Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 41 references

Bias voltage controlled inversions of tunneling magnetoresistance in van der Waals heterostructures Fe3GaTe2/hBN/Fe3GaTe2

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bias voltage flips the magnetoresistance sign of a van der Waals magnetic tunnel junction at a reproducible 0.625 V.

desk verdict Solid experimental demonstration of reproducible bias-controlled TMR inversion in Fe3GaTe2/hBN/Fe3GaTe2 at room temperature, but the theory's quantitative match is a one-parameter fit, not a derived prediction. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.06063 v1 pith:WZTHQ6LM submitted 2025-01-10 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Lihao Zhang , Miao He , Xiaoyu Wang , Haodong Zhang , Keying Han , Yonglai Liu , Lei Zhang , Yingchun Cheng
show 3 more authors
Jie Pan Zhe Qu Zhe Wang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords tunnelingmagnetoresistanceTMRinversionFe3GaTe2hBNbarriervanderWaalsheterostructuremagnetictunneljunctionspin-resolveddensityofstatesroom-temperaturespintronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that the tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) of Fe3GaTe2/hBN/Fe3GaTe2 magnetic tunnel junctions changes sign under applied bias at room temperature. The first reversal, from positive to negative TMR, occurs at 0.625±0.025 V and repeats across multiple devices and temperatures, while a second reversal back to positive occurs near 2.5 V. The authors argue that the mechanism is the energy-dependent spin-resolved density of states of the Fe3GaTe2 electrodes, not interface chemistry or barrier wave-function interference. They modify an existing tunneling-current model by weighting electronic states near the center of the momentum zone more heavily, approximating the effect of misaligned electrode lattices, and this moves the predicted first inversion voltage from about 0.19 V to 0.52 V. If the interpretation is right, bias-controlled TMR inversion is a reproducible, usable feature of two-dimensional magnetic tunnel junctions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the bias-dependent tunneling-current model built from spin-resolved densities of states. The parallel and antiparallel currents are integrals over the bias window of products of source and drain DOS, $\rho^\uparrow_D \rho^\uparrow_S + \rho^\downarrow_D \rho^\downarrow_S$ and $\rho^\uparrow_D \rho^\downarrow_S + \rho^\downarrow_D \rho^\uparrow_S$, with TMR defined as $I_P/I_{AP}-1$. To close the gap between the predicted 0.19 V inversion and the measured 0.625 V, the authors multiply the DOS at each in-plane momentum state by $W(k)=\delta/\sqrt{\delta^2+k^2}$ with $\delta=0.1\times2\pi/\mathrm{\AA}$, which suppresses states away from the $\Gamma$ point, the zone center where in-plane momentum is conserved automatically. This weighting function is what carries the improved quantitative agreement, moving the predicted first inversion to about 0.52 V.

