Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 81 references

From coupled-cluster and full-configuration-interaction calculations, this paper fixes the nitrogen atom's static polarizabilities and the long-range N–N dispersion coefficients C6 = 23.956(51), C8 = 515.2(28), C10 = 13733(73) atomic units.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 08:13 UTC pith:WZSHLDSR

load-bearing objection Valuable new N–N dispersion coefficients and a careful composite calculation, but the Padé scaling in Sec. III E leaves the C8/C10 error bars looking too tight by at least a factor of two. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.21172 v1 pith:WZSHLDSR submitted 2026-07-23 physics.chem-ph

Determination of fundamental properties of nitrogen from first principles. I. Atomic polarizabilities and long-range dispersion coefficients

Micha{\l} Przybytek , Jakub Lang , Micha{\l} Lesiuk This is my paper
classification physics.chem-ph PACS 31.15.Ar32.10.Dk
keywords nitrogen atomatomic polarizabilitiesdispersion coefficientsCasimir–Polder formulaPadé approximantsfull configuration interactiongas thermometryCauchy coefficients
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Working from the electronic Schrödinger equation, the paper computes the dipole, quadrupole, and octupole static polarizabilities of the nitrogen atom and then assembles the frequency-dependent polarizabilities needed for the Casimir–Polder integrals that produce the N–N dispersion coefficients C6, C8, C10. The recommended values are C6 = 23.956(51), C8 = 515.2(28), and C10 = 13733(73) atomic units, with uncertainty budgets explicitly dominated by the static polarizabilities. The work matters because nitrogen gas is a candidate working fluid for refractive-index and dielectric-constant gas thermometry, and the required atomic data had not previously been available at this accuracy from theory alone. If the numbers hold, they provide a parameter-free long-range input for the N2 interaction potential and for the later papers in this series that determine the temperature-dependent molecular polarizability.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the dipole, quadrupole, and octupole static polarizabilities of the nitrogen atom can be computed to about 0.1–0.5% relative uncertainty using a composite scheme that combines frozen-core full configuration interaction with all-electron CCSDT corrections, core-valence and core-core correlation up to the ae-FCI level, and scalar relativistic effects, within Gaussian basis sets whose diffuse functions are optimized for polarizabilities. These polarizabilities, continued to imaginary frequencies by Padé approximants, give the N–N dispersion coefficients C6 = 23.956(51), C8 = 515.2(28), and C10 = 13733(73) a.u. The authors note that C6 agrees with earlier semi-e

What carries the argument

The load-bearing construct is the Padé representation of the polarizability at imaginary frequencies: a rational function of ω² whose Taylor expansion around zero reproduces the computed Cauchy coefficients α_l^(2k) and whose large-ω behaviour is fixed by the leading asymptotic coefficient ζ_l^(2), a ground-state expectation value (for the dipole, exactly the electron number, N = 7). Only the leading static polarizability is replaced by the accurate composite value; all higher Cauchy coefficients are rescaled by the ratio of accurate to baseline α_l^(0), a step that removes spurious singularities in the approximants. These Padé functions are then integrated in the Casimir–Polder formulas to

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the trick of replacing only the static polarizability with the accurate value and rescaling all higher coefficients proportionally yields a correct description of the atom's response at the imaginary frequencies used in the dispersion integrals; this was verified only for helium, not for nitrogen.

