

  65. [73]

    Blencowe

    M. Blencowe. A consistent interacting massless higher spin field theory in d = (2 + 1). Class. Quant. Grav., 6:443–452, 1989

    1989

  66. [74]

    C. N. Pope and P. K. Townsend. Conformal higher spin in (2 + 1)- dimensions. Phys. Lett. B, 225:245–250, 1989

    1989

  67. [75]

    Bergshoeff, M

    E. Bergshoeff, M. P. Blencowe, and K. S. Stelle. Area preserving diffeo- morphisms and higher spin algebra. Commun. Math. Phys., 128:213– 230, 1990

    1990

  68. [76]

    E. S. Fradkin and V. Ya. Linetsky. A superconformal theory of massless higher spin fields in d = (2 + 1). Annals of Physics, 198:293–320, 1990

    1990

  69. [77]

    Y. A. Segal. Conformal higher spin theory. Nucl. Phys. B, 664:59–130,

  70. [78]

    S. N. Gupta. Gravitation and electromagnetism. Phys. Rev., 96:1683– 1685, 1954

    1954

  71. [79]

    R. H. Kraichnan. Special-relativistic derivation of generally covariant gravitation theory. Phys. Rev., 98:1118–1122, 1955

    1955

  72. [80]

    W. E. Thirring. An alternative approach to the theory of gravitation. Ann. Phys, 16:96–117, 1961

    1961

  73. [81]

    R. P. Feynman. Feynman Lectures on Gravitation. Westview Press 2002, 2002

    2002

  74. [82]

    W. Wyss. Zur unizit¨ at der Gravitationstheorie. Helv. Phys. Acta, 38:469–480, 1965

    1965

  75. [83]

    S. Deser. Self-interaction and gauge invariance. Gen. Rel. Grav., 1:9–18, 1970

    1970

  76. [84]

    D. G. Boulware and S. Deser. Classical general relativity derived from quantum gravity. Ann. Phys, 89:193–240, 1975

    1975

  77. [85]

    Fang and C

    J. Fang and C. Fronsdal. Deformations of gauge groups: Gravitation. J. Math. Phys., 20(11):2264–2271, 1979

    1979

  78. [86]

    Fronsdal

    C. Fronsdal. Some open problems with higher spins. In P. van Nieuwenhuizen and D. Z. Freedman, editors, Supergravity, pages 245–

  79. [87]

    On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space, 2025

    Mattia Serrani. On classification of (self-dual) higher-spin gravities in flat space, 2025. arXiv:2505.12839. 24

    2025 arXiv

  80. [88]

    T. Tran. Chiral higher-spin symmetry of the celestial twistor sphere,

  81. [89]

    T. Tran. Anomaly-free twistorial higher-spin theories, 2025. arXiv:2505.13785

    2025

  82. [90]

    Mason and A.Sharma

    L. Mason and A.Sharma. Chiral higher-spin theories from twistor space,

  83. [91]

    Chiral higher-spin double copy, 2025

    Dmitry Ponomarev. Chiral higher-spin double copy, 2025. arXiv:2409.19449. 25

    2025 arXiv

  84. [249]

    North-Holland Publishing Company, 1979

    1979

  85. [2003]

    arXiv:hep/th-0207212

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.