What would settle it

Fabricate two Fe3GaTe2/hBN/Fe3GaTe2 devices, one with the FGT flakes crystallographically aligned and one deliberately rotated (for example by 30 degrees), and measure the first TMR inversion voltage in each. The weighting model predicts the aligned device should approach the unweighted value near 0.19 V while the rotated device should invert near or above 0.5 V; observing no such difference would show the weighting function is not capturing the misalignment effect.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that a van der Waals magnetic tunnel junction with Fe3GaTe2 electrodes and a four-layer hBN barrier shows two bias-driven inversions of TMR at room temperature: positive-to-negative at 0.625±0.025 V and negative-to-positive near 2.5±0.5 V. It claims the first threshold is reproducible across devices and temperatures, and that the inversion mechanism is the participation of higher-energy electrons whose majority and minority spin densities of states differ, so that spin injection and detection can be tuned by voltage. The paper rules out interface states, which would require chemical bonding across the FGT/hBN interface, and Fowler-Nordheim barrier effects, which do not set in below about 3 V. It then shows that a DOS-integral model, corrected by a momentum-dependent weighting factor meant to represent lattice misalignment of the two exfoliated electrodes, reproduces the first inversion voltage much more closely than the unweighted model.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative agreement rests on the assumption that a single weighting factor $W(k)=\delta/\sqrt{\delta^2+k^2}$ with $\delta=0.1\times2\pi/\mathrm{\AA}$ correctly represents how lattice misalignment between the two Fe3GaTe2 electrodes reduces tunneling from states away from the zone center; if that factor does not capture the real momentum-conservation physics, the improved 0.52 V agreement is fitting rather than prediction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single Fe3GaTe2/hBN/Fe3GaTe2 junction can be switched between positive and negative TMR by choosing the bias voltage, adding a voltage-controlled handle on the resistance state.
  • The reproducible 0.625 V threshold becomes a quantitative benchmark against which refined theories of momentum conservation and lattice misalignment in van der Waals MTJs can be tested.
  • Because the inversion is tied to the spin-resolved DOS of Fe3GaTe2, other room-temperature two-dimensional ferromagnets with different band structures should show their own characteristic inversion voltages.
  • The model's failure to reproduce the second reversal marks the high-bias momentum dependence of the hBN barrier as the missing ingredient for a complete theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test the authors do not carry out: fabricate devices with a controlled crystallographic rotation between the two FGT electrodes. The model implies the first inversion voltage should move toward the unweighted value near 0.19 V when the flakes are aligned and remain near or above 0.5 V when they are rotated.
  • The paper does not emphasize this, but the near-temperature-independence of the 0.625 V threshold, despite strongly temperature-dependent spin polarization, suggests the band-structure features setting the inversion survive thermal broadening, which would make the effect practical at operating temperatures.
  • The same DOS-integral construction could serve as a screening tool for other van der Waals ferromagnet/insulator pairs, predicting which combinations invert TMR and at what bias, provided the weighting function can be derived from the misalignment angle instead of fitted.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports room-temperature tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) measurements in van der Waals magnetic tunnel junctions Fe3GaTe2/hBN/Fe3GaTe2. The central experimental claim is that the TMR sign inverts reproducibly at approximately 0.625±0.025 V across multiple devices and temperatures, and that a second inversion occurs near 2.5–3 V. The authors exclude Fowler–Nordheim tunneling and interfacial-state mechanisms and propose a theoretical explanation based on spin-resolved density of states at high bias, modified by a k-dependent weighting function W(k)=δ/sqrt(δ²+k²) intended to account for misalignment between the two electrodes. With δ chosen as 0.1×2π/Å, the predicted first inversion improves from 0.19 V to 0.52 V, approaching the measured value. The paper concludes that in-plane momentum conservation and electrode misalignment are important for quantitative TMR predictions.