What would settle it

A sum-over-states calculation of the nitrogen atom's dipole, quadrupole, and octupole polarizabilities at imaginary frequencies — obtained by diagonalizing the FCI Hamiltonian in a modest basis, as done here for helium — would provide an independent test of the scaled Padé representation. If the Casimir–Polder coefficients derived from those polarizabilities differ from 23.956, 515.2, or 13733 a.u. by more than roughly 0.05, 3, or 70 a.u., respectively, the scaling premise would be refuted.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The C6 value 23.956(51) a.u. agrees with the semi-empirical oscillator-strength bounds (24.9 ± 1.7) and narrows the spread of earlier theoretical estimates, most of which cluster between 24.0 and 24.2.
  • C8 and C10 are now available as direct first-principles values with explicit error bars; the new C8 is about 7–8% higher than the only previous direct calculation, and no direct C10 existed before.
  • The uncertainty budget shows that the dispersion coefficients are dominated by the static polarizabilities, so any future tightening of C6–C10 should focus on improving α_1(0), α_2(0), and α_3(0); the asymptotic ζ-coefficients contribute negligibly.
  • The first four dipole Cauchy coefficients provided here determine the real-frequency dipole polarizability to roughly 10 ppm at wavelengths from the helium–neon laser line upward, meeting the accuracy demanded by gas thermometry.
  • The results anchor the long-range tail of the N2 interaction potential and provide the input needed for the temperature- and frequency-dependent molecular polarizability reported in the subsequent papers of the series.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the scaled-Padé construction is validated only on helium, where sum-over-states benchmarks exist; for nitrogen no independent check of the imaginary-frequency polarizabilities or of C8/C10 was performed. A systematic failure of that scaling would shift the reported C8 and C10 outside their quoted error bars, so the N–N values carry a model risk beyond the stated uncertainties.
  • Editorial inference: the basis-set design (optimizing diffuse-function exponents through a Hylleraas functional) and the direct FCI response evaluation for Cauchy coefficients are transferable protocols. They could be applied to other light atoms or small molecules relevant to gas thermometry, such as argon, neon, or CO2, likely at lower cost than the helium benchmark because the optimization targ
  • Editorial inference: because the recommended C6 sits at the lower edge of the existing literature cluster, an independent experimental constraint — for example, high-precision refractive-index measurements of nitrogen gas at several optical frequencies, or low-temperature second-virial data sensitive to the long-range potential — could discriminate between the new value and the older estimates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports first-principles calculations of the dipole, quadrupole, and octupole static and dynamic polarizabilities of the nitrogen atom, and the long-range dispersion coefficients C6, C8, C10 for two nitrogen atoms. The methodology combines FCI valence calculations, CCSDT all-electron core corrections, FCI post-CCSDT corrections, DKH2 relativistic corrections, and custom diffuse-function-optimized basis sets. Cauchy coefficients are obtained by direct solution of response equations at the FCI level and by fitting for other methods. Imaginary-frequency polarizabilities are represented by Padé approximants anchored by the asymptotic coefficients ζ_l^(2). The recommended values are C6 = 23.956(51), C8 = 515.2(28), C10 = 13733(73) a.u. A helium benchmark is used to establish the accuracy of the Padé procedure.