Significance. If the experimental result holds, this is a valuable contribution: it demonstrates a room-temperature all-van-der-Waals magnetic tunnel junction with a reproducible voltage-controlled TMR inversion, a phenomenon with direct relevance for energy-efficient spintronic devices. The experimental part is careful and internally consistent: the inversion voltage is stable across devices and temperatures, the spin-valve data support the reported TMR values, and the authors explicitly rule out the main alternative mechanisms (Fowler–Nordheim transport below 3 V, interfacial chemical states, and magnon excitations as a sole cause). The theoretical part, however, is significantly weaker: the improved quantitative agreement is achieved by an ad hoc weighting function whose physical origin is not derived, and the model does not reproduce the second inversion. The paper should be credited for being explicit about these limitations, but as written the theoretical mechanism is not yet validated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Theoretical model (p. 5, Eq. (1) and Fig. 4c)] The weighting function W(k)=δ/sqrt(δ²+k²) is introduced in the text but it is not specified how it enters Eq. (1); the green curve in Fig. 4c is therefore not reproducible from the equations as written. Please write the modified current integrals explicitly, showing how W(k) multiplies the spin-resolved DOS terms and whether it is applied to both electrodes or only one.
  2. [Theoretical model (p. 5, Fig. 4c)] The parameter δ is a free parameter chosen as 0.1×2π/Å to shift the predicted first inversion voltage from 0.19 V to 0.52 V. No independent constraint, microscopic derivation, or connection to a specific crystallographic misalignment angle is provided. The improved agreement is therefore a one-parameter fit rather than a validated prediction of the momentum-conservation mechanism. Please either derive W(k) from a model of the misaligned interface, relate δ to an experimentally measurable quantity (e.g., twist angle), or present the result as a sensitivity study rather than an explanatory calculation.
  3. [Experimental bias dependence (Fig. 3d) vs theoretical model (Fig. 4c)] The model fails to reproduce the second TMR inversion near 2.5–3 V, and the manuscript attributes this discrepancy to hBN misalignment at high bias without any quantitative support. Since the title and abstract emphasize voltage-controlled inversions (plural) of TMR, the theoretical mechanism should at least provide a qualitative account of the second inversion, or the paper should explicitly narrow its claim to the first inversion only.
  4. [Experimental data and fitting (Fig. 3b)] The magnetization fit uses the empirical form M(T)=M(0)(1−(T/Tc)^α)^β with α=1.65, β=0.5, and Tc=310 K, but no error bars or fit residuals are shown for the extracted spin polarization or anomalous Hall conductance. Given that the critical exponent β=0.5 differs from previous reports (β=0.35–0.4), the fit quality and the sensitivity of β to the choice of Tc should be documented.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction (p. 1)] There is a typo in the sentence 'formatomicallyflat, defect-freeinterfaces' – it should read 'atomically flat, defect-free interfaces'.
  2. [Introduction (p. 1)] The statement 'the very large band gap of high quality hBN ensure the electronic transport would be tunneling for the whole investigated temperature range' should be rephrased for clarity and grammatical correctness.
  3. [Fig. 3d and accompanying text (p. 4)] The 'anomaly at zero bias' is mentioned in the text but not clearly identified in the figure. Please specify what the anomaly is (e.g., a local maximum or minimum in the TMR-bias curve) and whether it is reproducible across devices.
  4. [Theoretical model (p. 5)] The integration limits and the notation in Eq. (1) are not fully defined; in particular, the integration from μD to μS is presented with two lower limits in the displayed equation. Please clarify the convention for positive and negative bias and the relation μD−μS=eVb.
  5. [References] The claim that 'none of the existing experimental works on 2D MTJs report intentional crystal alignment yet' is broad and would benefit from a specific reference or a more cautious wording, since the reader cannot easily verify the absence of reports in the cited literature.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Experimental TMR-inversion result is independent; the theoretical match is a tuned-δ fit presented as a prediction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Theoretical model section, Fig. 4c, paragraph beginning 'To improve the theoretical results based on the Ref [15]']
    "To improve the theoretical results based on the Ref [15], we proposed a simplified approach by assigning different weights to the DOS at different k-points. ... we introduced a weighting function W (k) = δ/√(δ^2 + k^2) ... The results of our revised calculations (with δ = 0.1 × 2π/Å ), shown as the green line in Fig. 4c, indicate that the voltage at which the TMR switches from positive to negative is now approximately 0.52 V, much closer to the experimental data."

    The revised inversion voltage of ~0.52 V is obtained by choosing the free parameter δ = 0.1×2π/Å in the ad hoc weighting W(k). No independent constraint fixes δ; it is selected to bring the predicted crossover from 0.19 V toward the measured 0.625 V. The paper presents this as an improved theoretical result, but the quantitative agreement is a one-parameter fit to the target quantity, not a prediction derived from first principles. The claimed support for 'the importance of considering in-plane momentum conservation' therefore reduces to a tuned parameter, and the model explicitly fails to reproduce the second inversion near 2.5 V.

full rationale

The paper's central experimental claim—room-temperature TMR inversion at a reproducible 0.625 V across devices and temperatures—is self-contained, supported by spin-valve measurements, and not derived from any fitted model. The theoretical section uses an independent DOS-based model (Eq. 1) that already yields a qualitative inversion at 0.19 V. However, the claimed quantitative improvement to 0.52 V is obtained by introducing an ad hoc weighting W(k)=δ/√(δ²+k²) with δ set to 0.1×2π/Å without independent derivation. This is a fitted parameter renamed as an improved theoretical prediction, making the model's quantitative agreement partially circular. The paper openly acknowledges the adjustment and also admits the second inversion is not captured, which mitigates the severity. No load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems are present. Overall, the experimental result is not circular, but the explanatory theory's numerical match is a fit.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim of a robust experimental TMR inversion depends mainly on the device data, which appear self-consistent. The theoretical explanation, however, uses a free parameter δ to fit the inversion voltage, plus a magnetization fit with α, β, and Tc. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • δ (weighting parameter) = 0.1×2π/Å
    Chosen to make the theoretical TMR inversion voltage (0.52 V) closer to the experimental value (0.625 V). No independent physical derivation is provided.
  • α (magnetization fit exponent) = 1.65
    Fitted in the empirical magnetization formula M(T)=M(0)(1-(T/Tc)^α)^β to match the anomalous Hall conductance data.
  • β (magnetization critical exponent) = 0.5
    Set to 0.5 (mean-field value) to fit the temperature dependence; the authors note it differs from bulk critical exponents of 0.35-0.4.
  • Tc (Curie temperature of device FGT) = 310 K
    Assumed for the FGT flakes in the MTJ device in the magnetization fit; the flake AHE disappears around 340 K, so the device value is an estimate.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The tunneling current is given by Eq. (1), an energy integral over the product of spin-resolved DOS of source and drain electrodes, neglecting in-plane momentum conservation.
    This is the central model assumption, taken from Ref. [15]; it is an approximation that the paper later tries to correct with a weighting function.
  • ad hoc to paper Tunneling is elastic and coherent for electrons at the Γ point, while electrons away from Γ require scattering and have reduced tunneling weight.
    This assumption is the basis for the weighting function W(k), introduced to model electrode misalignment without a full ab initio treatment.
  • domain assumption The hBN barrier has a very large band gap and a high barrier height so that its momentum dependence can be ignored.
    Stated in the introduction to justify focusing only on the ferromagnetic electrodes and ignoring hBN lattice alignment.
  • domain assumption DFT band structure and spin-resolved DOS of Fe3GaTe2 are accurate inputs for the tunneling model.
    The theoretical TMR calculation relies on the DFT DOS; no detailed convergence or functional parameters are given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bias voltage controlled inversions of tunneling magnetoresistance in van der Waals heterostructures Fe3GaTe2/hBN/Fe3GaTe2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WZTHQ6LM

@misc{pith2026250106063,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bias voltage controlled inversions of tunneling magnetoresistance in van der Waals heterostructures Fe3GaTe2/hBN/Fe3GaTe2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WZTHQ6LM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.06063}
}
read the original abstract

We report the bias voltage controlled inversions of tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) in magnetic tunnel junctions composed of Fe3GaTe2 electrodes and hBN tunneling barrier, observed at room temperature. The polarity reversal of TMR occurs consistently at around 0.625 V across multiple devices and temperatures, highlighting the robustness of the effect. To understand this behavior, we developed a theoretical model incorporating spin-resolved density of states (DOS) at high energy levels. By adjusting the DOS weighting at different k points to account for misalignment between the crystal structure of electrodes in experimental devices, we improved agreement between experimental and theoretical inversion voltages. Our results provide valuable insight into the voltage-controlled spin injection and detection in two-dimensional magnetic tunnel junctions, with implications for the development of energy-efficient spintronic devices.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Das Sarma, S

    Žutić, I., Fabian, J. & Das Sarma, S. Spintronics: Fun- damentals and applications. Reviews of Modern Physics 76, 323–410 (2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    Y., Mryasov, O