Significance. If correct, these are the most accurate first-principles values to date for the nitrogen atom polarizabilities and N–N dispersion coefficients, and would be valuable inputs for gas-thermometry and interaction-potential work. The paper's strengths include systematic error budgets, direct (non-fitting) evaluation of higher Cauchy coefficients, optimized basis sets, and an independent helium benchmark for the Padé procedure. However, as detailed below, the treatment of imaginary-frequency polarizabilities rests on an ad hoc scaling whose systematic error is not included in the uncertainty budget, so the central claim of high accuracy for C8 and C10 is not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III E, Eqs. (5)–(7), Table VIII] The uniform scaling of all higher Cauchy coefficients by the ratio of accurate to baseline static polarizability is not a controlled approximation and is contradicted by the paper's own data. From Tables V and VI, r0 = 7.2552/7.300354 = 0.9938, while the same ratio for α1^(2) is 26.756/27.03894 = 0.9895 and for α1^(4) is 140.07/141.9554 = 0.9867. After scaling, α1^(2) and α1^(4) are 0.4–0.7% too large relative to the accurate values. Since C8 = (15/π)∫α1α2 dω and C10 contains ∫α2^2 and ∫α1α3, a 0.4–0.7% overestimate in the higher Cauchy coefficients of α2 and α3 propagates to C8/C10 at a level comparable to or larger than the quoted total uncertainties (0.54% and 0.53%). The scatter over K in Table VII does not capture this systematic bias. The uncertainty budget in Table VIII therefore underestimates the error for C8 and C10.
  2. [Sec. III C, Table IV] The helium benchmark does not validate the scaling for nitrogen. In Table IV, the modified Cauchy coefficients (with only α_l^(0) replaced and higher coefficients uniformly scaled) actually increase the relative error of C10 from −3.8×10⁻⁴ (SOS-based, unmodified) to +9.3×10⁻⁴. This is attributed to singularities in α̃_3^K for K≥5, but it shows that the scaling can degrade accuracy. Helium also has no core-valence correction, so the conditions under which the scaling is introduced for nitrogen (relativistic/non-relativistic mismatch between accurate and baseline coefficients) are absent in the benchmark. Thus the benchmark provides no evidence that the scaling is faithful for systems like nitrogen.
  3. [Sec. III E, Table VII] The convergence of C_n with respect to K is not evidence of accuracy, because every K uses the same uniformly scaled Cauchy coefficients. The mean and standard deviation over K≥3 in Table VIII measure only the numerical sensitivity to the Padé degree, not the systematic error of the scaling. A separate estimate of the scaling uncertainty—for example, by comparing results obtained with unscaled baseline coefficients, or by propagating the differences among ratios r0, r2, r4—is needed before the reported uncertainties for C8/C10 can be accepted.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III A] The word 'octuple' appears where 'octupole' is intended (e.g., in the basis-set discussion). Please correct throughout.
  2. [Eq. (22)] The normalization B^(0)=1 is stated after Eq. (8) but the form of Eq. (22) would benefit from an explicit statement that this normalization is used there as well.
  3. [Table IV] The entry 'mean(K≥4)' is used, but the table lists K=1–6. Please clarify the exact averaging procedure and why K≥4 is chosen.
  4. [Table IX] The C6 value attributed to Krauss and Neumann (32) is far outside the cluster of other values and seems inconsistent with the text. Please clarify whether this is a typo or a particularly crude estimate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: dispersion coefficients are outputs of a first-principles construction, not inputs or fitted targets.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The static and dynamic polarizabilities are obtained from response equations and a composite FCI/CCSDT scheme (Sec. III D, Appendix A), with no dispersion coefficient or literature C_n value used as an input. The imaginary-frequency polarizabilities are Padé approximants determined uniquely by Cauchy coefficients and the leading asymptotic coefficient ζ_l^(2), Eq. (22), and the Casimir–Polder integrals (Eqs. 5–7) then produce C6, C8, and C10 as outputs. The helium benchmark in Sec. III C is validated against independent exact values from Ref. 58, so the Padé construction is not being verified by the same data it predicts. The uniform scaling of higher Cauchy coefficients in Sec. III E is an approximation ansatz rather than a circular reduction: the scaled coefficients are built from the baseline FCI set and the accurate static polarizability, and no final C_n enters their determination. Self-citations (HECTOR code, Refs. 59 and 62) are tools or benchmark techniques, not load-bearing substitutes for the derivation. The lack of an independent nitrogen benchmark is a limitation on accuracy, but not evidence of circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central assumptions are standard electronic-structure approximations plus the specific Padé scaling heuristic. The only genuinely ad hoc element is the scaling of higher Cauchy coefficients, which does not fit the final dispersion coefficients but does shape the imaginary-frequency polarizabilities and hence the reported uncertainties.

free parameters (2)
  • Padé scaling ratio for higher Cauchy coefficients = α_l^(0),exact / α_l^(0),baseline, applied to α_l^(2k), k≥1
    Introduced in Sec. III E to avoid singularities when accurate static polarizabilities are mixed with baseline coefficients. It is not derived for nitrogen and is validated only indirectly through helium benchmarks.
  • Padé stabilization window K≥3 = K = 3,...,9 for C6, C8, C10
    Final dispersion coefficients are the arithmetic mean over the K range in which results visually stabilize (Sec. III E). This is a post-hoc selection, though its standard deviation is included in the uncertainty budget.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Casimir–Polder formulas, Eqs. (5)–(7), exactly give the long-range dispersion coefficients from imaginary-frequency polarizabilities.
    Standard result in molecular physics; used throughout the paper.
  • domain assumption Padé approximants of the form Eq. (22), anchored by Cauchy coefficients and the first asymptotic coefficient ζ_l^(2), converge to the true α_l(iω) for nitrogen.
    The paper demonstrates convergence for helium but cannot directly test it for nitrogen; this is the central modeling assumption.
  • domain assumption The composite formula Eq. (25) separates valence, core-correlation, and relativistic effects additively; error propagation assumes these contributions are statistically independent.
    Standard composite scheme in quantum chemistry, with uncertainties combined by quadrature in Sec. III D.
  • domain assumption Neglect of two-electron relativistic corrections and of QED/retardation effects is negligible at the stated accuracy.
    Justified in Sec. III D by comparison with helium/lithium/argon calculations; no explicit calculation for nitrogen is given.
  • ad hoc to paper Scaling all higher Cauchy coefficients by the ratio of accurate to baseline static polarizability preserves the accuracy of the Padé representation for nitrogen.
    Introduced in Sec. III E as a practical fix for singularities; not derived from theory and found to work only partially for helium octupole polarizability.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 20704 in / 10479 out tokens · 118932 ms · 2026-08-01T08:13:49.223928+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This work is the first in a series of papers in which we perform theoretical calculations of various fundamental properties of nitrogen relevant for gas thermometry experiments. In this part we focus on the properties of nitrogen atom, namely dynamic polarizabilities and dispersion coefficients that describe interaction between two nitrogen atoms at large internuclear separations. These quantities are calculated using a composite scheme based on coupled cluster and full configuration interaction methods and large Gaussian basis sets optimized specifically for the purposes of this work. The dispersion coefficients, $C_n$ with $n=6,8,10$, are obtained using Casimir--Polder formulas by numerical integration over dipole, quadrupole, and octuple polarizabilities for imaginary frequencies represented analytically by Pad\'e approximants. Special attention is paid to careful error control and uncertainty estimation of the calculated quantities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21172 by Jakub Lang, Micha{\l} Lesiuk, Micha{\l} Przybytek.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Static dipole (upper panel), quadrupole (middle panel) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lithium electric dipole polarizability , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.052518 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physreva.84.052518 2011