    Tsymbal, E. Y., Mryasov, O. N. & LeClair, P. R. Spin- dependent tunnelling in magnetic tunnel junctions.Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter 15, R109 (2003)

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    Avsar, A. et al. Colloquium: Spintronics in graphene and other two-dimensional materials.Reviews of Modern Physics 92, 021003 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Review on spintronics: Principles and device applications

    Hirohata, A.et al. Review on spintronics: Principles and device applications. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 509, 166711 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Two-dimensional materials prospects for non-volatile spintronic memories

    Yang, H.et al. Two-dimensional materials prospects for non-volatile spintronic memories. Nature 606, 663–673 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Geim, A. K. & Grigorieva, I. V. Van der waals het- erostructures. Nature 499, 419–425 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Huang, B. et al. Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a vanderwaalscrystaldowntothemonolayerlimit. Nature 546, 270–273 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Gong, C. et al. Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der waals crystals.Nature 546, 265–269 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Deng, Y. et al. Gate-tunable room-temperature ferro- magnetism in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2. Nature 563, 94–99 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Fei, Z. et al. Two-dimensional itinerant ferromagnetism in atomically thin Fe3GeTe2. Nature Materials 17, 778– 782 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Wang, Z. et al. Tunneling spin valves based on Fe3GeTe2/hBN/Fe3GeTe2 van der waals heterostruc- tures. Nano Letters 18, 4303–4308 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Lin, H. et al. Spin-valve effect in Fe3GeTe2/MoS2/Fe3GeTe2 van der waals heterostruc- tures. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 12, 43921–43926 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Zhu, W. et al. Large tunneling magnetoresistance in van der waals ferromagnet/semiconductor heterojunc- tions. Advanced Materials 33, 2104658 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Min, K.-H. et al. Tunable spin injection and detection across a van der waals interface. Nature Materials 21, 1144–1149 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Zhu, W. et al. Large and tunable magnetoresistance in van der waals ferromagnet/semiconductor junctions.Na- ture Communications 14, 5371 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Zhu, S. et al. Voltage tunable sign inver- sion of magnetoresistance in van der waals Fe3GeTe2/MoSe2/Fe3GeTe2 tunnel junctions. Ap- plied Physics Letters 124 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Zhu, W. et al. Large room-temperature magnetoresis- tance in van der waals ferromagnet/semiconductor junc- tions. Chinese Physics Letters 39, 128501 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Room-temperaturespin-valvedevicesbased on Fe3GaTe2/MoS2/Fe3GaTe2 2d van der waals hetero- junctions

    Jin, W.et al. Room-temperaturespin-valvedevicesbased on Fe3GaTe2/MoS2/Fe3GaTe2 2d van der waals hetero- junctions. Nanoscale 15, 5371–5378 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Jin, W. et al. Room-temperature and tunable tunneling magnetoresistance in Fe3GaTe2-based 2d van der waals heterojunctions. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 15, 36519–36526 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Room-temperature orbit-transfer torque enabling van der waals magnetoresistive memories.Sci- ence Bulletin 68, 2743–2749 (2023)

    Pan, Z.-C.et al. Room-temperature orbit-transfer torque enabling van der waals magnetoresistive memories.Sci- ence Bulletin 68, 2743–2749 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Room-temperature tunable tunneling mag- netoresistance in Fe 3GaTe2/WSe2/Fe3GaTe2 van der waals heterostructures

    Pan, H.et al. Room-temperature tunable tunneling mag- netoresistance in Fe 3GaTe2/WSe2/Fe3GaTe2 van der waals heterostructures. InfoMat 6, e12504 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Zhang, G. et al. Above-room-temperature strong intrin- sic ferromagnetism in 2d van der waals Fe3GaTe2 with large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. Nature Com- munications 13, 5067 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Hu, G. et al. Room-temperature antisymmetric mag- netoresistance in van der waals ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2 nanosheets. Advanced Materials 2403154 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Tunneling between ferromagnetic films

    Julliere, M. Tunneling between ferromagnetic films. Physics Letters A 54, 225–226 (1975)