  2. [2]

    , title =

    Starkschall, George and Gordon, Roy G. , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 1972 , month =

    1972

  3. [3]

    1988 , doi =

    A new implementation of the full CCSDT model for molecular electronic structure , journal =. 1988 , doi =

    1988

  4. [4]

    , title =

    Noga, Jozef and Bartlett, Rodney J. , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 1987 , month =

    1987

  5. [5]

    and Bylaska,E

    Apra,E. and Bylaska,E. J. and de Jong,W. A. and Govind,N. and Kowalski,K. and Straatsma,T. P. and Valiev,M. and van Dam,H. J. J. and Alexeev,Y. and Anchell,J. and Anisimov,V. and Aquino,F. W. and Atta-Fynn,R. and Autschbach,J. and Bauman,N. P. and Becca,J. C. and Bernholdt,D. E. and Bhaskaran-Nair,K. and Bogatko,S. and Borowski,P. and Boschen,J. and Brabe...

    2020

  6. [6]

    and Mohebifar, Mohamad and Johnson, Erin R

    Walters, Evan T. and Mohebifar, Mohamad and Johnson, Erin R. and Rowley, Christopher N. , title =. J. Phys. Chem. B , volume =

  7. [7]

    Grimme, Stefan and Ehrlich, Stephan and Goerigk, Lars , title =. J. Comput. Chem. , volume =

  8. [8]

    Grimme, Stefan and Antony, Jens and Ehrlich, Stephan and Krieg, Helge , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2010 , month =

    2010

  9. [9]

    Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , author=. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. , volume=. 2002 , publisher=. doi:10.1038/nsb0902-646 , url=

    doi:10.1038/nsb0902-646 2002

  10. [10]

    First-principles calculation of the frequency-dependent dipole polarizability of argon , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.107.042805 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physreva.107.042805 2023

  11. [11]

    Diamagnetic susceptibility of neon and argon including leading relativistic effects , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.109.012820 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.109.012820 2024

  12. [12]

    and Jeziorski, Bogumił , title =

    Garberoglio, Giovanni and Harvey, Allan H. and Jeziorski, Bogumił , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2021 , month =

    2021

  13. [13]

    Thermophysical properties of argon gas from improved two-body interaction potential , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.109.052803 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.109.052803 2024

  14. [14]

    Theoretical determination of polarizability and magnetic susceptibility of neon , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.102.052816 , url =

    doi:10.1103/physreva.102.052816 2020

  15. [15]

    Ab initio determination of the polarizability of neon , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.105.022809 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.105.022809 2022

  16. [16]

    Wiebke, Jonas and Pahl, Elke and Schwerdtfeger, Peter , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2012 , month =

    2012

  17. [17]

    Hellmann, Robert and Gaiser, Christof and Fellmuth, Bernd and Vasyltsova, Tatjana and Bich, Eckard , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2021 , month =

    2021

  18. [18]

    Relativistic and QED corrections to the polarizability of helium , author=. Phys. Rev. A , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  19. [19]

    Radiative corrections to the polarizability of helium , author=. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  20. [20]

    Frequency-dependent polarizability of helium including relativistic effects with nuclear recoil terms , author=. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  21. [21]

    Theoretical determination of the polarizability dispersion and the refractive index of helium , author=. Phys. Rev. A , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  22. [22]

    QED calculation of the dipole polarizability of helium atom , author=. Phys. Rev. A , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  23. [23]

    and Przybytek, M

    Lang, J. and Przybytek, M. and Lesiuk, M. and Jeziorski, B. , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  24. [24]

    and Lang, Jakub and Przybytek, Michał and Lesiuk, Michał and Jeziorski, Bogumił , title =

    Garberoglio, Giovanni and Harvey, Allan H. and Lang, Jakub and Przybytek, Michał and Lesiuk, Michał and Jeziorski, Bogumił , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  25. [25]

    Path-integral calculation of the second dielectric and refractivity virial coefficients of helium, neon, and argon , author=. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. , volume=

  26. [26]

    Second virial coefficients for He 4 and He 3 from an accurate relativistic interaction potential , author=. Phys. Rev. A , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  27. [27]

    Three-body potential and third virial coefficients for helium including relativistic and nuclear-motion effects , author=. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  28. [28]

    , title =

    Binosi, Daniele and Garberoglio, Giovanni and Harvey, Allan H. , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  29. [29]

    , title =

    Garberoglio, Giovanni and Harvey, Allan H. , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  30. [30]

    Relativistic treatment of the diamagnetic susceptibility of helium , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.108.042812 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.108.042812 2023

  31. [31]

    Ueber die Beziehung zwischen der Fortpflanzungsgeschwindigkeit des Lichtes und der K

    Lorentz, Hendrik Antoon , journal=. Ueber die Beziehung zwischen der Fortpflanzungsgeschwindigkeit des Lichtes und der K. 1880 , publisher=

  32. [32]

    Ueber die refractionsconstante , author=. Ann. Phys. , volume=. 1880 , publisher=

  33. [33]

    Metrologia , volume=

    Dielectric-constant gas thermometry , author=. Metrologia , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  34. [34]

    Metrologia , volume=

    Primary thermometry from 2.5 K to 140 K applying dielectric-constant gas thermometry , author=. Metrologia , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  35. [35]

    Polarizability of helium, neon, and argon: new perspectives for gas metrology , author=. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  36. [36]

    Primary gas-pressure standard from electrical measurements and thermophysical ab initio calculations , author=. Nat. Phys. , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  37. [37]

    Metrologia , volume=

    Primary thermometry at 4 K, 14 K, and 25 K applying dielectric-constant gas thermometry , author=. Metrologia , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  38. [38]

    Primary gas pressure standard passes next stress test , author=. Ann. Phys. , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  39. [39]

    Measurement , volume=

    Feasibility of primary thermometry using refractive index measurements at a single pressure , author=. Measurement , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  40. [40]

    Metrologia , volume=

    Refractive-index gas thermometry , author=. Metrologia , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  41. [41]

    Metrologia , volume=

    Refractive index gas thermometry between 13.8 K and 161.4 K , author=. Metrologia , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  42. [42]

    Rourke, Patrick M. C. , title =. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  43. [43]

    Perspectives for a new realization of the pascal by optical methods , journal =

    Jousten, Karl and Hendricks, Jay and Barker, Daniel and Douglas, Kevin and Eckel, Steve and Egan, Patrick and Fedchak, James and Fl. Perspectives for a new realization of the pascal by optical methods , journal =. doi:10.1088/1681-7575/aa8a4d , year =

    doi:10.1088/1681-7575/aa8a4d

  44. [44]

    The 5 g+ states of N2 , author=. Mol. Phys. , volume=. 1976 , publisher=

    1976

  45. [45]

    C 6 dispersion coefficients in multiconfiguration self-consistent field linear response theory , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1990 , publisher=

    1990

  46. [46]

    Production of metastable rare gas atoms in microwave and dc discharges , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1978 , publisher=

    1978

  47. [47]

    Linear response time-dependent density functional theory for van der

    Chu, Xiang and Dalgarno, Alexander , journal=. Linear response time-dependent density functional theory for van der

  48. [48]

    Accurate

    Tkatchenko, Alexandre and Scheffler, Matthias , journal=. Accurate. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  49. [49]

    Collisional properties of cold spin-polarized nitrogen gas:

    Tscherbul, Timur V and K. Collisional properties of cold spin-polarized nitrogen gas:. Phys. Rev. A , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  50. [50]

    C 6 coefficients and dipole polarizabilities for all atoms and many ions in rows 1--6 of the periodic table , author=. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  51. [51]

    Dispersion energy constants

    Zeiss, G D and Meath, William J , journal=. Dispersion energy constants. 1977 , publisher=

    1977

  52. [52]