    1975

  17. [25]

    Nagaosa, N., Sinova, J., Onoda, S., MacDonald, A. H. & Ong, N. P. Anomalous hall effect. Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 1539–1592 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    Zhang, G. et al. Room-temperature highly-tunable co- ercivity and highly-efficient multi-states magnetization 7 switching by small current in single 2D ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2. ACS Materials Letters 6, 482–488 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Wang, M. et al. Hard ferromagnetism in van der waals Fe3GaTe2 nanoflake down to monolayer.npj 2D Materi- als and Applications 8, 22 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Evans, R. F. L., Atxitia, U. & Chantrell, R. W. Quantita- tive simulation of temperature-dependent magnetization dynamics and equilibrium properties of elemental ferro- magnets. Physical Review B 91, 144425 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    Algaidi, H. et al. Magnetic critical behavior of van der waals Fe3GaTe2 with above-room-temperature ferromag- netism. APL Materials 12 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    & Guo, J.-g

    Chen, Z., Yang, Y., Ying, T. & Guo, J.-g. High-T c ferromagnetic semiconductor in thinned 3D ising ferro- magnetic metal Fe3GaTe2. Nano Letters 24, 993–1000 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    & Parkin, S

    Zhang, S., Levy, P., Marley, A. & Parkin, S. Quenching of magnetoresistance by hot electrons in magnetic tunnel junctions. Physical Review Letters 79, 3744 (1997)

    1997

  24. [32]

    Tiusan, C. et al. Interfacial resonance state probed by spin-polarized tunneling in epitaxial Fe/MgO/Fe tunnel junctions. Physical Review Letters 93, 106602 (2004)

    2004

  25. [33]

    Heiliger, C., Zahn, P., Yavorsky, B. Y. & Mertig, I. In- fluence of the interface structure on the bias dependence of tunneling magnetoresistance. Physical Review B 72, 180406 (2005)

    2005

  26. [34]

    Bias dependence of tunneling magne- toresistance in magnetic tunnel junctions with asymmet- ric barriers

    Kalitsov, A.et al. Bias dependence of tunneling magne- toresistance in magnetic tunnel junctions with asymmet- ric barriers. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 25, 496005 (2013)

    2013

  27. [35]

    Gangineni, R. et al. Interfacial electronic transport phe- nomenainsinglecrystallineFe-MgO-Fethinbarrierjunc- tions. Applied Physics Letters 104 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    Godel, F. et al. Voltage-controlled inver- sion of tunnel magnetoresistance in epitaxial nickel/graphene/MgO/cobalt junctions. Applied Physics Letters 105 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    Li, F.-f. et al. Bias dependence and inversion of the tunneling magnetoresistance in ferromagnetic junctions. Physical Review B 69, 054410 (2004)

    2004

  30. [38]

    Ren, Y., Li, Z.-z., Xiao, M.-w. & Hu, A. Oscillation effect and sign-change behaviour of the bias-dependent tunnelling magnetoresistance in ferromagnetic junctions. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 17, 4121 (2005)

    2005

  31. [39]

    De Teresa, J. et al. Inverse tunnel magnetoresis- tance in Co/SrTiO3/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3: new ideas on spin- polarized tunneling. Physical Review Letters 82, 4288 (1999)

    1999

  32. [40]

    Sharma, M., Wang, S. X. & Nickel, J. H. Inversion of spin polarization and tunneling magnetoresistance in spin-dependent tunneling junctions.Physical Review Let- ters 82, 616 (1999)

    1999

  33. [41]

    Tremendous tunneling magnetoresistance ef- fects based on van der waals room-temperature ferromag- net Fe3GaTe2 with highly spin-polarized fermi surfaces

    Li, X.et al. Tremendous tunneling magnetoresistance ef- fects based on van der waals room-temperature ferromag- net Fe3GaTe2 with highly spin-polarized fermi surfaces. Applied Physics Letters 122 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.