    Frequency-dependent polarizabilities and van der

    Hettema, Hinne and Wormer, Paul E S , journal=. Frequency-dependent polarizabilities and van der. 1990 , publisher=

    1990

  53. [53]

    Theoretical study of the 7 + u state of

    Partridge, Harry and Langhoff, Stephen R and Bauschlicher, Jr, Charles W , journal=. Theoretical study of the 7 + u state of. 1986 , publisher=

    1986

  54. [54]

    Pseudospectral dipole oscillator strength distributions and some related two body interaction coefficients for

    Margoliash, Daniel J and Meath, W J , journal=. Pseudospectral dipole oscillator strength distributions and some related two body interaction coefficients for. 1978 , publisher=

    1978

  55. [55]

    and Jeziorski, Bogumił and Szalewicz, Krzysztof , title = "

    Cencek, Wojciech and Przybytek, Michał and Komasa, Jacek and Mehl, James B. and Jeziorski, Bogumił and Szalewicz, Krzysztof , title = ". J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  56. [56]

    2008 , doi =

    Higher dispersion coefficients for the interaction of helium atoms , journal =. 2008 , doi =

    2008

  57. [57]

    and Moskalev, Anatolii N

    Varshalovich, Dmitrii A. and Moskalev, Anatolii N. and Khersonskii, Valerii K. , title =. 1988 , doi =

    1988

  58. [58]

    1999 , doi =

    The Configuration Interaction Method: Advances in Highly Correlated Approaches , journal =. 1999 , doi =

    1999

  59. [59]

    Przybytek , year=

    M. Przybytek , year=

  60. [60]

    Cauchy moments and dispersion coefficients using coupled cluster linear response theory , journal =

    H\"attig, Christof and Christiansen, Ove and J. Cauchy moments and dispersion coefficients using coupled cluster linear response theory , journal =. 1997 , doi =

    1997

  61. [61]

    Convergent partially augmented basis sets for post-hartree- fock calculations of molecular properties and reaction barrier heights , author=. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  62. [62]

    Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. IV. Calculation of static electrical response properties , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

    1994

  63. [63]

    Systematic basis sets and wave functions , author=

    Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  64. [64]

    Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen , author=. J. Chem. Phys. , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

    1989

  65. [65]

    and Dunning, Jr., Thom H

    Woon, David E. and Dunning, Jr., Thom H. , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 1995 , doi =

    1995

  66. [66]

    and Kilburn, Josie L

    Thorpe, James H. and Kilburn, Josie L. and Feller, David and Changala, P. Bryan and Bross, David H. and Ruscic, Branko and Stanton, John F. , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  67. [67]

    , title =

    Stone, Anthony J. , title =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  68. [68]

    Nature , volume=

    Influence of retardation on the London--van der Waals forces , author=. Nature , volume=. 1946 , publisher=

    1946

  69. [69]

    The influence of retardation on the London-van der Waals forces , author=. Phys. Rev. , volume=. 1948 , publisher=

    1948

  70. [70]

    and Graves-Morris, Peter , title =

    Baker, Jr., George A. and Graves-Morris, Peter , title =. 1996 , series =. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511530074 , isbn =

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511530074 1996

  71. [71]

    Spectral Distribution of Atomic Oscillator Strengths , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 1968 , doi =

    1968

  72. [72]

    Lesiuk, Michał and Jeziorski, Bogumił , title =. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  73. [73]

    Lang, Jakub and Przybytek, Michał and Lesiuk, Michał , title =. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  74. [74]

    Basis-set convergence in correlated calculations on Ne, N _2 , and H _2 O

    Asger Halkier and Trygve Helgaker and Poul J. Basis-set convergence in correlated calculations on Ne, N _2 , and H _2 O. Chem. Phys. Lett. , volume =. 1998 , doi =

    1998

  75. [75]

    Tew , title = "

    Trygve Helgaker and Wim Klopper and David P. Tew , title = ". Mol. Phys. , volume =. 2008 , doi =

    2008

  76. [76]

    Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms , author =

  77. [77]

    Long-wavelength quantum electrodynamics , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2004 , doi =

    2004

  78. [78]

    1974 , doi =

    Quantum electrodynamical corrections to the fine structure of helium , journal =. 1974 , doi =

    1974

  79. [79]

    Relativistic electronic-structure calculations employing a two-component no-pair formalism with external-field projection operators , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 1986 , doi =

    1986

  80. [80]

    Revision of the Douglas-Kroll transformation , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 1989 , doi =

    1989

Showing first 80 references.